Anti-Müllerian hormone production in the ovary: a comparative study in bovine and porcine granulosa cells
In this study, we aimed to determine the origin of the difference, in terms of anti-Müllerian hormone production, existing between the bovine and porcine ovaries. We first confirmed by quantitative real-time-Polymerase-Chain Reaction, ELISA assay and immunohistochemistry that anti-Müllerian hormone...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biology of reproduction 2020-08, Vol.103 (3), p.572-582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 582 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 572 |
container_title | Biology of reproduction |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Estienne, Anthony Jarrier, Peggy Staub, Christophe Venturi, Eric Le Vern, Yves Clemente Di, Nathalie Monniaux, Danielle Monget, Philippe |
description | In this study, we aimed to determine the origin of the difference, in terms of anti-Müllerian hormone production, existing between the bovine and porcine ovaries. We first confirmed by quantitative real-time-Polymerase-Chain Reaction, ELISA assay and immunohistochemistry that anti-Müllerian hormone mRNA and protein production are very low in porcine ovarian growing follicles compared to bovine ones. We then have transfected porcine and bovine granulosa cells with vectors containing the luciferase gene driven by the porcine or the bovine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter. These transfection experiments showed that the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter is less active and less responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulations than the bovine promoter in both porcine and bovine cells. Moreover, bovine but not porcine granulosa cells were responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulation after transfection of a plasmidic construction including a strong response element to the bone morphogenetic proteins (12 repetitions of the GCCG sequence) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. We also showed that SMAD6, an inhibitor of the SMAD1-5-8 pathway, is strongly expressed in porcine compared to the bovine granulosa cells. Overall, these results suggest that the low expression of anti-Müllerian hormone in porcine growing follicles is due to both a lack of activity/sensitivity of the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter, and to the lack of responsiveness of porcine granulosa cells to bone morphogenetic protein signaling, potentially due to an overexpression of SMAD6 compared to bovine granulosa cells. We propose that the low levels of anti-Müllerian hormone in the pig would explain the poly-ovulatory phenotype in this species. Summary Sentence The lower anti-Müllerian hormone expression in porcine than in bovine follicles is associated with a lower activity of the porcine AMH promoter and a lower sensitivity of the porcine granulosa cells to the bone morphogenetic proteins. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/biolre/ioaa077 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02973613v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A645280241</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/biolre/ioaa077</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A645280241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-930bf979b4e06db91531c0001f3c2480c83ed3b8bff35acd2f357e8915dc00973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1rFTEUhoNY7LW6dSkBNwpOm4_JfLi7FLWFW7rRdcjX9OaSScZk5kL_mzv_mAn32oIUShbncHjOy3tODgDvMDrHqKcX0gYXzYUNQqC2fQFWmJG-aknTvQQrhFBTUdrQU_A6pR1CuKaEvgKnlJQE0xXYrf1sq5s_v50z0QoPtyGOwRs4xaAXNdvgofVw3hoY9iLef4ECqjBOIorZ7g1M86LvCyHD3uY24TWcQlQlv4vCLy6k3GGcS2_AySBcMm-P8Qz8_Pb1x-VVtbn9fn253lSSUTZXPUVy6Nte1gY1WvaYUazyJHigitQdUh01mspODgNlQmmSQ2u6zOmM9S09A58Oulvh-BTtmG3zICy_Wm94qSGSqQbTPc7sxwObx_21mDTz0abiVngTlsRJjRhFNe4L-uE_dBeW6PMkmWJN17OOkUfqTjjDrR_CHIUqonzd1Ix0iNRF6_wJKj9tRqvy-geb6081qBhSimZ4GAwjXg6BHw6BHw8hN7w_ul3kaPQD_u_nH7cUlul5sc8HNtezuefwvxSazH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2456895852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-Müllerian hormone production in the ovary: a comparative study in bovine and porcine granulosa cells</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Estienne, Anthony ; Jarrier, Peggy ; Staub, Christophe ; Venturi, Eric ; Le Vern, Yves ; Clemente Di, Nathalie ; Monniaux, Danielle ; Monget, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Estienne, Anthony ; Jarrier, Peggy ; Staub, Christophe ; Venturi, Eric ; Le Vern, Yves ; Clemente Di, Nathalie ; Monniaux, Danielle ; Monget, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we aimed to determine the origin of the difference, in terms of anti-Müllerian hormone production, existing between the bovine and porcine ovaries. We first confirmed by quantitative real-time-Polymerase-Chain Reaction, ELISA assay and immunohistochemistry that anti-Müllerian hormone mRNA and protein production are very low in porcine ovarian growing follicles compared to bovine ones. We then have transfected porcine and bovine granulosa cells with vectors containing the luciferase gene driven by the porcine or the bovine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter. These transfection experiments showed that the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter is less active and less responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulations than the bovine promoter in both porcine and bovine cells. Moreover, bovine but not porcine granulosa cells were responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulation after transfection of a plasmidic construction including a strong response element to the bone morphogenetic proteins (12 repetitions of the GCCG sequence) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. We also showed that SMAD6, an inhibitor of the SMAD1-5-8 pathway, is strongly expressed in porcine compared to the bovine granulosa cells. Overall, these results suggest that the low expression of anti-Müllerian hormone in porcine growing follicles is due to both a lack of activity/sensitivity of the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter, and to the lack of responsiveness of porcine granulosa cells to bone morphogenetic protein signaling, potentially due to an overexpression of SMAD6 compared to bovine granulosa cells. We propose that the low levels of anti-Müllerian hormone in the pig would explain the poly-ovulatory phenotype in this species. Summary Sentence The lower anti-Müllerian hormone expression in porcine than in bovine follicles is associated with a lower activity of the porcine AMH promoter and a lower sensitivity of the porcine granulosa cells to the bone morphogenetic proteins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3363</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-7268</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32432313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for the Study of Reproduction</publisher><subject>AMH ; Anti-Müllerian hormone ; Bioassays ; Cattle ; granulosa ; Hogs ; Hormones ; Immunohistochemistry ; Life Sciences ; Ovaries ; Physiological aspects ; pig ; Polymerase chain reaction ; promoter ; Proteins ; Reproductive Biology ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Biology of reproduction, 2020-08, Vol.103 (3), p.572-582</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-930bf979b4e06db91531c0001f3c2480c83ed3b8bff35acd2f357e8915dc00973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-930bf979b4e06db91531c0001f3c2480c83ed3b8bff35acd2f357e8915dc00973</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3653-8737</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02973613$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estienne, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrier, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staub, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturi, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Vern, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente Di, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monniaux, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monget, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-Müllerian hormone production in the ovary: a comparative study in bovine and porcine granulosa cells</title><title>Biology of reproduction</title><addtitle>Biol Reprod</addtitle><description>In this study, we aimed to determine the origin of the difference, in terms of anti-Müllerian hormone production, existing between the bovine and porcine ovaries. We first confirmed by quantitative real-time-Polymerase-Chain Reaction, ELISA assay and immunohistochemistry that anti-Müllerian hormone mRNA and protein production are very low in porcine ovarian growing follicles compared to bovine ones. We then have transfected porcine and bovine granulosa cells with vectors containing the luciferase gene driven by the porcine or the bovine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter. These transfection experiments showed that the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter is less active and less responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulations than the bovine promoter in both porcine and bovine cells. Moreover, bovine but not porcine granulosa cells were responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulation after transfection of a plasmidic construction including a strong response element to the bone morphogenetic proteins (12 repetitions of the GCCG sequence) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. We also showed that SMAD6, an inhibitor of the SMAD1-5-8 pathway, is strongly expressed in porcine compared to the bovine granulosa cells. Overall, these results suggest that the low expression of anti-Müllerian hormone in porcine growing follicles is due to both a lack of activity/sensitivity of the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter, and to the lack of responsiveness of porcine granulosa cells to bone morphogenetic protein signaling, potentially due to an overexpression of SMAD6 compared to bovine granulosa cells. We propose that the low levels of anti-Müllerian hormone in the pig would explain the poly-ovulatory phenotype in this species. Summary Sentence The lower anti-Müllerian hormone expression in porcine than in bovine follicles is associated with a lower activity of the porcine AMH promoter and a lower sensitivity of the porcine granulosa cells to the bone morphogenetic proteins.</description><subject>AMH</subject><subject>Anti-Müllerian hormone</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>granulosa</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>pig</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>promoter</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Reproductive Biology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0006-3363</issn><issn>1529-7268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1rFTEUhoNY7LW6dSkBNwpOm4_JfLi7FLWFW7rRdcjX9OaSScZk5kL_mzv_mAn32oIUShbncHjOy3tODgDvMDrHqKcX0gYXzYUNQqC2fQFWmJG-aknTvQQrhFBTUdrQU_A6pR1CuKaEvgKnlJQE0xXYrf1sq5s_v50z0QoPtyGOwRs4xaAXNdvgofVw3hoY9iLef4ECqjBOIorZ7g1M86LvCyHD3uY24TWcQlQlv4vCLy6k3GGcS2_AySBcMm-P8Qz8_Pb1x-VVtbn9fn253lSSUTZXPUVy6Nte1gY1WvaYUazyJHigitQdUh01mspODgNlQmmSQ2u6zOmM9S09A58Oulvh-BTtmG3zICy_Wm94qSGSqQbTPc7sxwObx_21mDTz0abiVngTlsRJjRhFNe4L-uE_dBeW6PMkmWJN17OOkUfqTjjDrR_CHIUqonzd1Ix0iNRF6_wJKj9tRqvy-geb6081qBhSimZ4GAwjXg6BHw6BHw8hN7w_ul3kaPQD_u_nH7cUlul5sc8HNtezuefwvxSazH8</recordid><startdate>20200821</startdate><enddate>20200821</enddate><creator>Estienne, Anthony</creator><creator>Jarrier, Peggy</creator><creator>Staub, Christophe</creator><creator>Venturi, Eric</creator><creator>Le Vern, Yves</creator><creator>Clemente