Biomass production and carbon balance in two hybrid poplar (Populus euramericana) plantations raised with and without agriculture in southern France
Poplar is useful in different climates for bioenergy production and carbon sequestration when planted as a single species or in agroforestry. Europe has large areas potentially suitable for poplar forestry and a bioenergy policy that would encourage poplar forestry. In this study I estimated biomass...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forestry research 2018-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1689-1701 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1701 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1689 |
container_title | Journal of forestry research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar |
description | Poplar is useful in different climates for bioenergy production and carbon sequestration when planted as a single species or in agroforestry. Europe has large areas potentially suitable for poplar forestry and a bioenergy policy that would encourage poplar forestry. In this study I estimated biomass production and carbon sequestration in poplar monoculture plantation and poplar-wheat agroforestry, in the Mediterranean region of France. A single-tree harvesting method was used to estimate biomass and an empirical conversion factor was adopted to calculate sequestered carbon. Total biomass was higher in agroforestry trees (1223 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture plantation trees (1102 kg tree
−1
). Aboveground and belowground biomass distributions were similar in both cases (89 and 88% aboveground, and 11 and 12% belowground, respectively in agroforestry and monoculture). The partitioning of total biomass in an agroforestry tree in leaves, branch, and trunk (aboveground), and fine roots, medium roots, coarse roots and underground stem (belowground) was 1, 22, and 77, and 6, 9, 44 and 40%, respectively. Except for branch and trunk, all other compartments were similarly distributed in a monoculture tree. Storage of C was higher in agroforestry trees (612 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture trees (512 kg tree
−1
). In contrast, C storage on a per hectare basis was lower in agroforestry (85 Mg ha
−1
) than in monoculture (105 Mg ha
−1
) due to the lower density of trees per hectare in agroforestry (139 trees in agroforestry vs 204 trees in monoculture). On a per hectare basis, soil C stocks pattern were similar to per tree stocking: They were higher in agroforestry at 330 Mg ha
−1
than in monoculture 304 Mg ha
−1
. Higher C accumulation by agroforestry has a direct management implication in the sense that expanding agroforestry into agriculture production areas with short rotation and fast growing trees like poplar would encourage quicker and greater C sequestration. This could simultaneously fulfil the requirement of bioenergy plantation in Europe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11676-018-0590-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02622134v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A717798845</galeid><wanfj_id>lyyj201806024</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>lyyj201806024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6e3452396769173748b50a201325c3196f89ac1768a6055a8bc0e89836a5c5563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl2L1DAUhosouK7-AO8CIrgXXfPRfPRyXNxdYUAvFLwLp2k6k6FNatI6zP_wB5tuZQdByUUOJ8_7nnPCKYrXBF8TjOX7RIiQosRElZjXuMRPigtS16zEAsunOc5QKQT9_rx4kdIBY14xVl0Uvz64MEBKaIyhnc3kgkfgW2QgNjlsoAdvLHIeTceA9qcmuhaNYewhondfwjj3c0J2jjDY6Ax4uEL5zU-wOCUUwSXboqOb9g-2SxDmCcEu03M_zfHBO-Xc3kaPbuNS7mXxrIM-2Vd_7svi2-3Hrzf35fbz3aebzbY0VSWnUlhWccrqPHhNJJOVajgGigmj3DBSi07VYIgUCgTmHFRjsFW1YgK44Vywy-Jq9d1Dr8foBognHcDp-81WLzlMBaWEVT9JZt-u7BF8B36nD2GOPnen-9PpkIuq_NO0ytyblcsf-mO2aTqDlGClFJM1PVM76K12vgtTBDO4ZPRGEilrpSqeqet_UPm0dnAmeNu5nP9LQFaBiSGlaLvHqQjWywrodU90blcve6Jx1tBVkzLrdzaeG_6_6DdGD75G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108883792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomass production and carbon balance in two hybrid poplar (Populus euramericana) plantations raised with and without agriculture in southern France</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>Poplar is useful in different climates for bioenergy production and carbon sequestration when planted as a single species or in agroforestry. Europe has large areas potentially suitable for poplar forestry and a bioenergy policy that would encourage poplar forestry. In this study I estimated biomass production and carbon sequestration in poplar monoculture plantation and poplar-wheat agroforestry, in the Mediterranean region of France. A single-tree harvesting method was used to estimate biomass and an empirical conversion factor was adopted to calculate sequestered carbon. Total biomass was higher in agroforestry trees (1223 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture plantation trees (1102 kg tree
−1
). Aboveground and belowground biomass distributions were similar in both cases (89 and 88% aboveground, and 11 and 12% belowground, respectively in agroforestry and monoculture). The partitioning of total biomass in an agroforestry tree in leaves, branch, and trunk (aboveground), and fine roots, medium roots, coarse roots and underground stem (belowground) was 1, 22, and 77, and 6, 9, 44 and 40%, respectively. Except for branch and trunk, all other compartments were similarly distributed in a monoculture tree. Storage of C was higher in agroforestry trees (612 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture trees (512 kg tree
−1
). In contrast, C storage on a per hectare basis was lower in agroforestry (85 Mg ha
−1
) than in monoculture (105 Mg ha
−1
) due to the lower density of trees per hectare in agroforestry (139 trees in agroforestry vs 204 trees in monoculture). On a per hectare basis, soil C stocks pattern were similar to per tree stocking: They were higher in agroforestry at 330 Mg ha
−1
than in monoculture 304 Mg ha
−1
. Higher C accumulation by agroforestry has a direct management implication in the sense that expanding agroforestry into agriculture production areas with short rotation and fast growing trees like poplar would encourage quicker and greater C sequestration. This could simultaneously fulfil the requirement of bioenergy plantation in Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-662X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0590-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon content ; Carbon sequestration ; Climate ; Forestry ; Forests and forestry ; Harvesting ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Monoculture ; Original Paper ; Plantations ; Poplar ; Renewable energy ; Roots ; Soils ; Storage ; Trees ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Journal of forestry research, 2018-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1689-1701</ispartof><rights>Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6e3452396769173748b50a201325c3196f89ac1768a6055a8bc0e89836a5c5563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6e3452396769173748b50a201325c3196f89ac1768a6055a8bc0e89836a5c5563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/lyyj/lyyj.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11676-018-0590-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11676-018-0590-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02622134$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Biomass production and carbon balance in two hybrid poplar (Populus euramericana) plantations raised with and without agriculture in southern France</title><title>Journal of forestry research</title><addtitle>J. For. Res</addtitle><description>Poplar is useful in different climates for bioenergy production and carbon sequestration when planted as a single species or in agroforestry. Europe has large areas potentially suitable for poplar forestry and a bioenergy policy that would encourage poplar forestry. In this study I estimated biomass production and carbon sequestration in poplar monoculture plantation and poplar-wheat agroforestry, in the Mediterranean region of France. A single-tree harvesting method was used to estimate biomass and an empirical conversion factor was adopted to calculate sequestered carbon. Total biomass was higher in agroforestry trees (1223 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture plantation trees (1102 kg tree
−1
). Aboveground and belowground biomass distributions were similar in both cases (89 and 88% aboveground, and 11 and 12% belowground, respectively in agroforestry and monoculture). The partitioning of total biomass in an agroforestry tree in leaves, branch, and trunk (aboveground), and fine roots, medium roots, coarse roots and underground stem (belowground) was 1, 22, and 77, and 6, 9, 44 and 40%, respectively. Except for branch and trunk, all other compartments were similarly distributed in a monoculture tree. Storage of C was higher in agroforestry trees (612 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture trees (512 kg tree
−1
). In contrast, C storage on a per hectare basis was lower in agroforestry (85 Mg ha
−1
) than in monoculture (105 Mg ha
−1
) due to the lower density of trees per hectare in agroforestry (139 trees in agroforestry vs 204 trees in monoculture). On a per hectare basis, soil C stocks pattern were similar to per tree stocking: They were higher in agroforestry at 330 Mg ha
−1
than in monoculture 304 Mg ha
−1
