Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine
The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional quality of pea protein isolate in rats and to evaluate the impact of methionine (Met) supplementation. Several protein diets were studied: pea protein, casein, gluten, pea protein–gluten combination and pea protein supplemented with Met. Stud...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of nutrition 2021-02, Vol.125 (4), p.389-397 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 397 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 389 |
| container_title | British journal of nutrition |
| container_volume | 125 |
| creator | Guillin, Florence M. Gaudichon, Claire Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia Lefranc-Millot, Catherine Azzout-Marniche, Dalila Khodorova, Nadezda Calvez, Juliane |
| description | The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional quality of pea protein isolate in rats and to evaluate the impact of methionine (Met) supplementation. Several protein diets were studied: pea protein, casein, gluten, pea protein–gluten combination and pea protein supplemented with Met. Study 1: Young male Wistar rats (n 8/group) were fed the test diets ad libitum for 28 d. The protein efficiency ratio (PER) was measured. Study 2: Adult male Wistar rats (n 9/group) were fed the test diets for 10 d. A protein-free diet group was used to determine endogenous losses of N. The rats were placed in metabolism cages for 3 d to assess N balance, true faecal N digestibility and to calculate the Protein Digestible-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). They were then given a calibrated meal and euthanised 6 h later for collection of digestive contents. The true caecal amino acid (AA) digestibility was determined, and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) was calculated. Met supplementation increased the PER of pea protein (2·52 v. 1·14, P < 0·001) up to the PER of casein (2·55). Mean true caecal AA digestibility was 94 % for pea protein. The DIAAS was 0·88 for pea protein and 1·10 with Met supplementation, 1·29 for casein and 0·25 for gluten. Pea protein was highly digestible in rats under our experimental conditions, and Met supplementation enabled generation of a mixture that had a protein quality that was not different from that of casein. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007114520002883 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03010515v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007114520002883</cupid><sourcerecordid>2427519698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-2f03ca8e651b170f0cfb999509bff78a7406b733bd6f3e6a1e7fe19e581cdf9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1ERZfCA3BBlriARMATJ3HCraqAVlrEAThHk2TcdZXYqe1Q9Tl4YRzt0qogTp4_v_nGo4-xFyDegQD1_psQQgEUZZ6CvK7lI7aBQpVZXlX5Y7ZZ29naP2ZPQ7hKaQ2iecKOZa5AyrLasF9fljGarPcmkjfIMQQKYSIbudN8JuSzd5GM5dcLjibe8hR6jOEDR967aUZvgrO8o3hDZHmPIcFv-eW4xJSiHR6I4Ogsced5WOZ5pHUPDfzGxB2fKO6Ms8bSM3akcQz0_PCesB-fPn4_O8-2Xz9fnJ1us74QKma5FrLHmqoSOlBCi153TdOUoum0VjWqQlSdkrIbKi2pQiClCRoqa-gH3aA8YW_2ujsc29mbCf1t69C056fbdq0JKUCUUP6ExL7es-mS64VCbCcTehpHtOSW0OZFrkpoqqZO6Ku_0Cu3eJsuSZSqVa4kFImCPdV7F4InffcDEO3qbvuPu2nm5UF56SYa7ib-2JkAeRDFqfNmuKT73f-X_Q3u5LAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478727314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Guillin, Florence M. ; Gaudichon, Claire ; Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia ; Lefranc-Millot, Catherine ; Azzout-Marniche, Dalila ; Khodorova, Nadezda ; Calvez, Juliane</creator><creatorcontrib>Guillin, Florence M. ; Gaudichon, Claire ; Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia ; Lefranc-Millot, Catherine ; Azzout-Marniche, Dalila ; Khodorova, Nadezda ; Calvez, Juliane</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional quality of pea protein isolate in rats and to evaluate the impact of methionine (Met) supplementation. Several protein diets were studied: pea protein, casein, gluten, pea protein–gluten combination and pea protein supplemented with Met. Study 1: Young male Wistar rats (n 8/group) were fed the test diets ad libitum for 28 d. The protein efficiency ratio (PER) was measured. Study 2: Adult male Wistar rats (n 9/group) were fed the test diets for 10 d. A protein-free diet group was used to determine endogenous losses of N. The rats were placed in metabolism cages for 3 d to assess N balance, true faecal N digestibility and to calculate the Protein Digestible-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). They were then given a calibrated meal and euthanised 6 h later for collection of digestive contents. The true caecal amino acid (AA) digestibility was determined, and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) was calculated. Met supplementation increased the PER of pea protein (2·52 v. 1·14, P < 0·001) up to the PER of casein (2·55). Mean true caecal AA digestibility was 94 % for pea protein. The DIAAS was 0·88 for pea protein and 1·10 with Met supplementation, 1·29 for casein and 0·25 for gluten. Pea protein was highly digestible in rats under our experimental conditions, and Met supplementation enabled generation of a mixture that had a protein quality that was not different from that of casein.