Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review

Summary Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity reviews 2016-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.81-95
Hauptverfasser: Glonti, K., Mackenbach, J. D., Ng, J., Lakerveld, J., Oppert, J.-M., Bárdos, H., McKee, M., Rutter, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue S1
container_start_page 81
container_title Obesity reviews
container_volume 17
creator Glonti, K.
Mackenbach, J. D.
Ng, J.
Lakerveld, J.
Oppert, J.-M.
Bárdos, H.
McKee, M.
Rutter, H.
description Summary Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/obr.12383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02630704v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1765917229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoMo9kMv_AMS8EbBafMxSSbedUvtKksrotS7kJ05cVNnJjWZ2XX_vdnddgVB8Nycw8lzXt7wIvSCkhOa6zTM4wllvOKP0CEtpSpUpb893s8VPUBHKd0SQpXm9Ck6YLJSmlJ5iPyntK4XIYXa2xZDv_Qx9B30wzvcgPO9H3zo01vcgU1jhIRt32Cbtvz2Ca_8sMAr8N8XA06DHcaEC2xxWqcBuszUOMLSw-oZeuJsm-D5fT9GX99ffDmfFrPryw_nZ7OiLjXnhdOilkI6mw06QZhqrGOuVk4wKrklrimFZryRIIhllnIhgIPVoirnomKKH6M3O92Fbc1d9J2NaxOsN9OzmdnsCJOcKFIuaWZf79i7GH6OkAbT-VRD29oewpgMVUrmElT_ByqFpoqxDfrqL_Q2jLHPn95STDJG-R-fdQwpRXB7s5SYTawmx2q2sWb25b3iOO-g2ZMPOWbgdAesfAvrfyuZ68nnB8lid-FzTr_2Fzb-MFJxJczN1aXhE3HzcVpNzBX_Dc_8uiU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765262213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Glonti, K. ; Mackenbach, J. D. ; Ng, J. ; Lakerveld, J. ; Oppert, J.-M. ; Bárdos, H. ; McKee, M. ; Rutter, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glonti, K. ; Mackenbach, J. D. ; Ng, J. ; Lakerveld, J. ; Oppert, J.-M. ; Bárdos, H. ; McKee, M. ; Rutter, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.12383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26879116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Body Weight ; Databases, Factual ; Environment Design ; Health Behavior ; Health Status ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Obesity ; Obesity - psychology ; psychosocial environment ; Risk Assessment ; social capital ; Social Environment ; Socioeconomic Factors ; SPOTLIGHT</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2016-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.81-95</ispartof><rights>2016 World Obesity</rights><rights>2016 World Obesity.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fobr.12383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fobr.12383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02630704$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glonti, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenbach, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakerveld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppert, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bárdos, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><description>Summary Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.</description><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - psychology</subject><subject>psychosocial environment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>social capital</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>SPOTLIGHT</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoMo9kMv_AMS8EbBafMxSSbedUvtKksrotS7kJ05cVNnJjWZ2XX_vdnddgVB8Nycw8lzXt7wIvSCkhOa6zTM4wllvOKP0CEtpSpUpb893s8VPUBHKd0SQpXm9Ck6YLJSmlJ5iPyntK4XIYXa2xZDv_Qx9B30wzvcgPO9H3zo01vcgU1jhIRt32Cbtvz2Ca_8sMAr8N8XA06DHcaEC2xxWqcBuszUOMLSw-oZeuJsm-D5fT9GX99ffDmfFrPryw_nZ7OiLjXnhdOilkI6mw06QZhqrGOuVk4wKrklrimFZryRIIhllnIhgIPVoirnomKKH6M3O92Fbc1d9J2NaxOsN9OzmdnsCJOcKFIuaWZf79i7GH6OkAbT-VRD29oewpgMVUrmElT_ByqFpoqxDfrqL_Q2jLHPn95STDJG-R-fdQwpRXB7s5SYTawmx2q2sWb25b3iOO-g2ZMPOWbgdAesfAvrfyuZ68nnB8lid-FzTr_2Fzb-MFJxJczN1aXhE3HzcVpNzBX_Dc_8uiU</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Glonti, K.</creator><creator>Mackenbach, J. D.</creator><creator>Ng, J.</creator><creator>Lakerveld, J.</creator><creator>Oppert, J.-M.</creator><creator>Bárdos, H.</creator><creator>McKee, M.</creator><creator>Rutter, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</title><author>Glonti, K. ; Mackenbach, J. D. ; Ng, J. ; Lakerveld, J. ; Oppert, J.-M. ; Bárdos, H. ; McKee, M. ; Rutter, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - psychology</topic><topic>psychosocial environment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>social capital</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>SPOTLIGHT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glonti, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenbach, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakerveld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppert, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bárdos, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glonti, K.</au><au>Mackenbach, J. D.</au><au>Ng, J.</au><au>Lakerveld, J.</au><au>Oppert, J.-M.</au><au>Bárdos, H.</au><au>McKee, M.</au><au>Rutter, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>81-95</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Summary Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26879116</pmid><doi>10.1111/obr.12383</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-7881
ispartof Obesity reviews, 2016-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.81-95
issn 1467-7881
1467-789X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02630704v1
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Body Weight
Databases, Factual
Environment Design
Health Behavior
Health Status
Humans
Life Sciences
Obesity
Obesity - psychology
psychosocial environment
Risk Assessment
social capital
Social Environment
Socioeconomic Factors
SPOTLIGHT
title Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T04%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20environment:%20definitions,%20measures%20and%20associations%20with%20weight%20status%20-%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Glonti,%20K.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=81-95&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.12383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1765917229%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765262213&rft_id=info:pmid/26879116&rfr_iscdi=true