Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses

Protection and restoration of species in the wild may require conservation breeding programs under genetic management to minimize deleterious effects of genetic changes that occur in captivity, while preserving populations' genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience. Here, through interannua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoo biology 2020-11, Vol.39 (6), p.422-435
Hauptverfasser: Rabier, Robin, Robert, Alexandre, Lacroix, Frédéric, Lesobre, Loïc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 435
container_issue 6
container_start_page 422
container_title Zoo biology
container_volume 39
creator Rabier, Robin
Robert, Alexandre
Lacroix, Frédéric
Lesobre, Loïc
description Protection and restoration of species in the wild may require conservation breeding programs under genetic management to minimize deleterious effects of genetic changes that occur in captivity, while preserving populations' genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience. Here, through interannual pedigree analyses, we first assessed the efficiency of a 21‐year genetic management, including minimization of mean kinship, inbreeding avoidance, and regular addition of founders, of a conservation breeding program targeting on Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco. Secondly, we compared pedigree analyses, the classical way of assessing and managing genetic diversity in captivity, to molecular analyses based on seven microsatellites. Pedigree‐based results indicated an efficient maintenance of the genetic diversity (99% of the initial genetic diversity retained) while molecular‐based results indicated an increase in allelic richness and an increase in unbiased expected heterozygosity across time. The pedigree‐based average inbreeding coefficient F remained low (between 0.0004 and 0.003 in 2017) while the proportion of highly inbred individuals (F > .1) decreased over time and reached 0.2% in 2017. Furthermore, pedigree‐based F and molecular‐based individual multilocus heterozygosity were weakly negatively correlated, (Pearson's r = −.061 when considering all genotyped individuals), suggesting that they cannot be considered as alternatives, but rather as complementary sources of information. These findings suggest that a strict genetic monitoring and management, based on both pedigree and molecular tools can help mitigate genetic changes and allow to preserve genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience in conservation breeding programs. The use of a rigorous genetic management in conservation breeding programs allows preserving populations' genetic diversity. Research Highlight A strict genetic management within captive breeding is essential in the aim of preserving populations' genetic diversity. Discrepancies between pedigree‐based and molecular analyses show that both must be used in integrative genetic management.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/zoo.21569
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03020087v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2444874021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-89ebf451a0b08481f9c671d0c82a1477a6cfa279125dabeab52d9bff36e8472b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2xaibS24yTOshpBW2mq2ZQNG-vYPplJlcSDnRQNb8Ob4jBlKiGx8kWfvnP5CXnP2QVnTFz-9P5C8KKsX5AFZ7XKRF7yl2TBqjzPcq7UCXkT4wNjTBVcvCYnuaiLsuBqQX5d44BjaynEiDH2OIzUNxSo9UPE8Ahj6wdqAqJrhw3dBb8J0M_IuEW69ZOBANRMcYTg6Nly20G_d35sI50GN3UwwvFyTtuB3vngrfWfqIGIjib5Lqk3qQCFwdHed2gTHdILun3q6S151UAX8d3TeUq-fvl8v7zJVuvr2-XVKrNSiDpTNZpGFhyYYUoq3tS2rLhjVgngsqqgtA2IquaicGAQTCFcbZomL1HJSpj8lJwfvFvo9C60PYS99tDqm6uVnv9YzkTaYPXIE3t2YNM-vk8YR9230WLXwYB-ilpIKVUlmZjRj_-gD34KabaZKksmhZLsubgNPsaAzbEDzvScsU4Z6z8ZJ_bDk3EyPboj-TfUBFwegB9th_v_m_S39fqg_A0BJLI6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466042840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rabier, Robin ; Robert, Alexandre ; Lacroix, Frédéric ; Lesobre, Loïc</creator><creatorcontrib>Rabier, Robin ; Robert, Alexandre ; Lacroix, Frédéric ; Lesobre, Loïc</creatorcontrib><description>Protection and restoration of species in the wild may require conservation breeding programs under genetic management to minimize deleterious effects of genetic changes that occur in captivity, while preserving populations' genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience. Here, through interannual pedigree analyses, we first assessed the efficiency of a 21‐year genetic management, including minimization of mean kinship, inbreeding avoidance, and regular addition of founders, of a conservation breeding program targeting on Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco. Secondly, we compared pedigree analyses, the classical way of assessing and managing genetic diversity in captivity, to molecular analyses based on seven microsatellites. Pedigree‐based results indicated an efficient maintenance of the genetic diversity (99% of the initial genetic diversity retained) while molecular‐based results indicated an increase in allelic richness and an increase in unbiased expected heterozygosity across time. The pedigree‐based average inbreeding coefficient F remained low (between 0.0004 and 0.003 in 2017) while the proportion of highly inbred individuals (F &gt; .1) decreased over time and reached 0.2% in 2017. Furthermore, pedigree‐based F and molecular‐based individual multilocus heterozygosity were weakly negatively correlated, (Pearson's r = −.061 when considering all genotyped individuals), suggesting that they cannot be considered as alternatives, but rather as complementary sources of information. These findings suggest that a strict genetic monitoring