STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT

Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.9-20
Hauptverfasser: PRIETO, J. A, LEBON, E, OJEDA, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin
container_volume 44
creator PRIETO, J. A
LEBON, E
OJEDA, H
description Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD. Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.
doi_str_mv 10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02659264v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e8529a6f0f3e4a82a696f6f17b7daeae</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2636420063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6c4d644515ecb63d5ea07a69267678ab8b4ba2eda9930ff6965db5a3582ee2343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1r2zAYhc3YYKHtf9DNYLtwpm_bl1oiNwLPDraSXQrZlrcUN-6sdGz_vkoTCrsSOpzznBdOFAEElximCfw6ueMUT0cXvkGjdImWiLLsXbTANKMxwgl6Hy0QYiiGOGUfozvvHyCECGGGOFxEfxtdfRdaFOCb3Ii9qmpQ5WCt8lzWstTgvhZbuVelBKtdodVe1A1QJahls63KRgJdgaZSBfghtKxBo4XeNUCUayBUfRX3Yhuo2xBpdrUEa5mrldK30YfBjt7dXd-baJdLvdrERXWvVqKIO5rgU8w72nNKGWKuaznpmbMwsTzDPOFJatu0pa3FrrdZRuAw8IyzvmWWsBQ7hwklN5G6cPvJPpin-fBo539msgfzKkzzT2Pn06EbnXEpw5nlAxyIozbFoYYPfEBJm_TWWRdYXy6sX3b8D7URhTlrEHMWTqN_UPB-vnif5un3s_Mn83jwnRtHe3TTszeYE04xhJwEa3qxdvPk_eyGNzaC5nVnc97ZhJ3NeWdDqUHmvHOIfrq2WN_ZcZjtsTv4tzwmBBESql4A_DWfoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636420063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>PRIETO, J. A ; LEBON, E ; OJEDA, H</creator><creatorcontrib>PRIETO, J. A ; LEBON, E ; OJEDA, H</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD. Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1151-0285</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2494-1271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2494-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bordeaux: Vigne et vins</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; air ; anisohydric ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical and Process Engineering ; cultivars ; drought ; drought tolerance ; Engineering Sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; field experimentation ; Food engineering ; France ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gas exchange ; Generalities. Genetics. Plant material ; Genetic resources, diversity ; genetic variability ; genetic variation ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; grapes ; greenhouses ; isohydric ; leaf water potential ; leaves ; Life Sciences ; photosynthesis ; Plant material ; soil water ; soil water deficit ; stomatal movement ; transpiration ; vapor pressure deficit ; viability ; viticulture ; Vitis ; VPD ; water deficit ; water stress ; water use efficiency ; water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin, 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.9-20</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6c4d644515ecb63d5ea07a69267678ab8b4ba2eda9930ff6965db5a3582ee2343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23313326$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02659264$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PRIETO, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEBON, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OJEDA, H</creatorcontrib><title>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</title><title>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin</title><description>Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD. Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>air</subject><subject>anisohydric</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical and Process Engineering</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>drought</subject><subject>drought tolerance</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Food engineering</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</subject><subject>Genetic resources, diversity</subject><subject>genetic variability</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>grapes</subject><subject>greenhouses</subject><subject>isohydric</subject><subject>leaf water potential</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>photosynthesis</subject><subject>Plant material</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>soil water deficit</subject><subject>stomatal movement</subject><subject>transpiration</subject><subject>vapor pressure deficit</subject><subject>viability</subject><subject>viticulture</subject><subject>Vitis</subject><subject>VPD</subject><subject>water deficit</subject><subject>water stress</subject><subject>water use efficiency</subject><subject>water vapor</subject><issn>1151-0285</issn><issn>2494-1271</issn><issn>2494-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV1r2zAYhc3YYKHtf9DNYLtwpm_bl1oiNwLPDraSXQrZlrcUN-6sdGz_vkoTCrsSOpzznBdOFAEElximCfw6ueMUT0cXvkGjdImWiLLsXbTANKMxwgl6Hy0QYiiGOGUfozvvHyCECGGGOFxEfxtdfRdaFOCb3Ii9qmpQ5WCt8lzWstTgvhZbuVelBKtdodVe1A1QJahls63KRgJdgaZSBfghtKxBo4XeNUCUayBUfRX3Yhuo2xBpdrUEa5mrldK30YfBjt7dXd-baJdLvdrERXWvVqKIO5rgU8w72nNKGWKuaznpmbMwsTzDPOFJatu0pa3FrrdZRuAw8IyzvmWWsBQ7hwklN5G6cPvJPpin-fBo539msgfzKkzzT2Pn06EbnXEpw5nlAxyIozbFoYYPfEBJm_TWWRdYXy6sX3b8D7URhTlrEHMWTqN_UPB-vnif5un3s_Mn83jwnRtHe3TTszeYE04xhJwEa3qxdvPk_eyGNzaC5nVnc97ZhJ3NeWdDqUHmvHOIfrq2WN_ZcZjtsTv4tzwmBBESql4A_DWfoQ</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>PRIETO, J. A</creator><creator>LEBON, E</creator><creator>OJEDA, H</creator><general>Vigne et vins</general><general>International Viticulture and