Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants

•ERFs display differential expression in response to different abiotic stresses.•Responses to different types of abiotic stresses can involve common ERFs to set up adaptive strategy.•High and low temperature stresses activate different set of ERFs than those activated under water, flooding or salt s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant science (Limerick) 2018-09, Vol.274, p.137-145
Hauptverfasser: Klay, Imen, Gouia, Sandra, Liu, Mingchun, Mila, Isabelle, Khoudi, Habib, Bernadac, Anne, Bouzayen, Mondher, Pirrello, Julien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 145
container_issue
container_start_page 137
container_title Plant science (Limerick)
container_volume 274
creator Klay, Imen
Gouia, Sandra
Liu, Mingchun
Mila, Isabelle
Khoudi, Habib
Bernadac, Anne
Bouzayen, Mondher
Pirrello, Julien
description •ERFs display differential expression in response to different abiotic stresses.•Responses to different types of abiotic stresses can involve common ERFs to set up adaptive strategy.•High and low temperature stresses activate different set of ERFs than those activated under water, flooding or salt stresses.•ERFs regulate expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of the presence of GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter. Plants are sessile organisms, hence to face environmental constrains they developed strategies that rely on the activation of stress-response genes under the control of specific transcription factors. The plant hormone ethylene mediates physiological, developmental and stress responses through the activation of Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) which belong to a large multigene family of transcription factors. While an increasing number of studies supports the involvement of ERFs in abiotic stress responses, so far the specific role of ERF family members in different abiotic stress conditions remains unexplored. The present work investigates the expression profile of a set of ERFs, representative of different ERF types, in tomato plants subjected to cold, heat, salt, drought and flooding conditions. The study revealed that a group of ERFs is preferentially associated with cold and heat stress responses while another set is expressed in response to salt, water and flooding stresses. Transactivation assays indicated that ERFs can regulate the expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of whether or not they harbor conserved GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter region. The outcome of the study provides clue on which ERFs should be targeted when aiming to improve adaptation to a particular stress type.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02626871v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168945218301924</els_id><sourcerecordid>2084919048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a6573609e3cd0f609bf704365ee51def152c8da8071ec87ca4bd32df215b5a563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpabZp_0LQMTnYHcmWLd8awm5TWCiE9ixkadxo8VqupA3430eLk_TYkwbNN-8N8wi5YlAyYM3XQzmPekrRuJIDkyWIEnj1jmyYbKuCc9G9J5sMyqKrBb8gn2I8AAAXov1ILioACaJrN8Rv0-My4oT0AePsp4h0p03yIdLr7cPuhuqA1LphwIBTcnocFxrwz2nUCS3tl389qnvnkzM0poAx0rTMGKmbaPJHnTxd9_1MPgx6jPjl5b0kv3fbX3f3xf7n9x93t_vC1MBToRvRVg10WBkLQy76oYW6agSiYBYHJriRVktoGRrZGl33tuJ24Ez0QoumuiQ3q-6jHtUc3FGHRXnt1P3tXp3_gDe8kS17Ypm9Xtk5-L8njEkdXTQ45oXRn6LiIOuOdVDLjDYraoKPMeDwps1AnYNRB_UajDoHo0BkqyoPXr14nPoj2rex1yQy8G0FMF_lyWFQWQIng9YFNElZ7_7n8QypHKMf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084919048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Klay, Imen ; Gouia, Sandra ; Liu, Mingchun ; Mila, Isabelle ; Khoudi, Habib ; Bernadac, Anne ; Bouzayen, Mondher ; Pirrello, Julien</creator><creatorcontrib>Klay, Imen ; Gouia, Sandra ; Liu, Mingchun ; Mila, Isabelle ; Khoudi, Habib ; Bernadac, Anne ; Bouzayen, Mondher ; Pirrello, Julien</creatorcontrib><description>•ERFs display differential expression in response to different abiotic stresses.•Responses to different types of abiotic stresses can involve common ERFs to set up adaptive strategy.•High and low temperature stresses activate different set of ERFs than those activated under water, flooding or salt stresses.•ERFs regulate expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of the presence of GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter. Plants are sessile organisms, hence to face environmental constrains they developed strategies that rely on the activation of stress-response genes under the control of specific transcription factors. The plant hormone ethylene mediates physiological, developmental and stress responses through the activation of Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) which belong to a large multigene family of transcription factors. While an increasing number of studies supports the involvement of ERFs in abiotic stress responses, so far the specific role of ERF family members in different abiotic stress conditions remains unexplored. The present work investigates the expression profile of a set of ERFs, representative of different ERF types, in tomato plants subjected to cold, heat, salt, drought and flooding conditions. The study revealed that a group of ERFs is