Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations

Context. Conservation properties of magnetic helicity and energy in the quasi-ideal and low-β solar corona make these two quantities relevant for the study of solar active regions and eruptions. Aims. Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin) 2020-04, Vol.636
Hauptverfasser: Pariat, Etienne, Linan, L., Pariat, É., Aulanier, G., Moraitis, K., Valori, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)
container_volume 636
creator Pariat, Etienne
Linan, L.
Pariat, É.
Aulanier, G.
Moraitis, K.
Valori, G.
description Context. Conservation properties of magnetic helicity and energy in the quasi-ideal and low-β solar corona make these two quantities relevant for the study of solar active regions and eruptions. Aims. Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-like eruptions. Methods. We present the general formulations for the time-varying components of energy and helicity in resistive MHD. We calculated them numerically with a specific gauge, and compared their behaviors in the numerical simulations, which differ from one another by their imposed boundary-driving motions. Thus, we investigated the impact of different active regions surface flows on the development of the energy and helicity-related quantities. Results. Despite general similarities in their overall behaviors, helicities and energies display different evolutions that cannot be explained in a unique framework. While the energy fluxes are similar in all simulations, the physical mechanisms that govern the evolution of the helicities are markedly distinct from one simulation to another: the evolution of volume-threading helicity can be governed by boundary fluxes or helicity transfer, depending on the simulation. Conclusions. The eruption takes place for the same value of the ratio of the current-carrying helicity to the total helicity in all simulations. However, our study highlights that this threshold can be reached in different ways, with different helicity-related processes dominating for different photospheric flows. This means that the details of the pre-eruptive dynamics do not influence the eruptiononset helicity-related threshold. Nevertheless, the helicity-flux dynamics may be more or less efficient in changing the time required to reach the onset of the eruption.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/0004-6361/202037548
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03008345v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03008345v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03008345v13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVirsKwjAUQIMoWB9f4JLVofYm6WtwEak4OLqXYFN7JU1Lkxb79yqIu9PhHA4hGwY7BhELACD0YxGzgAMHkURhOiEeCwX3IYniKfF-x5wsrH28lbNUeGSfGdXdRypNQSul8YZupKXun8pSNFSjUb5DVVDV9a3DQVGLda-lw8bYFZmVUlu1_nJJtqfsejz7ldR522EtuzFvJObnwyX_NBAAqQijgYl_3hed1UJT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations</title><source>Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX</source><source>EDP Sciences</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pariat, Etienne ; Linan, L. ; Pariat, É. ; Aulanier, G. ; Moraitis, K. ; Valori, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pariat, Etienne ; Linan, L. ; Pariat, É. ; Aulanier, G. ; Moraitis, K. ; Valori, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Context. Conservation properties of magnetic helicity and energy in the quasi-ideal and low-β solar corona make these two quantities relevant for the study of solar active regions and eruptions. Aims. Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-like eruptions. Methods. We present the general formulations for the time-varying components of energy and helicity in resistive MHD. We calculated them numerically with a specific gauge, and compared their behaviors in the numerical simulations, which differ from one another by their imposed boundary-driving motions. Thus, we investigated the impact of different active regions surface flows on the development of the energy and helicity-related quantities. Results. Despite general similarities in their overall behaviors, helicities and energies display different evolutions that cannot be explained in a unique framework. While the energy fluxes are similar in all simulations, the physical mechanisms that govern the evolution of the helicities are markedly distinct from one simulation to another: the evolution of volume-threading helicity can be governed by boundary fluxes or helicity transfer, depending on the simulation. Conclusions. The eruption takes place for the same value of the ratio of the current-carrying helicity to the total helicity in all simulations. However, our study highlights that this threshold can be reached in different ways, with different helicity-related processes dominating for different photospheric flows. This means that the details of the pre-eruptive dynamics do not influence the eruptiononset helicity-related threshold. Nevertheless, the helicity-flux dynamics may be more or less efficient in changing the time required to reach the onset of the eruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-6361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; Sciences of the Universe ; Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</subject><ispartof>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2020-04, Vol.636</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2900-0608 ; 0000-0001-7809-0067 ; 0000-0001-8900-5948 ; 0000-0001-8900-5948 ; 0000-0001-7809-0067 ; 0000-0002-2900-0608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03008345$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pariat, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linan, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pariat, É.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aulanier, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraitis, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valori, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations</title><title>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</title><description>Context. Conservation properties of magnetic helicity and energy in the quasi-ideal and low-β solar corona make these two quantities relevant for the study of solar active regions and eruptions. Aims. Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-like eruptions. Methods. We present the general formulations for the time-varying components of energy and helicity in resistive MHD. We calculated them numerically with a specific gauge, and compared their behaviors in the numerical simulations, which differ from one another by their imposed boundary-driving motions. Thus, we investigated the impact of different active regions surface flows on the development of the energy and helicity-related quantities. Results. Despite general similarities in their overall behaviors, helicities and energies display different evolutions that cannot be explained in a unique framework. While the energy fluxes are similar in all simulations, the physical mechanisms that govern the evolution of the helicities are markedly distinct from one simulation to another: the evolution of volume-threading helicity can be governed by boundary fluxes or helicity transfer, depending on the simulation. Conclusions. The eruption takes place for the same value of the ratio of the current-carrying helicity to the total helicity in all simulations. However, our study highlights that this threshold can be reached in different ways, with different helicity-related processes dominating for different photospheric flows. This means that the details of the pre-eruptive dynamics do not influence the eruptiononset helicity-related threshold. Nevertheless, the helicity-flux dynamics may be more or less efficient in changing the time required to reach the onset of the eruption.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</subject><issn>0004-6361</issn><issn>1432-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVirsKwjAUQIMoWB9f4JLVofYm6WtwEak4OLqXYFN7JU1Lkxb79yqIu9PhHA4hGwY7BhELACD0YxGzgAMHkURhOiEeCwX3IYniKfF-x5wsrH28lbNUeGSfGdXdRypNQSul8YZupKXun8pSNFSjUb5DVVDV9a3DQVGLda-lw8bYFZmVUlu1_nJJtqfsejz7ldR522EtuzFvJObnwyX_NBAAqQijgYl_3hed1UJT</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Pariat, Etienne</creator><creator>Linan, L.</creator><creator>Pariat, É.</creator><creator>Aulanier, G.</creator><creator>Moraitis, K.</creator><creator>Valori, G.</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-0608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-0067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-5948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-5948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-0067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-0608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations</title><author>Pariat, Etienne ; Linan, L. ; Pariat, É. ; Aulanier, G. ; Moraitis, K. ; Valori, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03008345v13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pariat, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linan, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pariat, É.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aulanier, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraitis, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valori, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pariat, Etienne</au><au>Linan, L.</au><au>Pariat, É.</au><au>Aulanier, G.</au><au>Moraitis, K.</au><au>Valori, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations</atitle><jtitle>Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin)</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>636</volume><issn>0004-6361</issn><eissn>1432-0756</eissn><abstract>Context. Conservation properties of magnetic helicity and energy in the quasi-ideal and low-β solar corona make these two quantities relevant for the study of solar active regions and eruptions. Aims. Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-like eruptions. Methods. We present the general formulations for the time-varying components of energy and helicity in resistive MHD. We calculated them numerically with a specific gauge, and compared their behaviors in the numerical simulations, which differ from one another by their imposed boundary-driving motions. Thus, we investigated the impact of different active regions surface flows on the development of the energy and helicity-related quantities. Results. Despite general similarities in their overall behaviors, helicities and energies display different evolutions that cannot be explained in a unique framework. While the energy fluxes are similar in all simulations, the physical mechanisms that govern the evolution of the helicities are markedly distinct from one simulation to another: the evolution of volume-threading helicity can be governed by boundary fluxes or helicity transfer, depending on the simulation. Conclusions. The eruption takes place for the same value of the ratio of the current-carrying helicity to the total helicity in all simulations. However, our study highlights that this threshold can be reached in different ways, with different helicity-related processes dominating for different photospheric flows. This means that the details of the pre-eruptive dynamics do not influence the eruptiononset helicity-related threshold. Nevertheless, the helicity-flux dynamics may be more or less efficient in changing the time required to reach the onset of the eruption.</abstract><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/0004-6361/202037548</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-0608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-0067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-5948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-5948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-0067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2900-0608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-6361
ispartof Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), 2020-04, Vol.636
issn 0004-6361
1432-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03008345v1
source Bacon EDP Sciences France Licence nationale-ISTEX-PS-Journals-PFISTEX; EDP Sciences; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Astrophysics
Sciences of the Universe
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
title Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A46%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20and%20helicity%20fluxes%20in%20line-tied%20eruptive%20simulations&rft.jtitle=Astronomy%20and%20astrophysics%20(Berlin)&rft.au=Pariat,%20Etienne&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=636&rft.issn=0004-6361&rft.eissn=1432-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202037548&rft_dat=%3Chal%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03008345v1%3C/hal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true