How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin

Land-surface models are important tools for simulation of the past, present, and future capacity of terrestrialecosystems to absorb anthropogenic CO2emissions. However, fluvial carbon (C) transfers are presently ne-glected in these models. Using the Amazon basin as a case study, we show that this ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) Mass.), 2020-08, Vol.3 (2), p.226-236
Hauptverfasser: Lauerwald, Ronny, Regnier, Pierre, Guenet, Bertrand, Friedlingstein, Pierre, Ciais, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue 2
container_start_page 226
container_title One earth (Cambridge, Mass.)
container_volume 3
creator Lauerwald, Ronny
Regnier, Pierre
Guenet, Bertrand
Friedlingstein, Pierre
Ciais, Philippe
description Land-surface models are important tools for simulation of the past, present, and future capacity of terrestrialecosystems to absorb anthropogenic CO2emissions. However, fluvial carbon (C) transfers are presently ne-glected in these models. Using the Amazon basin as a case study, we show that this negligence leads to sig-nificant underestimation of the net uptake of atmospheric C while terrestrial C storage changes are overesti-mated. These biases arise from the fact that C—in reality, leached from soils and exported through the rivernetwork—is instead represented as partly being respired and partly being stored in soils. Moreover, thesebiases scale mainly to the fluvial C export to the coast, despite aquatic CO2emission to the atmosphere beingthe major pathway of riverine C exports. We further show that fluvial C transfers may change significantly inresponse to changes in either hydrology or in atmospheric C uptake by vegetation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03004933v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03004933v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-fc175770ab0f2bdda99d5907d76dd20ac4bb928f626084918eed383dd4053ea43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujiQT5Bx569cA6bffT20JESDbxAJ6b2W0XFpfWtAsGfr2LqPE0k3eemWQeQu4ZBAxY_LgNrNEaXcCBQwBJAJBdkQGPMhgLwfn1v_6WjLzfAgCPGGNZOCCnuf2ky2a3b7FrrPHU1rTbaFqgUXSKrrSmH5t3mjtNJw16rWh5pIu1sa4xazpr94cG21905dD4Wjv_RPM-85ouu7060tq677P5Dk89NkHfmDtyU2Pr9einDsnb7Hk1nY-L15fFNC_GlRCsG9cVS6IkASyh5qVSmGWq_ydRSawUB6zCssx4Wsc8hjTMWKq1EqlQKoRIaAzFkDxc7m6wlR-u2aE7SouNnOeFPGcgAMJMiAPr2fDCVs5673T9t8BAnnXLrbzolmfdEhLZ6xZfkNd0QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lauerwald, Ronny ; Regnier, Pierre ; Guenet, Bertrand ; Friedlingstein, Pierre ; Ciais, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauerwald, Ronny ; Regnier, Pierre ; Guenet, Bertrand ; Friedlingstein, Pierre ; Ciais, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Land-surface models are important tools for simulation of the past, present, and future capacity of terrestrialecosystems to absorb anthropogenic CO2emissions. However, fluvial carbon (C) transfers are presently ne-glected in these models. Using the Amazon basin as a case study, we show that this negligence leads to sig-nificant underestimation of the net uptake of atmospheric C while terrestrial C storage changes are overesti-mated. These biases arise from the fact that C—in reality, leached from soils and exported through the rivernetwork—is instead represented as partly being respired and partly being stored in soils. Moreover, thesebiases scale mainly to the fluvial C export to the coast, despite aquatic CO2emission to the atmosphere beingthe major pathway of riverine C exports. We further show that fluvial C transfers may change significantly inresponse to changes in either hydrology or in atmospheric C uptake by vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-3322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-3322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cell press</publisher><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><ispartof>One earth (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020-08, Vol.3 (2), p.226-236</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-fc175770ab0f2bdda99d5907d76dd20ac4bb928f626084918eed383dd4053ea43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-fc175770ab0f2bdda99d5907d76dd20ac4bb928f626084918eed383dd4053ea43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4311-8645 ; 0000-0001-5554-0897 ; 0000-0003-3309-4739 ; 0000-0001-8560-4943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03004933$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauerwald, Ronny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regnier, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenet, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlingstein, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciais, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin</title><title>One earth (Cambridge, Mass.)