Risk of Postoperative Stenosis after Segmental Resection versus Disk Excision for Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectosigmoid: A Retrospective Study

To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2021-01, Vol.28 (1), p.50-56
Hauptverfasser: Braund, Sophia, Hennetier, Clotilde, Klapczynski, Clemence, Scattarelli, Antoine, Coget, Julien, Bridoux, Valérie, Tuech, Jean Jacques, Roman, Horace
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue 1
container_start_page 50
container_title Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
container_volume 28
creator Braund, Sophia
Hennetier, Clotilde
Klapczynski, Clemence
Scattarelli, Antoine
Coget, Julien
Bridoux, Valérie
Tuech, Jean Jacques
Roman, Horace
description To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis database. University tertiary referral center. Four hundred thirty-one consecutive patients managed for rectosigmoid endometriosis were enrolled in our study. Laparoscopic SR or DE. One hundred sixty-five patients underwent DE, and 266 patients underwent SR. Large nodules ≥3 cm in diameter were more frequent in the SR group (73.3% vs 66.1%), whereas nodules infiltrating the low rectum were 3 times more frequent in the DE group (35.9% vs 11.3%). The frequency of vaginal excision (67.9% vs 62%) and stoma (46.7% vs 44.4%) were comparable between the DE and SR groups. Twenty-three patients presented with postoperative colorectal stenosis after SR (8.6%) versus none after DE (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02870135v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1553465020302223</els_id><sourcerecordid>2398151570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-42b628975a16586e33ed575b42c029ebc143ea1fa0a5655c3d1ea46a5d869f463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQj3DYMLZjJ0FcVu2WVloJ1MLZ8jqTrZckTm1nRR-Ft63TLXvkZHv8zWd5_ix7TyGnQOXnXb7r7TZnwCCHIgdevMhOqRB8UUhZvzzuBZxkb0LYAfASQL7OTjjjEqSQp9nfGxt-E9eSHy5EN6LX0e6R3EYcXLCB6DaiJ7e47XGIuiM3GNBE6wayRx-mQC7m_tUfY8NcbJ0nF4gjWQ2N6zF6-2S5Hlrbxdk9bEm8w6QxMd1se2ebL2SZztG7MM7qp9en5uFt9qrVXcB3z-tZ9uty9fP8arH-_u36fLleGF5DXBRsI1lVl0JTKSqJnGMjSrEpmAFW48bQgqOmrQYtpBCGNxR1IbVoKlm3heRn2aeD9053avS21_5BOW3V1XKt5hqwqgTKxZ4m9uOBHb27nzBE1dtgsOv0gG4KivG6ooKKEhLKDqhJHwse26ObgprjUzs1x6fm-BQUKsWXmj48-6dNj82x5V9eCfh6ADBNZG_Rq2AsDgYb69PwVOPs__yPxE6tpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398151570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of Postoperative Stenosis after Segmental Resection versus Disk Excision for Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectosigmoid: A Retrospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Braund, Sophia ; Hennetier, Clotilde ; Klapczynski, Clemence ; Scattarelli, Antoine ; Coget, Julien ; Bridoux, Valérie ; Tuech, Jean Jacques ; Roman, Horace</creator><creatorcontrib>Braund, Sophia ; Hennetier, Clotilde ; Klapczynski, Clemence ; Scattarelli, Antoine ; Coget, Julien ; Bridoux, Valérie ; Tuech, Jean Jacques ; Roman, Horace</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis database. University tertiary referral center. Four hundred thirty-one consecutive patients managed for rectosigmoid endometriosis were enrolled in our study. Laparoscopic SR or DE. One hundred sixty-five patients underwent DE, and 266 patients underwent SR. Large nodules ≥3 cm in diameter were more frequent in the SR group (73.3% vs 66.1%), whereas nodules infiltrating the low rectum were 3 times more frequent in the DE group (35.9% vs 11.3%). The frequency of vaginal excision (67.9% vs 62%) and stoma (46.7% vs 44.4%) were comparable between the DE and SR groups. Twenty-three patients presented with postoperative colorectal stenosis after SR (8.6%) versus none after DE (p &lt;.001). Treatment of colorectal stenosis involved dilatation in 20 (87%) cases and SR in 4 (17.4%) cases. For 1 patient, dilatation resulted in rectosigmoid injury requiring SR, followed by rectovaginal fistula. The logistic regression model identified a diverting stoma as the sole risk factor independently related to the risk of postoperative stenosis after SR. Bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis occurred in patients who underwent SR, most of them with a diverting stoma, whereas no cases of stenosis were reported in patients who underwent DE, with or without stoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-4669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32360656</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bowel stenosis ; Colonic Diseases - etiology ; Constriction, Pathologic - etiology ; Deep endometriosis ; Endometriosis - surgery ; Female ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Diseases - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Stoma ; Tissues and Organs</subject><ispartof>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2021-01, Vol.28 (1), p.50-56</ispartof><rights>2020 AAGL</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-42b628975a16586e33ed575b42c029ebc143ea1fa0a5655c3d1ea46a5d869f463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-42b628975a16586e33ed575b42c029ebc143ea1fa0a5655c3d1ea46a5d869f463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9237-0628</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32360656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-02870135$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braund, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennetier, Clotilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapczynski, Clemence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scattarelli, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coget, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridoux, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuech, Jean Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Horace</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of Postoperative Stenosis after Segmental Resection versus Disk Excision for Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectosigmoid: A Retrospective Study</title><title>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</title><addtitle>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</addtitle><description>To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis database. University tertiary referral center. Four hundred thirty-one consecutive patients managed for rectosigmoid endometriosis were enrolled in our study. Laparoscopic SR or DE. One hundred sixty-five patients underwent DE, and 266 patients underwent SR. Large nodules ≥3 cm in diameter were more frequent in the SR group (73.3% vs 66.1%), whereas nodules infiltrating the low rectum were 3 times more frequent in the DE group (35.9% vs 11.3%). The frequency of vaginal excision (67.9% vs 62%) and stoma (46.7% vs 44.4%) were comparable between the DE and SR groups. Twenty-three patients presented with postoperative colorectal stenosis after SR (8.6%) versus none after DE (p &lt;.001). Treatment of colorectal stenosis involved dilatation in 20 (87%) cases and SR in 4 (17.4%) cases. For 1 patient, dilatation resulted in rectosigmoid injury requiring SR, followed by rectovaginal fistula. The logistic regression model identified a diverting stoma as the sole risk factor independently related to the risk of postoperative stenosis after SR. Bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis occurred in patients who underwent SR, most of them with a diverting stoma, whereas no cases of stenosis were reported in patients who underwent DE, with or without stoma.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bowel stenosis</subject><subject>Colonic Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</subject><subject>Deep endometriosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Rectal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stoma</subject><subject>Tissues and Organs</subject><issn>1553-4650</issn><issn>1553-4669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQj3DYMLZjJ0FcVu2WVloJ1MLZ8jqTrZckTm1nRR-Ft63TLXvkZHv8zWd5_ix7TyGnQOXnXb7r7TZnwCCHIgdevMhOqRB8UUhZvzzuBZxkb0LYAfASQL7OTjjjEqSQp9nfGxt-E9eSHy5EN6LX0e6R3EYcXLCB6DaiJ7e47XGIuiM3GNBE6wayRx-mQC7m_tUfY8NcbJ0nF4gjWQ2N6zF6-2S5Hlrbxdk9bEm8w6QxMd1se2ebL2SZztG7MM7qp9en5uFt9qrVXcB3z-tZ9uty9fP8arH-_u36fLleGF5DXBRsI1lVl0JTKSqJnGMjSrEpmAFW48bQgqOmrQYtpBCGNxR1IbVoKlm3heRn2aeD9053avS21_5BOW3V1XKt5hqwqgTKxZ4m9uOBHb27nzBE1dtgsOv0gG4KivG6ooKKEhLKDqhJHwse26ObgprjUzs1x6fm-BQUKsWXmj48-6dNj82x5V9eCfh6ADBNZG_Rq2AsDgYb69PwVOPs__yPxE6tpw</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Braund, Sophia</creator><creator>Hennetier, Clotilde</creator><creator>Klapczynski, Clemence</creator><creator>Scattarelli, Antoine</creator><creator>Coget, Julien</creator><creator>Bridoux, Valérie</creator><creator>Tuech, Jean Jacques</creator><creator>Roman, Horace</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-0628</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Risk of Postoperative Stenosis after Segmental Resection versus Disk Excision for Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectosigmoid: A Retrospective Study</title><author>Braund, Sophia ; Hennetier, Clotilde ; Klapczynski, Clemence ; Scattarelli, Antoine ; Coget, Julien ; Bridoux, Valérie ; Tuech, Jean Jacques ; Roman, Horace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-42b628975a16586e33ed575b42c029ebc143ea1fa0a5655c3d1ea46a5d869f463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bowel stenosis</topic><topic>Colonic Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</topic><topic>Deep endometriosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Rectal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stoma</topic><topic>Tissues and Organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braund, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennetier, Clotilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapczynski, Clemence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scattarelli, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coget, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridoux, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuech, Jean Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Horace</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braund, Sophia</au><au>Hennetier, Clotilde</au><au>Klapczynski, Clemence</au><au>Scattarelli, Antoine</au><au>Coget, Julien</au><au>Bridoux, Valérie</au><au>Tuech, Jean Jacques</au><au>Roman, Horace</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of Postoperative Stenosis after Segmental Resection versus Disk Excision for Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectosigmoid: A Retrospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>50-56</pages><issn>1553-4650</issn><eissn>1553-4669</eissn><abstract>To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis database. University tertiary referral center. Four hundred thirty-one consecutive patients managed for rectosigmoid endometriosis were enrolled in our study. Laparoscopic SR or DE. One hundred sixty-five patients underwent DE, and 266 patients underwent SR. Large nodules ≥3 cm in diameter were more frequent in the SR group (73.3% vs 66.1%), whereas nodules infiltrating the low rectum were 3 times more frequent in the DE group (35.9% vs 11.3%). The frequency of vaginal excision (67.9% vs 62%) and stoma (46.7% vs 44.4%) were comparable between the DE and SR groups. Twenty-three patients presented with postoperative colorectal stenosis after SR (8.6%) versus none after DE (p &lt;.001). Treatment of colorectal stenosis involved dilatation in 20 (87%) cases and SR in 4 (17.4%) cases. For 1 patient, dilatation resulted in rectosigmoid injury requiring SR, followed by rectovaginal fistula. The logistic regression model identified a diverting stoma as the sole risk factor independently related to the risk of postoperative stenosis after SR. Bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis occurred in patients who underwent SR, most of them with a diverting stoma, whereas no cases of stenosis were reported in patients who underwent DE, with or without stoma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32360656</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-0628</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-4650
ispartof Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2021-01, Vol.28 (1), p.50-56
issn 1553-4650
1553-4669
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02870135v1
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Bowel stenosis
Colonic Diseases - etiology
Constriction, Pathologic - etiology
Deep endometriosis
Endometriosis - surgery
Female
Human health and pathology
Humans
Life Sciences
Postoperative Complications
Rectal Diseases - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Stoma
Tissues and Organs
title Risk of Postoperative Stenosis after Segmental Resection versus Disk Excision for Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectosigmoid: A Retrospective Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A39%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20Postoperative%20Stenosis%20after%20Segmental%20Resection%20versus%20Disk%20Excision%20for%20Deep%20Endometriosis%20Infiltrating%20the%20Rectosigmoid:%20A%20Retrospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20minimally%20invasive%20gynecology&rft.au=Braund,%20Sophia&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=50-56&rft.issn=1553-4650&rft.eissn=1553-4669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2398151570%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398151570&rft_id=info:pmid/32360656&rft_els_id=S1553465020302223&rfr_iscdi=true