Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review
Summary Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity reviews 2016-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.81-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | Obesity reviews |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Glonti, K. Mackenbach, J. D. Ng, J. Lakerveld, J. Oppert, J.-M. Bárdos, H. McKee, M. Rutter, H. |
description | Summary
Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/obr.12383 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02630704v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1765917229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoMo9kMv_AMS8EbBafMxSSbedUvtKksrotS7kJ05cVNnJjWZ2XX_vdnddgVB8Nycw8lzXt7wIvSCkhOa6zTM4wllvOKP0CEtpSpUpb893s8VPUBHKd0SQpXm9Ck6YLJSmlJ5iPyntK4XIYXa2xZDv_Qx9B30wzvcgPO9H3zo01vcgU1jhIRt32Cbtvz2Ca_8sMAr8N8XA06DHcaEC2xxWqcBuszUOMLSw-oZeuJsm-D5fT9GX99ffDmfFrPryw_nZ7OiLjXnhdOilkI6mw06QZhqrGOuVk4wKrklrimFZryRIIhllnIhgIPVoirnomKKH6M3O92Fbc1d9J2NaxOsN9OzmdnsCJOcKFIuaWZf79i7GH6OkAbT-VRD29oewpgMVUrmElT_ByqFpoqxDfrqL_Q2jLHPn95STDJG-R-fdQwpRXB7s5SYTawmx2q2sWb25b3iOO-g2ZMPOWbgdAesfAvrfyuZ68nnB8lid-FzTr_2Fzb-MFJxJczN1aXhE3HzcVpNzBX_Dc_8uiU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765262213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Glonti, K. ; Mackenbach, J. D. ; Ng, J. ; Lakerveld, J. ; Oppert, J.-M. ; Bárdos, H. ; McKee, M. ; Rutter, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glonti, K. ; Mackenbach, J. D. ; Ng, J. ; Lakerveld, J. ; Oppert, J.-M. ; Bárdos, H. ; McKee, M. ; Rutter, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.12383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26879116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Body Weight ; Databases, Factual ; Environment Design ; Health Behavior ; Health Status ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Obesity ; Obesity - psychology ; psychosocial environment ; Risk Assessment ; social capital ; Social Environment ; Socioeconomic Factors ; SPOTLIGHT</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2016-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.81-95</ispartof><rights>2016 World Obesity</rights><rights>2016 World Obesity.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fobr.12383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fobr.12383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02630704$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glonti, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenbach, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakerveld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppert, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bárdos, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><description>Summary
Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.</description><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - psychology</subject><subject>psychosocial environment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>social capital</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>SPOTLIGHT</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoMo9kMv_AMS8EbBafMxSSbedUvtKksrotS7kJ05cVNnJjWZ2XX_vdnddgVB8Nycw8lzXt7wIvSCkhOa6zTM4wllvOKP0CEtpSpUpb893s8VPUBHKd0SQpXm9Ck6YLJSmlJ5iPyntK4XIYXa2xZDv_Qx9B30wzvcgPO9H3zo01vcgU1jhIRt32Cbtvz2Ca_8sMAr8N8XA06DHcaEC2xxWqcBuszUOMLSw-oZeuJsm-D5fT9GX99ffDmfFrPryw_nZ7OiLjXnhdOilkI6mw06QZhqrGOuVk4wKrklrimFZryRIIhllnIhgIPVoirnomKKH6M3O92Fbc1d9J2NaxOsN9OzmdnsCJOcKFIuaWZf79i7GH6OkAbT-VRD29oewpgMVUrmElT_ByqFpoqxDfrqL_Q2jLHPn95STDJG-R-fdQwpRXB7s5SYTawmx2q2sWb25b3iOO-g2ZMPOWbgdAesfAvrfyuZ68nnB8lid-FzTr_2Fzb-MFJxJczN1aXhE3HzcVpNzBX_Dc_8uiU</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Glonti, K.</creator><creator>Mackenbach, J. D.</creator><creator>Ng, J.</creator><creator>Lakerveld, J.</creator><creator>Oppert, J.-M.</creator><creator>Bárdos, H.</creator><creator>McKee, M.</creator><creator>Rutter, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</title><author>Glonti, K. ; Mackenbach, J. D. ; Ng, J. ; Lakerveld, J. ; Oppert, J.-M. ; Bárdos, H. ; McKee, M. ; Rutter, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4933-f95c656fa791f5027daf2fc7f52163a0fd45923d6e50a2a1355e3ea9584b58273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - psychology</topic><topic>psychosocial environment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>social capital</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>SPOTLIGHT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glonti, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenbach, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakerveld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppert, J.-M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bárdos, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glonti, K.</au><au>Mackenbach, J. D.</au><au>Ng, J.</au><au>Lakerveld, J.</au><au>Oppert, J.-M.</au><au>Bárdos, H.</au><au>McKee, M.</au><au>Rutter, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Obesity Reviews</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>81-95</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Summary
Socio‐ecological models suggest that many elements of the social environment act as upstream determinants of obesity. This systematic review examined definitions, measures and strength of associations between the psychosocial environment and adult weight status. Studies were included if they were conducted on adults, the outcome was weight status, carried out in any developed country and investigated at least one psychosocial environmental construct. Six databases for primary studies were searched: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We restricted our search to studies published in English between January 1995 and February 2015. An adapted ‘Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies’ was used to evaluate risk of bias of included studies. Out of 14,784 screened records, 42 articles were assessed using full text. A total of 19 studies were included. The strongest associations with weight status were found for social capital and collective efficacy, although few studies found significant associations. There was heterogeneity in the definitions and metrics of psychosocial environmental constructs. There is limited evidence that greater social capital and collective efficacy are associated with healthier weight status. The research conducted to date has not robustly identified relations. We highlight challenges to undertaking research and establishing causality in this field and provide recommendations for further research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26879116</pmid><doi>10.1111/obr.12383</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-7881 |
ispartof | Obesity reviews, 2016-01, Vol.17 (S1), p.81-95 |
issn | 1467-7881 1467-789X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02630704v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Body Weight Databases, Factual Environment Design Health Behavior Health Status Humans Life Sciences Obesity Obesity - psychology psychosocial environment Risk Assessment social capital Social Environment Socioeconomic Factors SPOTLIGHT |
title | Psychosocial environment: definitions, measures and associations with weight status - a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T04%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20environment:%20definitions,%20measures%20and%20associations%20with%20weight%20status%20-%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Glonti,%20K.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=81-95&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.12383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1765917229%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765262213&rft_id=info:pmid/26879116&rfr_iscdi=true |