Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging

BackgroundIn the face of comprehensive bans on the marketing of tobacco products, packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry. A ban on the use of branding on tobacco packaging, known as ‘plain’ packaging, has emerged as a promising regulatory strategy. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tobacco control 2012-09, Vol.21 (5), p.502-506
Hauptverfasser: Gallopel-Morvan, Karine, Moodie, Crawford, Hammond, David, Eker, Figen, Beguinot, Emmanuelle, Martinet, Yves
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 5
container_start_page 502
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 21
creator Gallopel-Morvan, Karine
Moodie, Crawford
Hammond, David
Eker, Figen
Beguinot, Emmanuelle
Martinet, Yves
description BackgroundIn the face of comprehensive bans on the marketing of tobacco products, packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry. A ban on the use of branding on tobacco packaging, known as ‘plain’ packaging, has emerged as a promising regulatory strategy. The current study sought to examine perceptions of cigarette packaging among adults in France.MethodsAdult smokers and non-smokers (N=836) were surveyed using computer-assisted personal interviewing to assess perceptions of pack design by comparing ‘regular’ branded packs and ‘limited edition’ packs (with novel designs or innovations) with ‘plain’ versions of these packs with all branding, including colour, removed.ResultsPlain packs (PP) were less likely than regular packs, and particularly limited edition packs, to be considered attractive, attention grabbing and likely to motivate youth purchase. PPs were also rated as the most effective in convincing non-smokers not to start and smokers to reduce consumption and quit. Logistic regression showed that smokers motivated to quit, in comparison to smokers not motivated to quit, were significantly more likely to consider the PPs as the packs most likely to motivate cessation.ConclusionsNovel cigarette packaging, in the form of limited edition packs, had the highest ratings of consumer appeal, ahead of regular branded packs and also PPs. Interestingly, PPs were perceived to be the packs most likely to promote cessation among those adults with quitting intentions. Plain packaging, therefore, may be a means of helping existing adult smokers motivated to quit to do so.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03118691v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43289255</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43289255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b553t-49023f75753f8da704415791d2784faec961eae37f3e0047ed02935d5b5fd2153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkstu1DAUhiMEokPhEUAWbEAi4ONLHHdXDZSChiKhwtZykpPB0yQOdoLg7XGUMhLsWFn2-f5z-51lT4G-AuDF68lXtq597Ycp-C5nFCCnklKl72QbEEWZcw7l3WxDdSFyIQt-kj2I8UApcCXhfnbCQOsSmNpk89YPce4xkBFDjePk0p34ltRubwNOE5LR1jekwej2A3EDuQh2qPGMWFL7frTBRT8sgoD7ubPhJelc7yZsCDZuyUbs0JCxs0m6ZLJ7N-wfZvda20V8dHueZl8u3l5vL_Pdp3fvt-e7vJKST7nQlPFWSSV5WzZWUSFAKg0NU6VoLda6ALTIVcuRUqGwoUxz2chKtg0DyU-zF2veb7YzY3C9Db-Mt85cnu_M8kY5QFlo-AGJfb6yY_DfZ4yT6V2ssevsgH6OBigXaW0gFvTZP-jBz2FIkxhQJWNpzYwm6myl6uBjDNgeOwBqFiPN30aaxUizGpnET25LzFWPzVH6x7kEPF6BQ5x8OMYFZ6Vmchk9X-MuTvjzGLfhxhQqfQNz9XVrJPt8da0_fjBvEi9XvuoP_9Pob-Y8x3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1782213720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Hammond, David ; Eker, Figen ; Beguinot, Emmanuelle ; Martinet, Yves</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Hammond, David ; Eker, Figen ; Beguinot, Emmanuelle ; Martinet, Yves</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundIn the face of comprehensive bans on the marketing of tobacco products, packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry. A ban on the use of branding on tobacco packaging, known as ‘plain’ packaging, has emerged as a promising regulatory strategy. The current study sought to examine perceptions of cigarette packaging among adults in France.MethodsAdult smokers and non-smokers (N=836) were surveyed using computer-assisted personal interviewing to assess perceptions of pack design by comparing ‘regular’ branded packs and ‘limited edition’ packs (with novel designs or innovations) with ‘plain’ versions of these packs with all branding, including colour, removed.ResultsPlain packs (PP) were less likely than regular packs, and particularly limited edition packs, to be considered attractive, attention grabbing and likely to motivate youth purchase. PPs were also rated as the most effective in convincing non-smokers not to start and smokers to reduce consumption and quit. Logistic regression showed that smokers motivated to quit, in comparison to smokers not motivated to quit, were significantly more likely to consider the PPs as the packs most likely to motivate cessation.ConclusionsNovel cigarette packaging, in the form of limited edition packs, had the highest ratings of consumer appeal, ahead of regular branded packs and also PPs. Interestingly, PPs were perceived to be the packs most likely to promote cessation among those adults with quitting intentions. Plain packaging, therefore, may be a means of helping existing adult smokers motivated to quit to do so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21998127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; advertising and promotion ; Age ; Age groups ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Brands ; cessation ; Cigarette smoking ; Cigarettes ; Consumer Behavior ; Consumer motivation ; Data Collection ; denormalisation ; Female ; Gender ; Humans ; Innovations ; Interviews as Topic ; Life Sciences ; Logistic Models ; Logistic regression ; Male ; Marketing ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; nicotine reduction in cigarettes ; Packaging ; packaging and labelling ; Perception ; Perceptions ; population health ; prevention ; Product Labeling ; Product Packaging ; Regression analysis ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Smoking ; Smoking Cessation ; Smoking Prevention ; smoking topography ; social marketing ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Industry ; tobacco industry documents ; Tobacco packaging and labelling ; Tobacco Products ; Variables ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2012-09, Vol.21 (5), p.502-506</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2012 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b553t-49023f75753f8da704415791d2784faec961eae37f3e0047ed02935d5b5fd2153</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0152-4079</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/21/5/502.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/21/5/502.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,780,784,803,885,3195,23570,27923,27924,58016,58249,77471,77502</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21998127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://ehesp.hal.science/hal-03118691$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodie, Crawford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eker, Figen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beguinot, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinet, Yves</creatorcontrib><title>Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>BackgroundIn the face of comprehensive bans on the marketing of tobacco products, packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry. A ban on the use of branding on tobacco packaging, known as ‘plain’ packaging, has emerged as a promising regulatory strategy. The current study sought to examine perceptions of cigarette packaging among adults in France.MethodsAdult smokers and non-smokers (N=836) were surveyed using computer-assisted personal interviewing to assess perceptions of pack design by comparing ‘regular’ branded packs and ‘limited edition’ packs (with novel designs or innovations) with ‘plain’ versions of these packs with all branding, including colour, removed.ResultsPlain packs (PP) were less likely than regular packs, and particularly limited edition packs, to be considered attractive, attention grabbing and likely to motivate youth purchase. PPs were also rated as the most effective in convincing non-smokers not to start and smokers to reduce consumption and quit. Logistic regression showed that smokers motivated to quit, in comparison to smokers not motivated to quit, were significantly more likely to consider the PPs as the packs most likely to motivate cessation.ConclusionsNovel cigarette packaging, in the form of limited edition packs, had the highest ratings of consumer appeal, ahead of regular branded packs and also PPs. Interestingly, PPs were perceived to be the packs most likely to promote cessation among those adults with quitting intentions. Plain packaging, therefore, may be a means of helping existing adult smokers motivated to quit to do so.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>advertising and promotion</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>cessation</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Consumer motivation</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>denormalisation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>nicotine reduction in cigarettes</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>packaging and labelling</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>population health</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>Product Labeling</subject><subject>Product Packaging</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>smoking topography</subject><subject>social marketing</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry</subject><subject>tobacco industry documents</subject><subject>Tobacco packaging and labelling</subject><subject>Tobacco Products</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkstu1DAUhiMEokPhEUAWbEAi4ONLHHdXDZSChiKhwtZykpPB0yQOdoLg7XGUMhLsWFn2-f5z-51lT4G-AuDF68lXtq597Ycp-C5nFCCnklKl72QbEEWZcw7l3WxDdSFyIQt-kj2I8UApcCXhfnbCQOsSmNpk89YPce4xkBFDjePk0p34ltRubwNOE5LR1jekwej2A3EDuQh2qPGMWFL7frTBRT8sgoD7ubPhJelc7yZsCDZuyUbs0JCxs0m6ZLJ7N-wfZvda20V8dHueZl8u3l5vL_Pdp3fvt-e7vJKST7nQlPFWSSV5WzZWUSFAKg0NU6VoLda6ALTIVcuRUqGwoUxz2chKtg0DyU-zF2veb7YzY3C9Db-Mt85cnu_M8kY5QFlo-AGJfb6yY_DfZ4yT6V2ssevsgH6OBigXaW0gFvTZP-jBz2FIkxhQJWNpzYwm6myl6uBjDNgeOwBqFiPN30aaxUizGpnET25LzFWPzVH6x7kEPF6BQ5x8OMYFZ6Vmchk9X-MuTvjzGLfhxhQqfQNz9XVrJPt8da0_fjBvEi9XvuoP_9Pob-Y8x3A</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine</creator><creator>Moodie, Crawford</creator><creator>Hammond, David</creator><creator>Eker, Figen</creator><creator>Beguinot, Emmanuelle</creator><creator>Martinet, Yves</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0152-4079</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging</title><author>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine ; Moodie, Crawford ; Hammond, David ; Eker, Figen ; Beguinot, Emmanuelle ; Martinet, Yves</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b553t-49023f75753f8da704415791d2784faec961eae37f3e0047ed02935d5b5fd2153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>advertising and promotion</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>cessation</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Consumer motivation</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>denormalisation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>nicotine reduction in cigarettes</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>packaging and labelling</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>population health</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>Product Labeling</topic><topic>Product Packaging</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>smoking topography</topic><topic>social marketing</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry</topic><topic>tobacco industry documents</topic><topic>Tobacco packaging and labelling</topic><topic>Tobacco Products</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moodie, Crawford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eker, Figen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beguinot, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinet, Yves</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallopel-Morvan, Karine</au><au>Moodie, Crawford</au><au>Hammond, David</au><au>Eker, Figen</au><au>Beguinot, Emmanuelle</au><au>Martinet, Yves</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>502-506</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>BackgroundIn the face of comprehensive bans on the marketing of tobacco products, packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry. A ban on the use of branding on tobacco packaging, known as ‘plain’ packaging, has emerged as a promising regulatory strategy. The current study sought to examine perceptions of cigarette packaging among adults in France.MethodsAdult smokers and non-smokers (N=836) were surveyed using computer-assisted personal interviewing to assess perceptions of pack design by comparing ‘regular’ branded packs and ‘limited edition’ packs (with novel designs or innovations) with ‘plain’ versions of these packs with all branding, including colour, removed.ResultsPlain packs (PP) were less likely than regular packs, and particularly limited edition packs, to be considered attractive, attention grabbing and likely to motivate youth purchase. PPs were also rated as the most effective in convincing non-smokers not to start and smokers to reduce consumption and quit. Logistic regression showed that smokers motivated to quit, in comparison to smokers not motivated to quit, were significantly more likely to consider the PPs as the packs most likely to motivate cessation.ConclusionsNovel cigarette packaging, in the form of limited edition packs, had the highest ratings of consumer appeal, ahead of regular branded packs and also PPs. Interestingly, PPs were perceived to be the packs most likely to promote cessation among those adults with quitting intentions. Plain packaging, therefore, may be a means of helping existing adult smokers motivated to quit to do so.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>21998127</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0152-4079</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2012-09, Vol.21 (5), p.502-506
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03118691v1
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Adults
advertising and promotion
Age
Age groups
Aged
Attitude to Health
Brands
cessation
Cigarette smoking
Cigarettes
Consumer Behavior
Consumer motivation
Data Collection
denormalisation
Female
Gender
Humans
Innovations
Interviews as Topic
Life Sciences
Logistic Models
Logistic regression
Male
Marketing
Middle Aged
Motivation
nicotine reduction in cigarettes
Packaging
packaging and labelling
Perception
Perceptions
population health
prevention
Product Labeling
Product Packaging
Regression analysis
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Smoking
Smoking Cessation
Smoking Prevention
smoking topography
social marketing
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic status
Tobacco
Tobacco Industry
tobacco industry documents
Tobacco packaging and labelling
Tobacco Products
Variables
Young Adult
Young adults
title Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A48%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer%20perceptions%20of%20cigarette%20pack%20design%20in%20France:%20a%20comparison%20of%20regular,%20limited%20edition%20and%20plain%20packaging&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Gallopel-Morvan,%20Karine&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=502-506&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E43289255%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1782213720&rft_id=info:pmid/21998127&rft_jstor_id=43289255&rfr_iscdi=true