The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis
The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2006-09, Vol.120 (1-4), p.176-183 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 183 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-4 |
| container_start_page | 176 |
| container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
| container_volume | 120 |
| creator | Wieser, A. Debuyst, R. Fattibene, P. Meghzifene, A. Onori, S. Bayankin, S. N. Brik, A. Bugay, A. Chumak, V. Ciesielski, B. Hoshi, M. Imata, H. Ivannikov, A. Ivanov, D. Junczewska, M. Miyazawa, C. Penkowski, M. Pivovarov, S. Romanyukha, A. Romanyukha, L. Schauer, D. Scherbina, O. Schultka, K. Sholom, S. Skvortsov, V. Stepanenko, V. Thomas, J. A. Tielewuhan, E. Toyoda, S. Trompier, F. |
| description | The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/nci549 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03029110v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19312857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-6607c0ab52bffa209a8f38f200aee9527136c98d3cf9b1c418f90b8ca8a039b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1r2zAUBmAxVtas681-wPDVYGVujz5sSb0rbde0pB-UbIzeCFmRiDbbyiSnNP9-Cg7d5UBISOc5B8GL0EcMxxgkPYmrxUlvfMXkGzTBnJGSMqjfoglgxkrBCOyj9yn9AiBcVuwd2sc1B0IYn6Af86Ut5ksfF8V1P9jY68GHXrfjzYRupaNPoS_yunx4LOYhDMviIiTf2SFuTotcHwrytXB-26Xztkk-fUB7TrfJHu7OA_T92-X8fFrO7q-uz89mpWGYDmVdAzegm4o0zmkCUgtHhSMA2lpZEY5pbaRYUONkg3OPcBIaYbTQQGUj6QH6Ms5d6latou903KigvZqezdT2DSgQiTE842w_j3YVw5-1TYPqfDK2bXVvwzqpWgguMP4_xJJiIiqe4dEITQwpRetev4BBbaNRORo1RpPxp93UddPZxT-6yyKDcgQ-Dfblta7jb1Vzyis1_fmkCL9lt3d3T-qG_gWmYJhr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19312857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Wieser, A. ; Debuyst, R. ; Fattibene, P. ; Meghzifene, A. ; Onori, S. ; Bayankin, S. N. ; Brik, A. ; Bugay, A. ; Chumak, V. ; Ciesielski, B. ; Hoshi, M. ; Imata, H. ; Ivannikov, A. ; Ivanov, D. ; Junczewska, M. ; Miyazawa, C. ; Penkowski, M. ; Pivovarov, S. ; Romanyukha, A. ; Romanyukha, L. ; Schauer, D. ; Scherbina, O. ; Schultka, K. ; Sholom, S. ; Skvortsov, V. ; Stepanenko, V. ; Thomas, J. A. ; Tielewuhan, E. ; Toyoda, S. ; Trompier, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wieser, A. ; Debuyst, R. ; Fattibene, P. ; Meghzifene, A. ; Onori, S. ; Bayankin, S. N. ; Brik, A. ; Bugay, A. ; Chumak, V. ; Ciesielski, B. ; Hoshi, M. ; Imata, H. ; Ivannikov, A. ; Ivanov, D. ; Junczewska, M. ; Miyazawa, C. ; Penkowski, M. ; Pivovarov, S. ; Romanyukha, A. ; Romanyukha, L. ; Schauer, D. ; Scherbina, O. ; Schultka, K. ; Sholom, S. ; Skvortsov, V. ; Stepanenko, V. ; Thomas, J. A. ; Tielewuhan, E. ; Toyoda, S. ; Trompier, F.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry <300 mGy. Final analysis of results included a correlation analysis between features of laboratory dose reconstruction protocols and dosimetry performance. Applicability of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry at low dose was shown at two applied dose levels of 79 and 176 mGy. Most (9 of 12) laboratories reported the dose to be within 50 mGy of the delivered dose of 79 mGy, and 10 of 12 laboratories reported the dose to be within 100 mGy of the delivered dose of 176 mGy. At the high-dose tested (704 mGy) agreement within 25% of the delivered dose was found in 10 laboratories. Features of EPR dose reconstruction protocols that affect dosimetry performance were found to be magnetic field modulation amplitude in EPR spectrum recording, EPR signal model in spectrum deconvolution and duration of latency period for tooth enamel samples after preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci549</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16702247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - trends ; Forensic Dentistry - methods ; Forensic Dentistry - trends ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Radioisotopes - analysis ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiometry - trends ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tooth - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2006-09, Vol.120 (1-4), p.176-183</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-6607c0ab52bffa209a8f38f200aee9527136c98d3cf9b1c418f90b8ca8a039b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16702247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03029110$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wieser, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debuyst, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattibene, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meghzifene, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onori, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayankin, S. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugay, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chumak, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imata, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivannikov, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanov, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junczewska, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazawa, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penkowski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivovarov, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanyukha, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanyukha, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherbina, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sholom, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skvortsov, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanenko, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tielewuhan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyoda, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trompier, F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry <300 mGy. Final analysis of results included a correlation analysis between features of laboratory dose reconstruction protocols and dosimetry performance. Applicability of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry at low dose was shown at two applied dose levels of 79 and 176 mGy. Most (9 of 12) laboratories reported the dose to be within 50 mGy of the delivered dose of 79 mGy, and 10 of 12 laboratories reported the dose to be within 100 mGy of the delivered dose of 176 mGy. At the high-dose tested (704 mGy) agreement within 25% of the delivered dose was found in 10 laboratories. Features of EPR dose reconstruction protocols that affect dosimetry performance were found to be magnetic field modulation amplitude in EPR spectrum recording, EPR signal model in spectrum deconvolution and duration of latency period for tooth enamel samples after preparation.</description><subject>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - trends</subject><subject>Forensic Dentistry - methods</subject><subject>Forensic Dentistry - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Radioisotopes - analysis</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiometry - trends</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tooth - chemistry</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1r2zAUBmAxVtas681-wPDVYGVujz5sSb0rbde0pB-UbIzeCFmRiDbbyiSnNP9-Cg7d5UBISOc5B8GL0EcMxxgkPYmrxUlvfMXkGzTBnJGSMqjfoglgxkrBCOyj9yn9AiBcVuwd2sc1B0IYn6Af86Ut5ksfF8V1P9jY68GHXrfjzYRupaNPoS_yunx4LOYhDMviIiTf2SFuTotcHwrytXB-26Xztkk-fUB7TrfJHu7OA_T92-X8fFrO7q-uz89mpWGYDmVdAzegm4o0zmkCUgtHhSMA2lpZEY5pbaRYUONkg3OPcBIaYbTQQGUj6QH6Ms5d6latou903KigvZqezdT2DSgQiTE842w_j3YVw5-1TYPqfDK2bXVvwzqpWgguMP4_xJJiIiqe4dEITQwpRetev4BBbaNRORo1RpPxp93UddPZxT-6yyKDcgQ-Dfblta7jb1Vzyis1_fmkCL9lt3d3T-qG_gWmYJhr</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Wieser, A.</creator><creator>Debuyst, R.</creator><creator>Fattibene, P.</creator><creator>Meghzifene, A.</creator><creator>Onori, S.</creator><creator>Bayankin, S. N.</creator><creator>Brik, A.</creator><creator>Bugay, A.</creator><creator>Chumak, V.</creator><creator>Ciesielski, B.</creator><creator>Hoshi, M.</creator><creator>Imata, H.</creator><creator>Ivannikov, A.</creator><creator>Ivanov, D.</creator><creator>Junczewska, M.</creator><creator>Miyazawa, C.</creator><creator>Penkowski, M.</creator><creator>Pivovarov, S.</creator><creator>Romanyukha, A.</creator><creator>Romanyukha, L.</creator><creator>Schauer, D.</creator><creator>Scherbina, O.</creator><creator>Schultka, K.</creator><creator>Sholom, S.</creator><creator>Skvortsov, V.</creator><creator>Stepanenko, V.</creator><creator>Thomas, J. A.</creator><creator>Tielewuhan, E.</creator><creator>Toyoda, S.</creator><creator>Trompier, F.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis</title><author>Wieser, A. ; Debuyst, R. ; Fattibene, P. ; Meghzifene, A. ; Onori, S. ; Bayankin, S. N. ; Brik, A. ; Bugay, A. ; Chumak, V. ; Ciesielski, B. ; Hoshi, M. ; Imata, H. ; Ivannikov, A. ; Ivanov, D. ; Junczewska, M. ; Miyazawa, C. ; Penkowski, M. ; Pivovarov, S. ; Romanyukha, A. ; Romanyukha, L. ; Schauer, D. ; Scherbina, O. ; Schultka, K. ; Sholom, S. ; Skvortsov, V. ; Stepanenko, V. ; Thomas, J. A. ; Tielewuhan, E. ; Toyoda, S. ; Trompier, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-6607c0ab52bffa209a8f38f200aee9527136c98d3cf9b1c418f90b8ca8a039b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - trends</topic><topic>Forensic Dentistry - methods</topic><topic>Forensic Dentistry - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Radioisotopes - analysis</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiometry - trends</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tooth - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wieser, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debuyst, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattibene, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meghzifene, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onori, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayankin, S. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brik, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugay, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chumak, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciesielski, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imata, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivannikov, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanov, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junczewska, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazawa, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penkowski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivovarov, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanyukha, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanyukha, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherbina, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sholom, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skvortsov, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanenko, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tielewuhan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyoda, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trompier, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wieser, A.</au><au>Debuyst, R.</au><au>Fattibene, P.</au><au>Meghzifene, A.</au><au>Onori, S.</au><au>Bayankin, S. N.</au><au>Brik, A.</au><au>Bugay, A.</au><au>Chumak, V.</au><au>Ciesielski, B.</au><au>Hoshi, M.</au><au>Imata, H.</au><au>Ivannikov, A.</au><au>Ivanov, D.</au><au>Junczewska, M.</au><au>Miyazawa, C.</au><au>Penkowski, M.</au><au>Pivovarov, S.</au><au>Romanyukha, A.</au><au>Romanyukha, L.</au><au>Schauer, D.</au><au>Scherbina, O.</au><au>Schultka, K.</au><au>Sholom, S.</au><au>Skvortsov, V.</au><au>Stepanenko, V.</au><au>Thomas, J. A.</au><au>Tielewuhan, E.</au><au>Toyoda, S.</au><au>Trompier, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>176-183</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry <300 mGy. Final analysis of results included a correlation analysis between features of laboratory dose reconstruction protocols and dosimetry performance. Applicability of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry at low dose was shown at two applied dose levels of 79 and 176 mGy. Most (9 of 12) laboratories reported the dose to be within 50 mGy of the delivered dose of 79 mGy, and 10 of 12 laboratories reported the dose to be within 100 mGy of the delivered dose of 176 mGy. At the high-dose tested (704 mGy) agreement within 25% of the delivered dose was found in 10 laboratories. Features of EPR dose reconstruction protocols that affect dosimetry performance were found to be magnetic field modulation amplitude in EPR spectrum recording, EPR signal model in spectrum deconvolution and duration of latency period for tooth enamel samples after preparation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16702247</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/nci549</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
| ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2006-09, Vol.120 (1-4), p.176-183 |
| issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03029110v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - methods Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy - trends Forensic Dentistry - methods Forensic Dentistry - trends Humans Life Sciences Radioisotopes - analysis Radiometry - methods Radiometry - trends Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Tooth - chemistry |
| title | The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A34%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Third%20International%20Intercomparison%20on%20EPR%20Tooth%20Dosimetry:%20part%202,%20final%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Wieser,%20A.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=176-183&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/nci549&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E19312857%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19312857&rft_id=info:pmid/16702247&rfr_iscdi=true |