A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees

Key message Field methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees have evolved from increment borer, torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurement. A partial resistance drilling approach coupled with knowledge of internal tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of forest science. 2017-06, Vol.74 (2), p.1-13, Article 27
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Shan, Wang, Xiping, Wiemann, Michael C., Brashaw, Brian K., Ross, Robert J., Wang, Lihai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Annals of forest science.
container_volume 74
creator Gao, Shan
Wang, Xiping
Wiemann, Michael C.
Brashaw, Brian K.
Ross, Robert J.
Wang, Lihai
description Key message Field methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees have evolved from increment borer, torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurement. A partial resistance drilling approach coupled with knowledge of internal tree density distribution may offer an alternative solution for wood density surveys in the future. Context Finding ways to nondestructively assess wood density in trees has been a quest by foresters and wood scientists around the world. In the past several decades, traditional increment borer methods have gradually evolved into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurements. Aims We provide a comprehensive review of research development in the use of several field nondestructive methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees and discuss pros and cons of each method for field applications. Results The use of the increment borer has been a standard method for assessing wood density in trees, and it has been further developed into a system approach allowing the use of outer wood cores and knowledge of internal density distribution for predicting wood density of major tree components. Studies on the use of torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal tools have had very limited success and do not warrant replacement of the increment borer. Resistance drilling, on the other hand, has emerged as a potential tool for more efficient and economical collection of wood density information in trees. Conclusion The resistance drilling method has considerable advantages over other methods in terms of less damage to trees, faster operation, and higher measurement sensitivity. Internal friction is a key factor that currently hinders further application.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_C6C</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02976522v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880744674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-81a8e96a94f7ccee7cb8d695cad1e38779c7a0577166708a0e7b3aa65bda7ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPwyAYhonRxDn9Ad5IPHmoQlugPS6LOpMlXjTxRr4B3ZgbTGAz-_fS1BgvniAv7_MmPAhdU3JHCRH3kVasZQWhoiC8rIr6BI1o2Yqi5fz9tL83vKgZJ-foIsY1ITmo6Qh9TLAKNlkFGwwONsdoI_Yd3pq08jrizgccYGd1ftXYeadNTGGvkj0YrE0yYWsdJOtdT315r3Pqok1HbB2OKVPWLXEKxsRLdNbBJpqrn3OM3h4fXqezYv7y9DydzAvFyjYVDYXGtBzauhNKGSPUotG8ZQo0NVUjRKsEECYE5VyQBogRiwqAs4UGYTSrxuh22F3BRu6C3UI4Sg9WziZz2Wcki-GsLA80d2-G7i74z33-m1z7fcgioqRNQ0Rdc1HnFh1aKvgYg-l-ZymRvX85-JfZv-z9y54pBybmrlua8Gf5X-gbpuGJbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880744674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Gao, Shan ; Wang, Xiping ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Brashaw, Brian K. ; Ross, Robert J. ; Wang, Lihai</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shan ; Wang, Xiping ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Brashaw, Brian K. ; Ross, Robert J. ; Wang, Lihai</creatorcontrib><description>Key message Field methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees have evolved from increment borer, torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurement. A partial resistance drilling approach coupled with knowledge of internal tree density distribution may offer an alternative solution for wood density surveys in the future. Context Finding ways to nondestructively assess wood density in trees has been a quest by foresters and wood scientists around the world. In the past several decades, traditional increment borer methods have gradually evolved into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurements. Aims We provide a comprehensive review of research development in the use of several field nondestructive methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees and discuss pros and cons of each method for field applications. Results The use of the increment borer has been a standard method for assessing wood density in trees, and it has been further developed into a system approach allowing the use of outer wood cores and knowledge of internal density distribution for predicting wood density of major tree components. Studies on the use of torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal tools have had very limited success and do not warrant replacement of the increment borer. Resistance drilling, on the other hand, has emerged as a potential tool for more efficient and economical collection of wood density information in trees. Conclusion The resistance drilling method has considerable advantages over other methods in terms of less damage to trees, faster operation, and higher measurement sensitivity. Internal friction is a key factor that currently hinders further application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1286-4560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1297-966X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Density distribution ; Drilling ; Environment ; Forestry ; Forestry Management ; Internal friction ; Life Sciences ; Nondestructive testing ; Review Paper ; Tree Biology ; Trees ; Wood ; Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Annals of forest science., 2017-06, Vol.74 (2), p.1-13, Article 27</ispartof><rights>INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2017</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-81a8e96a94f7ccee7cb8d695cad1e38779c7a0577166708a0e7b3aa65bda7ed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-81a8e96a94f7ccee7cb8d695cad1e38779c7a0577166708a0e7b3aa65bda7ed53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7424-476X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927,41122,41490,42191,42559,51321,51578</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4$$EView_record_in_Springer_Nature$$FView_record_in_$$GSpringer_Nature</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02976522$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemann, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashaw, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lihai</creatorcontrib><title>A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees</title><title>Annals of forest science.