Gain in biodiversity but not in phytostabilization after 3 years of ecological restoration of contaminated Mediterranean soils
Recent studies consider the native flora as a potential source of plant candidates for phytostabilization of metal and metalloid (MM) contaminated soils, but ecological restoration is not the main objective of these researches. However, in contaminated areas, phytostabilization should be considered...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological engineering 2020-10, Vol.157, p.105998, Article 105998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105998 |
container_title | Ecological engineering |
container_volume | 157 |
creator | Tosini, L. Folzer, H. Heckenroth, A. Prudent, P. Santonja, M. Farnet, A.-M. Salducci, M.-D. Vassalo, L. Labrousse, Y. Oursel, B. Laffont-Schwob, I. |
description | Recent studies consider the native flora as a potential source of plant candidates for phytostabilization of metal and metalloid (MM) contaminated soils, but ecological restoration is not the main objective of these researches. However, in contaminated areas, phytostabilization should be considered as a useful tool for ecological restoration. The present study takes stock of 3 years of a Mediterranean pilot site implementation using native plant species to recover plant and microbial communities (diversity and functions) together with soil remediation in the Calanques National Park. To determine the success of this operation, three in situ treatments were compared: ecological restoration plots characterized by the handling of physical environment (creation of cultivation terraces) and plants, negative control plots without vegetation but with the same physical environment handling as ecological restoration plots, and positive control plots with natural vegetation and no handling. The results suggest that an ecological restoration trajectory is initiated in the ecological restoration plots, characterized by a partial permanent plant cover. However, there is no evidence of a significant improvement of soil quality (evaluated by soil texture, pH, nutrients and organic carbon contents, cation exchange capacity, microbial biomass and activities) and phytostabilization efficiency after 3 years. Native plant communities and their associated microorganisms may need more time before improving soil quality and MM stabilization under the drastic Mediterranean conditions. Any amendment addition to accelerate restoration and MM immobilization was forbidden in this protected area. Under such conditions, an active restoration need to be carried out in this contaminated area even if resilient dynamics of the native plant communities may sporadically occur over a long period of time.
[Display omitted]
•Metal and metalloid soil contamination slows down the ecological restoration dynamics.•Native plants transplanted in Mediterranean contaminated soils persist after 3 years.•Active ecological restoration allows the creation of favorable micro-niches for plants.•Metal and metalloid phytostabilization efficiency is not evidenced after 3 years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105998 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02919816v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092585742030286X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2461618441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-514f9c5d0690837d5cffeeea144ef906333a4f3884ebe8aef7656a8b75cfcb983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFqFDEYhQdRcK0-ghDwyovZJjNJJrmSUmwrrHij1-GfzJ82yzRZk-zC9sZX8Vl8MjNM8VYIBE6-c5I_p2neM7pllMnL_RZtnDHcbzvaLZrQWr1oNkwNXSu17l42G6o70Sox8NfNm5z3lNKhE3rT_LoFH0hdo4-TP2HKvpzJeCwkxLLoh4dzibnA6Gf_BMXHQMAVTKT_8_uMkDKJjiz3x3tvYSYJc4lpBeuJjaHAow9QcCJfcfLVmiAgBJKjn_Pb5pWDOeO75_2i-XHz-fv1Xbv7dvvl-mrXWs5UaQXjTlsxUamp6odJWOcQERjn6DSVfd8Dd71SHEdUgG6QQoIahwraUav-ovm45j7AbA7JP0I6mwje3F3tzKLRTjOtmDyxyn5Y2UOKP491HrOPxxTq80zHJZNMcb5QYqVsijkndP9iGTVLL2ZvnnsxSy9m7aX6Pq0-rOOePCaTrcdg698ktMVM0f8n4S_6zZxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461618441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gain in biodiversity but not in phytostabilization after 3 years of ecological restoration of contaminated Mediterranean soils</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tosini, L. ; Folzer, H. ; Heckenroth, A. ; Prudent, P. ; Santonja, M. ; Farnet, A.-M. ; Salducci, M.-D. ; Vassalo, L. ; Labrousse, Y. ; Oursel, B. ; Laffont-Schwob, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tosini, L. ; Folzer, H. ; Heckenroth, A. ; Prudent, P. ; Santonja, M. ; Farnet, A.-M. ; Salducci, M.-D. ; Vassalo, L. ; Labrousse, Y. ; Oursel, B. ; Laffont-Schwob, I.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies consider the native flora as a potential source of plant candidates for phytostabilization of metal and metalloid (MM) contaminated soils, but ecological restoration is not the main objective of these researches. However, in contaminated areas, phytostabilization should be considered as a useful tool for ecological restoration. The present study takes stock of 3 years of a Mediterranean pilot site implementation using native plant species to recover plant and microbial communities (diversity and functions) together with soil remediation in the Calanques National Park. To determine the success of this operation, three in situ treatments were compared: ecological restoration plots characterized by the handling of physical environment (creation of cultivation terraces) and plants, negative control plots without vegetation but with the same physical environment handling as ecological restoration plots, and positive control plots with natural vegetation and no handling. The results