Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context
The monetized value of avoided premature mortality typically dominates the calculated benefits of air pollution regulations; therefore, characterization of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates is key to good policymaking. Formal expert judgment elicitation methods are one means of characteriz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Risk analysis 2012-12, Vol.32 (12), p.2133-2151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2151 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2133 |
container_title | Risk analysis |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Roman, Henry A. Hammitt, James K. Walsh, Tyra L. Stieb, David M. |
description | The monetized value of avoided premature mortality typically dominates the calculated benefits of air pollution regulations; therefore, characterization of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates is key to good policymaking. Formal expert judgment elicitation methods are one means of characterizing this uncertainty. They have been applied to characterize uncertainty in the mortality concentration‐response function, but have yet to be used to characterize uncertainty in the economic values placed on avoided mortality. We report the findings of a pilot expert judgment study for Health Canada designed to elicit quantitative probabilistic judgments of uncertainties in Value‐per‐Statistical‐Life (VSL) estimates for use in an air pollution context. The two‐stage elicitation addressed uncertainties in both a base case VSL for a reduction in mortality risk from traumatic accidents and in benefits transfer‐related adjustments to the base case for an air quality application (e.g., adjustments for age, income, and health status). Results for each expert were integrated to develop example quantitative probabilistic uncertainty distributions for VSL that could be incorporated into air quality models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01826.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02644898v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1239059707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6196-f2b1a70697f1b302d81140ac44c13f270e27c1552ebec8d4c45775f0abe9f9303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhi0EYmXwF5AlbuAiwT7-im-QqqrrJlUwMWDSbiwndTQXN-nyAdm_x2lGL7ih9oUtn-e8lo4ehDAlKY3r4zalgulEauApEAopoRnIdHiGZsfCczQjoCDhjMEZetW2W0IoIUK9RGcAQlEu5QxdL4e9azq8DL7wne18XeG6xN29wz9s6B2OVXwzFtrOFzbgtS8d9hW2FZ77Bl_XIfSHrkVddW7oXqMXpQ2te_N0nqPvF8tvi8tk_WV1tZivk0JSLZMScmoVkVqVNGcENhmlnNiC84KyEhRxoAoqBLjcFdmGF1woJUpic6dLzQg7Rx-m3HsbzL7xO9s8mtp6czlfm_GNgOQ809kvGtn3E7tv6ofetZ3Z-bZwIdjK1X1rKANQTAvJ_o9CFreGTJ-AKpBaZ5yfgDJNhFZERfTdP-i27psqjnKklBaEHahsooqmbtvGlccRUGJGRczWjCaY0QQzKmIOipghtr59-qDPd25zbPzrRAQ-TcBvH9zjycHm69XNfLzGgGQKiM644Rhgm59GKqaEuf28MvpCrujt3Z1ZsD_y09Ss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1237950307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Roman, Henry A. ; Hammitt, James K. ; Walsh, Tyra L. ; Stieb, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roman, Henry A. ; Hammitt, James K. ; Walsh, Tyra L. ; Stieb, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>The monetized value of avoided premature mortality typically dominates the calculated benefits of air pollution regulations; therefore, characterization of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates is key to good policymaking. Formal expert judgment elicitation methods are one means of characterizing this uncertainty. They have been applied to characterize uncertainty in the mortality concentration‐response function, but have yet to be used to characterize uncertainty in the economic values placed on avoided mortality. We report the findings of a pilot expert judgment study for Health Canada designed to elicit quantitative probabilistic judgments of uncertainties in Value‐per‐Statistical‐Life (VSL) estimates for use in an air pollution context. The two‐stage elicitation addressed uncertainties in both a base case VSL for a reduction in mortality risk from traumatic accidents and in benefits transfer‐related adjustments to the base case for an air quality application (e.g., adjustments for age, income, and health status). Results for each expert were integrated to develop example quantitative probabilistic uncertainty distributions for VSL that could be incorporated into air quality models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01826.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22571466</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RIANDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Air Pollution ; Air quality ; Benefits ; Canada ; Decision analysis ; Environmental impact ; expert judgment ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Income ; Mortality ; Outdoor air quality ; Policy making ; Pollution control ; Probability ; Public policy ; Regulation ; Risk ; Studies ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty analysis ; value per statistical life</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2012-12, Vol.32 (12), p.2133-2151</ispartof><rights>2012 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><rights>2012 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6196-f2b1a70697f1b302d81140ac44c13f270e27c1552ebec8d4c45775f0abe9f9303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6196-f2b1a70697f1b302d81140ac44c13f270e27c1552ebec8d4c45775f0abe9f9303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.2012.01826.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.2012.01826.