Comparative distribution of ivermectin and doramectin to parasite location tissues in cattle

Pharmacokinetic studies have been used traditionally to characterize drug concentration profiles achieved in the bloodstream. However, endectocide molecules exert their persistent and broad spectrum activity against parasites localized in many different tissues. The aim of this study was to compare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary parasitology 2000-02, Vol.87 (4), p.327-338
Hauptverfasser: Lifschitz, A, Virkel, G, Sallovitz, J, Sutra, J.F, Galtier, P, Alvinerie, M, Lanusse, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 338
container_issue 4
container_start_page 327
container_title Veterinary parasitology
container_volume 87
creator Lifschitz, A
Virkel, G
Sallovitz, J
Sutra, J.F
Galtier, P
Alvinerie, M
Lanusse, C
description Pharmacokinetic studies have been used traditionally to characterize drug concentration profiles achieved in the bloodstream. However, endectocide molecules exert their persistent and broad spectrum activity against parasites localized in many different tissues. The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) to different tissues in which parasites are found following subcutaneous administration to calves. Holstein calves weighing 120–140 kg were injected in the shoulder area with commercially available formulations of IVM (Ivomec 1% MSD AGVET, NJ, USA) (Group A) or DRM (Dectomax 1%, Pfizer, NY, USA) (Group B). Two treated calves were sacrificed at 1, 4, 8, 18, 28, 38, 48 or 58 days post-treatment. Plasma, abomasal and small intestinal fluids and mucosal tissues, bile, faeces, lung and skin samples were collected, extracted, derivatized and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection to determine IVM and DRM concentrations. IVM and DRM were distributed to all the tissues and fluids analyzed. Concentrations >0.1 ng/ml (ng/g) were detected between 1 and 48 days post-treatment in all the tissues and fluids investigated. At 58 days post-treatment, IVM and DRM were detected only in bile and faeces, where large concentrations were excreted. Delayed T max values for DRM (4 days post-administration) compared to those for IVM (1 day) were observed in the different tissues and fluids. High IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in the most important target tissues, including skin. The highest IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in abomasal mucosa and lung tissue. Enhanced availabilities of both IVM (between 45 and 244%) and DRM (20–147%) were obtained in tissues compared to plasma. There was good correlation between concentration profiles of both compounds in plasma and target tissues (mucosal tissue, skin, and lung). Drug concentrations in target tissues remained above 1 ng/g for either 18 (IVM) or 38 (DRM) days post-treatment. The characterization of tissue distribution patterns contributes to our understanding of the basis for the broad-spectrum endectocide activity of avermectin-type compounds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00175-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02695148v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304401799001752</els_id><sourcerecordid>70900674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-395c6ae40adb5d764e02dd5aed35a270cec3ab1d95db963bd7fe7d649cbd70a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rGzEQhkVJqZ20P6FhTyE5bDra1Ud0KsbkCww9tL0VhFYaU4XdlSvJhv77yF5jcstppFfPOyPeIeQrhVsKVHz7CS2wmgGV10rdQKm8bj6QOb2Tbd1wDmdkfkJm5DylFwBgIOQnMqMghKLQzMmfZRg2Jprsd1g5n3L03Tb7MFZhXRUtDmizHyszusqFaI7XHKq9K_mMVR-sOTiyT2mLqSrvRck9fiYf16ZP-OVYL8jvh_tfy6d69ePxeblY1ZYxmetWcSsMMjCu404KhtA4xw26lptGgkXbmo46xV2nRNs5uUbpBFO2HMGo9oLcTH3_ml5voh9M_K-D8fppsdJ7DRqhOGV3O1rYq4ndxPCv_DbrwSeLfW9GDNukJSgoIbEC8gm0MaQUcX3qTEHvV6APK9D7fLVS-rAC3RTf5XHAthvQvXFNmRfg-wRgiWTnMepkPY4WnY8lXe2Cf2fEK2khl4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70900674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative distribution of ivermectin and doramectin to parasite location tissues in cattle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lifschitz, A ; Virkel, G ; Sallovitz, J ; Sutra, J.F ; Galtier, P ; Alvinerie, M ; Lanusse, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lifschitz, A ; Virkel, G ; Sallovitz, J ; Sutra, J.F ; Galtier, P ; Alvinerie, M ; Lanusse, C</creatorcontrib><description>Pharmacokinetic studies have been used traditionally to characterize drug concentration profiles achieved in the bloodstream. However, endectocide molecules exert their persistent and broad spectrum activity against parasites localized in many different tissues. The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) to different tissues in which parasites are found following subcutaneous administration to calves. Holstein calves weighing 120–140 kg were injected in the shoulder area with commercially available formulations of IVM (Ivomec 1% MSD AGVET, NJ, USA) (Group A) or DRM (Dectomax 1%, Pfizer, NY, USA) (Group B). Two treated calves were sacrificed at 1, 4, 8, 18, 28, 38, 48 or 58 days post-treatment. Plasma, abomasal and small intestinal fluids and mucosal tissues, bile, faeces, lung and skin samples were collected, extracted, derivatized and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection to determine IVM and DRM concentrations. IVM and DRM were distributed to all the tissues and fluids analyzed. Concentrations &gt;0.1 ng/ml (ng/g) were detected between 1 and 48 days post-treatment in all the tissues and fluids investigated. At 58 days post-treatment, IVM and DRM were detected only in bile and faeces, where large concentrations were excreted. Delayed T max values for DRM (4 days post-administration) compared to those for IVM (1 day) were observed in the different tissues and fluids. High IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in the most important target tissues, including skin. The highest IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in abomasal mucosa and lung tissue. Enhanced availabilities of both IVM (between 45 and 244%) and DRM (20–147%) were obtained in tissues compared to plasma. There was good correlation between concentration profiles of both compounds in plasma and target tissues (mucosal tissue, skin, and lung). Drug concentrations in target tissues remained above 1 ng/g for either 18 (IVM) or 38 (DRM) days post-treatment. The characterization of tissue distribution patterns contributes to our understanding of the basis for the broad-spectrum endectocide activity of avermectin-type compounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00175-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10669102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abomasum - metabolism ; Animal biology ; Animals ; Antiprotozoal Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antiprotozoal Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Cattle - metabolism ; Cattle: Nematoda ; Doramectin ; Gastric Mucosa - metabolism ; Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary ; Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism ; Ivermectin ; Ivermectin - administration &amp; dosage ; Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics ; Life Sciences ; Lung - metabolism ; Male ; Pharmacokinetics ; Random Allocation ; Reference Values ; Skin - metabolism ; Tissue Distribution ; Veterinary medicine and animal Health</subject><ispartof>Veterinary parasitology, 2000-02, Vol.87 (4), p.327-338</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-395c6ae40adb5d764e02dd5aed35a270cec3ab1d95db963bd7fe7d649cbd70a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-395c6ae40adb5d764e02dd5aed35a270cec3ab1d95db963bd7fe7d649cbd70a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401799001752$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10669102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02695148$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lifschitz, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virkel, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallovitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutra, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galtier, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvinerie, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanusse, C</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative distribution of ivermectin and doramectin to parasite location tissues in cattle</title><title>Veterinary parasitology</title><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><description>Pharmacokinetic studies have been used traditionally to characterize drug concentration profiles achieved in the bloodstream. However, endectocide molecules exert their persistent and broad spectrum activity against parasites localized in many different tissues. The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) to different tissues in which parasites are found following subcutaneous administration to calves. Holstein calves weighing 120–140 kg were injected in the shoulder area with commercially available formulations of IVM (Ivomec 1% MSD AGVET, NJ, USA) (Group A) or DRM (Dectomax 1%, Pfizer, NY, USA) (Group B). Two treated calves were sacrificed at 1, 4, 8, 18, 28, 38, 48 or 58 days post-treatment. Plasma, abomasal and small intestinal fluids and mucosal tissues, bile, faeces, lung and skin samples were collected, extracted, derivatized and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection to determine IVM and DRM concentrations. IVM and DRM were distributed to all the tissues and fluids analyzed. Concentrations &gt;0.1 ng/ml (ng/g) were detected between 1 and 48 days post-treatment in all the tissues and fluids investigated. At 58 days post-treatment, IVM and DRM were detected only in bile and faeces, where large concentrations were excreted. Delayed T max values for DRM (4 days post-administration) compared to those for IVM (1 day) were observed in the different tissues and fluids. High IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in the most important target tissues, including skin. The highest IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in abomasal mucosa and lung tissue. Enhanced availabilities of both IVM (between 45 and 244%) and DRM (20–147%) were obtained in tissues compared to plasma. There was good correlation between concentration profiles of both compounds in plasma and target tissues (mucosal tissue, skin, and lung). Drug concentrations in target tissues remained above 1 ng/g for either 18 (IVM) or 38 (DRM) days post-treatment. The characterization of tissue distribution patterns contributes to our understanding of the basis for the broad-spectrum endectocide activity of avermectin-type compounds.</description><subject>Abomasum - metabolism</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antiprotozoal Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antiprotozoal Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle: Nematoda</subject><subject>Doramectin</subject><subject>Gastric Mucosa - metabolism</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism</subject><subject>Ivermectin</subject><subject>Ivermectin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lung - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Skin - metabolism</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine and animal Health</subject><issn>0304-4017</issn><issn>1873-2550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rGzEQhkVJqZ20P6FhTyE5bDra1Ud0KsbkCww9tL0VhFYaU4XdlSvJhv77yF5jcstppFfPOyPeIeQrhVsKVHz7CS2wmgGV10rdQKm8bj6QOb2Tbd1wDmdkfkJm5DylFwBgIOQnMqMghKLQzMmfZRg2Jprsd1g5n3L03Tb7MFZhXRUtDmizHyszusqFaI7XHKq9K_mMVR-sOTiyT2mLqSrvRck9fiYf16ZP-OVYL8jvh_tfy6d69ePxeblY1ZYxmetWcSsMMjCu404KhtA4xw26lptGgkXbmo46xV2nRNs5uUbpBFO2HMGo9oLcTH3_ml5voh9M_K-D8fppsdJ7DRqhOGV3O1rYq4ndxPCv_DbrwSeLfW9GDNukJSgoIbEC8gm0MaQUcX3qTEHvV6APK9D7fLVS-rAC3RTf5XHAthvQvXFNmRfg-wRgiWTnMepkPY4WnY8lXe2Cf2fEK2khl4Q</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>Lifschitz, A</creator><creator>Virkel, G</creator><creator>Sallovitz, J</creator><creator>Sutra, J.F</creator><creator>Galtier, P</creator><creator>Alvinerie, M</creator><creator>Lanusse, C</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Comparative distribution of ivermectin and doramectin to parasite location tissues in cattle</title><author>Lifschitz, A ; Virkel, G ; Sallovitz, J ; Sutra, J.F ; Galtier, P ; Alvinerie, M ; Lanusse, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-395c6ae40adb5d764e02dd5aed35a270cec3ab1d95db963bd7fe7d649cbd70a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Abomasum - metabolism</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antiprotozoal Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antiprotozoal Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle: Nematoda</topic><topic>Doramectin</topic><topic>Gastric Mucosa - metabolism</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism</topic><topic>Ivermectin</topic><topic>Ivermectin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ivermectin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lung - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Skin - metabolism</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine and animal Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lifschitz, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virkel, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallovitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutra, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galtier, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvinerie, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanusse, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lifschitz, A</au><au>Virkel, G</au><au>Sallovitz, J</au><au>Sutra, J.F</au><au>Galtier, P</au><au>Alvinerie, M</au><au>Lanusse, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative distribution of ivermectin and doramectin to parasite location tissues in cattle</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>327-338</pages><issn>0304-4017</issn><eissn>1873-2550</eissn><abstract>Pharmacokinetic studies have been used traditionally to characterize drug concentration profiles achieved in the bloodstream. However, endectocide molecules exert their persistent and broad spectrum activity against parasites localized in many different tissues. The aim of this study was to compare the distribution of ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) to different tissues in which parasites are found following subcutaneous administration to calves. Holstein calves weighing 120–140 kg were injected in the shoulder area with commercially available formulations of IVM (Ivomec 1% MSD AGVET, NJ, USA) (Group A) or DRM (Dectomax 1%, Pfizer, NY, USA) (Group B). Two treated calves were sacrificed at 1, 4, 8, 18, 28, 38, 48 or 58 days post-treatment. Plasma, abomasal and small intestinal fluids and mucosal tissues, bile, faeces, lung and skin samples were collected, extracted, derivatized and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection to determine IVM and DRM concentrations. IVM and DRM were distributed to all the tissues and fluids analyzed. Concentrations &gt;0.1 ng/ml (ng/g) were detected between 1 and 48 days post-treatment in all the tissues and fluids investigated. At 58 days post-treatment, IVM and DRM were detected only in bile and faeces, where large concentrations were excreted. Delayed T max values for DRM (4 days post-administration) compared to those for IVM (1 day) were observed in the different tissues and fluids. High IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in the most important target tissues, including skin. The highest IVM and DRM concentrations were measured in abomasal mucosa and lung tissue. Enhanced availabilities of both IVM (between 45 and 244%) and DRM (20–147%) were obtained in tissues compared to plasma. There was good correlation between concentration profiles of both compounds in plasma and target tissues (mucosal tissue, skin, and lung). Drug concentrations in target tissues remained above 1 ng/g for either 18 (IVM) or 38 (DRM) days post-treatment. The characterization of tissue distribution patterns contributes to our understanding of the basis for the broad-spectrum endectocide activity of avermectin-type compounds.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10669102</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00175-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-4017
ispartof Veterinary parasitology, 2000-02, Vol.87 (4), p.327-338
issn 0304-4017
1873-2550
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02695148v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abomasum - metabolism
Animal biology
Animals
Antiprotozoal Agents - administration & dosage
Antiprotozoal Agents - pharmacokinetics
Cattle - metabolism
Cattle: Nematoda
Doramectin
Gastric Mucosa - metabolism
Injections, Subcutaneous - veterinary
Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism
Ivermectin
Ivermectin - administration & dosage
Ivermectin - analogs & derivatives
Ivermectin - pharmacokinetics
Life Sciences
Lung - metabolism
Male
Pharmacokinetics
Random Allocation
Reference Values
Skin - metabolism
Tissue Distribution
Veterinary medicine and animal Health
title Comparative distribution of ivermectin and doramectin to parasite location tissues in cattle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T03%3A10%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20distribution%20of%20ivermectin%20and%20doramectin%20to%20parasite%20location%20tissues%20in%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20parasitology&rft.au=Lifschitz,%20A&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=327-338&rft.issn=0304-4017&rft.eissn=1873-2550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00175-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E70900674%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70900674&rft_id=info:pmid/10669102&rft_els_id=S0304401799001752&rfr_iscdi=true