Di, Nathalie</creator><creator>Monniaux, Danielle</creator><creator>Monget, Philippe</creator><general>Society for the Study of Reproduction</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Society for the Study of Reproduction - Oxford Academic</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-8737</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200821</creationdate><title>Anti-Müllerian hormone production in the ovary: a comparative study in bovine and porcine granulosa cells</title><author>Estienne, Anthony ; Jarrier, Peggy ; Staub, Christophe ; Venturi, Eric ; Le Vern, Yves ; Clemente Di, Nathalie ; Monniaux, Danielle ; Monget, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b535t-930bf979b4e06db91531c0001f3c2480c83ed3b8bff35acd2f357e8915dc00973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>AMH</topic><topic>Anti-Müllerian hormone</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>granulosa</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>pig</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>promoter</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Reproductive Biology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estienne, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrier, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staub, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturi, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Vern, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente Di, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monniaux, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monget, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Biology of reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estienne, Anthony</au><au>Jarrier, Peggy</au><au>Staub, Christophe</au><au>Venturi, Eric</au><au>Le Vern, Yves</au><au>Clemente Di, Nathalie</au><au>Monniaux, Danielle</au><au>Monget, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-Müllerian hormone production in the ovary: a comparative study in bovine and porcine granulosa cells</atitle><jtitle>Biology of reproduction</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Reprod</addtitle><date>2020-08-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>572-582</pages><issn>0006-3363</issn><eissn>1529-7268</eissn><abstract>In this study, we aimed to determine the origin of the difference, in terms of anti-Müllerian hormone production, existing between the bovine and porcine ovaries. We first confirmed by quantitative real-time-Polymerase-Chain Reaction, ELISA assay and immunohistochemistry that anti-Müllerian hormone mRNA and protein production are very low in porcine ovarian growing follicles compared to bovine ones. We then have transfected porcine and bovine granulosa cells with vectors containing the luciferase gene driven by the porcine or the bovine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter. These transfection experiments showed that the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter is less active and less responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulations than the bovine promoter in both porcine and bovine cells. Moreover, bovine but not porcine granulosa cells were responsive to bone morphogenetic protein stimulation after transfection of a plasmidic construction including a strong response element to the bone morphogenetic proteins (12 repetitions of the GCCG sequence) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. We also showed that SMAD6, an inhibitor of the SMAD1-5-8 pathway, is strongly expressed in porcine compared to the bovine granulosa cells. Overall, these results suggest that the low expression of anti-Müllerian hormone in porcine growing follicles is due to both a lack of activity/sensitivity of the porcine anti-Müllerian hormone promoter, and to the lack of responsiveness of porcine granulosa cells to bone morphogenetic protein signaling, potentially due to an overexpression of SMAD6 compared to bovine granulosa cells. We propose that the low levels of anti-Müllerian hormone in the pig would explain the poly-ovulatory phenotype in this species. Summary Sentence The lower anti-Müllerian hormone expression in porcine than in bovine follicles is associated with a lower activity of the porcine AMH promoter and a lower sensitivity of the porcine granulosa cells to the bone morphogenetic proteins.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for the Study of Reproduction</pub><pmid>32432313</pmid><doi>10.1093/biolre/ioaa077</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-8737</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3363 |
ispartof | Biology of reproduction, 2020-08, Vol.103 (3), p.572-582 |
issn | 0006-3363 1529-7268 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02973613v1 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | AMH Anti-Müllerian hormone Bioassays Cattle granulosa Hogs Hormones Immunohistochemistry Life Sciences Ovaries Physiological aspects pig Polymerase chain reaction promoter Proteins Reproductive Biology Swine |
title | Anti-Müllerian hormone production in the ovary: a comparative study in bovine and porcine granulosa cells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A16%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-M%C3%BCllerian%20hormone%20production%20in%20the%20ovary:%20a%20comparative%20study%20in%20bovine%20and%20porcine%20granulosa%20cells&rft.jtitle=Biology%20of%20reproduction&rft.au=Estienne,%20Anthony&rft.date=2020-08-21&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=572-582&rft.issn=0006-3363&rft.eissn=1529-7268&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/biolre/ioaa077&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA645280241%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2456895852&rft_id=info:pmid/32432313&rft_galeid=A645280241&rft_oup_id=10.1093/biolre/ioaa077&rfr_iscdi=true |