</title><description>Land-surface models are important tools for simulation of the past, present, and future capacity of terrestrialecosystems to absorb anthropogenic CO2emissions. However, fluvial carbon (C) transfers are presently ne-glected in these models. Using the Amazon basin as a case study, we show that this negligence leads to sig-nificant underestimation of the net uptake of atmospheric C while terrestrial C storage changes are overesti-mated. These biases arise from the fact that C—in reality, leached from soils and exported through the rivernetwork—is instead represented as partly being respired and partly being stored in soils. Moreover, thesebiases scale mainly to the fluvial C export to the coast, despite aquatic CO2emission to the atmosphere beingthe major pathway of riverine C exports. We further show that fluvial C transfers may change significantly inresponse to changes in either hydrology or in atmospheric C uptake by vegetation.</description><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><issn>2590-3322</issn><issn>2590-3322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1PAjEQhhujiQT5Bx569cA6bffT20JESDbxAJ6b2W0XFpfWtAsGfr2LqPE0k3eemWQeQu4ZBAxY_LgNrNEaXcCBQwBJAJBdkQGPMhgLwfn1v_6WjLzfAgCPGGNZOCCnuf2ky2a3b7FrrPHU1rTbaFqgUXSKrrSmH5t3mjtNJw16rWh5pIu1sa4xazpr94cG21905dD4Wjv_RPM-85ouu7060tq677P5Dk89NkHfmDtyU2Pr9einDsnb7Hk1nY-L15fFNC_GlRCsG9cVS6IkASyh5qVSmGWq_ydRSawUB6zCssx4Wsc8hjTMWKq1EqlQKoRIaAzFkDxc7m6wlR-u2aE7SouNnOeFPGcgAMJMiAPr2fDCVs5673T9t8BAnnXLrbzolmfdEhLZ6xZfkNd0QA</recordid><startdate>20200821</startdate><enddate>20200821</enddate><creator>Lauerwald, Ronny</creator><creator>Regnier, Pierre</creator><creator>Guenet, Bertrand</creator><creator>Friedlingstein, Pierre</creator><creator>Ciais, Philippe</creator><general>Cell press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4311-8645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-4739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-4943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200821</creationdate><title>How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin</title><author>Lauerwald, Ronny ; Regnier, Pierre ; Guenet, Bertrand ; Friedlingstein, Pierre ; Ciais, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-fc175770ab0f2bdda99d5907d76dd20ac4bb928f626084918eed383dd4053ea43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauerwald, Ronny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regnier, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guenet, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedlingstein, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciais, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>One earth (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauerwald, Ronny</au><au>Regnier, Pierre</au><au>Guenet, Bertrand</au><au>Friedlingstein, Pierre</au><au>Ciais, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin</atitle><jtitle>One earth (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2020-08-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>226-236</pages><issn>2590-3322</issn><eissn>2590-3322</eissn><abstract>Land-surface models are important tools for simulation of the past, present, and future capacity of terrestrialecosystems to absorb anthropogenic CO2emissions. However, fluvial carbon (C) transfers are presently ne-glected in these models. Using the Amazon basin as a case study, we show that this negligence leads to sig-nificant underestimation of the net uptake of atmospheric C while terrestrial C storage changes are overesti-mated. These biases arise from the fact that C—in reality, leached from soils and exported through the rivernetwork—is instead represented as partly being respired and partly being stored in soils. Moreover, thesebiases scale mainly to the fluvial C export to the coast, despite aquatic CO2emission to the atmosphere beingthe major pathway of riverine C exports. We further show that fluvial C transfers may change significantly inresponse to changes in either hydrology or in atmospheric C uptake by vegetation.</abstract><pub>Cell press</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.009</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4311-8645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-4739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-4943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2590-3322
ispartof One earth (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020-08, Vol.3 (2), p.226-236
issn 2590-3322
2590-3322
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03004933v1
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Environmental Sciences
title How Simulations of the Land Carbon Sink Are Biased by Ignoring Fluvial Carbon Transfers: A Case Study for the Amazon Basin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A26%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Simulations%20of%20the%20Land%20Carbon%20Sink%20Are%20Biased%20by%20Ignoring%20Fluvial%20Carbon%20Transfers:%20A%20Case%20Study%20for%20the%20Amazon%20Basin&rft.jtitle=One%20earth%20(Cambridge,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Lauerwald,%20Ronny&rft.date=2020-08-21&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=226-236&rft.issn=2590-3322&rft.eissn=2590-3322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.009&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03004933v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true