suggest that an ecological restoration trajectory is initiated in the ecological restoration plots, characterized by a partial permanent plant cover. However, there is no evidence of a significant improvement of soil quality (evaluated by soil texture, pH, nutrients and organic carbon contents, cation exchange capacity, microbial biomass and activities) and phytostabilization efficiency after 3 years. Native plant communities and their associated microorganisms may need more time before improving soil quality and MM stabilization under the drastic Mediterranean conditions. Any amendment addition to accelerate restoration and MM immobilization was forbidden in this protected area. Under such conditions, an active restoration need to be carried out in this contaminated area even if resilient dynamics of the native plant communities may sporadically occur over a long period of time.
[Display omitted]
•Metal and metalloid soil contamination slows down the ecological restoration dynamics.•Native plants transplanted in Mediterranean contaminated soils persist after 3 years.•Active ecological restoration allows the creation of favorable micro-niches for plants.•Metal and metalloid phytostabilization efficiency is not evidenced after 3 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105998</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Active restoration ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Cation exchange ; Cation exchanging ; Cations ; Cultivation ; Ecological effects ; Environmental restoration ; Environmental Sciences ; Exchange capacity ; Field experiment ; Flora ; Handling ; Immobilization ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Mediterranean protected area ; Metals ; Metals and metalloids ; Microbial activity ; Microorganisms ; National parks ; Native plant communities ; Natural vegetation ; Nutrients ; Organic carbon ; Plant communities ; Plant control ; Plant diversity ; Plant populations ; Plants ; Plants (botany) ; Protected areas ; Resilient dynamics ; Restoration ; Sediment pollution ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil improvement ; Soil pollution ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; Soil remediation ; Soil stabilization ; Soil texture ; Soils ; Terraces ; Texture ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2020-10, Vol.157, p.105998, Article 105998</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 1, 2020</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-514f9c5d0690837d5cffeeea144ef906333a4f3884ebe8aef7656a8b75cfcb983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-514f9c5d0690837d5cffeeea144ef906333a4f3884ebe8aef7656a8b75cfcb983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3630-6450 ; 0000-0001-6603-1174 ; 0000-0002-6553-5992 ; 0000-0002-6322-6352 ; 0009-0000-9644-1465 ; 0000-0002-8709-3304 ; 0000-0001-9127-9454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02919816$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tosini, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folzer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckenroth, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prudent, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonja, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnet, A.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salducci, M.-D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassalo, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrousse, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oursel, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laffont-Schwob, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Gain in biodiversity but not in phytostabilization after 3 years of ecological restoration of contaminated Mediterranean soils</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>Recent studies consider the native flora as a potential source of plant candidates for phytostabilization of metal and metalloid (MM) contaminated soils, but ecological restoration is not the main objective of these researches. However, in contaminated areas, phytostabilization should be considered as a useful tool for ecological restoration. The present study takes stock of 3 years of a Mediterranean pilot site implementation using native plant species to recover plant and microbial communities (diversity and functions) together with soil remediation in the Calanques National Park. To determine the success of this operation, three in situ treatments were compared: ecological restoration plots characterized by the handling of physical environment (creation of cultivation terraces) and plants, negative control plots without vegetation but with the same physical environment handling as ecological restoration plots, and positive control plots with natural vegetation and no handling. The results suggest that an ecological restoration trajectory is initiated in the ecological restoration plots, characterized by a partial permanent plant cover. However, there is no evidence of a significant improvement of soil quality (evaluated by soil texture, pH, nutrients and organic carbon contents, cation exchange capacity, microbial biomass and activities) and phytostabilization efficiency after 3 years. Native plant communities and their associated microorganisms may need more time before improving soil quality and MM stabilization under the drastic Mediterranean conditions. Any amendment addition to accelerate restoration and MM immobilization was forbidden in this protected area. Under such conditions, an active restoration need to be carried out in this contaminated area even if resilient dynamics of the native plant communities may sporadically occur over a long period of time.
[Display omitted]
•Metal and metalloid soil contamination slows down the ecological restoration dynamics.•Native plants transplanted in Mediterranean contaminated soils persist after 3 years.•Active ecological restoration allows the creation of favorable micro-niches for plants.•Metal and metalloid phytostabilization efficiency is not evidenced after 3 years.</description><subject>Active restoration</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Cation exchange</subject><subject>Cation exchanging</subject><subject>Cations</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exchange capacity</subject><subject>Field experiment</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Handling</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Mediterranean protected area</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Metals and metalloids</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Native plant communities</subject><subject>Natural vegetation</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant control</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Resilient dynamics</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Soil stabilization</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Terraces</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdFqFDEYhQdRcK0-ghDwyovZJjNJJrmSUmwrrHij1-GfzJ82yzRZk-zC9sZX8Vl8MjNM8VYIBE6-c5I_p2neM7pllMnL_RZtnDHcbzvaLZrQWr1oNkwNXSu17l42G6o70Sox8NfNm5z3lNKhE3rT_LoFH0hdo4-TP2HKvpzJeCwkxLLoh4dzibnA6Gf_BMXHQMAVTKT_8_uMkDKJjiz3x3tvYSYJc4lpBeuJjaHAow9QcCJfcfLVmiAgBJKjn_Pb5pWDOeO75_2i-XHz-fv1Xbv7dvvl-mrXWs5UaQXjTlsxUamp6odJWOcQERjn6DSVfd8Dd71SHEdUgG6QQoIahwraUav-ovm45j7AbA7JP0I6mwje3F3tzKLRTjOtmDyxyn5Y2UOKP491HrOPxxTq80zHJZNMcb5QYqVsijkndP9iGTVLL2ZvnnsxSy9m7aX6Pq0-rOOePCaTrcdg698ktMVM0f8n4S_6zZxM</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Tosini, L.</creator><creator>Folzer, H.</creator><creator>Heckenroth, A.</creator><creator>Prudent, P.</creator><creator>Santonja, M.</creator><creator>Farnet, A.-M.</creator><creator>Salducci, M.-D.</creator><creator>Vassalo, L.</creator><creator>Labrousse, Y.</creator><creator>Oursel, B.</creator><creator>Laffont-Schwob, I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-6450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-1174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-5992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-6352</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9644-1465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8709-3304</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-9454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Gain in biodiversity but not in phytostabilization after 3 years of ecological restoration of contaminated Mediterranean soils</title><author>Tosini, L. ; Folzer, H. ; Heckenroth, A. ; Prudent, P. ; Santonja, M. ; Farnet, A.-M. ; Salducci, M.-D. ; Vassalo, L. ; Labrousse, Y. ; Oursel, B. ; Laffont-Schwob, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-514f9c5d0690837d5cffeeea144ef906333a4f3884ebe8aef7656a8b75cfcb983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Active restoration</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Cation exchange</topic><topic>Cation exchanging</topic><topic>Cations</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exchange capacity</topic><topic>Field experiment</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Handling</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Mediterranean protected area</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Metals and metalloids</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Native plant communities</topic><topic>Natural vegetation</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant control</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Resilient dynamics</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Soil stabilization</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Terraces</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tosini, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folzer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heckenroth, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prudent, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonja, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnet, A.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salducci, M.-D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassalo, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrousse, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oursel, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laffont-Schwob, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tosini, L.</au><au>Folzer, H.</au><au>Heckenroth, A.</au><au>Prudent, P.</au><au>Santonja, M.</au><au>Farnet, A.-M.</au><au>Salducci, M.-D.</au><au>Vassalo, L.</au><au>Labrousse, Y.</au><au>Oursel, B.</au><au>Laffont-Schwob, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gain in biodiversity but not in phytostabilization after 3 years of ecological restoration of contaminated Mediterranean soils</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>105998</spage><pages>105998-</pages><artnum>105998</artnum><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>Recent studies consider the native flora as a potential source of plant candidates for phytostabilization of metal and metalloid (MM) contaminated soils, but ecological restoration is not the main objective of these researches. However, in contaminated areas, phytostabilization should be considered as a useful tool for ecological restoration. The present study takes stock of 3 years of a Mediterranean pilot site implementation using native plant species to recover plant and microbial communities (diversity and functions) together with soil remediation in the Calanques National Park. To determine the success of this operation, three in situ treatments were compared: ecological restoration plots characterized by the handling of physical environment (creation of cultivation terraces) and plants, negative control plots without vegetation but with the same physical environment handling as ecological restoration plots, and positive control plots with natural vegetation and no handling. The results suggest that an ecological restoration trajectory is initiated in the ecological restoration plots, characterized by a partial permanent plant cover. However, there is no evidence of a significant improvement of soil quality (evaluated by soil texture, pH, nutrients and organic carbon contents, cation exchange capacity, microbial biomass and activities) and phytostabilization efficiency after 3 years. Native plant communities and their associated microorganisms may need more time before improving soil quality and MM stabilization under the drastic Mediterranean conditions. Any amendment addition to accelerate restoration and MM immobilization was forbidden in this protected area. Under such conditions, an active restoration need to be carried out in this contaminated area even if resilient dynamics of the native plant communities may sporadically occur over a long period of time.
[Display omitted]
•Metal and metalloid soil contamination slows down the ecological restoration dynamics.•Native plants transplanted in Mediterranean contaminated soils persist after 3 years.•Active ecological restoration allows the creation of favorable micro-niches for plants.•Metal and metalloid phytostabilization efficiency is not evidenced after 3 years.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105998</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-6450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-1174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-5992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-6352</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9644-1465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8709-3304</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-9454</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-8574 |
ispartof | Ecological engineering, 2020-10, Vol.157, p.105998, Article 105998 |
issn | 0925-8574 1872-6992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02919816v1 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Active restoration Biodiversity Biodiversity and Ecology Cation exchange Cation exchanging Cations Cultivation Ecological effects Environmental restoration Environmental Sciences Exchange capacity Field experiment Flora Handling Immobilization Indigenous plants Indigenous species Mediterranean protected area Metals Metals and metalloids Microbial activity Microorganisms National parks Native plant communities Natural vegetation Nutrients Organic carbon Plant communities Plant control Plant diversity Plant populations Plants Plants (botany) Protected areas Resilient dynamics Restoration Sediment pollution Soil Soil contamination Soil improvement Soil pollution Soil properties Soil quality Soil remediation Soil stabilization Soil texture Soils Terraces Texture Vegetation |
title | Gain in biodiversity but not in phytostabilization after 3 years of ecological restoration of contaminated Mediterranean soils |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A51%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gain%20in%20biodiversity%20but%20not%20in%20phytostabilization%20after%203%C2%A0years%20of%20ecological%20restoration%20of%20contaminated%20Mediterranean%20soils&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Tosini,%20L.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=105998&rft.pages=105998-&rft.artnum=105998&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2461618441%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461618441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S092585742030286X&rfr_iscdi=true |