Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions
This paper analyzes industry adjustments to trade liberalization. It introduces cross‐border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as an alternative mode of industrial restructuring to firms' exit. In a two‐country Cournot model, we examine the responses of domestic and foreign firms endowed with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economics & management strategy 2006-06, Vol.15 (2), p.479-515 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 515 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 479 |
container_title | Journal of economics & management strategy |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Bertrand, Olivier Zitouna, Habib |
description | This paper analyzes industry adjustments to trade liberalization. It introduces cross‐border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as an alternative mode of industrial restructuring to firms' exit. In a two‐country Cournot model, we examine the responses of domestic and foreign firms endowed with different technologies for different stages of trade openness. It is found that the less efficient firm loses market shares in its home market at the beginning of trade liberalization. Only for a more advanced level of liberalization, does it take advantage of a larger access to foreign demand. Trade liberalization may therefore harm its profits too strongly, forcing it to leave the market. However, although its incentives decrease with trade liberalization, the high‐technology firm may be willing to take it over for low organizational and technological costs of firms' integration. In addition, it may buy it out even if the less efficient firm manages to stay. Then, trade liberalization affects M&A incentives depending on the technological gap. For low and high (medium) gap, there is an inverted U‐ (W‐) shaped relation between trade costs and incentives to merge. Moreover, although technology transfer is assumed to be complete, M&A may lead to a reduction in consumers' welfare. Firms may capture some pro‐competitive gains from economic openness. Lastly, an empirical analysis based on a data set of OECD members' multinationals gives some support to these theoretical predictions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00108.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02658379v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1037509171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe6841b3d67a1829ccf13567648245cca73e21a58e70c62b5962cb2ae036c9fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEqXwHSwOSBwS7Dj-EyQOy6psi1IQ7SIkLiOvM2m9pHFrb2DLp8dp0B444Yuf7Peb8fhlGWG0YGm92RZMcJrXjFdFSaksKGVUF_tH2dHh4nHSVOhcVlQ9zZ7FuKXJWXN2lLXrYFokjdtgML37bXbOD8QMLTkb2jHugjM9ucAkRrsbgxuu3pL1NZIL3yPxHVkGH2P-3ocWAznHcIUhPuALeze66KZy8Xn2pDN9xBd_9-Ps64eT9fI0bz6vzpaLJrdiel6HUldsw1upDNNlbW3HuJBKVrqshLVGcSyZERoVtbLciFqWdlMapFzaumv5cfZ6rnttergN7saEe_DGwemigemMllJoruqfLHlfzd7b4O_GNCDcuGix782AfozAZSVT7yoZX_5j3PoxDGkOKLnQWnHBk0nPJjv9R8Du0J5RmHKCLUxxwBQHTDnBQ06wT-i7Gf3lerz_bw4-npxfJpX4fOZd3OH-wJvwA6TiSsC3Tyto1Oo7bb5cguR_AAXypw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235887353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bertrand, Olivier ; Zitouna, Habib</creator><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Olivier ; Zitouna, Habib</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes industry adjustments to trade liberalization. It introduces cross‐border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as an alternative mode of industrial restructuring to firms' exit. In a two‐country Cournot model, we examine the responses of domestic and foreign firms endowed with different technologies for different stages of trade openness. It is found that the less efficient firm loses market shares in its home market at the beginning of trade liberalization. Only for a more advanced level of liberalization, does it take advantage of a larger access to foreign demand. Trade liberalization may therefore harm its profits too strongly, forcing it to leave the market. However, although its incentives decrease with trade liberalization, the high‐technology firm may be willing to take it over for low organizational and technological costs of firms' integration. In addition, it may buy it out even if the less efficient firm manages to stay. Then, trade liberalization affects M&A incentives depending on the technological gap. For low and high (medium) gap, there is an inverted U‐ (W‐) shaped relation between trade costs and incentives to merge. Moreover, although technology transfer is assumed to be complete, M&A may lead to a reduction in consumers' welfare. Firms may capture some pro‐competitive gains from economic openness. Lastly, an empirical analysis based on a data set of OECD members' multinationals gives some support to these theoretical predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-6407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00108.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Business studies ; Competitiveness ; Cross border transactions ; Economic integration ; Economic models ; Effects ; Firm theory ; High tech industries ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Market access ; Market shares ; Modelling ; Organizational change ; Studies ; Technology transfer ; Trade liberalization</subject><ispartof>Journal of economics & management strategy, 2006-06, Vol.15 (2), p.479-515</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Summer 2006</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe6841b3d67a1829ccf13567648245cca73e21a58e70c62b5962cb2ae036c9fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe6841b3d67a1829ccf13567648245cca73e21a58e70c62b5962cb2ae036c9fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1530-9134.2006.00108.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1530-9134.2006.00108.