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27842,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22571466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02644898$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roman, Henry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammitt, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Tyra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieb, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>The monetized value of avoided premature mortality typically dominates the calculated benefits of air pollution regulations; therefore, characterization of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates is key to good policymaking. Formal expert judgment elicitation methods are one means of characterizing this uncertainty. They have been applied to characterize uncertainty in the mortality concentration‐response function, but have yet to be used to characterize uncertainty in the economic values placed on avoided mortality. We report the findings of a pilot expert judgment study for Health Canada designed to elicit quantitative probabilistic judgments of uncertainties in Value‐per‐Statistical‐Life (VSL) estimates for use in an air pollution context. The two‐stage elicitation addressed uncertainties in both a base case VSL for a reduction in mortality risk from traumatic accidents and in benefits transfer‐related adjustments to the base case for an air quality application (e.g., adjustments for age, income, and health status). Results for each expert were integrated to develop example quantitative probabilistic uncertainty distributions for VSL that could be incorporated into air quality models.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Air Pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>expert judgment</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>value per statistical life</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhi0EYmXwF5AlbuAiwT7-im-QqqrrJlUwMWDSbiwndTQXN-nyAdm_x2lGL7ih9oUtn-e8lo4ehDAlKY3r4zalgulEauApEAopoRnIdHiGZsfCczQjoCDhjMEZetW2W0IoIUK9RGcAQlEu5QxdL4e9azq8DL7wne18XeG6xN29wz9s6B2OVXwzFtrOFzbgtS8d9hW2FZ77Bl_XIfSHrkVddW7oXqMXpQ2te_N0nqPvF8tvi8tk_WV1tZivk0JSLZMScmoVkVqVNGcENhmlnNiC84KyEhRxoAoqBLjcFdmGF1woJUpic6dLzQg7Rx-m3HsbzL7xO9s8mtp6czlfm_GNgOQ809kvGtn3E7tv6ofetZ3Z-bZwIdjK1X1rKANQTAvJ_o9CFreGTJ-AKpBaZ5yfgDJNhFZERfTdP-i27psqjnKklBaEHahsooqmbtvGlccRUGJGRczWjCaY0QQzKmIOipghtr59-qDPd25zbPzrRAQ-TcBvH9zjycHm69XNfLzGgGQKiM644Rhgm59GKqaEuf28MvpCrujt3Z1ZsD_y09Ss</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Roman, Henry A.</creator><creator>Hammitt, James K.</creator><creator>Walsh, Tyra L.</creator><creator>Stieb, David M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context</title><author>Roman, Henry A. ; Hammitt, James K. ; Walsh, Tyra L. ; Stieb, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6196-f2b1a70697f1b302d81140ac44c13f270e27c1552ebec8d4c45775f0abe9f9303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Air Pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>expert judgment</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>value per statistical life</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roman, Henry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammitt, James K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Tyra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stieb, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roman, Henry A.</au><au>Hammitt, James K.</au><au>Walsh, Tyra L.</au><au>Stieb, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2133</spage><epage>2151</epage><pages>2133-2151</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><coden>RIANDF</coden><abstract>The monetized value of avoided premature mortality typically dominates the calculated benefits of air pollution regulations; therefore, characterization of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates is key to good policymaking. Formal expert judgment elicitation methods are one means of characterizing this uncertainty. They have been applied to characterize uncertainty in the mortality concentration‐response function, but have yet to be used to characterize uncertainty in the economic values placed on avoided mortality. We report the findings of a pilot expert judgment study for Health Canada designed to elicit quantitative probabilistic judgments of uncertainties in Value‐per‐Statistical‐Life (VSL) estimates for use in an air pollution context. The two‐stage elicitation addressed uncertainties in both a base case VSL for a reduction in mortality risk from traumatic accidents and in benefits transfer‐related adjustments to the base case for an air quality application (e.g., adjustments for age, income, and health status). Results for each expert were integrated to develop example quantitative probabilistic uncertainty distributions for VSL that could be incorporated into air quality models.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22571466</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01826.x</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
ispartof | Risk analysis, 2012-12, Vol.32 (12), p.2133-2151 |
issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02644898v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Accidents Air Pollution Air quality Benefits Canada Decision analysis Environmental impact expert judgment Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Income Mortality Outdoor air quality Policy making Pollution control Probability Public policy Regulation Risk Studies Uncertainty uncertainty analysis value per statistical life |
title | Expert Elicitation of the Value per Statistical Life in an Air Pollution Context |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T13%3A00%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expert%20Elicitation%20of%20the%20Value%20per%20Statistical%20Life%20in%20an%20Air%20Pollution%20Context&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Roman,%20Henry%20A.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2133&rft.epage=2151&rft.pages=2133-2151&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft.coden=RIANDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01826.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1239059707%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1237950307&rft_id=info:pmid/22571466&rfr_iscdi=true |