Genetic resistance to mortality of day-old chicks and carrier-state of hens after inoculation with Salmonella enteritidis

The heritability of resistance of poultry to Salmonella enteritidis (SE) was investigated. Three measurements of resistance were made: survival after intramuscular inoculation of 419 day-old chicks, absence versus presence of Salmonella in spleens and caeca 4 weeks after oral inoculation of 304 hens...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Avian pathology 1999-04, Vol.28 (2), p.131-135
Hauptverfasser: Beaumont, C., Protais, J., Guillot, J. F., Colin, P., Proux, K., Millet, N., Pardon, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Avian pathology
container_volume 28
creator Beaumont, C.
Protais, J.
Guillot, J. F.
Colin, P.
Proux, K.
Millet, N.
Pardon, P.
description The heritability of resistance of poultry to Salmonella enteritidis (SE) was investigated. Three measurements of resistance were made: survival after intramuscular inoculation of 419 day-old chicks, absence versus presence of Salmonella in spleens and caeca 4 weeks after oral inoculation of 304 hens at peak of laying, and antibody response of 228 hens following two inoculations of an aroA mutant of this serotype. In the first two models of infection, resistance appeared to be heritable. The heritability was estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively, at 0.14 ± 0.10 and 0.62 ± 0.16 for chick mortality, 0.47 ± 0.21 and 0.13 ± 0.26 for resistance to spleen contamination, and 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.53 ± 0.26 for resistance to caecal contamination in laying hens. By contrast the estimated heritability of antibody response was very low (0.03 ± 0.08 and 0.10 ± 0.08 when estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively). These results suggest that a selection for increased resistance to SE may be efficient.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03079459994858
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02693392v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>42248287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c76a9280dbb95503ac327e74707f503af8bb24a8c218787bcc51a207404f9a1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vFSEYhSdGY6_VrUtDXOliKp8DLJtGW5ObuFDXhGEgl8pABaZ1_r1Mbm1iE-OKj_OcNwdO171G8AxBAT9AArmkTEpJBRNPuh2iA-sJIeJpt9vEvqn8pHtRyjWEcGAMP-9O8CARolLuuvXSRlu9AdkWX6qOxoKawJxy1cHXFSQHJr32KUzAHLz5UYCObatz9jb3zVHtxhxsbIqrNgMfk1mCrj5FcOfrAXzVYU7RhqCBjY3w1U--vOyeOR2KfXW_nnbfP338dnHV779cfr443_eGUll7wwctsYDTOErGINGGYG455ZC77ejEOGKqhcFIcMFHYxjSGHIKqZMaOXLavT_OPeigbrKfdV5V0l5dne_VdgfbbxAi8S1q7Lsje5PTz8WWqmZfzJY82rQUhfgg2IAw2dC3j9DrtOTYXqIwpANijMIGnR0hk1Mp2bqHAAiqrT_1d3_N8OZ-6jLOdnrA_xTWAHoEfHQpz_ou5TCpqteQssutPl8ezVT1V202-V8b-Uem3_nnuUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204615540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic resistance to mortality of day-old chicks and carrier-state of hens after inoculation with Salmonella enteritidis</title><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Beaumont, C. ; Protais, J. ; Guillot, J. F. ; Colin, P. ; Proux, K. ; Millet, N. ; Pardon, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, C. ; Protais, J. ; Guillot, J. F. ; Colin, P. ; Proux, K. ; Millet, N. ; Pardon, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The heritability of resistance of poultry to Salmonella enteritidis (SE) was investigated. Three measurements of resistance were made: survival after intramuscular inoculation of 419 day-old chicks, absence versus presence of Salmonella in spleens and caeca 4 weeks after oral inoculation of 304 hens at peak of laying, and antibody response of 228 hens following two inoculations of an aroA mutant of this serotype. In the first two models of infection, resistance appeared to be heritable. The heritability was estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively, at 0.14 ± 0.10 and 0.62 ± 0.16 for chick mortality, 0.47 ± 0.21 and 0.13 ± 0.26 for resistance to spleen contamination, and 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.53 ± 0.26 for resistance to caecal contamination in laying hens. By contrast the estimated heritability of antibody response was very low (0.03 ± 0.08 and 0.10 ± 0.08 when estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively). These results suggest that a selection for increased resistance to SE may be efficient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03079459994858</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26911499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Computer Science ; Genetics ; Life Sciences ; Mortality ; Poultry ; Salmonella</subject><ispartof>Avian pathology, 1999-04, Vol.28 (2), p.131-135</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1999</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Apr 1999</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c76a9280dbb95503ac327e74707f503af8bb24a8c218787bcc51a207404f9a1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c76a9280dbb95503ac327e74707f503af8bb24a8c218787bcc51a207404f9a1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02693392$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protais, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillot, J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proux, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millet, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardon, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic resistance to mortality of day-old chicks and carrier-state of hens after inoculation with Salmonella