Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models
The current alarming state of many coastal ecosystems and fisheries calls for the development of tools to support recovery of exploited stocks, ensure their sustainable exploitation and protect marine ecosystems. Multi-zone Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are often advocated to reconcile conservation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean & coastal management 2020-08, Vol.193, p.105232, Article 105232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105232 |
container_title | Ocean & coastal management |
container_volume | 193 |
creator | Corrales, X. Vilas, D. Piroddi, C. Steenbeek, J. Claudet, J. Lloret, J. Calò, A. Di Franco, A. Font, T. Ligas, A. Prato, G. Sahyoun, R. Sartor, P. Guidetti, P. Coll, M. |
description | The current alarming state of many coastal ecosystems and fisheries calls for the development of tools to support recovery of exploited stocks, ensure their sustainable exploitation and protect marine ecosystems. Multi-zone Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are often advocated to reconcile conservation and fisheries benefits. However, while there is a consensus about the ecological benefits whether such types of MPAs can really provide both benefits is still uncertain. Here, we analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs (Cerbère-Banyuls, Cap de Creus and Medes Islands) using a comparative temporal ecosystem modelling approach to assess their effectiveness over time in recovering marine resources and ecosystem in the area. Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs, potentially driven by MPA design, management and implementation features. Temporal increases of benefits were small, whenever detected, and showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators, mostly in Cerbère-Banyuls and Medes Islands MPAs. Our results confirm the benefits of protection to coastal marine resources and ecosystems when MPAs are enforced but highlight the current limitations of the three MPAs due to their small size and the significant impacts of small-scale and recreational fisheries. This study illustrates the capability to evaluate protection effects of small multi-zone MPAs with an ecosystem modelling perspective and represents the baseline to develop future scenarios of alternative management options to foster ecosystem recovery and resource rebuilding in the studied MPAs.
[Display omitted]
•We analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs.•We used a comparative temporal ecosystem approach.•Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs.•Our results showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators.•Our results highlighted the current limitations of the three MPAs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03034139v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964569120301423</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0964569120301423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c236a941ef4ba8a06669a5717838427f19b0b28d062781bab7b64e583992ef123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFY_g3v1kLp_ks2ut1LUChUvCt6WTfJityTZui8t6Kc3oVK8eXowzMxjfoRcczbjjKvbzSyUUAbXum4mmBjVTEhxQiZc5zLJRPp-SibMqDTJlOHn5AJxwxgTmdIT8vm8a3qffIcOaOuiH842hh7KHirqIji8o3NEQGyh62mo6fALv7CHlrquorXHNUQPSAvooPY90h367oO2Y--2gT_-NlTQ4CU5q12DcPV7p-Tt4f51sUxWL49Pi_kqKaXRfVIKqZxJOdRp4bRjSinjspznWupU5DU3BSuErpgSueaFK_JCpZBpaYyAmgs5JTeH3rVr7Db6Yd2XDc7b5XxlR41JJlMuzZ4P3vzgLWNAjFAfA5zZkbLd2CNlO1K2B8pDcn5IDstg7yFaLD10JVQ-DhBtFfy_HT-ATYtJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Corrales, X. ; Vilas, D. ; Piroddi, C. ; Steenbeek, J. ; Claudet, J. ; Lloret, J. ; Calò, A. ; Di Franco, A. ; Font, T. ; Ligas, A. ; Prato, G. ; Sahyoun, R. ; Sartor, P. ; Guidetti, P. ; Coll, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Corrales, X. ; Vilas, D. ; Piroddi, C. ; Steenbeek, J. ; Claudet, J. ; Lloret, J. ; Calò, A. ; Di Franco, A. ; Font, T. ; Ligas, A. ; Prato, G. ; Sahyoun, R. ; Sartor, P. ; Guidetti, P. ; Coll, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The current alarming state of many coastal ecosystems and fisheries calls for the development of tools to support recovery of exploited stocks, ensure their sustainable exploitation and protect marine ecosystems. Multi-zone Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are often advocated to reconcile conservation and fisheries benefits. However, while there is a consensus about the ecological benefits whether such types of MPAs can really provide both benefits is still uncertain. Here, we analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs (Cerbère-Banyuls, Cap de Creus and Medes Islands) using a comparative temporal ecosystem modelling approach to assess their effectiveness over time in recovering marine resources and ecosystem in the area. Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs, potentially driven by MPA design, management and implementation features. Temporal increases of benefits were small, whenever detected, and showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators, mostly in Cerbère-Banyuls and Medes Islands MPAs. Our results confirm the benefits of protection to coastal marine resources and ecosystems when MPAs are enforced but highlight the current limitations of the three MPAs due to their small size and the significant impacts of small-scale and recreational fisheries. This study illustrates the capability to evaluate protection effects of small multi-zone MPAs with an ecosystem modelling perspective and represents the baseline to develop future scenarios of alternative management options to foster ecosystem recovery and resource rebuilding in the studied MPAs.
[Display omitted]
•We analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs.•We used a comparative temporal ecosystem approach.•Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs.•Our results showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators.•Our results highlighted the current limitations of the three MPAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-5691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-524X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology ; Ecological indicators ; Ecopath model ; Environmental Sciences ; Marine protected areas ; Northwestern Mediterranean sea ; Recreational fisheries ; Small-scale fisheries</subject><ispartof>Ocean & coastal management, 2020-08, Vol.193, p.105232, Article 105232</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c236a941ef4ba8a06669a5717838427f19b0b28d062781bab7b64e583992ef123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c236a941ef4ba8a06669a5717838427f19b0b28d062781bab7b64e583992ef123</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6295-1061 ; 0000-0001-6235-5868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03034139$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corrales, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilas, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piroddi, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbeek, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claudet, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloret, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calò, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Font, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ligas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahyoun, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartor, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidetti, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models</title><title>Ocean & coastal management</title><description>The current alarming state of many coastal ecosystems and fisheries calls for the development of tools to support recovery of exploited stocks, ensure their sustainable exploitation and protect marine ecosystems. Multi-zone Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are often advocated to reconcile conservation and fisheries benefits. However, while there is a consensus about the ecological benefits whether such types of MPAs can really provide both benefits is still uncertain. Here, we analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs (Cerbère-Banyuls, Cap de Creus and Medes Islands) using a comparative temporal ecosystem modelling approach to assess their effectiveness over time in recovering marine resources and ecosystem in the area. Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs, potentially driven by MPA design, management and implementation features. Temporal increases of benefits were small, whenever detected, and showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators, mostly in Cerbère-Banyuls and Medes Islands MPAs. Our results confirm the benefits of protection to coastal marine resources and ecosystems when MPAs are enforced but highlight the current limitations of the three MPAs due to their small size and the significant impacts of small-scale and recreational fisheries. This study illustrates the capability to evaluate protection effects of small multi-zone MPAs with an ecosystem modelling perspective and represents the baseline to develop future scenarios of alternative management options to foster ecosystem recovery and resource rebuilding in the studied MPAs.
[Display omitted]
•We analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs.•We used a comparative temporal ecosystem approach.•Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs.•Our results showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators.•Our results highlighted the current limitations of the three MPAs.</description><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Ecological indicators</subject><subject>Ecopath model</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Northwestern Mediterranean sea</subject><subject>Recreational fisheries</subject><subject>Small-scale fisheries</subject><issn>0964-5691</issn><issn>1873-524X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AUxBdRsFY_g3v1kLp_ks2ut1LUChUvCt6WTfJityTZui8t6Kc3oVK8eXowzMxjfoRcczbjjKvbzSyUUAbXum4mmBjVTEhxQiZc5zLJRPp-SibMqDTJlOHn5AJxwxgTmdIT8vm8a3qffIcOaOuiH842hh7KHirqIji8o3NEQGyh62mo6fALv7CHlrquorXHNUQPSAvooPY90h367oO2Y--2gT_-NlTQ4CU5q12DcPV7p-Tt4f51sUxWL49Pi_kqKaXRfVIKqZxJOdRp4bRjSinjspznWupU5DU3BSuErpgSueaFK_JCpZBpaYyAmgs5JTeH3rVr7Db6Yd2XDc7b5XxlR41JJlMuzZ4P3vzgLWNAjFAfA5zZkbLd2CNlO1K2B8pDcn5IDstg7yFaLD10JVQ-DhBtFfy_HT-ATYtJ</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Corrales, X.</creator><creator>Vilas, D.</creator><creator>Piroddi, C.</creator><creator>Steenbeek, J.</creator><creator>Claudet, J.</creator><creator>Lloret, J.</creator><creator>Calò, A.</creator><creator>Di Franco, A.</creator><creator>Font, T.</creator><creator>Ligas, A.</creator><creator>Prato, G.</creator><creator>Sahyoun, R.</creator><creator>Sartor, P.</creator><creator>Guidetti, P.</creator><creator>Coll, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-1061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-5868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models</title><author>Corrales, X. ; Vilas, D. ; Piroddi, C. ; Steenbeek, J. ; Claudet, J. ; Lloret, J. ; Calò, A. ; Di Franco, A. ; Font, T. ; Ligas, A. ; Prato, G. ; Sahyoun, R. ; Sartor, P. ; Guidetti, P. ; Coll, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c236a941ef4ba8a06669a5717838427f19b0b28d062781bab7b64e583992ef123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Ecological indicators</topic><topic>Ecopath model</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Northwestern Mediterranean sea</topic><topic>Recreational fisheries</topic><topic>Small-scale fisheries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corrales, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilas, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piroddi, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbeek, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claudet, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloret, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calò, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Font, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ligas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahyoun, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartor, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidetti, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ocean & coastal management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corrales, X.</au><au>Vilas, D.</au><au>Piroddi, C.</au><au>Steenbeek, J.</au><au>Claudet, J.</au><au>Lloret, J.</au><au>Calò, A.</au><au>Di Franco, A.</au><au>Font, T.</au><au>Ligas, A.</au><au>Prato, G.</au><au>Sahyoun, R.</au><au>Sartor, P.</au><au>Guidetti, P.</au><au>Coll, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models</atitle><jtitle>Ocean & coastal management</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>193</volume><spage>105232</spage><pages>105232-</pages><artnum>105232</artnum><issn>0964-5691</issn><eissn>1873-524X</eissn><abstract>The current alarming state of many coastal ecosystems and fisheries calls for the development of tools to support recovery of exploited stocks, ensure their sustainable exploitation and protect marine ecosystems. Multi-zone Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are often advocated to reconcile conservation and fisheries benefits. However, while there is a consensus about the ecological benefits whether such types of MPAs can really provide both benefits is still uncertain. Here, we analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs (Cerbère-Banyuls, Cap de Creus and Medes Islands) using a comparative temporal ecosystem modelling approach to assess their effectiveness over time in recovering marine resources and ecosystem in the area. Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs, potentially driven by MPA design, management and implementation features. Temporal increases of benefits were small, whenever detected, and showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators, mostly in Cerbère-Banyuls and Medes Islands MPAs. Our results confirm the benefits of protection to coastal marine resources and ecosystems when MPAs are enforced but highlight the current limitations of the three MPAs due to their small size and the significant impacts of small-scale and recreational fisheries. This study illustrates the capability to evaluate protection effects of small multi-zone MPAs with an ecosystem modelling perspective and represents the baseline to develop future scenarios of alternative management options to foster ecosystem recovery and resource rebuilding in the studied MPAs.
[Display omitted]
•We analysed three existing Northwestern Mediterranean multi-zone MPAs.•We used a comparative temporal ecosystem approach.•Our results showed differences in the ecological effectiveness of the three MPAs.•Our results showed slight recoveries of some target species and ecological indicators.•Our results highlighted the current limitations of the three MPAs.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-1061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-5868</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-5691 |
ispartof | Ocean & coastal management, 2020-08, Vol.193, p.105232, Article 105232 |
issn | 0964-5691 1873-524X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03034139v1 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biodiversity and Ecology Ecological indicators Ecopath model Environmental Sciences Marine protected areas Northwestern Mediterranean sea Recreational fisheries Small-scale fisheries |
title | Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-zone%20marine%20protected%20areas:%20Assessment%20of%20ecosystem%20and%20fisheries%20benefits%20using%20multiple%20ecosystem%20models&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20&%20coastal%20management&rft.au=Corrales,%20X.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=193&rft.spage=105232&rft.pages=105232-&rft.artnum=105232&rft.issn=0964-5691&rft.eissn=1873-524X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105232&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0964569120301423%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0964569120301423&rfr_iscdi=true |