and management, based on both pedigree and molecular tools can help mitigate genetic changes and allow to preserve genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience in conservation breeding programs. The use of a rigorous genetic management in conservation breeding programs allows preserving populations' genetic diversity. Research Highlight A strict genetic management within captive breeding is essential in the aim of preserving populations' genetic diversity. Discrepancies between pedigree‐based and molecular analyses show that both must be used in integrative genetic management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-3188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21569</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32956518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Birds - classification ; Birds - genetics ; Breeding ; Captive breeding ; Captivity ; Chlamydotis undulata undulata ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; DNA - genetics ; Ecology, environment ; Evolution ; ex situ ; Female ; Genetic analysis ; Genetic diversity ; genetic management ; Genotype ; Heterozygosity ; Inbreeding ; inbreeding avoidance ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Management ; mean kinship ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Microsatellites ; Morocco ; Pedigree ; Population genetics ; Populations ; Resilience ; Time Factors ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Zoo biology, 2020-11, Vol.39 (6), p.422-435</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-89ebf451a0b08481f9c671d0c82a1477a6cfa279125dabeab52d9bff36e8472b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-89ebf451a0b08481f9c671d0c82a1477a6cfa279125dabeab52d9bff36e8472b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9219-4580 ; 0000-0001-7169-5522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fzoo.21569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fzoo.21569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32956518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-03020087$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rabier, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesobre, Loïc</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses</title><title>Zoo biology</title><addtitle>Zoo Biol</addtitle><description>Protection and restoration of species in the wild may require conservation breeding programs under genetic management to minimize deleterious effects of genetic changes that occur in captivity, while preserving populations' genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience. Here, through interannual pedigree analyses, we first assessed the efficiency of a 21‐year genetic management, including minimization of mean kinship, inbreeding avoidance, and regular addition of founders, of a conservation breeding program targeting on Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco. Secondly, we compared pedigree analyses, the classical way of assessing and managing genetic diversity in captivity, to molecular analyses based on seven microsatellites. Pedigree‐based results indicated an efficient maintenance of the genetic diversity (99% of the initial genetic diversity retained) while molecular‐based results indicated an increase in allelic richness and an increase in unbiased expected heterozygosity across time. The pedigree‐based average inbreeding coefficient F remained low (between 0.0004 and 0.003 in 2017) while the proportion of highly inbred individuals (F &gt; .1) decreased over time and reached 0.2% in 2017. Furthermore, pedigree‐based F and molecular‐based individual multilocus heterozygosity were weakly negatively correlated, (Pearson's r = −.061 when considering all genotyped individuals), suggesting that they cannot be considered as alternatives, but rather as complementary sources of information. These findings suggest that a strict genetic monitoring and management, based on both pedigree and molecular tools can help mitigate genetic changes and allow to preserve genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience in conservation breeding programs. The use of a rigorous genetic management in conservation breeding programs allows preserving populations' genetic diversity. Research Highlight A strict genetic management within captive breeding is essential in the aim of preserving populations' genetic diversity. Discrepancies between pedigree‐based and molecular analyses show that both must be used in integrative genetic management.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds - classification</subject><subject>Birds - genetics</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Captive breeding</subject><subject>Captivity</subject><subject>Chlamydotis undulata undulata</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>ex situ</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>genetic management</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Heterozygosity</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>inbreeding avoidance</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>mean kinship</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Morocco</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0733-3188</issn><issn>1098-2361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2xaibS24yTOshpBW2mq2ZQNG-vYPplJlcSDnRQNb8Ob4jBlKiGx8kWfvnP5CXnP2QVnTFz-9P5C8KKsX5AFZ7XKRF7yl2TBqjzPcq7UCXkT4wNjTBVcvCYnuaiLsuBqQX5d44BjaynEiDH2OIzUNxSo9UPE8Ahj6wdqAqJrhw3dBb8J0M_IuEW69ZOBANRMcYTg6Nly20G_d35sI50GN3UwwvFyTtuB3vngrfWfqIGIjib5Lqk3qQCFwdHed2gTHdILun3q6S151UAX8d3TeUq-fvl8v7zJVuvr2-XVKrNSiDpTNZpGFhyYYUoq3tS2rLhjVgngsqqgtA2IquaicGAQTCFcbZomL1HJSpj8lJwfvFvo9C60PYS99tDqm6uVnv9YzkTaYPXIE3t2YNM-vk8YR9230WLXwYB-ilpIKVUlmZjRj_-gD34KabaZKksmhZLsubgNPsaAzbEDzvScsU4Z6z8ZJ_bDk3EyPboj-TfUBFwegB9th_v_m_S39fqg_A0BJLI6</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Rabier, Robin</creator><creator>Robert, Alexandre</creator><creator>Lacroix, Frédéric</creator><creator>Lesobre, Loïc</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-4580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-5522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses</title><author>Rabier, Robin ; Robert, Alexandre ; Lacroix, Frédéric ; Lesobre, Loïc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-89ebf451a0b08481f9c671d0c82a1477a6cfa279125dabeab52d9bff36e8472b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds - classification</topic><topic>Birds - genetics</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Captive breeding</topic><topic>Captivity</topic><topic>Chlamydotis undulata undulata</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>ex situ</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>genetic management</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Heterozygosity</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>inbreeding avoidance</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>mean kinship</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Morocco</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rabier, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesobre, Loïc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Zoo biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rabier, Robin</au><au>Robert, Alexandre</au><au>Lacroix, Frédéric</au><au>Lesobre, Loïc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses</atitle><jtitle>Zoo biology</jtitle><addtitle>Zoo Biol</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>422-435</pages><issn>0733-3188</issn><eissn>1098-2361</eissn><abstract>Protection and restoration of species in the wild may require conservation breeding programs under genetic management to minimize deleterious effects of genetic changes that occur in captivity, while preserving populations' genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience. Here, through interannual pedigree analyses, we first assessed the efficiency of a 21‐year genetic management, including minimization of mean kinship, inbreeding avoidance, and regular addition of founders, of a conservation breeding program targeting on Houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco. Secondly, we compared pedigree analyses, the classical way of assessing and managing genetic diversity in captivity, to molecular analyses based on seven microsatellites. Pedigree‐based results indicated an efficient maintenance of the genetic diversity (99% of the initial genetic diversity retained) while molecular‐based results indicated an increase in allelic richness and an increase in unbiased expected heterozygosity across time. The pedigree‐based average inbreeding coefficient F remained low (between 0.0004 and 0.003 in 2017) while the proportion of highly inbred individuals (F &gt; .1) decreased over time and reached 0.2% in 2017. Furthermore, pedigree‐based F and molecular‐based individual multilocus heterozygosity were weakly negatively correlated, (Pearson's r = −.061 when considering all genotyped individuals), suggesting that they cannot be considered as alternatives, but rather as complementary sources of information. These findings suggest that a strict genetic monitoring and management, based on both pedigree and molecular tools can help mitigate genetic changes and allow to preserve genetic diversity and evolutionary resilience in conservation breeding programs. The use of a rigorous genetic management in conservation breeding programs allows preserving populations' genetic diversity. Research Highlight A strict genetic management within captive breeding is essential in the aim of preserving populations' genetic diversity. Discrepancies between pedigree‐based and molecular analyses show that both must be used in integrative genetic management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32956518</pmid><doi>10.1002/zoo.21569</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-4580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-5522</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-3188
ispartof Zoo biology, 2020-11, Vol.39 (6), p.422-435
issn 0733-3188
1098-2361
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03020087v1
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Birds - classification
Birds - genetics
Breeding
Captive breeding
Captivity
Chlamydotis undulata undulata
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
DNA - genetics
Ecology, environment
Evolution
ex situ
Female
Genetic analysis
Genetic diversity
genetic management
Genotype
Heterozygosity
Inbreeding
inbreeding avoidance
Life Sciences
Male
Management
mean kinship
Microsatellite Repeats
Microsatellites
Morocco
Pedigree
Population genetics
Populations
Resilience
Time Factors
Wildlife conservation
title Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A13%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20assessment%20of%20a%20conservation%20breeding%20program%20of%20the%20houbara%20bustard%20(Chlamydotis%20undulata%20undulata)%20in%20Morocco,%20based%20on%20pedigree%20and%20molecular%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Zoo%20biology&rft.au=Rabier,%20Robin&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=422-435&rft.issn=0733-3188&rft.eissn=1098-2361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/zoo.21569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2444874021%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466042840&rft_id=info:pmid/32956518&rfr_iscdi=true