Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area

Farmers increasingly need to adjust their management practices to accommodate unexpected events such as drought, and preserve the sustainability of their production. This flexibility requires background knowledge about where and when freedom of choice can be exercised. Here, we designed an analysis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy for sustainable development 2009-04, Vol.29 (2), p.381-389
Hauptverfasser: Martin, G., Hossard, L., Theau, J. P., Therond, O., Josien, E., Cruz, P., Rellier, J. P., Martin-Clouaire, R., Duru, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 2
container_start_page 381
container_title Agronomy for sustainable development
container_volume 29
creator Martin, G.
Hossard, L.
Theau, J. P.
Therond, O.
Josien, E.
Cruz, P.
Rellier, J. P.
Martin-Clouaire, R.
Duru, M.
description Farmers increasingly need to adjust their management practices to accommodate unexpected events such as drought, and preserve the sustainability of their production. This flexibility requires background knowledge about where and when freedom of choice can be exercised. Here, we designed an analysis framework for grassland-based farming systems in mountainous and less-favored areas. An expert-based discrimination tree characterizes organizational flexibility by determining the range of possible types of grassland use under various topographic and farming constraints such as suitability for mechanization, and ease of access to a field. A set of time windows evaluates the timing flexibility in grassland use, each associated with a combination of a grassland community type and a type of grassland use. Our results show that the outputs of the discrimination tree match for 139 of 165 grassland fields, by comparison with field data obtained in the French Aubrac region. For a particular type of grassland use, the set of time windows proves that timing flexibility in grassland use between grassland community types can increase by 15 days over a 37-day time range. When applying the two components of the analysis framework to a farm case, it shows that 24% of the farm area offers organizational flexibility, with several possibilities for grassland use. Timing flexibility for bringing forward or delaying the use of the grassland fields is unused in the farm. Most of the dates of grassland first use are similar irrespective of the diversity of grassland communities. The application of the analysis framework offers a sound evaluation of the potential flexibility to establish where and when it is possible to adjust management practices to cope with unexpected events. It can also be helpful in setting up coherent alternatives to the observed management strategies that can then be expanded in dynamic simulation models enabling deeper analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/agro:2008063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02666273v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21320944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11db49e9f1ddf0d940df1f0767f99609d0c3a0dff11a105e163372c9001317633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFvFCEYhifGJtbWmz-AiyYmTv2-GZYRb5uNtSabeKk3E_ItA7s0FEZgTNtfL-NuevIEvDw85Hub5i3CFcIKP9E-xS8dwGcQ_YvmHIehbwFXq5f_9ryFgYtXzeuc7wD4kpw3vzYHSqSLSe7JhT2bYjGhOPLMevPgds678shcYPtEOXsKI5uzuWLrafJOU3ExsBJZORh2nUzQB7aed1XIKBm6bM4s-WzenNaL5uf119vNTbv98e37Zr1tNQdRWsRxx6WRFsfRwig5jBYtDGKwUgqQI-ieamYRqc5pUPT90GkJgD0O9XDRfDh6D-TVlNw9pUcVyamb9VYtGXRCiG7o_2Bl3x_ZKcXfs8lF3busja-jmThn1WHfgeS8gh-PoE4x52TssxlBLXWrpW51qrvi705eypq8TRS0y89vqnYlBV_-b49crldhb5K6i3MKtZ7_e_8CPmOONg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21320944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Martin, G. ; Hossard, L. ; Theau, J. P. ; Therond, O. ; Josien, E. ; Cruz, P. ; Rellier, J. P. ; Martin-Clouaire, R. ; Duru, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, G. ; Hossard, L. ; Theau, J. P. ; Therond, O. ; Josien, E. ; Cruz, P. ; Rellier, J. P. ; Martin-Clouaire, R. ; Duru, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Farmers increasingly need to adjust their management practices to accommodate unexpected events such as drought, and preserve the sustainability of their production. This flexibility requires background knowledge about where and when freedom of choice can be exercised. Here, we designed an analysis framework for grassland-based farming systems in mountainous and less-favored areas. An expert-based discrimination tree characterizes organizational flexibility by determining the range of possible types of grassland use under various topographic and farming constraints such as suitability for mechanization, and ease of access to a field. A set of time windows evaluates the timing flexibility in grassland use, each associated with a combination of a grassland community type and a type of grassland use. Our results show that the outputs of the discrimination tree match for 139 of 165 grassland fields, by comparison with field data obtained in the French Aubrac region. For a particular type of grassland use, the set of time windows proves that timing flexibility in grassland use between grassland community types can increase by 15 days over a 37-day time range. When applying the two components of the analysis framework to a farm case, it shows that 24% of the farm area offers organizational flexibility, with several possibilities for grassland use. Timing flexibility for bringing forward or delaying the use of the grassland fields is unused in the farm. Most of the dates of grassland first use are similar irrespective of the diversity of grassland communities. The application of the analysis framework offers a sound evaluation of the potential flexibility to establish where and when it is possible to adjust management practices to cope with unexpected events. It can also be helpful in setting up coherent alternatives to the observed management strategies that can then be expanded in dynamic simulation models enabling deeper analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1774-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1773-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/agro:2008063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Life Sciences ; Research Article ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Agronomy for sustainable development, 2009-04, Vol.29 (2), p.381-389</ispartof><rights>Springer S+B Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11db49e9f1ddf0d940df1f0767f99609d0c3a0dff11a105e163372c9001317633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11db49e9f1ddf0d940df1f0767f99609d0c3a0dff11a105e163372c9001317633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0495-5886 ; 0000-0003-1875-0777 ; 0000-0002-5543-3490 ; 0000-0003-0191-3509 ; 0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1051/agro:2008063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1051/agro:2008063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21359641$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02666273$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossard, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theau, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therond, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josien, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rellier, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin-Clouaire, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duru, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area</title><title>Agronomy for sustainable