preferentially associated with cold and heat stress responses while another set is expressed in response to salt, water and flooding stresses. Transactivation assays indicated that ERFs can regulate the expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of whether or not they harbor conserved GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter region. The outcome of the study provides clue on which ERFs should be targeted when aiming to improve adaptation to a particular stress type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-9452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30080597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abiotic stress ; Cold-Shock Response ; ERF ; Ethylenes ; Gene Expression Regulation ; Heat-Shock Response ; Life Sciences ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; Metabolism ; Physiology ; Plant Proteins ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Salt Tolerance ; Tomato ; Transcription Factors ; Vegetal Biology ; Water</subject><ispartof>Plant science (Limerick), 2018-09, Vol.274, p.137-145</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a6573609e3cd0f609bf704365ee51def152c8da8071ec87ca4bd32df215b5a563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a6573609e3cd0f609bf704365ee51def152c8da8071ec87ca4bd32df215b5a563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7630-1449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168945218301924$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30080597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02626871$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klay, Imen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gouia, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mila, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoudi, Habib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernadac, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzayen, Mondher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirrello, Julien</creatorcontrib><title>Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants</title><title>Plant science (Limerick)</title><addtitle>Plant Sci</addtitle><description>•ERFs display differential expression in response to different abiotic stresses.•Responses to different types of abiotic stresses can involve common ERFs to set up adaptive strategy.•High and low temperature stresses activate different set of ERFs than those activated under water, flooding or salt stresses.•ERFs regulate expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of the presence of GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter. Plants are sessile organisms, hence to face environmental constrains they developed strategies that rely on the activation of stress-response genes under the control of specific transcription factors. The plant hormone ethylene mediates physiological, developmental and stress responses through the activation of Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) which belong to a large multigene family of transcription factors. While an increasing number of studies supports the involvement of ERFs in abiotic stress responses, so far the specific role of ERF family members in different abiotic stress conditions remains unexplored. The present work investigates the expression profile of a set of ERFs, representative of different ERF types, in tomato plants subjected to cold, heat, salt, drought and flooding conditions. The study revealed that a group of ERFs is preferentially associated with cold and heat stress responses while another set is expressed in response to salt, water and flooding stresses. Transactivation assays indicated that ERFs can regulate the expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of whether or not they harbor conserved GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter region. The outcome of the study provides clue on which ERFs should be targeted when aiming to improve adaptation to a particular stress type.</description><subject>Abiotic stress</subject><subject>Cold-Shock Response</subject><subject>ERF</subject><subject>Ethylenes</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation</subject><subject>Heat-Shock Response</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Proteins</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Salt Tolerance</subject><subject>Tomato</subject><subject>Transcription Factors</subject><subject>Vegetal Biology</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0168-9452</issn><issn>1873-2259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpabZp_0LQMTnYHcmWLd8awm5TWCiE9ixkadxo8VqupA3430eLk_TYkwbNN-8N8wi5YlAyYM3XQzmPekrRuJIDkyWIEnj1jmyYbKuCc9G9J5sMyqKrBb8gn2I8AAAXov1ILioACaJrN8Rv0-My4oT0AePsp4h0p03yIdLr7cPuhuqA1LphwIBTcnocFxrwz2nUCS3tl389qnvnkzM0poAx0rTMGKmbaPJHnTxd9_1MPgx6jPjl5b0kv3fbX3f3xf7n9x93t_vC1MBToRvRVg10WBkLQy76oYW6agSiYBYHJriRVktoGRrZGl33tuJ24Ez0QoumuiQ3q-6jHtUc3FGHRXnt1P3tXp3_gDe8kS17Ypm9Xtk5-L8njEkdXTQ45oXRn6LiIOuOdVDLjDYraoKPMeDwps1AnYNRB_UajDoHo0BkqyoPXr14nPoj2rex1yQy8G0FMF_lyWFQWQIng9YFNElZ7_7n8QypHKMf</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Klay, Imen</creator><creator>Gouia, Sandra</creator><creator>Liu, Mingchun</creator><creator>Mila, Isabelle</creator><creator>Khoudi, Habib</creator><creator>Bernadac, Anne</creator><creator>Bouzayen, Mondher</creator><creator>Pirrello, Julien</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-1449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants</title><author>Klay, Imen ; Gouia, Sandra ; Liu, Mingchun ; Mila, Isabelle ; Khoudi, Habib ; Bernadac, Anne ; Bouzayen, Mondher ; Pirrello, Julien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a6573609e3cd0f609bf704365ee51def152c8da8071ec87ca4bd32df215b5a563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abiotic stress</topic><topic>Cold-Shock Response</topic><topic>ERF</topic><topic>Ethylenes</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation</topic><topic>Heat-Shock Response</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Proteins</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Salt Tolerance</topic><topic>Tomato</topic><topic>Transcription Factors</topic><topic>Vegetal Biology</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klay, Imen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gouia, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mila, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoudi, Habib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernadac, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzayen, Mondher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirrello, Julien</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Plant science (Limerick)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klay, Imen</au><au>Gouia, Sandra</au><au>Liu, Mingchun</au><au>Mila, Isabelle</au><au>Khoudi, Habib</au><au>Bernadac, Anne</au><au>Bouzayen, Mondher</au><au>Pirrello, Julien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants</atitle><jtitle>Plant science (Limerick)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Sci</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>274</volume><spage>137</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>137-145</pages><issn>0168-9452</issn><eissn>1873-2259</eissn><abstract>•ERFs display differential expression in response to different abiotic stresses.•Responses to different types of abiotic stresses can involve common ERFs to set up adaptive strategy.•High and low temperature stresses activate different set of ERFs than those activated under water, flooding or salt stresses.•ERFs regulate expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of the presence of GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter. Plants are sessile organisms, hence to face environmental constrains they developed strategies that rely on the activation of stress-response genes under the control of specific transcription factors. The plant hormone ethylene mediates physiological, developmental and stress responses through the activation of Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) which belong to a large multigene family of transcription factors. While an increasing number of studies supports the involvement of ERFs in abiotic stress responses, so far the specific role of ERF family members in different abiotic stress conditions remains unexplored. The present work investigates the expression profile of a set of ERFs, representative of different ERF types, in tomato plants subjected to cold, heat, salt, drought and flooding conditions. The study revealed that a group of ERFs is preferentially associated with cold and heat stress responses while another set is expressed in response to salt, water and flooding stresses. Transactivation assays indicated that ERFs can regulate the expression of abiotic stress genes regardless of whether or not they harbor conserved GCC or DRE cis-elements in their promoter region. The outcome of the study provides clue on which ERFs should be targeted when aiming to improve adaptation to a particular stress type.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30080597</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.023</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-1449</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-9452
ispartof Plant science (Limerick), 2018-09, Vol.274, p.137-145
issn 0168-9452
1873-2259
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02626871v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abiotic stress
Cold-Shock Response
ERF
Ethylenes
Gene Expression Regulation
Heat-Shock Response
Life Sciences
Lycopersicon esculentum
Metabolism
Physiology
Plant Proteins
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Salt Tolerance
Tomato
Transcription Factors
Vegetal Biology
Water
title Ethylene Response Factors (ERF) are differentially regulated by different abiotic stress types in tomato plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A04%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethylene%20Response%20Factors%20(ERF)%20are%20differentially%20regulated%20by%20different%20abiotic%20stress%20types%20in%20tomato%20plants&rft.jtitle=Plant%20science%20(Limerick)&rft.au=Klay,%20Imen&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=274&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=137-145&rft.issn=0168-9452&rft.eissn=1873-2259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2084919048%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084919048&rft_id=info:pmid/30080597&rft_els_id=S0168945218301924&rfr_iscdi=true