Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts

The environmental and economic performance of five Charolais beef production systems (three specialized beef producer test cases in grassland areas and two mixed crop–livestock test cases with a more intensive production system) were assessed by coupling an economic optimization model (“Opt’INRA”) w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural systems 2010, Vol.103 (1), p.41-50
Hauptverfasser: Veysset, P., Lherm, M., Bébin, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Agricultural systems
container_volume 103
creator Veysset, P.
Lherm, M.
Bébin, D.
description The environmental and economic performance of five Charolais beef production systems (three specialized beef producer test cases in grassland areas and two mixed crop–livestock test cases with a more intensive production system) were assessed by coupling an economic optimization model (“Opt’INRA”) with a model assessing non-renewable energy (NRE) consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (“PLANETE”). The test cases studied covered a relatively diverse range of raised and sold animals: calf-to-weanling or calf-to-beef systems (animals sold: from 10-month-old weaners to 36-month-old beef steers). In 2006, NRE consumption ranged from 26,440 to 31,863 MJ/ton of live weight produced over 1 year. Fuels and lubricants were the main factors of NRE consumption, followed by fertilizers and farm equipment. Livestock was the main driver of global warming potential. GHG emissions, at 14.3–18.3 tCO 2eq/t LW, were mainly determined by the proportion of cows in the total herd livestock units, according to the farming system deployed, i.e. calf-to-weanling vs. calf-to-beef. Against a background of rising energy costs, farms running mixed crop–livestock systems enjoy greater flexibility to adjust their farming systems than grassland-based farms, enabling them to minimize the drop in income over the timeframe to 2012 (−3%). In this same setting, specialist beef producers face a 15–25% drop in income. In all the scenarios run, system adjustments designed to minimize the drop in income have only a very limited impact on NRE consumption and GHG emissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02665855v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308521X09000948</els_id><sourcerecordid>21312491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-1ea12ef210fd26babe22517b97e81178d346c230b4071a089e151a5e22a78d3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxiMEEmXhBbjgExLSpoyd5k8Rl1W1y65UxAFW4mZNnUnrksTFk1bKy_CsTBS0Rw5jS57ffOOZL0nealhq0MXH4xL3PC4NwHoJ1RIgf5YsdFVmqTFF-TxZQAZVmhv982XyivkIAmqoFsmf257iflQu9HzuToMP_bXaR6L-EM5Mao-sqPPMkmCFfa1I0NB5p04UmxA77B0pZCbmjvqBle_VXaTeHdTmgDG06Fnx2f1qKSqHw9CSajB2_El9DTW16Q6ZapHGdmQ_9xBdcsgDv05eNNgyvfl3XyWPd7c_Nvfp9tuXh83NNnUy05BqQm2oMRqa2hQ73JExuS5365IqrcuqzlaFMxnsVlBqhGpNOteYC4VT0mVXyYdZ94CtPUXfYRxtQG_vb7Z2egNTFHmV5xct7PuZPcXw-0w8WNmPo7bFnmRn1uhMm9V6As0MuhiYIzVPyhrsZJs92sk2O9lmobJimxQ9zEWRTuSeKogI955HtheboYZMzlHCgGhl8lF5lDhJrLTNwR6GTrTezVoNBukUPdvH71KRgS5hJRMJ8XkmSJZ78RQtOy_eUe3FgcHWwf_vs38B0SPF-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21312491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Veysset, P. ; Lherm, M. ; Bébin, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Veysset, P. ; Lherm, M. ; Bébin, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The environmental and economic performance of five Charolais beef production systems (three specialized beef producer test cases in grassland areas and two mixed crop–livestock test cases with a more intensive production system) were assessed by coupling an economic optimization model (“Opt’INRA”) with a model assessing non-renewable energy (NRE) consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (“PLANETE”). The test cases studied covered a relatively diverse range of raised and sold animals: calf-to-weanling or calf-to-beef systems (animals sold: from 10-month-old weaners to 36-month-old beef steers). In 2006, NRE consumption ranged from 26,440 to 31,863 MJ/ton of live weight produced over 1 year. Fuels and lubricants were the main factors of NRE consumption, followed by fertilizers and farm equipment. Livestock was the main driver of global warming potential. GHG emissions, at 14.3–18.3 tCO 2eq/t LW, were mainly determined by the proportion of cows in the total herd livestock units, according to the farming system deployed, i.e. calf-to-weanling vs. calf-to-beef. Against a background of rising energy costs, farms running mixed crop–livestock systems enjoy greater flexibility to adjust their farming systems than grassland-based farms, enabling them to minimize the drop in income over the timeframe to 2012 (−3%). In this same setting, specialist beef producers face a 15–25% drop in income. In all the scenarios run, system adjustments designed to minimize the drop in income have only a very limited impact on NRE consumption and GHG emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-521X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture, economy and politics ; beef cattle ; beef cows ; calves ; Charolais ; cow-calf operations ; economic analysis ; energy use and consumption ; gas emissions ; greenhouse gases ; Life Sciences ; optimization ; profitability ; simulation models ; weanlings</subject><ispartof>Agricultural systems, 2010, Vol.103 (1), p.41-50</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-1ea12ef210fd26babe22517b97e81178d346c230b4071a089e151a5e22a78d3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-1ea12ef210fd26babe22517b97e81178d346c230b4071a089e151a5e22a78d3c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8914-0143</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,4008,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagisys/v_3a103_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a41-50.