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520002883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32713356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Body composition ; Casein ; Caseins - metabolism ; Caseins - standards ; Diet ; Dietary supplements ; Digestibility ; Experiments ; Food and Nutrition ; Gluten ; Glutens - metabolism ; Glutens - standards ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Mathematical analysis ; Metabolism ; Metabolism and Metabolic Studies ; Methionine ; Methionine - metabolism ; Methionine - standards ; Multiple criterion ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nutrition assessment ; Nutritive Value ; Peas ; Pisum sativum - chemistry ; Plant Proteins - chemistry ; Plant Proteins - metabolism ; Plant Proteins - standards ; Proteins ; Quality assessment ; Rats ; Sulfur</subject><ispartof>British journal of nutrition, 2021-02, Vol.125 (4), p.389-397</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-2f03ca8e651b170f0cfb999509bff78a7406b733bd6f3e6a1e7fe19e581cdf9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-2f03ca8e651b170f0cfb999509bff78a7406b733bd6f3e6a1e7fe19e581cdf9a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0983-4760 ; 0000-0001-8397-9143 ; 0000-0003-1181-9786 ; 0000-0001-5099-251X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007114520002883/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://agroparistech.hal.science/hal-03010515$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guillin, Florence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudichon, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefranc-Millot, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzout-Marniche, Dalila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodorova, Nadezda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvez, Juliane</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine</title><title>British journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional quality of pea protein isolate in rats and to evaluate the impact of methionine (Met) supplementation. Several protein diets were studied: pea protein, casein, gluten, pea protein–gluten combination and pea protein supplemented with Met. Study 1: Young male Wistar rats (n 8/group) were fed the test diets ad libitum for 28 d. The protein efficiency ratio (PER) was measured. Study 2: Adult male Wistar rats (n 9/group) were fed the test diets for 10 d. A protein-free diet group was used to determine endogenous losses of N. The rats were placed in metabolism cages for 3 d to assess N balance, true faecal N digestibility and to calculate the Protein Digestible-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). They were then given a calibrated meal and euthanised 6 h later for collection of digestive contents. The true caecal amino acid (AA) digestibility was determined, and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) was calculated. Met supplementation increased the PER of pea protein (2·52 v. 1·14, P < 0·001) up to the PER of casein (2·55). Mean true caecal AA digestibility was 94 % for pea protein. The DIAAS was 0·88 for pea protein and 1·10 with Met supplementation, 1·29 for casein and 0·25 for gluten. Pea protein was highly digestible in rats under our experimental conditions, and Met supplementation enabled generation of a mixture that had a protein quality that was not different from that of casein.</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Casein</subject><subject>Caseins - metabolism</subject><subject>Caseins - standards</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Food and Nutrition</subject><subject>Gluten</subject><subject>Glutens - metabolism</subject><subject>Glutens - standards</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metabolism and Metabolic Studies</subject><subject>Methionine</subject><subject>Methionine - metabolism</subject><subject>Methionine - standards</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nutrition assessment</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Peas</subject><subject>Pisum sativum - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - standards</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><issn>0007-1145</issn><issn>1475-2662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1ERZfCA3BBlriARMATJ3HCraqAVlrEAThHk2TcdZXYqe1Q9Tl4YRzt0qogTp4_v_nGo4-xFyDegQD1_psQQgEUZZ6CvK7lI7aBQpVZXlX5Y7ZZ29naP2ZPQ7hKaQ2iecKOZa5AyrLasF9fljGarPcmkjfIMQQKYSIbudN8JuSzd5GM5dcLjibe8hR6jOEDR967aUZvgrO8o3hDZHmPIcFv-eW4xJSiHR6I4Ogsced5WOZ5pHUPDfzGxB2fKO6Ms8bSM3akcQz0_PCesB-fPn4_O8-2Xz9fnJ1us74QKma5FrLHmqoSOlBCi153TdOUoum0VjWqQlSdkrIbKi2pQiClCRoqa-gH3aA8YW_2ujsc29mbCf1t69C056fbdq0JKUCUUP6ExL7es-mS64VCbCcTehpHtOSW0OZFrkpoqqZO6Ku_0Cu3eJsuSZSqVa4kFImCPdV7F4InffcDEO3qbvuPu2nm5UF56SYa7ib-2JkAeRDFqfNmuKT73f-X_Q3u5LAA</recordid><startdate>20210228</startdate><enddate>20210228</enddate><creator>Guillin, Florence M.</creator><creator>Gaudichon, Claire</creator><creator>Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia</creator><creator>Lefranc-Millot, Catherine</creator><creator>Azzout-Marniche, Dalila</creator><creator>Khodorova, Nadezda</creator><creator>Calvez, Juliane</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-4760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1181-9786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5099-251X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210228</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine</title><author>Guillin, Florence M. ; Gaudichon, Claire ; Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia ; Lefranc-Millot, Catherine ; Azzout-Marniche, Dalila ; Khodorova, Nadezda ; Calvez, Juliane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-2f03ca8e651b170f0cfb999509bff78a7406b733bd6f3e6a1e7fe19e581cdf9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Casein</topic><topic>Caseins - metabolism</topic><topic>Caseins - standards</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Food and Nutrition</topic><topic>Gluten</topic><topic>Glutens - metabolism</topic><topic>Glutens - standards</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metabolism and Metabolic Studies</topic><topic>Methionine</topic><topic>Methionine - metabolism</topic><topic>Methionine - standards</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nutrition assessment</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Peas</topic><topic>Pisum sativum - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - standards</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guillin, Florence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudichon, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefranc-Millot, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzout-Marniche, Dalila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodorova, Nadezda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvez, Juliane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guillin, Florence M.</au><au>Gaudichon, Claire</au><au>Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia</au><au>Lefranc-Millot, Catherine</au><au>Azzout-Marniche, Dalila</au><au>Khodorova, Nadezda</au><au>Calvez, Juliane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine</atitle><jtitle>British journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-02-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>389-397</pages><issn>0007-1145</issn><eissn>1475-2662</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional quality of pea protein isolate in rats and to evaluate the impact of methionine (Met) supplementation. Several protein diets were studied: pea protein, casein, gluten, pea protein–gluten combination and pea protein supplemented with Met. Study 1: Young male Wistar rats (n 8/group) were fed the test diets ad libitum for 28 d. The protein efficiency ratio (PER) was measured. Study 2: Adult male Wistar rats (n 9/group) were fed the test diets for 10 d. A protein-free diet group was used to determine endogenous losses of N. The rats were placed in metabolism cages for 3 d to assess N balance, true faecal N digestibility and to calculate the Protein Digestible-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). They were then given a calibrated meal and euthanised 6 h later for collection of digestive contents. The true caecal amino acid (AA) digestibility was determined, and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) was calculated. Met supplementation increased the PER of pea protein (2·52 v. 1·14, P < 0·001) up to the PER of casein (2·55). Mean true caecal AA digestibility was 94 % for pea protein. The DIAAS was 0·88 for pea protein and 1·10 with Met supplementation, 1·29 for casein and 0·25 for gluten. Pea protein was highly digestible in rats under our experimental conditions, and Met supplementation enabled generation of a mixture that had a protein quality that was not different from that of casein.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32713356</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007114520002883</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0983-4760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1181-9786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5099-251X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1145 |
| ispartof | British journal of nutrition, 2021-02, Vol.125 (4), p.389-397 |
| issn | 0007-1145 1475-2662 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03010515v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Amino acids Animal Feed - analysis Animals Body composition Casein Caseins - metabolism Caseins - standards Diet Dietary supplements Digestibility Experiments Food and Nutrition Gluten Glutens - metabolism Glutens - standards Life Sciences Male Mathematical analysis Metabolism Metabolism and Metabolic Studies Methionine Methionine - metabolism Methionine - standards Multiple criterion Nitrogen Nitrogen - metabolism Nutrition assessment Nutritive Value Peas Pisum sativum - chemistry Plant Proteins - chemistry Plant Proteins - metabolism Plant Proteins - standards Proteins Quality assessment Rats Sulfur |
| title | Multi-criteria assessment of pea protein quality in rats: a comparison between casein, gluten and pea protein alone or supplemented with methionine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T01%3A02%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20assessment%20of%20pea%20protein%20quality%20in%20rats:%20a%20comparison%20between%20casein,%20gluten%20and%20pea%20protein%20alone%20or%20supplemented%20with%20methionine&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Guillin,%20Florence%20M.&rft.date=2021-02-28&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=389-397&rft.issn=0007-1145&rft.eissn=1475-2662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007114520002883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2427519698%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478727314&rft_id=info:pmid/32713356&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007114520002883&rfr_iscdi=true |