Electroporation of a nanoparticle-associated DNA vaccine induces higher inflammation and immunity compared to its delivery with microneedle patches in pigs

DNA vaccination is an attractive technology, based on its well-established manufacturing process, safety profile, adaptability to rapidly combat pandemic pathogens, and stability at ambient temperature; however an optimal delivery method of DNA remains to be determined. As pigs are a relevant model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of controlled release 2019-08, Vol.308, p.14-28
Hauptverfasser: Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy, Urien, Céline, McCaffrey, Joanne, Collins, Damien, Donadei, Agnese, McDaid, Dennis, Jakob, Virginie, Barnier-Quer, Christophe, Collin, Nicolas, Bouguyon, Edwige, Bordet, Elise, Barc, Céline, Boulesteix, Olivier, Leplat, Jean-Jacques, Blanc, Fany, Contreras, Vanessa, Bertho, Nicolas, Moore, Anne C., Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue
container_start_page 14
container_title Journal of controlled release
container_volume 308
creator Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy
Urien, Céline
McCaffrey, Joanne
Collins, Damien
Donadei, Agnese
McDaid, Dennis
Jakob, Virginie
Barnier-Quer, Christophe
Collin, Nicolas
Bouguyon, Edwige
Bordet, Elise
Barc, Céline
Boulesteix, Olivier
Leplat, Jean-Jacques
Blanc, Fany
Contreras, Vanessa
Bertho, Nicolas
Moore, Anne C.
Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle
description DNA vaccination is an attractive technology, based on its well-established manufacturing process, safety profile, adaptability to rapidly combat pandemic pathogens, and stability at ambient temperature; however an optimal delivery method of DNA remains to be determined. As pigs are a relevant model for humans, we comparatively evaluated the efficiency of vaccine DNA delivery in vivo to pigs using dissolvable microneedle patches, intradermal inoculation with needle (ID), surface electroporation (EP), with DNA associated or not to cationic poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles (NPs). We used a luciferase encoding plasmid (pLuc) as a reporter and vaccine plasmids encoding antigens from the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), a clinically-significant swine arterivirus. Patches were successful at inducing luciferase expression in skin although at lower level than EP. EP induced the cutaneaous recruitment of granulocytes, of MHC2posCD172Apos myeloid cells and type 1 conventional dendritic cells, in association with local production of IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-17; these local responses were more limited with ID and undetectable with patches. The addition of NP to EP especially promoted the recruitment of the MHC2posCD172Apos CD163int and CD163neg myeloid subsets. Notably we obtained the strongest and broadest IFNγ T-cell response against a panel of PRRSV antigens with DNA + NPs delivered by EP, whereas patches and ID were ineffective. The anti-PRRSV IgG responses were the highest with EP administration independently of NPs, mild with ID, and undetectable with patches. These results contrast with the immunogenicity and efficacy previously induced in mice with patches. This study concludes that successful DNA vaccine administration in skin can be achieved in pigs with electroporation and patches, but only the former induces local inflammation, humoral and cellular immunity, with the highest potency when NPs were used. This finding shows the importance of evaluating the delivery and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines beyond the mouse model in a preclinical model relevant to human such as pig and reveals that EP with DNA combined to NP induces strong immunogenicity. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02622470v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168365919303840</els_id><sourcerecordid>2251689687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-ff2c0bd8892c1192f9eb84dba017da73379c9dbd3393a52e518b9095dbd0a3b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhlcIREPhJ4B8hMMGf-yXTyhqS4sUwQXOlteebSbatRfbmyq_hT-Lo4ReOVkePfOMZt6ieM_omlHWfN6v98a7AOOaUybXtFnTir0oVqxrRVlJWb8sVpnrStHU8qp4E-OeUlqLqn1dXAnGm7rr-Kr4czeCScHPPuiE3hE_EE2cdn7WIaEZodQxeoM6gSW33zfkoI1BBwSdXQxEssPHHYT8HUY9TWeJdpbgNC0O05EYP2VX7k6eYIrEwogHCEfyhGlHJjTBOwA7Apl1MrusREdmfIxvi1eDHiO8u7zXxa-vdz9vHsrtj_tvN5ttaapOpHIYuKG97TrJDWOSDxL6rrK9pqy1uhWilUba3gohha451KzrJZV1LlEt-lZcF5_O3p0e1Rxw0uGovEb1sNmqU43yhvOqpQeW2Y9ndg7-9wIxqQmjgXHUDvwSFed1PrpsupO2PqN5wRgDDM9uRtUpQ7VXlwzVKUNFG5UzzH0fLiOWfgL73PUvtAx8OQOQj3JACCoaBGfAYshhKuvxPyP-Av9Ss2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2251689687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electroporation of a nanoparticle-associated DNA vaccine induces higher inflammation and immunity compared to its delivery with microneedle patches in pigs</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy ; Urien, Céline ; McCaffrey, Joanne ; Collins, Damien ; Donadei, Agnese ; McDaid, Dennis ; Jakob, Virginie ; Barnier-Quer, Christophe ; Collin, Nicolas ; Bouguyon, Edwige ; Bordet, Elise ; Barc, Céline ; Boulesteix, Olivier ; Leplat, Jean-Jacques ; Blanc, Fany ; Contreras, Vanessa ; Bertho, Nicolas ; Moore, Anne C. ; Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy ; Urien, Céline ; McCaffrey, Joanne ; Collins, Damien ; Donadei, Agnese ; McDaid, Dennis ; Jakob, Virginie ; Barnier-Quer, Christophe ; Collin, Nicolas ; Bouguyon, Edwige ; Bordet, Elise ; Barc, Céline ; Boulesteix, Olivier ; Leplat, Jean-Jacques ; Blanc, Fany ; Contreras, Vanessa ; Bertho, Nicolas ; Moore, Anne C. ; Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><description>DNA vaccination is an attractive technology, based on its well-established manufacturing process, safety profile, adaptability to rapidly combat pandemic pathogens, and stability at ambient temperature; however an optimal delivery method of DNA remains to be determined. As pigs are a relevant model for humans, we comparatively evaluated the efficiency of vaccine DNA delivery in vivo to pigs using dissolvable microneedle patches, intradermal inoculation with needle (ID), surface electroporation (EP), with DNA associated or not to cationic poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles (NPs). We used a luciferase encoding plasmid (pLuc) as a reporter and vaccine plasmids encoding antigens from the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), a clinically-significant swine arterivirus. Patches were successful at inducing luciferase expression in skin although at lower level than EP. EP induced the cutaneaous recruitment of granulocytes, of MHC2posCD172Apos myeloid cells and type 1 conventional dendritic cells, in association with local production of IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-17; these local responses were more limited with ID and undetectable with patches. The addition of NP to EP especially promoted the recruitment of the MHC2posCD172Apos CD163int and CD163neg myeloid subsets. Notably we obtained the strongest and broadest IFNγ T-cell response against a panel of PRRSV antigens with DNA + NPs delivered by EP, whereas patches and ID were ineffective. The anti-PRRSV IgG responses were the highest with EP administration independently of NPs, mild with ID, and undetectable with patches. These results contrast with the immunogenicity and efficacy previously induced in mice with patches. This study concludes that successful DNA vaccine administration in skin can be achieved in pigs with electroporation and patches, but only the former induces local inflammation, humoral and cellular immunity, with the highest potency when NPs were used. This finding shows the importance of evaluating the delivery and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines beyond the mouse model in a preclinical model relevant to human such as pig and reveals that EP with DNA combined to NP induces strong immunogenicity. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-3659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31265882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal biology ; Bioengineering ; Dissolvable microneedle ; DNA vaccines ; Electroporation ; Life Sciences ; Pig model ; PLGA nanoparticles ; Skin ; Veterinary medicine and animal Health</subject><ispartof>Journal of controlled release, 2019-08, Vol.308, p.14-28</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-ff2c0bd8892c1192f9eb84dba017da73379c9dbd3393a52e518b9095dbd0a3b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-ff2c0bd8892c1192f9eb84dba017da73379c9dbd3393a52e518b9095dbd0a3b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3485-1765 ; 0000-0002-5912-4652 ; 0000-0003-2366-9826 ; 0000-0002-6732-3483</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31265882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02622470$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urien, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donadei, Agnese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakob, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnier-Quer, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouguyon, Edwige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordet, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barc, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulesteix, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leplat, Jean-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Fany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertho, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Electroporation of a nanoparticle-associated DNA vaccine induces higher inflammation and immunity compared to its delivery with microneedle patches in pigs</title><title>Journal of controlled release</title><addtitle>J Control Release</addtitle><description>DNA vaccination is an attractive technology, based on its well-established manufacturing process, safety profile, adaptability to rapidly combat pandemic pathogens, and stability at ambient temperature; however an optimal delivery method of DNA remains to be determined. As pigs are a relevant model for humans, we comparatively evaluated the efficiency of vaccine DNA delivery in vivo to pigs using dissolvable microneedle patches, intradermal inoculation with needle (ID), surface electroporation (EP), with DNA associated or not to cationic poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles (NPs). We used a luciferase encoding plasmid (pLuc) as a reporter and vaccine plasmids encoding antigens from the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), a clinically-significant swine arterivirus. Patches were successful at inducing luciferase expression in skin although at lower level than EP. EP induced the cutaneaous recruitment of granulocytes, of MHC2posCD172Apos myeloid cells and type 1 conventional dendritic cells, in association with local production of IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-17; these local responses were more limited with ID and undetectable with patches. The addition of NP to EP especially promoted the recruitment of the MHC2posCD172Apos CD163int and CD163neg myeloid subsets. Notably we obtained the strongest and broadest IFNγ T-cell response against a panel of PRRSV antigens with DNA + NPs delivered by EP, whereas patches and ID were ineffective. The anti-PRRSV IgG responses were the highest with EP administration independently of NPs, mild with ID, and undetectable with patches. These results contrast with the immunogenicity and efficacy previously induced in mice with patches. This study concludes that successful DNA vaccine administration in skin can be achieved in pigs with electroporation and patches, but only the former induces local inflammation, humoral and cellular immunity, with the highest potency when NPs were used. This finding shows the importance of evaluating the delivery and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines beyond the mouse model in a preclinical model relevant to human such as pig and reveals that EP with DNA combined to NP induces strong immunogenicity. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Dissolvable microneedle</subject><subject>DNA vaccines</subject><subject>Electroporation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Pig model</subject><subject>PLGA nanoparticles</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine and animal Health</subject><issn>0168-3659</issn><issn>1873-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhlcIREPhJ4B8hMMGf-yXTyhqS4sUwQXOlteebSbatRfbmyq_hT-Lo4ReOVkePfOMZt6ieM_omlHWfN6v98a7AOOaUybXtFnTir0oVqxrRVlJWb8sVpnrStHU8qp4E-OeUlqLqn1dXAnGm7rr-Kr4czeCScHPPuiE3hE_EE2cdn7WIaEZodQxeoM6gSW33zfkoI1BBwSdXQxEssPHHYT8HUY9TWeJdpbgNC0O05EYP2VX7k6eYIrEwogHCEfyhGlHJjTBOwA7Apl1MrusREdmfIxvi1eDHiO8u7zXxa-vdz9vHsrtj_tvN5ttaapOpHIYuKG97TrJDWOSDxL6rrK9pqy1uhWilUba3gohha451KzrJZV1LlEt-lZcF5_O3p0e1Rxw0uGovEb1sNmqU43yhvOqpQeW2Y9ndg7-9wIxqQmjgXHUDvwSFed1PrpsupO2PqN5wRgDDM9uRtUpQ7VXlwzVKUNFG5UzzH0fLiOWfgL73PUvtAx8OQOQj3JACCoaBGfAYshhKuvxPyP-Av9Ss2c</recordid><startdate>20190828</startdate><enddate>20190828</enddate><creator>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy</creator><creator>Urien, Céline</creator><creator>McCaffrey, Joanne</creator><creator>Collins, Damien</creator><creator>Donadei, Agnese</creator><creator>McDaid, Dennis</creator><creator>Jakob, Virginie</creator><creator>Barnier-Quer, Christophe</creator><creator>Collin, Nicolas</creator><creator>Bouguyon, Edwige</creator><creator>Bordet, Elise</creator><creator>Barc, Céline</creator><creator>Boulesteix, Olivier</creator><creator>Leplat, Jean-Jacques</creator><creator>Blanc, Fany</creator><creator>Contreras, Vanessa</creator><creator>Bertho, Nicolas</creator><creator>Moore, Anne C.</creator><creator>Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-1765</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-4652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6732-3483</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190828</creationdate><title>Electroporation of a nanoparticle-associated DNA vaccine induces higher inflammation and immunity compared to its delivery with microneedle patches in pigs</title><author>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy ; Urien, Céline ; McCaffrey, Joanne ; Collins, Damien ; Donadei, Agnese ; McDaid, Dennis ; Jakob, Virginie ; Barnier-Quer, Christophe ; Collin, Nicolas ; Bouguyon, Edwige ; Bordet, Elise ; Barc, Céline ; Boulesteix, Olivier ; Leplat, Jean-Jacques ; Blanc, Fany ; Contreras, Vanessa ; Bertho, Nicolas ; Moore, Anne C. ; Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-ff2c0bd8892c1192f9eb84dba017da73379c9dbd3393a52e518b9095dbd0a3b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Dissolvable microneedle</topic><topic>DNA vaccines</topic><topic>Electroporation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Pig model</topic><topic>PLGA nanoparticles</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine and animal Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urien, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donadei, Agnese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaid, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakob, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnier-Quer, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouguyon, Edwige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordet, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barc, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulesteix, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leplat, Jean-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Fany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertho, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of controlled release</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernelin-Cottet, Cindy</au><au>Urien, Céline</au><au>McCaffrey, Joanne</au><au>Collins, Damien</au><au>Donadei, Agnese</au><au>McDaid, Dennis</au><au>Jakob, Virginie</au><au>Barnier-Quer, Christophe</au><au>Collin, Nicolas</au><au>Bouguyon, Edwige</au><au>Bordet, Elise</au><au>Barc, Céline</au><au>Boulesteix, Olivier</au><au>Leplat, Jean-Jacques</au><au>Blanc, Fany</au><au>Contreras, Vanessa</au><au>Bertho, Nicolas</au><au>Moore, Anne C.