enteritidis</title><title>Avian pathology</title><addtitle>Avian Pathol</addtitle><description>The heritability of resistance of poultry to Salmonella enteritidis (SE) was investigated. Three measurements of resistance were made: survival after intramuscular inoculation of 419 day-old chicks, absence versus presence of Salmonella in spleens and caeca 4 weeks after oral inoculation of 304 hens at peak of laying, and antibody response of 228 hens following two inoculations of an aroA mutant of this serotype. In the first two models of infection, resistance appeared to be heritable. The heritability was estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively, at 0.14 ± 0.10 and 0.62 ± 0.16 for chick mortality, 0.47 ± 0.21 and 0.13 ± 0.26 for resistance to spleen contamination, and 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.53 ± 0.26 for resistance to caecal contamination in laying hens. By contrast the estimated heritability of antibody response was very low (0.03 ± 0.08 and 0.10 ± 0.08 when estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively). These results suggest that a selection for increased resistance to SE may be efficient.</description><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><issn>0307-9457</issn><issn>1465-3338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vFSEYhSdGY6_VrUtDXOliKp8DLJtGW5ObuFDXhGEgl8pABaZ1_r1Mbm1iE-OKj_OcNwdO171G8AxBAT9AArmkTEpJBRNPuh2iA-sJIeJpt9vEvqn8pHtRyjWEcGAMP-9O8CARolLuuvXSRlu9AdkWX6qOxoKawJxy1cHXFSQHJr32KUzAHLz5UYCObatz9jb3zVHtxhxsbIqrNgMfk1mCrj5FcOfrAXzVYU7RhqCBjY3w1U--vOyeOR2KfXW_nnbfP338dnHV779cfr443_eGUll7wwctsYDTOErGINGGYG455ZC77ejEOGKqhcFIcMFHYxjSGHIKqZMaOXLavT_OPeigbrKfdV5V0l5dne_VdgfbbxAi8S1q7Lsje5PTz8WWqmZfzJY82rQUhfgg2IAw2dC3j9DrtOTYXqIwpANijMIGnR0hk1Mp2bqHAAiqrT_1d3_N8OZ-6jLOdnrA_xTWAHoEfHQpz_ou5TCpqteQssutPl8ezVT1V202-V8b-Uem3_nnuUM</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Beaumont, C.</creator><creator>Protais, J.</creator><creator>Guillot, J. F.</creator><creator>Colin, P.</creator><creator>Proux, K.</creator><creator>Millet, N.</creator><creator>Pardon, P.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Genetic resistance to mortality of day-old chicks and carrier-state of hens after inoculation with Salmonella enteritidis</title><author>Beaumont, C. ; Protais, J. ; Guillot, J. F. ; Colin, P. ; Proux, K. ; Millet, N. ; Pardon, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c76a9280dbb95503ac327e74707f503af8bb24a8c218787bcc51a207404f9a1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protais, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillot, J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proux, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millet, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardon, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Avian pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beaumont, C.</au><au>Protais, J.</au><au>Guillot, J. F.</au><au>Colin, P.</au><au>Proux, K.</au><au>Millet, N.</au><au>Pardon, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic resistance to mortality of day-old chicks and carrier-state of hens after inoculation with Salmonella enteritidis</atitle><jtitle>Avian pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Avian Pathol</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>131-135</pages><issn>0307-9457</issn><eissn>1465-3338</eissn><abstract>The heritability of resistance of poultry to Salmonella enteritidis (SE) was investigated. Three measurements of resistance were made: survival after intramuscular inoculation of 419 day-old chicks, absence versus presence of Salmonella in spleens and caeca 4 weeks after oral inoculation of 304 hens at peak of laying, and antibody response of 228 hens following two inoculations of an aroA mutant of this serotype. In the first two models of infection, resistance appeared to be heritable. The heritability was estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively, at 0.14 ± 0.10 and 0.62 ± 0.16 for chick mortality, 0.47 ± 0.21 and 0.13 ± 0.26 for resistance to spleen contamination, and 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.53 ± 0.26 for resistance to caecal contamination in laying hens. By contrast the estimated heritability of antibody response was very low (0.03 ± 0.08 and 0.10 ± 0.08 when estimated from the sire and dam components, respectively). These results suggest that a selection for increased resistance to SE may be efficient.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>26911499</pmid><doi>10.1080/03079459994858</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-9457
ispartof Avian pathology, 1999-04, Vol.28 (2), p.131-135
issn 0307-9457
1465-3338
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02693392v1
source IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Computer Science
Genetics
Life Sciences
Mortality
Poultry
Salmonella
title Genetic resistance to mortality of day-old chicks and carrier-state of hens after inoculation with Salmonella enteritidis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20resistance%20to%20mortality%20of%20day-old%20chicks%20and%20carrier-state%20of%20hens%20after%20inoculation%20with%20Salmonella%20enteritidis&rft.jtitle=Avian%20pathology&rft.au=Beaumont,%20C.&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=131-135&rft.issn=0307-9457&rft.eissn=1465-3338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03079459994858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E42248287%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204615540&rft_id=info:pmid/26911499&rfr_iscdi=true