STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT
Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.9-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | PRIETO, J. A LEBON, E OJEDA, H |
description | Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD).
Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD.
Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02659264v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e8529a6f0f3e4a82a696f6f17b7daeae</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2636420063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6c4d644515ecb63d5ea07a69267678ab8b4ba2eda9930ff6965db5a3582ee2343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1r2zAYhc3YYKHtf9DNYLtwpm_bl1oiNwLPDraSXQrZlrcUN-6sdGz_vkoTCrsSOpzznBdOFAEElximCfw6ueMUT0cXvkGjdImWiLLsXbTANKMxwgl6Hy0QYiiGOGUfozvvHyCECGGGOFxEfxtdfRdaFOCb3Ii9qmpQ5WCt8lzWstTgvhZbuVelBKtdodVe1A1QJahls63KRgJdgaZSBfghtKxBo4XeNUCUayBUfRX3Yhuo2xBpdrUEa5mrldK30YfBjt7dXd-baJdLvdrERXWvVqKIO5rgU8w72nNKGWKuaznpmbMwsTzDPOFJatu0pa3FrrdZRuAw8IyzvmWWsBQ7hwklN5G6cPvJPpin-fBo539msgfzKkzzT2Pn06EbnXEpw5nlAxyIozbFoYYPfEBJm_TWWRdYXy6sX3b8D7URhTlrEHMWTqN_UPB-vnif5un3s_Mn83jwnRtHe3TTszeYE04xhJwEa3qxdvPk_eyGNzaC5nVnc97ZhJ3NeWdDqUHmvHOIfrq2WN_ZcZjtsTv4tzwmBBESql4A_DWfoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636420063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>PRIETO, J. A ; LEBON, E ; OJEDA, H</creator><creatorcontrib>PRIETO, J. A ; LEBON, E ; OJEDA, H</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD).
Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD.
Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1151-0285</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2494-1271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2494-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bordeaux: Vigne et vins</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; air ; anisohydric ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical and Process Engineering ; cultivars ; drought ; drought tolerance ; Engineering Sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; field experimentation ; Food engineering ; France ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gas exchange ; Generalities. Genetics. Plant material ; Genetic resources, diversity ; genetic variability ; genetic variation ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; grapes ; greenhouses ; isohydric ; leaf water potential ; leaves ; Life Sciences ; photosynthesis ; Plant material ; soil water ; soil water deficit ; stomatal movement ; transpiration ; vapor pressure deficit ; viability ; viticulture ; Vitis ; VPD ; water deficit ; water stress ; water use efficiency ; water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin, 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.9-20</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6c4d644515ecb63d5ea07a69267678ab8b4ba2eda9930ff6965db5a3582ee2343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23313326$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02659264$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PRIETO, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEBON, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OJEDA, H</creatorcontrib><title>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</title><title>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin</title><description>Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD).
Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD.
Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>air</subject><subject>anisohydric</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical and Process Engineering</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>drought tolerance</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Food engineering</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</subject><subject>Genetic resources, diversity</subject><subject>genetic variability</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>grapes</subject><subject>greenhouses</subject><subject>isohydric</subject><subject>leaf water potential</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant material</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>soil water deficit</subject><subject>stomatal movement</subject><subject>transpiration</subject><subject>vapor pressure deficit</subject><subject>viability</subject><subject>viticulture</subject><subject>Vitis</subject><subject>VPD</subject><subject>water deficit</subject><subject>water stress</subject><subject>water use efficiency</subject><subject>water vapor</subject><issn>1151-0285</issn><issn>2494-1271</issn><issn>2494-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV1r2zAYhc3YYKHtf9DNYLtwpm_bl1oiNwLPDraSXQrZlrcUN-6sdGz_vkoTCrsSOpzznBdOFAEElximCfw6ueMUT0cXvkGjdImWiLLsXbTANKMxwgl6Hy0QYiiGOGUfozvvHyCECGGGOFxEfxtdfRdaFOCb3Ii9qmpQ5WCt8lzWstTgvhZbuVelBKtdodVe1A1QJahls63KRgJdgaZSBfghtKxBo4XeNUCUayBUfRX3Yhuo2xBpdrUEa5mrldK30YfBjt7dXd-baJdLvdrERXWvVqKIO5rgU8w72nNKGWKuaznpmbMwsTzDPOFJatu0pa3FrrdZRuAw8IyzvmWWsBQ7hwklN5G6cPvJPpin-fBo539msgfzKkzzT2Pn06EbnXEpw5nlAxyIozbFoYYPfEBJm_TWWRdYXy6sX3b8D7URhTlrEHMWTqN_UPB-vnif5un3s_Mn83jwnRtHe3TTszeYE04xhJwEa3qxdvPk_eyGNzaC5nVnc97ZhJ3NeWdDqUHmvHOIfrq2WN_ZcZjtsTv4tzwmBBESql4A_DWfoQ</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>PRIETO, J. A</creator><creator>LEBON, E</creator><creator>OJEDA, H</creator><general>Vigne et vins</general><general>International Viticulture and Enology Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</title><author>PRIETO, J. A ; LEBON, E ; OJEDA, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6c4d644515ecb63d5ea07a69267678ab8b4ba2eda9930ff6965db5a3582ee2343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>air</topic><topic>anisohydric</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical and Process Engineering</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>drought tolerance</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Food engineering</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</topic><topic>Genetic resources, diversity</topic><topic>genetic variability</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>grapes</topic><topic>greenhouses</topic><topic>isohydric</topic><topic>leaf water potential</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant material</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>soil water deficit</topic><topic>stomatal movement</topic><topic>transpiration</topic><topic>vapor pressure deficit</topic><topic>viability</topic><topic>viticulture</topic><topic>Vitis</topic><topic>VPD</topic><topic>water deficit</topic><topic>water stress</topic><topic>water use efficiency</topic><topic>water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PRIETO, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEBON, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OJEDA, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PRIETO, J. A</au><au>LEBON, E</au><au>OJEDA, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</atitle><jtitle>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>9-20</pages><issn>1151-0285</issn><issn>2494-1271</issn><eissn>2494-1271</eissn><abstract>Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD).
Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD.
Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.</abstract><cop>Bordeaux</cop><pub>Vigne et vins</pub><doi>10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1151-0285 |
ispartof | Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin, 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.9-20 |
issn | 1151-0285 2494-1271 2494-1271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02659264v1 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions air anisohydric Biological and medical sciences Chemical and Process Engineering cultivars drought drought tolerance Engineering Sciences Environmental Sciences field experimentation Food engineering France Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology gas exchange Generalities. Genetics. Plant material Genetic resources, diversity genetic variability genetic variation Genetics and breeding of economic plants grapes greenhouses isohydric leaf water potential leaves Life Sciences photosynthesis Plant material soil water soil water deficit stomatal movement transpiration vapor pressure deficit viability viticulture Vitis VPD water deficit water stress water use efficiency water vapor |
title | STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T16%3A54%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STOMATAL%20BEHAVIOR%20OF%20DIFFERENT%20GRAPEVINE%20CULTIVARS%20IN%20RESPONSE%20TO%20SOIL%20WATER%20STATUS%20AND%20AIR%20WATER%20VAPOR%20PRESSURE%20DEFICIT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20international%20des%20sciences%20de%20la%20vigne%20et%20du%20vin&rft.au=PRIETO,%20J.%20A&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=9-20&rft.issn=1151-0285&rft.eissn=2494-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2636420063%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636420063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e8529a6f0f3e4a82a696f6f17b7daeae&rfr_iscdi=true |