Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis

Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behaviour 2014-01, Vol.151 (12-13), p.1903-1920
Hauptverfasser: Aubret, Fabien, Tort, Mélodie, Michniewicz, Radika J, Blanvillain, Gaëlle, Coulon, Aurélie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1920
container_issue 12-13
container_start_page 1903
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 151
creator Aubret, Fabien
Tort, Mélodie
Michniewicz, Radika J
Blanvillain, Gaëlle
Coulon, Aurélie
description Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/1568539X-00003222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02972146v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24526464</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24526464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b417t-53817fef4a9d50abb4d5967fa21ad4e5a8de4dee7af278bb89cb456dc4b5e0853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhUVpoNOkD9BFQcsE4sSSJctehTAkTWCgXbTQnbiyrjsaNNZEsvP3NH2WPlk1OMmy2gh995yDOJeQz6w8Y6yuzpmsG1m1v4oyn4pz_o4s9qzYw_dkkaksVCvbD-RjSpv8VLKSCxKXIewwwog0RNqF7Q5HvKC3Q-8nHLpMe5rwkcJgqQn2iSb3nOFA0xr9iNENv6nBNdy7MEXqBjqukT6A99S7Z4j2lH4PFmLn0t8_2ymCd-mIHPTgE356uQ_Jz-urH8ubYvXt6-3yclUYwdSYP94w1WMvoLWyBGOElW2teuAMrEAJjUVhERX0XDXGNG1nhKxtJ4zEMpdxSE7m3DV4vYtuC_FJB3D65nKl96zkreJM1Pcsa49n7S6GuwnTqLcudeg9DBimpHPFsmSVaFSWslnaxZBSxP4tm5V6vwv9ugv9uovs-TJ7NmkM8c3AheS1qEWen89zE533epO7HHI1_0n8B4v0laI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1635013487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Aubret, Fabien ; Tort, Mélodie ; Michniewicz, Radika J ; Blanvillain, Gaëlle ; Coulon, Aurélie</creator><creatorcontrib>Aubret, Fabien ; Tort, Mélodie ; Michniewicz, Radika J ; Blanvillain, Gaëlle ; Coulon, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><description>Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-539X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Brill</publisher><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Lacertilia ; Podarcis muralis</subject><ispartof>Behaviour, 2014-01, Vol.151 (12-13), p.1903-1920</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2014 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.</rights><rights>2014 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b417t-53817fef4a9d50abb4d5967fa21ad4e5a8de4dee7af278bb89cb456dc4b5e0853</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0309-2214 ; 0000-0002-7783-8659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24526464$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24526464$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-02972146$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aubret, Fabien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tort, Mélodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michniewicz, Radika J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulon, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><title>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</title><title>Behaviour</title><description>Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.</description><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Podarcis muralis</subject><issn>0005-7959</issn><issn>1568-539X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhUVpoNOkD9BFQcsE4sSSJctehTAkTWCgXbTQnbiyrjsaNNZEsvP3NH2WPlk1OMmy2gh995yDOJeQz6w8Y6yuzpmsG1m1v4oyn4pz_o4s9qzYw_dkkaksVCvbD-RjSpv8VLKSCxKXIewwwog0RNqF7Q5HvKC3Q-8nHLpMe5rwkcJgqQn2iSb3nOFA0xr9iNENv6nBNdy7MEXqBjqukT6A99S7Z4j2lH4PFmLn0t8_2ymCd-mIHPTgE356uQ_Jz-urH8ubYvXt6-3yclUYwdSYP94w1WMvoLWyBGOElW2teuAMrEAJjUVhERX0XDXGNG1nhKxtJ4zEMpdxSE7m3DV4vYtuC_FJB3D65nKl96zkreJM1Pcsa49n7S6GuwnTqLcudeg9DBimpHPFsmSVaFSWslnaxZBSxP4tm5V6vwv9ugv9uovs-TJ7NmkM8c3AheS1qEWen89zE533epO7HHI1_0n8B4v0laI</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Aubret, Fabien</creator><creator>Tort, Mélodie</creator><creator>Michniewicz, Radika J</creator><creator>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</creator><creator>Coulon, Aurélie</creator><general>Brill</general><general>Brill Academic Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-2214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-8659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</title><author>Aubret, Fabien ; Tort, Mélodie ; Michniewicz, Radika J ; Blanvillain, Gaëlle ; Coulon, Aurélie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b417t-53817fef4a9d50abb4d5967fa21ad4e5a8de4dee7af278bb89cb456dc4b5e0853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Podarcis muralis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aubret, Fabien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tort, Mélodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michniewicz, Radika J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulon, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aubret, Fabien</au><au>Tort, Mélodie</au><au>Michniewicz, Radika J</au><au>Blanvillain, Gaëlle</au><au>Coulon, Aurélie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>12-13</issue><spage>1903</spage><epage>1920</epage><pages>1903-1920</pages><issn>0005-7959</issn><eissn>1568-539X</eissn><abstract>Reptile sheltering behaviour, despite profound life history ramifications, remains poorly investigated. Whether or not individuals share a suitable shelter or, conversely, exclude conspecifics may depend on associated costs (resource partitioning, sexual harassment, disease or parasite contamination) and benefits (predation risk dilution, thermal resilience, information sharing). We performed two experiments on field caught wall lizards (Podarcis muralis), a highly territorial species, to investigate the relative roles of sex and body size in night sheltering. In the first experiment, random pairs of lizards were offered two identical shelters. Lizards either shared a shelter, or sheltered separately. In the second experiment, different random pairs of lizards were offered only one shelter so as to elicit a share or compete response. Body size and sex both appeared as significant drivers for sheltering patterns. Unexpectedly, wall lizards often chose to share shelters. When only one shelter (too small to accommodate two adult lizards) was available, many lizards rejected the sheltering option in preference for aggregation. Such aggregative behaviour was not sex dependant, and may reflect thermoregulatory or anti-predatory benefits. Our results nevertheless suggest that cooperative behaviour may exist in wall lizards.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/1568539X-00003222</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0309-2214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-8659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7959
ispartof Behaviour, 2014-01, Vol.151 (12-13), p.1903-1920
issn 0005-7959
1568-539X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02972146v1
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Biodiversity and Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Lacertilia
Podarcis muralis
title Cooperate or compete? Influence of sex and body size on sheltering behaviour in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooperate%20or%20compete?%20Influence%20of%20sex%20and%20body%20size%20on%20sheltering%20behaviour%20in%20the%20wall%20lizard,%20Podarcis%C2%A0muralis&rft.jtitle=Behaviour&rft.au=Aubret,%20Fabien&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=12-13&rft.spage=1903&rft.epage=1920&rft.pages=1903-1920&rft.issn=0005-7959&rft.eissn=1568-539X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/1568539X-00003222&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E24526464%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1635013487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24526464&rfr_iscdi=true