When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection

This consensus paper presents the results of a workshop held in Essen, Germany in September 2017, called to examine critically the current approach to radiological environmental protection. The meeting brought together participants from the field of low dose radiobiology and those working in radioec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research 2018-04, Vol.162, p.318-324
Hauptverfasser: Mothersill, Carmel, Abend, Michael, Bréchignac, François, Iliakis, George, Impens, Nathalie, Kadhim, Munira, Møller, Anders Pape, Oughton, Deborah, Powathil, Gibin, Saenen, Eline, Seymour, Colin, Sutcliffe, Jill, Tang, Fen-Ru, Schofield, Paul N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 324
container_issue
container_start_page 318
container_title Environmental research
container_volume 162
creator Mothersill, Carmel
Abend, Michael
Bréchignac, François
Iliakis, George
Impens, Nathalie
Kadhim, Munira
Møller, Anders Pape
Oughton, Deborah
Powathil, Gibin
Saenen, Eline
Seymour, Colin
Sutcliffe, Jill
Tang, Fen-Ru
Schofield, Paul N.
description This consensus paper presents the results of a workshop held in Essen, Germany in September 2017, called to examine critically the current approach to radiological environmental protection. The meeting brought together participants from the field of low dose radiobiology and those working in radioecology. Both groups have a common aim of identifying radiation exposures and protecting populations and individuals from harmful effects of ionising radiation exposure, but rarely work closely together. A key question in radiobiology is to understand mechanisms triggered by low doses or dose rates, leading to adverse outcomes of individuals while in radioecology a key objective is to recognise when harm is occurring at the level of the ecosystem. The discussion provided a total of six strategic recommendations which would help to address these questions. •The importance of gathering large, complex and broad datasets from contaminated and control sites.•Using environmental data to contextualise findings in key species where a holistic view of the ecosystem is unfeasible.•Recognition of the importance of multi-stressors in the analysis of radiation effects especially in the context of low dose.•The importance of historic dose and non-targeted radiation effects.•Utility of applying biomarkers from radiation biology to individual organisms; need for population biomarkers of fitness.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02871808v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013935118300215</els_id><sourcerecordid>1999191887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-76543a9375e788a410dc893dbb99ed9d6352c8201937a620391115444621b9463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi0EomnhDRDyEQ67eGzvri0kpKqCtlKkXoo4Wo49URw2drA3QX17HG3osafxWN_MP_MPIR-AtcCg_7JtMR4zlpYzUC2DlnH-iiyA6b5huhOvyYIxEI0WHVyQy1K2NYVOsLfkgmvJhqEXC-J-bTBSS_3B_aah0Jimc_a1xoh_aYgTZh-KC_sxRJufaHmK0wZLpdcp0zpFyCnuME52pNn6YKeQIt3nNKE7Pd-RN2s7Fnx_jlfk54_vjzd3zfLh9v7metk4KfnUDH0nhdVi6HBQykpg3ikt_GqlNXrte9Fxp-q2FbE9Z0JD3UdK2XNYadmLK_J57ruxo9nnsKvDmmSDubtemtMf42oAxdQRKvtpZuuYfw5YJrOrK-I42ojpUAxorUGDUkNF5Yy6nErJuH7uDcycTmG2Zj6FOZ3CMKhCvJZ9PCscVjv0z0X_va_AtxnA6skxYDbVY4wOfcjVOONTeFnhHyPKmq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1999191887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mothersill, Carmel ; Abend, Michael ; Bréchignac, François ; Iliakis, George ; Impens, Nathalie ; Kadhim, Munira ; Møller, Anders Pape ; Oughton, Deborah ; Powathil, Gibin ; Saenen, Eline ; Seymour, Colin ; Sutcliffe, Jill ; Tang, Fen-Ru ; Schofield, Paul N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel ; Abend, Michael ; Bréchignac, François ; Iliakis, George ; Impens, Nathalie ; Kadhim, Munira ; Møller, Anders Pape ; Oughton, Deborah ; Powathil, Gibin ; Saenen, Eline ; Seymour, Colin ; Sutcliffe, Jill ; Tang, Fen-Ru ; Schofield, Paul N.</creatorcontrib><description>This consensus paper presents the results of a workshop held in Essen, Germany in September 2017, called to examine critically the current approach to radiological environmental protection. The meeting brought together participants from the field of low dose radiobiology and those working in radioecology. Both groups have a common aim of identifying radiation exposures and protecting populations and individuals from harmful effects of ionising radiation exposure, but rarely work closely together. A key question in radiobiology is to understand mechanisms triggered by low doses or dose rates, leading to adverse outcomes of individuals while in radioecology a key objective is to recognise when harm is occurring at the level of the ecosystem. The discussion provided a total of six strategic recommendations which would help to address these questions. •The importance of gathering large, complex and broad datasets from contaminated and control sites.