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02665855$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veysset, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lherm, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bébin, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts</title><title>Agricultural systems</title><description>The environmental and economic performance of five Charolais beef production systems (three specialized beef producer test cases in grassland areas and two mixed crop–livestock test cases with a more intensive production system) were assessed by coupling an economic optimization model (“Opt’INRA”) with a model assessing non-renewable energy (NRE) consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (“PLANETE”). The test cases studied covered a relatively diverse range of raised and sold animals: calf-to-weanling or calf-to-beef systems (animals sold: from 10-month-old weaners to 36-month-old beef steers). In 2006, NRE consumption ranged from 26,440 to 31,863 MJ/ton of live weight produced over 1 year. Fuels and lubricants were the main factors of NRE consumption, followed by fertilizers and farm equipment. Livestock was the main driver of global warming potential. GHG emissions, at 14.3–18.3 tCO 2eq/t LW, were mainly determined by the proportion of cows in the total herd livestock units, according to the farming system deployed, i.e. calf-to-weanling vs. calf-to-beef. Against a background of rising energy costs, farms running mixed crop–livestock systems enjoy greater flexibility to adjust their farming systems than grassland-based farms, enabling them to minimize the drop in income over the timeframe to 2012 (−3%). In this same setting, specialist beef producers face a 15–25% drop in income. In all the scenarios run, system adjustments designed to minimize the drop in income have only a very limited impact on NRE consumption and GHG emissions.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture, economy and politics</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>beef cows</subject><subject>calves</subject><subject>Charolais</subject><subject>cow-calf operations</subject><subject>economic analysis</subject><subject>energy use and consumption</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>profitability</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>weanlings</subject><issn>0308-521X</issn><issn>1873-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxiMEEmXhBbjgExLSpoyd5k8Rl1W1y65UxAFW4mZNnUnrksTFk1bKy_CsTBS0Rw5jS57ffOOZL0nealhq0MXH4xL3PC4NwHoJ1RIgf5YsdFVmqTFF-TxZQAZVmhv982XyivkIAmqoFsmf257iflQu9HzuToMP_bXaR6L-EM5Mao-sqPPMkmCFfa1I0NB5p04UmxA77B0pZCbmjvqBle_VXaTeHdTmgDG06Fnx2f1qKSqHw9CSajB2_El9DTW16Q6ZapHGdmQ_9xBdcsgDv05eNNgyvfl3XyWPd7c_Nvfp9tuXh83NNnUy05BqQm2oMRqa2hQ73JExuS5365IqrcuqzlaFMxnsVlBqhGpNOteYC4VT0mVXyYdZ94CtPUXfYRxtQG_vb7Z2egNTFHmV5xct7PuZPcXw-0w8WNmPo7bFnmRn1uhMm9V6As0MuhiYIzVPyhrsZJs92sk2O9lmobJimxQ9zEWRTuSeKogI955HtheboYZMzlHCgGhl8lF5lDhJrLTNwR6GTrTezVoNBukUPdvH71KRgS5hJRMJ8XkmSJZ78RQtOy_eUe3FgcHWwf_vs38B0SPF-g</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Veysset, P.</creator><creator>Lherm, M.</creator><creator>Bébin, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>[England]: Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Masson</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-0143</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts</title><author>Veysset, P. ; Lherm, M. ; Bébin, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-1ea12ef210fd26babe22517b97e81178d346c230b4071a089e151a5e22a78d3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture, economy and politics</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>beef cows</topic><topic>calves</topic><topic>Charolais</topic><topic>cow-calf operations</topic><topic>economic analysis</topic><topic>energy use and consumption</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>profitability</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>weanlings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veysset, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lherm, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bébin, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veysset, P.</au><au>Lherm, M.</au><au>Bébin, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>41-50</pages><issn>0308-521X</issn><eissn>1873-2267</eissn><abstract>The environmental and economic performance of five Charolais beef production systems (three specialized beef producer test cases in grassland areas and two mixed crop–livestock test cases with a more intensive production system) were assessed by coupling an economic optimization model (“Opt’INRA”) with a model assessing non-renewable energy (NRE) consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (“PLANETE”). The test cases studied covered a relatively diverse range of raised and sold animals: calf-to-weanling or calf-to-beef systems (animals sold: from 10-month-old weaners to 36-month-old beef steers). In 2006, NRE consumption ranged from 26,440 to 31,863 MJ/ton of live weight produced over 1 year. Fuels and lubricants were the main factors of NRE consumption, followed by fertilizers and farm equipment. Livestock was the main driver of global warming potential. GHG emissions, at 14.3–18.3 tCO 2eq/t LW, were mainly determined by the proportion of cows in the total herd livestock units, according to the farming system deployed, i.e. calf-to-weanling vs. calf-to-beef. Against a background of rising energy costs, farms running mixed crop–livestock systems enjoy greater flexibility to adjust their farming systems than grassland-based farms, enabling them to minimize the drop in income over the timeframe to 2012 (−3%). In this same setting, specialist beef producers face a 15–25% drop in income. In all the scenarios run, system adjustments designed to minimize the drop in income have only a very limited impact on NRE consumption and GHG emissions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-0143</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-521X
ispartof Agricultural systems, 2010, Vol.103 (1), p.41-50
issn 0308-521X
1873-2267
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02665855v1
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural sciences
Agriculture, economy and politics
beef cattle
beef cows
calves
Charolais
cow-calf operations
economic analysis
energy use and consumption
gas emissions
greenhouse gases
Life Sciences
optimization
profitability
simulation models
weanlings
title Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A42%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20consumption,%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20and%20economic%20performance%20assessments%20in%20French%20Charolais%20suckler%20cattle%20farms:%20Model-based%20analysis%20and%20forecasts&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20systems&rft.au=Veysset,%20P.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=41-50&rft.issn=0308-521X&rft.eissn=1873-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E21312491%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21312491&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308521X09000948&rfr_iscdi=true