Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach

Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by red...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2015-11, Vol.6 (11), p.art219-12
Hauptverfasser: Bertolo, Andrea, Rodríguez, Marco A, Lacroix, Gérard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 11
container_start_page art219
container_title Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
container_volume 6
creator Bertolo, Andrea
Rodríguez, Marco A
Lacroix, Gérard
description Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga Colacium sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed Colacium burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions. Colacium burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/ES14-00451.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02634868v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2300650284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9r2zAUxcXoYCHtWz-AYVAo1K3-WLbUtxCydhDoQzb6KGT5Grt1JNVSu2Sffso8RqBsepG4-p1zDwehc4KviZD4ZrUhRY5xwck1-YBmlHCcC0n5ydH7EzoL4Qmnw4tKFGyGHpfOxtEN2RZMp20ftiFzbeY7F13Y29hB7E0Gvq_7BKY_m_10zg_aPkdnbzNtM9h5GPst2KiHTHs_Om26U_Sx1UOAsz_3HH3_svq2vM_XD3dfl4t1rouilHmD24owyStogdaNkA1hwkjGK1EbXYPmrMYtIQU3EmppcImbtixlxRiXpgI2R5eTb6cH5VMMPe6V0726X6zVYYZpyQpRijeS2M8TmyK-vEKI6sm9jjbFU5RhXHJMUydzdDVRZnQhjND-tSVYHZpWh6bV76bVwVRM-I9-gP1_WbVabijFhJeEUCKT9GKS6rj3zioI-l873oMQjox906q4i-wXN9iZGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300650284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bertolo, Andrea ; Rodríguez, Marco A ; Lacroix, Gérard</creator><creatorcontrib>Bertolo, Andrea ; Rodríguez, Marco A ; Lacroix, Gérard</creatorcontrib><description>Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga Colacium sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed Colacium burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions. Colacium burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/ES14-00451.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Bayesian framework ; Ceriodaphnia ; Colacium ; Diaphanosoma ; epibiosis ; Fish ; fish predation ; Hypotheses ; Life Sciences ; Light ; light limitation ; Light penetration ; non-consumptive effects ; Parasites ; Plankton ; Population growth ; Population number ; Predation ; Respiration ; shared doom hypothesis ; Vertical distribution ; Water column ; Zooplankton ; zooplankton vertical distribution</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2015-11, Vol.6 (11), p.art219-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2015 Bertolo et al.</rights><rights>2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890%2FES14-00451.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890%2FES14-00451.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02634868$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bertolo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Marco A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, Gérard</creatorcontrib><title>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga Colacium sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed Colacium burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions. Colacium burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.</description><subject>Bayesian framework</subject><subject>Ceriodaphnia</subject><subject>Colacium</subject><subject>Diaphanosoma</subject><subject>epibiosis</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish predation</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>light limitation</subject><subject>Light penetration</subject><subject>non-consumptive effects</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>shared doom hypothesis</subject><subject>Vertical distribution</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><subject>zooplankton vertical distribution</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9r2zAUxcXoYCHtWz-AYVAo1K3-WLbUtxCydhDoQzb6KGT5Grt1JNVSu2Sffso8RqBsepG4-p1zDwehc4KviZD4ZrUhRY5xwck1-YBmlHCcC0n5ydH7EzoL4Qmnw4tKFGyGHpfOxtEN2RZMp20ftiFzbeY7F13Y29hB7E0Gvq_7BKY_m_10zg_aPkdnbzNtM9h5GPst2KiHTHs_Om26U_Sx1UOAsz_3HH3_svq2vM_XD3dfl4t1rouilHmD24owyStogdaNkA1hwkjGK1EbXYPmrMYtIQU3EmppcImbtixlxRiXpgI2R5eTb6cH5VMMPe6V0726X6zVYYZpyQpRijeS2M8TmyK-vEKI6sm9jjbFU5RhXHJMUydzdDVRZnQhjND-tSVYHZpWh6bV76bVwVRM-I9-gP1_WbVabijFhJeEUCKT9GKS6rj3zioI-l873oMQjox906q4i-wXN9iZGg</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Bertolo, Andrea</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Marco A</creator><creator>Lacroix, Gérard</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</title><author>Bertolo, Andrea ; Rodríguez, Marco A ; Lacroix, Gérard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bayesian framework</topic><topic>Ceriodaphnia</topic><topic>Colacium</topic><topic>Diaphanosoma</topic><topic>epibiosis</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish predation</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>light limitation</topic><topic>Light penetration</topic><topic>non-consumptive effects</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>shared doom hypothesis</topic><topic>Vertical distribution</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><topic>zooplankton vertical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bertolo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Marco A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, Gérard</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bertolo, Andrea</au><au>Rodríguez, Marco A</au><au>Lacroix, Gérard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>art219</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>art219-12</pages><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga Colacium sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed Colacium burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions. Colacium burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/ES14-00451.1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2150-8925
ispartof Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2015-11, Vol.6 (11), p.art219-12
issn 2150-8925
2150-8925
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02634868v1
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bayesian framework
Ceriodaphnia
Colacium
Diaphanosoma
epibiosis
Fish
fish predation
Hypotheses
Life Sciences
Light
light limitation
Light penetration
non-consumptive effects
Parasites
Plankton
Population growth
Population number
Predation
Respiration
shared doom hypothesis
Vertical distribution
Water column
Zooplankton
zooplankton vertical distribution
title Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20mechanisms%20of%20photosynthetic%20epibionts%20on%20zooplankton:%20an%20experimental%20approach&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Bertolo,%20Andrea&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=art219&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=art219-12&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/ES14-00451.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2300650284%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300650284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true