Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis
Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behaviour 2014-01, Vol.151 (12-13), p.1903-1920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1920 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12-13 |
container_start_page | 1903 |
container_title | Behaviour |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Aubret, Fabien Tort, Mélodie Michniewicz, Radika J Blanvillain, Gaëlle Coulon, Aurélie |
description | Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/1568539X-00003222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02972146v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24526464</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24526464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b417t-53817fef4a9d50abb4d5967fa21ad4e5a8de4dee7af278bb89cb456dc4b5e0853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhUVpoNOkD9BFQcsE4sSSJctehTAkTWCgXbTQnbiyrjsaNNZEsvP3NH2WPlk1OMmy2gh995yDOJeQz6w8Y6yuzpmsG1m1v4oyn4pz_o4s9qzYw_dkkaksVCvbD-RjSpv8VLKSCxKXIewwwog0RNqF7Q5HvKC3Q-8nHLpMe5rwkcJgqQn2iSb3nOFA0xr9iNENv6nBNdy7MEXqBjqukT6A99S7Z4j2lH4PFmLn0t8_2ymCd-mIHPTgE356uQ_Jz-urH8ubYvXt6-3yclUYwdSYP94w1WMvoLWyBGOElW2teuAMrEAJjUVhERX0XDXGNG1nhKxtJ4zEMpdxSE7m3DV4vYtuC_FJB3D65nKl96zkreJM1Pcsa49n7S6GuwnTqLcudeg9DBimpHPFsmSVaFSWslnaxZBSxP4tm5V6vwv9ugv9uovs-TJ7NmkM8c3AheS1qEWen89zE533epO7HHI1_0n8B4v0laI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635013487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Aubret, Fabien ; Tort, Mélodie ; Michniewicz, Radika J ; Blanvillain, Gaëlle ; Coulon, Aurélie</creator><creatorcontrib>Aubret, Fabien ; Tort, Mélodie ; Michniewicz, Radika J ; Blanvillain, Gaëlle ; Coulon, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><description>Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-539X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Brill</publisher><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Lacertilia ; Podarcis muralis</subject><ispartof>Behaviour, 2014-01, Vol.151 (12-13), p.1903-1920</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.</rights><rights>2014 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b417t-53817fef4a9d50abb4d5967fa21ad4e5a8de4dee7af278bb89cb456dc4b5e0853</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0309-2214 ; 0000-0002-7783-8659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24526464$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24526464$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-02972146$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aubret, Fabien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tort, Mélodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michniewicz, Radika J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulon, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><title>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</title><title>Behaviour</title><description>Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.</description><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Podarcis muralis</subject><issn>0005-7959</issn><issn>1568-539X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhUVpoNOkD9BFQcsE4sSSJctehTAkTWCgXbTQnbiyrjsaNNZEsvP3NH2WPlk1OMmy2gh995yDOJeQz6w8Y6yuzpmsG1m1v4oyn4pz_o4s9qzYw_dkkaksVCvbD-RjSpv8VLKSCxKXIewwwog0RNqF7Q5HvKC3Q-8nHLpMe5rwkcJgqQn2iSb3nOFA0xr9iNENv6nBNdy7MEXqBjqukT6A99S7Z4j2lH4PFmLn0t8_2ymCd-mIHPTgE356uQ_Jz-urH8ubYvXt6-3yclUYwdSYP94w1WMvoLWyBGOElW2teuAMrEAJjUVhERX0XDXGNG1nhKxtJ4zEMpdxSE7m3DV4vYtuC_FJB3D65nKl96zkreJM1Pcsa49n7S6GuwnTqLcudeg9DBimpHPFsmSVaFSWslnaxZBSxP4tm5V6vwv9ugv9uovs-TJ7NmkM8c3AheS1qEWen89zE533epO7HHI1_0n8B4v0laI</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Aubret, Fabien</creator><creator>Tort, Mélodie</creator><creator>Michniewicz, Radika J</creator><creator>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</creator><creator>Coulon, Aurélie</creator><general>Brill</general><general>Brill Academic Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-2214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-8659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</title><author>Aubret, Fabien ; Tort, Mélodie ; Michniewicz, Radika J ; Blanvillain, Gaëlle ; Coulon, Aurélie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b417t-53817fef4a9d50abb4d5967fa21ad4e5a8de4dee7af278bb89cb456dc4b5e0853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Podarcis muralis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aubret, Fabien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tort, Mélodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michniewicz, Radika J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulon, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aubret, Fabien</au><au>Tort, Mélodie</au><au>Michniewicz, Radika J</au><au>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</au><au>Coulon, Aurélie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>12-13</issue><spage>1903</spage><epage>1920</epage><pages>1903-1920</pages><issn>0005-7959</issn><eissn>1568-539X</eissn><abstract>Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/1568539X-00003222</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-2214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-8659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-7959 |
ispartof | Behaviour, 2014-01, Vol.151 (12-13), p.1903-1920 |
issn | 0005-7959 1568-539X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02972146v1 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Biodiversity and Ecology Environmental Sciences Lacertilia Podarcis muralis |
title | Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooperate%20or%20compete?%20Influence%20of%20sex%20and%20body%20size%20on%20sheltering%20behaviour%20in%20the%20wall%20lizard,%20Podarcis%C2%A0muralis&rft.jtitle=Behaviour&rft.au=Aubret,%20Fabien&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=12-13&rft.spage=1903&rft.epage=1920&rft.pages=1903-1920&rft.issn=0005-7959&rft.eissn=1568-539X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/1568539X-00003222&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24526464%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635013487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24526464&rfr_iscdi=true |