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02658379$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitouna, Habib</creatorcontrib><title>Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions</title><title>Journal of economics & management strategy</title><description>This paper analyzes industry adjustments to trade liberalization. It introduces cross‐border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as an alternative mode of industrial restructuring to firms' exit. In a two‐country Cournot model, we examine the responses of domestic and foreign firms endowed with different technologies for different stages of trade openness. It is found that the less efficient firm loses market shares in its home market at the beginning of trade liberalization. Only for a more advanced level of liberalization, does it take advantage of a larger access to foreign demand. Trade liberalization may therefore harm its profits too strongly, forcing it to leave the market. However, although its incentives decrease with trade liberalization, the high‐technology firm may be willing to take it over for low organizational and technological costs of firms' integration. In addition, it may buy it out even if the less efficient firm manages to stay. Then, trade liberalization affects M&A incentives depending on the technological gap. For low and high (medium) gap, there is an inverted U‐ (W‐) shaped relation between trade costs and incentives to merge. Moreover, although technology transfer is assumed to be complete, M&A may lead to a reduction in consumers' welfare. Firms may capture some pro‐competitive gains from economic openness. Lastly, an empirical analysis based on a data set of OECD members' multinationals gives some support to these theoretical predictions.</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Cross border transactions</subject><subject>Economic integration</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>Firm theory</subject><subject>High tech industries</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Market access</subject><subject>Market shares</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><issn>1058-6407</issn><issn>1530-9134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxSMEEqXwHSwOSBwS7Dj-EyQOy6psi1IQ7SIkLiOvM2m9pHFrb2DLp8dp0B444Yuf7Peb8fhlGWG0YGm92RZMcJrXjFdFSaksKGVUF_tH2dHh4nHSVOhcVlQ9zZ7FuKXJWXN2lLXrYFokjdtgML37bXbOD8QMLTkb2jHugjM9ucAkRrsbgxuu3pL1NZIL3yPxHVkGH2P-3ocWAznHcIUhPuALeze66KZy8Xn2pDN9xBd_9-Ps64eT9fI0bz6vzpaLJrdiel6HUldsw1upDNNlbW3HuJBKVrqshLVGcSyZERoVtbLciFqWdlMapFzaumv5cfZ6rnttergN7saEe_DGwemigemMllJoruqfLHlfzd7b4O_GNCDcuGix782AfozAZSVT7yoZX_5j3PoxDGkOKLnQWnHBk0nPJjv9R8Du0J5RmHKCLUxxwBQHTDnBQ06wT-i7Gf3lerz_bw4-npxfJpX4fOZd3OH-wJvwA6TiSsC3Tyto1Oo7bb5cguR_AAXypw0</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Bertrand, Olivier</creator><creator>Zitouna, Habib</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions</title><author>Bertrand, Olivier ; Zitouna, Habib</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-fe6841b3d67a1829ccf13567648245cca73e21a58e70c62b5962cb2ae036c9fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Cross border transactions</topic><topic>Economic integration</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>Firm theory</topic><topic>High tech industries</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Market access</topic><topic>Market shares</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitouna, Habib</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Journal of economics & management strategy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bertrand, Olivier</au><au>Zitouna, Habib</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economics & management strategy</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>479-515</pages><issn>1058-6407</issn><eissn>1530-9134</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes industry adjustments to trade liberalization. It introduces cross‐border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as an alternative mode of industrial restructuring to firms' exit. In a two‐country Cournot model, we examine the responses of domestic and foreign firms endowed with different technologies for different stages of trade openness. It is found that the less efficient firm loses market shares in its home market at the beginning of trade liberalization. Only for a more advanced level of liberalization, does it take advantage of a larger access to foreign demand. Trade liberalization may therefore harm its profits too strongly, forcing it to leave the market. However, although its incentives decrease with trade liberalization, the high‐technology firm may be willing to take it over for low organizational and technological costs of firms' integration. In addition, it may buy it out even if the less efficient firm manages to stay. Then, trade liberalization affects M&A incentives depending on the technological gap. For low and high (medium) gap, there is an inverted U‐ (W‐) shaped relation between trade costs and incentives to merge. Moreover, although technology transfer is assumed to be complete, M&A may lead to a reduction in consumers' welfare. Firms may capture some pro‐competitive gains from economic openness. Lastly, an empirical analysis based on a data set of OECD members' multinationals gives some support to these theoretical predictions.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00108.x</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-6407 |
ispartof | Journal of economics & management strategy, 2006-06, Vol.15 (2), p.479-515 |
issn | 1058-6407 1530-9134 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02658379v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Business studies Competitiveness Cross border transactions Economic integration Economic models Effects Firm theory High tech industries Humanities and Social Sciences Market access Market shares Modelling Organizational change Studies Technology transfer Trade liberalization |
title | Trade Liberalization and Industrial Restructuring: The Role of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade%20Liberalization%20and%20Industrial%20Restructuring:%20The%20Role%20of%20Cross-Border%20Mergers%20and%20Acquisitions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economics%20&%20management%20strategy&rft.au=Bertrand,%20Olivier&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=479-515&rft.issn=1058-6407&rft.eissn=1530-9134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00108.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1037509171%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235887353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |