Overall survival among chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer patients under abiraterone versus enzalutamide: a direct comparison based on a 2014-2018 French population study (the SPEAR cohort)

Abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are considered to be clinically relevant comparators among chemotherapy-naive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. No clinical trials comparing overall survival with ABI versus ENZ in a head-to-head approach have been published so far....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of epidemiology 2021-02, Vol.190 (3), p.413-422
Hauptverfasser: Scailteux, Lucie-Marie, Campillo-Gimenez, Boris, Kerbrat, Sandrine, Despas, Fabien, Mathieu, Romain, Vincendeau, Sébastien, Balusson, Frédéric, Happe, André, Nowak, Emmanuel, Oger, Emmanuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are considered to be clinically relevant comparators among chemotherapy-naive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. No clinical trials comparing overall survival with ABI versus ENZ in a head-to-head approach have been published so far. A few observational studies with low power suggested a potential benefit of ENZ. We used the French National Health Data System to compare overall survival of new users of ABI and ENZ among chemotherapy-naive patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer in 2014-2017, followed through 2018 (the SPEAR cohort, a 2014-2018 cohort study). With an intent-to-treat approach, a survival analysis was performed, estimating hazard ratios for overall survival with the inverse probability weighted Cox model method. Among 10,308 new users, 64% were treated with ABI and 36% with ENZ. The crude mortality rate was 25.2 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI): 24.4, 26.0) for ABI and 23.7 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 22.6, 24.9) for ENZ. In the weighted analysis, ENZ was associated with better overall survival compared with ABI (hazard ratio = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.96) with a median overall survival of 31.7 months for ABI and 34.2 months for ENZ). When restricting to 2015-2017 new users, the effect estimate shifted up to a hazard ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.01).
ISSN:0002-9262
1476-6256
DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaa190