ENHANCING WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: ROLE OF CAPITALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE GANGA BASIN

The concept of water productivity (WP) or ‘more crop per drop’ has been revived recently in international water debates. Its application has notably been extended from single crops to mixed farming systems, integrating both crops and livestock, with the wider objective of reducing poverty. Using evi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental agriculture 2011-01, Vol.47 (S1), p.133-151
Hauptverfasser: CLEMENT, FLORIANE, HAILESLASSIE, AMARE, ISHAQ, SABA, BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL, MURTY, M. V. R, SAMAD, MADAR, DEY, SANJIIB, DAS, HIMANGSHU, KHAN, M. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 151
container_issue S1
container_start_page 133
container_title Experimental agriculture
container_volume 47
creator CLEMENT, FLORIANE
HAILESLASSIE, AMARE
ISHAQ, SABA
BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL
MURTY, M. V. R
SAMAD, MADAR
DEY, SANJIIB
DAS, HIMANGSHU
KHAN, M. A.
description The concept of water productivity (WP) or ‘more crop per drop’ has been revived recently in international water debates. Its application has notably been extended from single crops to mixed farming systems, integrating both crops and livestock, with the wider objective of reducing poverty. Using evidence from the Ganga Basin, India, we discuss the relevance of this concept as a tool to guide interventions for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. We argue that WP studies would benefit from greater attention to the role of capitals, inequities and institutions. Firstly, it is crucial to acknowledge the heterogeneity of capitals and capabilities of farmers to make changes in their farming systems and practices and avoid one-fix-all interventions. Identifying pre-existing inequities in water access within and among communities will support better targeting of poor communities. WP interventions can either reinforce or reduce inter-household inequities within communities. We stress the need for assessment of institutional impacts of WP interventions on water access and development.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0014479710000827
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02643709v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0014479710000827</cupid><sourcerecordid>911150442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c949fc608cad504c692ef72464849f833c18c4f66d33b7ebd5a6f5a29ae792f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1r2zAUhsXYYFm3H7A70ZvRC7f6ii3tTnUcR2DsEisZuxKKIncJSZ3aSaH_vjIpLWxMN0fnvM97pMMB4DtG1xjh5KZGCDOWiASjcDhJPoARZrGIGGP4IxgNcjTon8GXvt-GlCJOR2CblTNZpqrM4S-pszm8m1eTRarVUunfcFqFQrXM5uEuiyJbKqlVVf6E86rIYDWFqbxTWhY1lOUEqrLWSi8Gog4J1LMM5rLMJbyVtSq_gk-N3fX-22u8AItpptNZVFS5SmUROcrJMXKCicbFiDu7HiPmYkF8kxAWMx4ETqnD3LEmjteUrhK_Wo9t3IwtEdYngjSUXoCrc98_dmcO3WZvu2fT2o2ZycIMNURiRhMknnBgf5zZQ9c-nnx_NPtN7_xuZx98e-qNwBiHTzASyMu_yG176h7CIIZTwemYkAHCZ8h1bd93vnl7HyMz7Mn8s6fgoa8eu191m_W9f-_8f9cLXVqJUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>839835222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ENHANCING WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: ROLE OF CAPITALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE GANGA BASIN</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>CLEMENT, FLORIANE ; HAILESLASSIE, AMARE ; ISHAQ, SABA ; BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL ; MURTY, M. V. R ; SAMAD, MADAR ; DEY, SANJIIB ; DAS, HIMANGSHU ; KHAN, M. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>CLEMENT, FLORIANE ; HAILESLASSIE, AMARE ; ISHAQ, SABA ; BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL ; MURTY, M. V. R ; SAMAD, MADAR ; DEY, SANJIIB ; DAS, HIMANGSHU ; KHAN, M. A.</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of water productivity (WP) or ‘more crop per drop’ has been revived recently in international water debates. Its application has notably been extended from single crops to mixed farming systems, integrating both crops and livestock, with the wider objective of reducing poverty. Using evidence from the Ganga Basin, India, we discuss the relevance of this concept as a tool to guide interventions for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. We argue that WP studies would benefit from greater attention to the role of capitals, inequities and institutions. Firstly, it is crucial to acknowledge the heterogeneity of capitals and capabilities of farmers to make changes in their farming systems and practices and avoid one-fix-all interventions. Identifying pre-existing inequities in water access within and among communities will support better targeting of poor communities. WP interventions can either reinforce or reduce inter-household inequities within communities. We stress the need for assessment of institutional impacts of WP interventions on water access and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0014479710000827</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXAGAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Crops ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Farming systems ; Heterogeneity ; LDCs ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Livestock industry ; Low income areas ; Poverty ; Sustainable agriculture ; Water resources management</subject><ispartof>Experimental agriculture, 2011-01, Vol.47 (S1), p.133-151</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c949fc608cad504c692ef72464849f833c18c4f66d33b7ebd5a6f5a29ae792f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c949fc608cad504c692ef72464849f833c18c4f66d33b7ebd5a6f5a29ae792f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0014479710000827/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,4009,27902,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02643709$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CLEMENT, FLORIANE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAILESLASSIE, AMARE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHAQ, SABA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURTY, M. V. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMAD, MADAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEY, SANJIIB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAS, HIMANGSHU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KHAN, M. A.