Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach
Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by red...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2015-11, Vol.6 (11), p.art219-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | art219 |
container_title | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Bertolo, Andrea Rodríguez, Marco A Lacroix, Gérard |
description | Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga
Colacium
sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed
Colacium
burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions.
Colacium
burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/ES14-00451.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02634868v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2300650284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9r2zAUxcXoYCHtWz-AYVAo1K3-WLbUtxCydhDoQzb6KGT5Grt1JNVSu2Sffso8RqBsepG4-p1zDwehc4KviZD4ZrUhRY5xwck1-YBmlHCcC0n5ydH7EzoL4Qmnw4tKFGyGHpfOxtEN2RZMp20ftiFzbeY7F13Y29hB7E0Gvq_7BKY_m_10zg_aPkdnbzNtM9h5GPst2KiHTHs_Om26U_Sx1UOAsz_3HH3_svq2vM_XD3dfl4t1rouilHmD24owyStogdaNkA1hwkjGK1EbXYPmrMYtIQU3EmppcImbtixlxRiXpgI2R5eTb6cH5VMMPe6V0726X6zVYYZpyQpRijeS2M8TmyK-vEKI6sm9jjbFU5RhXHJMUydzdDVRZnQhjND-tSVYHZpWh6bV76bVwVRM-I9-gP1_WbVabijFhJeEUCKT9GKS6rj3zioI-l873oMQjox906q4i-wXN9iZGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300650284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bertolo, Andrea ; Rodríguez, Marco A ; Lacroix, Gérard</creator><creatorcontrib>Bertolo, Andrea ; Rodríguez, Marco A ; Lacroix, Gérard</creatorcontrib><description>Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga
Colacium
sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed
Colacium
burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions.
Colacium
burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/ES14-00451.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Bayesian framework ; Ceriodaphnia ; Colacium ; Diaphanosoma ; epibiosis ; Fish ; fish predation ; Hypotheses ; Life Sciences ; Light ; light limitation ; Light penetration ; non-consumptive effects ; Parasites ; Plankton ; Population growth ; Population number ; Predation ; Respiration ; shared doom hypothesis ; Vertical distribution ; Water column ; Zooplankton ; zooplankton vertical distribution</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2015-11, Vol.6 (11), p.art219-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2015 Bertolo et al.</rights><rights>2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890%2FES14-00451.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890%2FES14-00451.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02634868$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bertolo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Marco A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, Gérard</creatorcontrib><title>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga
Colacium
sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed
Colacium
burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions.
Colacium
burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.</description><subject>Bayesian framework</subject><subject>Ceriodaphnia</subject><subject>Colacium</subject><subject>Diaphanosoma</subject><subject>epibiosis</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish predation</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>light limitation</subject><subject>Light penetration</subject><subject>non-consumptive effects</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>shared doom hypothesis</subject><subject>Vertical distribution</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><subject>zooplankton vertical distribution</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9r2zAUxcXoYCHtWz-AYVAo1K3-WLbUtxCydhDoQzb6KGT5Grt1JNVSu2Sffso8RqBsepG4-p1zDwehc4KviZD4ZrUhRY5xwck1-YBmlHCcC0n5ydH7EzoL4Qmnw4tKFGyGHpfOxtEN2RZMp20ftiFzbeY7F13Y29hB7E0Gvq_7BKY_m_10zg_aPkdnbzNtM9h5GPst2KiHTHs_Om26U_Sx1UOAsz_3HH3_svq2vM_XD3dfl4t1rouilHmD24owyStogdaNkA1hwkjGK1EbXYPmrMYtIQU3EmppcImbtixlxRiXpgI2R5eTb6cH5VMMPe6V0726X6zVYYZpyQpRijeS2M8TmyK-vEKI6sm9jjbFU5RhXHJMUydzdDVRZnQhjND-tSVYHZpWh6bV76bVwVRM-I9-gP1_WbVabijFhJeEUCKT9GKS6rj3zioI-l873oMQjox906q4i-wXN9iZGg</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Bertolo, Andrea</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Marco A</creator><creator>Lacroix, Gérard</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</title><author>Bertolo, Andrea ; Rodríguez, Marco A ; Lacroix, Gérard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4469-d0f713957efe2bd89d138c93578bcabea53b0f1145c9eb9c060df66973359c7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bayesian framework</topic><topic>Ceriodaphnia</topic><topic>Colacium</topic><topic>Diaphanosoma</topic><topic>epibiosis</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish predation</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>light limitation</topic><topic>Light penetration</topic><topic>non-consumptive effects</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>shared doom hypothesis</topic><topic>Vertical distribution</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><topic>zooplankton vertical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bertolo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Marco A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, Gérard</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bertolo, Andrea</au><au>Rodríguez, Marco A</au><au>Lacroix, Gérard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>art219</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>art219-12</pages><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Several top-down and bottom-up forces have been put forward to explain variable infestation rates of zooplankton by epibionts. Among top-down forces, fish predation affects epibiont prevalence on zooplanktonic organisms, either by eliminating more conspicuous, heavily burdened individuals, or by reducing population size of zooplankton hosts, with consequences for substrate availability for epibionts. However, detailed experimental-based information on the effects of top-down forces is still lacking. Among bottom-up forces, light can potentially control populations of photosynthetic epibionts. Therefore, both changes in light penetration in the water column and the vertical position of hosts in the water column could affect the photic conditions in which epibionts live and could thus control their population growth. We tested experimentally the hypothesis that both light limitation and fish predation affect epibiont burden on zooplankton. Moreover, we also tested the hypothesis that zooplanktivorous fish affect the prevalence and burden of the epibiotic alga
Colacium
sp. (Euglenida) on zooplankton not only by direct predation, but also by affecting the vertical distribution of zooplankton. We analyzed
Colacium
burden on two zooplankton genera that responded differently to the presence of zooplanktivorous fish by altering their daytime vertical distributions, thus exposing photosynthetic epibionts to different light conditions.
Colacium
burden on the two zooplankton genera was also compared between enclosures with different degrees of light limitation. Our results suggest that (1) ambient light limitation has the potential to reduce the burden of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton in natural conditions, and (2) zooplankton behavior (e.g., daytime refuge use to escape fish predation) can reduce the burden by exposing photosynthetic epibionts to suboptimal light conditions.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/ES14-00451.1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2150-8925 |
ispartof | Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2015-11, Vol.6 (11), p.art219-12 |
issn | 2150-8925 2150-8925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02634868v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bayesian framework Ceriodaphnia Colacium Diaphanosoma epibiosis Fish fish predation Hypotheses Life Sciences Light light limitation Light penetration non-consumptive effects Parasites Plankton Population growth Population number Predation Respiration shared doom hypothesis Vertical distribution Water column Zooplankton zooplankton vertical distribution |
title | Control mechanisms of photosynthetic epibionts on zooplankton: an experimental approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20mechanisms%20of%20photosynthetic%20epibionts%20on%20zooplankton:%20an%20experimental%20approach&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Bertolo,%20Andrea&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=art219&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=art219-12&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/ES14-00451.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2300650284%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300650284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |