The interplay of hydraulic failure and cell vitality explains tree capacity to recover from drought
Global climatic models predict an increment in the frequency and intensity of drought events, which have important consequences on forest dieback. However, the mechanisms leading to tree mortality under drought conditions and the physiological thresholds for recovery are not totally understood yet....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiologia plantarum 2021-05, Vol.172 (1), p.247-257 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 257 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Physiologia plantarum |
container_volume | 172 |
creator | Mantova, Marylou Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E. Badel, Eric Cochard, Hervé Torres‐Ruiz, José M. |
description | Global climatic models predict an increment in the frequency and intensity of drought events, which have important consequences on forest dieback. However, the mechanisms leading to tree mortality under drought conditions and the physiological thresholds for recovery are not totally understood yet. This study aimed to identify what are the key physiological traits that determine the tree capacity to recover from drought. Individuals of a conifer (Pseudotsuga menziesii M.) and an angiosperm (Prunus lusitanica L.) species were exposed to drought and their ability to recover after rehydration monitored. Results showed that the actual thresholds used for recovery from drought based on percentage loss of conductance (PLC) (i.e., 50% for conifers, 88% for angiosperms) do not provide accurate insights about the tree capacity for surviving extreme drought events. On the contrary, differences in stem relative water content (RWCStem) and the level of electrolytes leakage (EL) were directly related to the capacity of the trees to recover from drought. This was the case for the conifer species, P. menziesii, for which higher RWCStem and lower EL values were related to the recovery capacity. Even if results showed a similar trend for the angiosperm P. lusitanica as for the conifers, differences between the two traits were much more subtle and did not allow an accurate differentiation between trees able to recover and those that were not. RWCStem and EL could work as indicators of tree capacity to recover from drought for conifers but more studies are required to confirm this observation for angiosperms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ppl.13331 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03109304v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477265535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4221-e0bf54cd3d30ae5373a65174754c99ba9e38605fb93d6179420e15f527e2b6303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS1ERZfCgS-ALHGBQ1rbYzv4WFW0RVqpPbRny3EmrCtvHJxkS7493m6pEBJzGenppzd_HiEfODvlpc6GIZ5yAOCvyIqDMRUwJV-TFWPAKwO8PiZvx_GBMa41F2_IMYAEoYxcEX-3QRr6CfMQ3UJTRzdLm90cg6edC3HOSF3fUo8x0l2YXAzTQvFXoUM_0ikjUu8G5_fylGhGn3aYaZfTlrY5zT820zty1Lk44vvnfkLuL7_dXVxX65ur7xfn68pLIXiFrOmU9C20wBwqqMFpxWtZF9GYxhmEr5qprjHQal4bKRhy1SlRo2g0MDghXw6-GxftkMPW5cUmF-z1-drutfIOZoDJHS_s5wM75PRzxnGy2zDuj3Q9pnm0Qta10EqBKuinf9CHNOe-XGKF4pqVXfRfw31O45ixe9mAM7tPyZaU7FNKhf347Dg3W2xfyD-xFODsADyGiMv_nezt7fpg-RvjCZnr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516061760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interplay of hydraulic failure and cell vitality explains tree capacity to recover from drought</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mantova, Marylou ; Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E. ; Badel, Eric ; Cochard, Hervé ; Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mantova, Marylou ; Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E. ; Badel, Eric ; Cochard, Hervé ; Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</creatorcontrib><description>Global climatic models predict an increment in the frequency and intensity of drought events, which have important consequences on forest dieback. However, the mechanisms leading to tree mortality under drought conditions and the physiological thresholds for recovery are not totally understood yet. This study aimed to identify what are the key physiological traits that determine the tree capacity to recover from drought. Individuals of a conifer (Pseudotsuga menziesii M.) and an angiosperm (Prunus lusitanica L.) species were exposed to drought and their ability to recover after rehydration monitored. Results showed that the actual thresholds used for recovery from drought based on percentage loss of conductance (PLC) (i.e., 50% for conifers, 88% for angiosperms) do not provide accurate insights about the tree capacity for surviving extreme drought events. On the contrary, differences in stem relative water content (RWCStem) and the level of electrolytes leakage (EL) were directly related to the capacity of the trees to recover from drought. This was the case for the conifer species, P. menziesii, for which higher RWCStem and lower EL values were related to the recovery capacity. Even if results showed a similar trend for the angiosperm P. lusitanica as for the conifers, differences between the two traits were much more subtle and did not allow an accurate differentiation between trees able to recover and those that were not. RWCStem and EL could work as indicators of tree capacity to recover from drought for conifers but more studies are required to confirm this observation for angiosperms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-3054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13331</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33432594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Angiosperms ; Conductance ; Coniferous trees ; Conifers ; Dieback ; Drought ; Droughts ; Electrolytes ; Extreme drought ; Forests ; Global climate ; Life Sciences ; Magnoliopsida ; Moisture content ; Physiology ; Recovery ; Rehydration ; Resistance ; Thresholds ; Trees ; Vegetal Biology ; Water ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Physiologia plantarum, 2021-05, Vol.172 (1), p.247-257</ispartof><rights>2021 Scandinavian Plant Physiology Society</rights><rights>2021 Scandinavian Plant Physiology Society.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4221-e0bf54cd3d30ae5373a65174754c99ba9e38605fb93d6179420e15f527e2b6303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4221-e0bf54cd3d30ae5373a65174754c99ba9e38605fb93d6179420e15f527e2b6303</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4445-3100 ; 0000-0003-1367-7056 ; 0000-0002-8122-3489 ; 0000-0003-2282-7554 ; 0000-0002-2727-7072</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fppl.13331$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fppl.13331$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03109304$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mantova, Marylou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badel, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochard, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</creatorcontrib><title>The interplay of hydraulic failure and cell vitality explains tree capacity to recover from drought</title><title>Physiologia plantarum</title><addtitle>Physiol Plant</addtitle><description>Global climatic models predict an increment in the frequency and intensity of drought events, which have important consequences on forest dieback. However, the mechanisms leading to tree mortality under drought conditions and the physiological thresholds for recovery are not totally understood yet. This study aimed to identify what are the key physiological traits that determine the tree capacity to recover from drought. Individuals of a conifer (Pseudotsuga menziesii M.) and an angiosperm (Prunus lusitanica L.) species were exposed to drought and their ability to recover after rehydration monitored. Results showed that the actual thresholds used for recovery from drought based on percentage loss of conductance (PLC) (i.e., 50% for conifers, 88% for angiosperms) do not provide accurate insights about the tree capacity for surviving extreme drought events. On the contrary, differences in stem relative water content (RWCStem) and the level of electrolytes leakage (EL) were directly related to the capacity of the trees to recover from drought. This was the case for the conifer species, P. menziesii, for which higher RWCStem and lower EL values were related to the recovery capacity. Even if results showed a similar trend for the angiosperm P. lusitanica as for the conifers, differences between the two traits were much more subtle and did not allow an accurate differentiation between trees able to recover and those that were not. RWCStem and EL could work as indicators of tree capacity to recover from drought for conifers but more studies are required to confirm this observation for angiosperms.</description><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Conifers</subject><subject>Dieback</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Extreme drought</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Rehydration</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Vegetal Biology</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0031-9317</issn><issn>1399-3054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS1ERZfCgS-ALHGBQ1rbYzv4WFW0RVqpPbRny3EmrCtvHJxkS7493m6pEBJzGenppzd_HiEfODvlpc6GIZ5yAOCvyIqDMRUwJV-TFWPAKwO8PiZvx_GBMa41F2_IMYAEoYxcEX-3QRr6CfMQ3UJTRzdLm90cg6edC3HOSF3fUo8x0l2YXAzTQvFXoUM_0ikjUu8G5_fylGhGn3aYaZfTlrY5zT820zty1Lk44vvnfkLuL7_dXVxX65ur7xfn68pLIXiFrOmU9C20wBwqqMFpxWtZF9GYxhmEr5qprjHQal4bKRhy1SlRo2g0MDghXw6-GxftkMPW5cUmF-z1-drutfIOZoDJHS_s5wM75PRzxnGy2zDuj3Q9pnm0Qta10EqBKuinf9CHNOe-XGKF4pqVXfRfw31O45ixe9mAM7tPyZaU7FNKhf347Dg3W2xfyD-xFODsADyGiMv_nezt7fpg-RvjCZnr</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Mantova, Marylou</creator><creator>Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E.</creator><creator>Badel, Eric</creator><creator>Cochard, Hervé</creator><creator>Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-3100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-7056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8122-3489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-7554</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-7072</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>The interplay of hydraulic failure and cell vitality explains tree capacity to recover from drought</title><author>Mantova, Marylou ; Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E. ; Badel, Eric ; Cochard, Hervé ; Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4221-e0bf54cd3d30ae5373a65174754c99ba9e38605fb93d6179420e15f527e2b6303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Conifers</topic><topic>Dieback</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Extreme drought</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Rehydration</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Vegetal Biology</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mantova, Marylou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badel, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochard, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Physiologia plantarum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mantova, Marylou</au><au>Menezes‐Silva, Paulo E.</au><au>Badel, Eric</au><au>Cochard, Hervé</au><au>Torres‐Ruiz, José M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interplay of hydraulic failure and cell vitality explains tree capacity to recover from drought</atitle><jtitle>Physiologia plantarum</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Plant</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>247-257</pages><issn>0031-9317</issn><eissn>1399-3054</eissn><abstract>Global climatic models predict an increment in the frequency and intensity of drought events, which have important consequences on forest dieback. However, the mechanisms leading to tree mortality under drought conditions and the physiological thresholds for recovery are not totally understood yet. This study aimed to identify what are the key physiological traits that determine the tree capacity to recover from drought. Individuals of a conifer (Pseudotsuga menziesii M.) and an angiosperm (Prunus lusitanica L.) species were exposed to drought and their ability to recover after rehydration monitored. Results showed that the actual thresholds used for recovery from drought based on percentage loss of conductance (PLC) (i.e., 50% for conifers, 88% for angiosperms) do not provide accurate insights about the tree capacity for surviving extreme drought events. On the contrary, differences in stem relative water content (RWCStem) and the level of electrolytes leakage (EL) were directly related to the capacity of the trees to recover from drought. This was the case for the conifer species, P. menziesii, for which higher RWCStem and lower EL values were related to the recovery capacity. Even if results showed a similar trend for the angiosperm P. lusitanica as for the conifers, differences between the two traits were much more subtle and did not allow an accurate differentiation between trees able to recover and those that were not. RWCStem and EL could work as indicators of tree capacity to recover from drought for conifers but more studies are required to confirm this observation for angiosperms.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33432594</pmid><doi>10.1111/ppl.13331</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-3100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-7056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8122-3489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-7554</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-7072</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9317 |
ispartof | Physiologia plantarum, 2021-05, Vol.172 (1), p.247-257 |
issn | 0031-9317 1399-3054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03109304v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Angiosperms Conductance Coniferous trees Conifers Dieback Drought Droughts Electrolytes Extreme drought Forests Global climate Life Sciences Magnoliopsida Moisture content Physiology Recovery Rehydration Resistance Thresholds Trees Vegetal Biology Water Water content |
title | The interplay of hydraulic failure and cell vitality explains tree capacity to recover from drought |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A52%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interplay%20of%20hydraulic%20failure%20and%20cell%20vitality%20explains%20tree%20capacity%20to%20recover%20from%20drought&rft.jtitle=Physiologia%20plantarum&rft.au=Mantova,%20Marylou&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=247-257&rft.issn=0031-9317&rft.eissn=1399-3054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppl.13331&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2477265535%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516061760&rft_id=info:pmid/33432594&rfr_iscdi=true |