development</title><addtitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</addtitle><description>Farmers increasingly need to adjust their management practices to accommodate unexpected events such as drought, and preserve the sustainability of their production. This flexibility requires background knowledge about where and when freedom of choice can be exercised. Here, we designed an analysis framework for grassland-based farming systems in mountainous and less-favored areas. An expert-based discrimination tree characterizes organizational flexibility by determining the range of possible types of grassland use under various topographic and farming constraints such as suitability for mechanization, and ease of access to a field. A set of time windows evaluates the timing flexibility in grassland use, each associated with a combination of a grassland community type and a type of grassland use. Our results show that the outputs of the discrimination tree match for 139 of 165 grassland fields, by comparison with field data obtained in the French Aubrac region. For a particular type of grassland use, the set of time windows proves that timing flexibility in grassland use between grassland community types can increase by 15 days over a 37-day time range. When applying the two components of the analysis framework to a farm case, it shows that 24% of the farm area offers organizational flexibility, with several possibilities for grassland use. Timing flexibility for bringing forward or delaying the use of the grassland fields is unused in the farm. Most of the dates of grassland first use are similar irrespective of the diversity of grassland communities. The application of the analysis framework offers a sound evaluation of the potential flexibility to establish where and when it is possible to adjust management practices to cope with unexpected events. It can also be helpful in setting up coherent alternatives to the observed management strategies that can then be expanded in dynamic simulation models enabling deeper analysis.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>1774-0746</issn><issn>1773-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEFvFCEYhifGJtbWmz-AiyYmTv2-GZYRb5uNtSabeKk3E_ItA7s0FEZgTNtfL-NuevIEvDw85Hub5i3CFcIKP9E-xS8dwGcQ_YvmHIehbwFXq5f_9ryFgYtXzeuc7wD4kpw3vzYHSqSLSe7JhT2bYjGhOPLMevPgds678shcYPtEOXsKI5uzuWLrafJOU3ExsBJZORh2nUzQB7aed1XIKBm6bM4s-WzenNaL5uf119vNTbv98e37Zr1tNQdRWsRxx6WRFsfRwig5jBYtDGKwUgqQI-ieamYRqc5pUPT90GkJgD0O9XDRfDh6D-TVlNw9pUcVyamb9VYtGXRCiG7o_2Bl3x_ZKcXfs8lF3busja-jmThn1WHfgeS8gh-PoE4x52TssxlBLXWrpW51qrvi705eypq8TRS0y89vqnYlBV_-b49crldhb5K6i3MKtZ7_e_8CPmOONg</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Martin, G.</creator><creator>Hossard, L.</creator><creator>Theau, J. P.</creator><creator>Therond, O.</creator><creator>Josien, E.</creator><creator>Cruz, P.</creator><creator>Rellier, J. P.</creator><creator>Martin-Clouaire, R.</creator><creator>Duru, M.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>EDP Sciences</general><general>Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-3490</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area</title><author>Martin, G. ; Hossard, L. ; Theau, J. P. ; Therond, O. ; Josien, E. ; Cruz, P. ; Rellier, J. P. ; Martin-Clouaire, R. ; Duru, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11db49e9f1ddf0d940df1f0767f99609d0c3a0dff11a105e163372c9001317633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossard, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theau, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therond, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josien, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rellier, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin-Clouaire, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duru, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, G.</au><au>Hossard, L.</au><au>Theau, J. P.</au><au>Therond, O.</au><au>Josien, E.</au><au>Cruz, P.</au><au>Rellier, J. P.</au><au>Martin-Clouaire, R.</au><au>Duru, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle><stitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</stitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>381-389</pages><issn>1774-0746</issn><eissn>1773-0155</eissn><abstract>Farmers increasingly need to adjust their management practices to accommodate unexpected events such as drought, and preserve the sustainability of their production. This flexibility requires background knowledge about where and when freedom of choice can be exercised. Here, we designed an analysis framework for grassland-based farming systems in mountainous and less-favored areas. An expert-based discrimination tree characterizes organizational flexibility by determining the range of possible types of grassland use under various topographic and farming constraints such as suitability for mechanization, and ease of access to a field. A set of time windows evaluates the timing flexibility in grassland use, each associated with a combination of a grassland community type and a type of grassland use. Our results show that the outputs of the discrimination tree match for 139 of 165 grassland fields, by comparison with field data obtained in the French Aubrac region. For a particular type of grassland use, the set of time windows proves that timing flexibility in grassland use between grassland community types can increase by 15 days over a 37-day time range. When applying the two components of the analysis framework to a farm case, it shows that 24% of the farm area offers organizational flexibility, with several possibilities for grassland use. Timing flexibility for bringing forward or delaying the use of the grassland fields is unused in the farm. Most of the dates of grassland first use are similar irrespective of the diversity of grassland communities. The application of the analysis framework offers a sound evaluation of the potential flexibility to establish where and when it is possible to adjust management practices to cope with unexpected events. It can also be helpful in setting up coherent alternatives to the observed management strategies that can then be expanded in dynamic simulation models enabling deeper analysis.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1051/agro:2008063</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-5886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1875-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-3490</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-4393</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1774-0746
ispartof Agronomy for sustainable development, 2009-04, Vol.29 (2), p.381-389
issn 1774-0746
1773-0155
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02666273v1
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural sciences
Agriculture
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Life Sciences
Research Article
Soil Science & Conservation
Sustainable Development
title Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use. Application to the French Aubrac area
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T02%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20potential%20flexibility%20in%20grassland%20use.%20Application%20to%20the%20French%20Aubrac%20area&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.au=Martin,%20G.&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=381-389&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/agro:2008063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E21320944%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21320944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true