</title><addtitle>Annals of Forest Science</addtitle><description>Key message Field methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees have evolved from increment borer, torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurement. A partial resistance drilling approach coupled with knowledge of internal tree density distribution may offer an alternative solution for wood density surveys in the future. Context Finding ways to nondestructively assess wood density in trees has been a quest by foresters and wood scientists around the world. In the past several decades, traditional increment borer methods have gradually evolved into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurements. Aims We provide a comprehensive review of research development in the use of several field nondestructive methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees and discuss pros and cons of each method for field applications. Results The use of the increment borer has been a standard method for assessing wood density in trees, and it has been further developed into a system approach allowing the use of outer wood cores and knowledge of internal density distribution for predicting wood density of major tree components. Studies on the use of torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal tools have had very limited success and do not warrant replacement of the increment borer. Resistance drilling, on the other hand, has emerged as a potential tool for more efficient and economical collection of wood density information in trees. Conclusion The resistance drilling method has considerable advantages over other methods in terms of less damage to trees, faster operation, and higher measurement sensitivity. Internal friction is a key factor that currently hinders further application.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Density distribution</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Internal friction</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Tree Biology</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>1286-4560</issn><issn>1297-966X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPwyAYhonRxDn9Ad5IPHmoQlugPS6LOpMlXjTxRr4B3ZgbTGAz-_fS1BgvniAv7_MmPAhdU3JHCRH3kVasZQWhoiC8rIr6BI1o2Yqi5fz9tL83vKgZJ-foIsY1ITmo6Qh9TLAKNlkFGwwONsdoI_Yd3pq08jrizgccYGd1ftXYeadNTGGvkj0YrE0yYWsdJOtdT315r3Pqok1HbB2OKVPWLXEKxsRLdNbBJpqrn3OM3h4fXqezYv7y9DydzAvFyjYVDYXGtBzauhNKGSPUotG8ZQo0NVUjRKsEECYE5VyQBogRiwqAs4UGYTSrxuh22F3BRu6C3UI4Sg9WziZz2Wcki-GsLA80d2-G7i74z33-m1z7fcgioqRNQ0Rdc1HnFh1aKvgYg-l-ZymRvX85-JfZv-z9y54pBybmrlua8Gf5X-gbpuGJbw</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Gao, Shan</creator><creator>Wang, Xiping</creator><creator>Wiemann, Michael C.</creator><creator>Brashaw, Brian K.</creator><creator>Ross, Robert J.</creator><creator>Wang, Lihai</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-476X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees</title><author>Gao, Shan ; Wang, Xiping ; Wiemann, Michael C. ; Brashaw, Brian K. ; Ross, Robert J. ; Wang, Lihai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-81a8e96a94f7ccee7cb8d695cad1e38779c7a0577166708a0e7b3aa65bda7ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Density distribution</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Internal friction</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Tree Biology</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemann, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashaw, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lihai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Annals of forest science.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Shan</au><au>Wang, Xiping</au><au>Wiemann, Michael C.</au><au>Brashaw, Brian K.</au><au>Ross, Robert J.</au><au>Wang, Lihai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees</atitle><jtitle>Annals of forest science.</jtitle><stitle>Annals of Forest Science</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><artnum>27</artnum><issn>1286-4560</issn><eissn>1297-966X</eissn><abstract>Key message Field methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees have evolved from increment borer, torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurement. A partial resistance drilling approach coupled with knowledge of internal tree density distribution may offer an alternative solution for wood density surveys in the future. Context Finding ways to nondestructively assess wood density in trees has been a quest by foresters and wood scientists around the world. In the past several decades, traditional increment borer methods have gradually evolved into sophisticated electronic tools of resistance drilling measurements. Aims We provide a comprehensive review of research development in the use of several field nondestructive methods for rapid determination of wood density in trees and discuss pros and cons of each method for field applications. Results The use of the increment borer has been a standard method for assessing wood density in trees, and it has been further developed into a system approach allowing the use of outer wood cores and knowledge of internal density distribution for predicting wood density of major tree components. Studies on the use of torsiometer, Pilodyn, and nail withdrawal tools have had very limited success and do not warrant replacement of the increment borer. Resistance drilling, on the other hand, has emerged as a potential tool for more efficient and economical collection of wood density information in trees. Conclusion The resistance drilling method has considerable advantages over other methods in terms of less damage to trees, faster operation, and higher measurement sensitivity. Internal friction is a key factor that currently hinders further application.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-476X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1286-4560
ispartof Annals of forest science., 2017-06, Vol.74 (2), p.1-13, Article 27
issn 1286-4560
1297-966X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02976522v1
source Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Density distribution
Drilling
Environment
Forestry
Forestry Management
Internal friction
Life Sciences
Nondestructive testing
Review Paper
Tree Biology
Trees
Wood
Wood Science & Technology
title A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T14%3A31%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_C6C&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20analysis%20of%20methods%20for%20rapid%20and%20nondestructive%20determination%20of%20wood%20density%20in%20standing%20trees&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20forest%20science.&rft.au=Gao,%20Shan&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.artnum=27&rft.issn=1286-4560&rft.eissn=1297-966X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_C6C%3E1880744674%3C/proquest_C6C%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880744674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true