</au><au>Schwartz-Cornil, Isabelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electroporation of a nanoparticle-associated DNA vaccine induces higher inflammation and immunity compared to its delivery with microneedle patches in pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of controlled release</jtitle><addtitle>J Control Release</addtitle><date>2019-08-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>308</volume><spage>14</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>14-28</pages><issn>0168-3659</issn><eissn>1873-4995</eissn><abstract>DNA vaccination is an attractive technology, based on its well-established manufacturing process, safety profile, adaptability to rapidly combat pandemic pathogens, and stability at ambient temperature; however an optimal delivery method of DNA remains to be determined. As pigs are a relevant model for humans, we comparatively evaluated the efficiency of vaccine DNA delivery in vivo to pigs using dissolvable microneedle patches, intradermal inoculation with needle (ID), surface electroporation (EP), with DNA associated or not to cationic poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles (NPs). We used a luciferase encoding plasmid (pLuc) as a reporter and vaccine plasmids encoding antigens from the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), a clinically-significant swine arterivirus. Patches were successful at inducing luciferase expression in skin although at lower level than EP. EP induced the cutaneaous recruitment of granulocytes, of MHC2posCD172Apos myeloid cells and type 1 conventional dendritic cells, in association with local production of IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-17; these local responses were more limited with ID and undetectable with patches. The addition of NP to EP especially promoted the recruitment of the MHC2posCD172Apos CD163int and CD163neg myeloid subsets. Notably we obtained the strongest and broadest IFNγ T-cell response against a panel of PRRSV antigens with DNA + NPs delivered by EP, whereas patches and ID were ineffective. The anti-PRRSV IgG responses were the highest with EP administration independently of NPs, mild with ID, and undetectable with patches. These results contrast with the immunogenicity and efficacy previously induced in mice with patches. This study concludes that successful DNA vaccine administration in skin can be achieved in pigs with electroporation and patches, but only the former induces local inflammation, humoral and cellular immunity, with the highest potency when NPs were used. This finding shows the importance of evaluating the delivery and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines beyond the mouse model in a preclinical model relevant to human such as pig and reveals that EP with DNA combined to NP induces strong immunogenicity. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31265882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.041</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-1765</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-4652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6732-3483</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-3659
ispartof Journal of controlled release, 2019-08, Vol.308, p.14-28
issn 0168-3659
1873-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02622470v1
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal biology
Bioengineering
Dissolvable microneedle
DNA vaccines
Electroporation
Life Sciences
Pig model
PLGA nanoparticles
Skin
Veterinary medicine and animal Health
title Electroporation of a nanoparticle-associated DNA vaccine induces higher inflammation and immunity compared to its delivery with microneedle patches in pigs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T20%3A44%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electroporation%20of%20a%20nanoparticle-associated%20DNA%20vaccine%20induces%20higher%20inflammation%20and%20immunity%20compared%20to%20its%20delivery%20with%20microneedle%20patches%20in%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20controlled%20release&rft.au=Bernelin-Cottet,%20Cindy&rft.date=2019-08-28&rft.volume=308&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=14-28&rft.issn=0168-3659&rft.eissn=1873-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2251689687%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2251689687&rft_id=info:pmid/31265882&rft_els_id=S0168365919303840&rfr_iscdi=true