Enology Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</title><author>PRIETO, J. A ; LEBON, E ; OJEDA, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6c4d644515ecb63d5ea07a69267678ab8b4ba2eda9930ff6965db5a3582ee2343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>air</topic><topic>anisohydric</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical and Process Engineering</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>drought</topic><topic>drought tolerance</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Food engineering</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</topic><topic>Genetic resources, diversity</topic><topic>genetic variability</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>grapes</topic><topic>greenhouses</topic><topic>isohydric</topic><topic>leaf water potential</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>photosynthesis</topic><topic>Plant material</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>soil water deficit</topic><topic>stomatal movement</topic><topic>transpiration</topic><topic>vapor pressure deficit</topic><topic>viability</topic><topic>viticulture</topic><topic>Vitis</topic><topic>VPD</topic><topic>water deficit</topic><topic>water stress</topic><topic>water use efficiency</topic><topic>water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PRIETO, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEBON, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OJEDA, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PRIETO, J. A</au><au>LEBON, E</au><au>OJEDA, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT</atitle><jtitle>Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>9-20</pages><issn>1151-0285</issn><issn>2494-1271</issn><eissn>2494-1271</eissn><abstract>Aims: Genetic variability in grapevine cultivars may influence their strategy to cope with drought through stomatal regulation of transpiration rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stomatal sensitivity of five cultivars (Ekigaïna, Grenache, Marselan, Mourvèdre, and Syrah) to soil water status and air water vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Methods and results: Leaf gas exchange and canopy light interception efficiency (εi) were evaluated through a wide range of predawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) measurements in a field experiment in Southern France. Additionally, greenhouse experiments were carried out to monitor stomatal response to increasing VPD levels. Ekigaïna showed a strong isohydric behavior with the highest decrease in leaf gas exchange in response to soil water stress and VPD. Mourvèdre and Grenache showed a similar but relatively less extreme behavior. These three cultivars showed a constant leaf water status during the day through stomatal regulation and a strong decrease in εi. In contrast, Syrah and Marselan displayed anisohydric behavior as they presented a less sensitive stomatal control. Both cultivars showed fluctuating midday leaf water potential and Marselan was the least affected in terms of εi. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that grape cultivars differed in their stomatal response to soil water deficit and VPD. For a given cultivar, a similar stomatal behavior was found in response to both ΨPD and VPD. Significance and impact of the results: Adaptation to drought and viticulture viability in hot and dry environments could be achieved by identifying and breeding cultivars with drought tolerance traits.</abstract><cop>Bordeaux</cop><pub>Vigne et vins</pub><doi>10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1151-0285
ispartof Journal international des sciences de la vigne et du vin, 2010-01, Vol.44 (1), p.9-20
issn 1151-0285
2494-1271
2494-1271
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02659264v1
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
air
anisohydric
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical and Process Engineering
cultivars
drought
drought tolerance
Engineering Sciences
Environmental Sciences
field experimentation
Food engineering
France
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gas exchange
Generalities. Genetics. Plant material
Genetic resources, diversity
genetic variability
genetic variation
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
grapes
greenhouses
isohydric
leaf water potential
leaves
Life Sciences
photosynthesis
Plant material
soil water
soil water deficit
stomatal movement
transpiration
vapor pressure deficit
viability
viticulture
Vitis
VPD
water deficit
water stress
water use efficiency
water vapor
title STOMATAL BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER STATUS AND AIR WATER VAPOR PRESSURE DEFICIT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T16%3A54%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STOMATAL%20BEHAVIOR%20OF%20DIFFERENT%20GRAPEVINE%20CULTIVARS%20IN%20RESPONSE%20TO%20SOIL%20WATER%20STATUS%20AND%20AIR%20WATER%20VAPOR%20PRESSURE%20DEFICIT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20international%20des%20sciences%20de%20la%20vigne%20et%20du%20vin&rft.au=PRIETO,%20J.%20A&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=9-20&rft.issn=1151-0285&rft.eissn=2494-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.20870/oeno-one.2010.44.1.1459&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2636420063%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636420063&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e8529a6f0f3e4a82a696f6f17b7daeae&rfr_iscdi=true