•Using environmental data to contextualise findings in key species where a holistic view of the ecosystem is unfeasible.•Recognition of the importance of multi-stressors in the analysis of radiation effects especially in the context of low dose.•The importance of historic dose and non-targeted radiation effects.•Utility of applying biomarkers from radiation biology to individual organisms; need for population biomarkers of fitness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29407763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources ; Environment ; Germany ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Low dose ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection ; Radiobiology ; Radioecology ; Reference animals and plants</subject><ispartof>Environmental research, 2018-04, Vol.162, p.318-324</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-76543a9375e788a410dc893dbb99ed9d6352c8201937a620391115444621b9463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-76543a9375e788a410dc893dbb99ed9d6352c8201937a620391115444621b9463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29407763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02871808$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abend, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bréchignac, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iliakis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impens, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadhim, Munira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Anders Pape</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oughton, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powathil, Gibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saenen, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutcliffe, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fen-Ru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Paul N.</creatorcontrib><title>When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection</title><title>Environmental research</title><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><description>This consensus paper presents the results of a workshop held in Essen, Germany in September 2017, called to examine critically the current approach to radiological environmental protection. The meeting brought together participants from the field of low dose radiobiology and those working in radioecology. Both groups have a common aim of identifying radiation exposures and protecting populations and individuals from harmful effects of ionising radiation exposure, but rarely work closely together. A key question in radiobiology is to understand mechanisms triggered by low doses or dose rates, leading to adverse outcomes of individuals while in radioecology a key objective is to recognise when harm is occurring at the level of the ecosystem. The discussion provided a total of six strategic recommendations which would help to address these questions. •The importance of gathering large, complex and broad datasets from contaminated and control sites.•Using environmental data to contextualise findings in key species where a holistic view of the ecosystem is unfeasible.•Recognition of the importance of multi-stressors in the analysis of radiation effects especially in the context of low dose.•The importance of historic dose and non-targeted radiation effects.•Utility of applying biomarkers from radiation biology to individual organisms; need for population biomarkers of fitness.</description><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Low dose</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiobiology</subject><subject>Radioecology</subject><subject>Reference animals and plants</subject><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhi0EomnhDRDyEQ67eGzvri0kpKqCtlKkXoo4Wo49URw2drA3QX17HG3osafxWN_MP_MPIR-AtcCg_7JtMR4zlpYzUC2DlnH-iiyA6b5huhOvyYIxEI0WHVyQy1K2NYVOsLfkgmvJhqEXC-J-bTBSS_3B_aah0Jimc_a1xoh_aYgTZh-KC_sxRJufaHmK0wZLpdcp0zpFyCnuME52pNn6YKeQIt3nNKE7Pd-RN2s7Fnx_jlfk54_vjzd3zfLh9v7metk4KfnUDH0nhdVi6HBQykpg3ikt_GqlNXrte9Fxp-q2FbE9Z0JD3UdK2XNYadmLK_J57ruxo9nnsKvDmmSDubtemtMf42oAxdQRKvtpZuuYfw5YJrOrK-I42ojpUAxorUGDUkNF5Yy6nErJuH7uDcycTmG2Zj6FOZ3CMKhCvJZ9PCscVjv0z0X_va_AtxnA6skxYDbVY4wOfcjVOONTeFnhHyPKmq0</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Mothersill, Carmel</creator><creator>Abend, Michael</creator><creator>Bréchignac, François</creator><creator>Iliakis, George</creator><creator>Impens, Nathalie</creator><creator>Kadhim, Munira</creator><creator>Møller, Anders Pape</creator><creator>Oughton, Deborah</creator><creator>Powathil, Gibin</creator><creator>Saenen, Eline</creator><creator>Seymour, Colin</creator><creator>Sutcliffe, Jill</creator><creator>Tang, Fen-Ru</creator><creator>Schofield, Paul N.