</creatorcontrib><title>ENHANCING WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: ROLE OF CAPITALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE GANGA BASIN</title><title>Experimental agriculture</title><description>The concept of water productivity (WP) or ‘more crop per drop’ has been revived recently in international water debates. Its application has notably been extended from single crops to mixed farming systems, integrating both crops and livestock, with the wider objective of reducing poverty. Using evidence from the Ganga Basin, India, we discuss the relevance of this concept as a tool to guide interventions for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. We argue that WP studies would benefit from greater attention to the role of capitals, inequities and institutions. Firstly, it is crucial to acknowledge the heterogeneity of capitals and capabilities of farmers to make changes in their farming systems and practices and avoid one-fix-all interventions. Identifying pre-existing inequities in water access within and among communities will support better targeting of poor communities. WP interventions can either reinforce or reduce inter-household inequities within communities. We stress the need for assessment of institutional impacts of WP interventions on water access and development.</description><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock industry</subject><subject>Low income areas</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><issn>0014-4797</issn><issn>1469-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1r2zAUhsXYYFm3H7A70ZvRC7f6ii3tTnUcR2DsEisZuxKKIncJSZ3aSaH_vjIpLWxMN0fnvM97pMMB4DtG1xjh5KZGCDOWiASjcDhJPoARZrGIGGP4IxgNcjTon8GXvt-GlCJOR2CblTNZpqrM4S-pszm8m1eTRarVUunfcFqFQrXM5uEuiyJbKqlVVf6E86rIYDWFqbxTWhY1lOUEqrLWSi8Gog4J1LMM5rLMJbyVtSq_gk-N3fX-22u8AItpptNZVFS5SmUROcrJMXKCicbFiDu7HiPmYkF8kxAWMx4ETqnD3LEmjteUrhK_Wo9t3IwtEdYngjSUXoCrc98_dmcO3WZvu2fT2o2ZycIMNURiRhMknnBgf5zZQ9c-nnx_NPtN7_xuZx98e-qNwBiHTzASyMu_yG176h7CIIZTwemYkAHCZ8h1bd93vnl7HyMz7Mn8s6fgoa8eu191m_W9f-_8f9cLXVqJUw</recordid><startdate>201101</startdate><enddate>201101</enddate><creator>CLEMENT, FLORIANE</creator><creator>HAILESLASSIE, AMARE</creator><creator>ISHAQ, SABA</creator><creator>BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL</creator><creator>MURTY, M. V. R</creator><creator>SAMAD, MADAR</creator><creator>DEY, SANJIIB</creator><creator>DAS, HIMANGSHU</creator><creator>KHAN, M. A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201101</creationdate><title>ENHANCING WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: ROLE OF CAPITALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE GANGA BASIN</title><author>CLEMENT, FLORIANE ; HAILESLASSIE, AMARE ; ISHAQ, SABA ; BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL ; MURTY, M. V. R ; SAMAD, MADAR ; DEY, SANJIIB ; DAS, HIMANGSHU ; KHAN, M. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-c949fc608cad504c692ef72464849f833c18c4f66d33b7ebd5a6f5a29ae792f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock industry</topic><topic>Low income areas</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CLEMENT, FLORIANE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAILESLASSIE, AMARE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHAQ, SABA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURTY, M. V. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMAD, MADAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEY, SANJIIB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAS, HIMANGSHU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KHAN, M. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Experimental agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CLEMENT, FLORIANE</au><au>HAILESLASSIE, AMARE</au><au>ISHAQ, SABA</au><au>BLÜMMEL, MICHAEL</au><au>MURTY, M. V. R</au><au>SAMAD, MADAR</au><au>DEY, SANJIIB</au><au>DAS, HIMANGSHU</au><au>KHAN, M. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ENHANCING WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: ROLE OF CAPITALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE GANGA BASIN</atitle><jtitle>Experimental agriculture</jtitle><date>2011-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>133-151</pages><issn>0014-4797</issn><eissn>1469-4441</eissn><coden>EXAGAL</coden><abstract>The concept of water productivity (WP) or ‘more crop per drop’ has been revived recently in international water debates. Its application has notably been extended from single crops to mixed farming systems, integrating both crops and livestock, with the wider objective of reducing poverty. Using evidence from the Ganga Basin, India, we discuss the relevance of this concept as a tool to guide interventions for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. We argue that WP studies would benefit from greater attention to the role of capitals, inequities and institutions. Firstly, it is crucial to acknowledge the heterogeneity of capitals and capabilities of farmers to make changes in their farming systems and practices and avoid one-fix-all interventions. Identifying pre-existing inequities in water access within and among communities will support better targeting of poor communities. WP interventions can either reinforce or reduce inter-household inequities within communities. We stress the need for assessment of institutional impacts of WP interventions on water access and development.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0014479710000827</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-222X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4797
ispartof Experimental agriculture, 2011-01, Vol.47 (S1), p.133-151
issn 0014-4797
1469-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02643709v1
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Crops
Developing countries
Economic development
Farming systems
Heterogeneity
LDCs
Life Sciences
Livestock
Livestock industry
Low income areas
Poverty
Sustainable agriculture
Water resources management
title ENHANCING WATER PRODUCTIVITY FOR POVERTY ALLEVIATION: ROLE OF CAPITALS AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE GANGA BASIN
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A28%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ENHANCING%20WATER%20PRODUCTIVITY%20FOR%20POVERTY%20ALLEVIATION:%20ROLE%20OF%20CAPITALS%20AND%20INSTITUTIONS%20IN%20THE%20GANGA%20BASIN&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20agriculture&rft.au=CLEMENT,%20FLORIANE&rft.date=2011-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=133-151&rft.issn=0014-4797&rft.eissn=1469-4441&rft.coden=EXAGAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0014479710000827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E911150442%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=839835222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0014479710000827&rfr_iscdi=true