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection</title><author>Mothersill, Carmel ; Abend, Michael ; Bréchignac, François ; Iliakis, George ; Impens, Nathalie ; Kadhim, Munira ; Møller, Anders Pape ; Oughton, Deborah ; Powathil, Gibin ; Saenen, Eline ; Seymour, Colin ; Sutcliffe, Jill ; Tang, Fen-Ru ; Schofield, Paul N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-76543a9375e788a410dc893dbb99ed9d6352c8201937a620391115444621b9463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Low dose</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiobiology</topic><topic>Radioecology</topic><topic>Reference animals and plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, Carmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abend, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bréchignac, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iliakis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impens, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadhim, Munira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Anders Pape</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oughton, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powathil, Gibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saenen, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seymour, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutcliffe, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fen-Ru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Paul N.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mothersill, Carmel</au><au>Abend, Michael</au><au>Bréchignac, François</au><au>Iliakis, George</au><au>Impens, Nathalie</au><au>Kadhim, Munira</au><au>Møller, Anders Pape</au><au>Oughton, Deborah</au><au>Powathil, Gibin</au><au>Saenen, Eline</au><au>Seymour, Colin</au><au>Sutcliffe, Jill</au><au>Tang, Fen-Ru</au><au>Schofield, Paul N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>162</volume><spage>318</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>318-324</pages><issn>0013-9351</issn><eissn>1096-0953</eissn><abstract>This consensus paper presents the results of a workshop held in Essen, Germany in September 2017, called to examine critically the current approach to radiological environmental protection. The meeting brought together participants from the field of low dose radiobiology and those working in radioecology. Both groups have a common aim of identifying radiation exposures and protecting populations and individuals from harmful effects of ionising radiation exposure, but rarely work closely together. A key question in radiobiology is to understand mechanisms triggered by low doses or dose rates, leading to adverse outcomes of individuals while in radioecology a key objective is to recognise when harm is occurring at the level of the ecosystem. The discussion provided a total of six strategic recommendations which would help to address these questions. •The importance of gathering large, complex and broad datasets from contaminated and control sites.•Using environmental data to contextualise findings in key species where a holistic view of the ecosystem is unfeasible.•Recognition of the importance of multi-stressors in the analysis of radiation effects especially in the context of low dose.•The importance of historic dose and non-targeted radiation effects.•Utility of applying biomarkers from radiation biology to individual organisms; need for population biomarkers of fitness.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29407763</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9351
ispartof Environmental research, 2018-04, Vol.162, p.318-324
issn 0013-9351
1096-0953
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02871808v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Conservation of Natural Resources
Environment
Germany
Humans
Life Sciences
Low dose
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection
Radiobiology
Radioecology
Reference animals and plants
title When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20a%20duck%20is%20not%20a%20duck;%20a%20new%20interdisciplinary%20synthesis%20for%20environmental%20radiation%20protection&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research&rft.au=Mothersill,%20Carmel&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=162&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=318-324&rft.issn=0013-9351&rft.eissn=1096-0953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1999191887%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1999191887&rft_id=info:pmid/29407763&rft_els_id=S0013935118300215&rfr_iscdi=true