. Higher C accumulation by agroforestry has a direct management implication in the sense that expanding agroforestry into agriculture production areas with short rotation and fast growing trees like poplar would encourage quicker and greater C sequestration. This could simultaneously fulfil the requirement of bioenergy plantation in Europe.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests and forestry</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Poplar</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1007-662X</issn><issn>1993-0607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kl2L1DAUhosouK7-AO8CIrgXXfPRfPRyXNxdYUAvFLwLp2k6k6FNatI6zP_wB5tuZQdByUUOJ8_7nnPCKYrXBF8TjOX7RIiQosRElZjXuMRPigtS16zEAsunOc5QKQT9_rx4kdIBY14xVl0Uvz64MEBKaIyhnc3kgkfgW2QgNjlsoAdvLHIeTceA9qcmuhaNYewhondfwjj3c0J2jjDY6Ax4uEL5zU-wOCUUwSXboqOb9g-2SxDmCcEu03M_zfHBO-Xc3kaPbuNS7mXxrIM-2Vd_7svi2-3Hrzf35fbz3aebzbY0VSWnUlhWccrqPHhNJJOVajgGigmj3DBSi07VYIgUCgTmHFRjsFW1YgK44Vywy-Jq9d1Dr8foBognHcDp-81WLzlMBaWEVT9JZt-u7BF8B36nD2GOPnen-9PpkIuq_NO0ytyblcsf-mO2aTqDlGClFJM1PVM76K12vgtTBDO4ZPRGEilrpSqeqet_UPm0dnAmeNu5nP9LQFaBiSGlaLvHqQjWywrodU90blcve6Jx1tBVkzLrdzaeG_6_6DdGD75G</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>UMR Systems, Institute Nationale de la Recherche Agronomique, 2 place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France</general><general>Technical Forestry, Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal, India</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Biomass production and carbon balance in two hybrid poplar (Populus euramericana) plantations raised with and without agriculture in southern France</title><author>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-6e3452396769173748b50a201325c3196f89ac1768a6055a8bc0e89836a5c5563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests and forestry</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Poplar</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jha, Kaushalendra Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomass production and carbon balance in two hybrid poplar (Populus euramericana) plantations raised with and without agriculture in southern France</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry research</jtitle><stitle>J. For. Res</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1689</spage><epage>1701</epage><pages>1689-1701</pages><issn>1007-662X</issn><eissn>1993-0607</eissn><abstract>Poplar is useful in different climates for bioenergy production and carbon sequestration when planted as a single species or in agroforestry. Europe has large areas potentially suitable for poplar forestry and a bioenergy policy that would encourage poplar forestry. In this study I estimated biomass production and carbon sequestration in poplar monoculture plantation and poplar-wheat agroforestry, in the Mediterranean region of France. A single-tree harvesting method was used to estimate biomass and an empirical conversion factor was adopted to calculate sequestered carbon. Total biomass was higher in agroforestry trees (1223 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture plantation trees (1102 kg tree
−1
). Aboveground and belowground biomass distributions were similar in both cases (89 and 88% aboveground, and 11 and 12% belowground, respectively in agroforestry and monoculture). The partitioning of total biomass in an agroforestry tree in leaves, branch, and trunk (aboveground), and fine roots, medium roots, coarse roots and underground stem (belowground) was 1, 22, and 77, and 6, 9, 44 and 40%, respectively. Except for branch and trunk, all other compartments were similarly distributed in a monoculture tree. Storage of C was higher in agroforestry trees (612 kg tree
−1
) than in monoculture trees (512 kg tree
−1
). In contrast, C storage on a per hectare basis was lower in agroforestry (85 Mg ha
−1
) than in monoculture (105 Mg ha
−1
) due to the lower density of trees per hectare in agroforestry (139 trees in agroforestry vs 204 trees in monoculture). On a per hectare basis, soil C stocks pattern were similar to per tree stocking: They were higher in agroforestry at 330 Mg ha
−1
than in monoculture 304 Mg ha
−1
. Higher C accumulation by agroforestry has a direct management implication in the sense that expanding agroforestry into agriculture production areas with short rotation and fast growing trees like poplar would encourage quicker and greater C sequestration. This could simultaneously fulfil the requirement of bioenergy plantation in Europe.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11676-018-0590-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1007-662X |
ispartof | Journal of forestry research, 2018-11, Vol.29 (6), p.1689-1701 |
issn | 1007-662X 1993-0607 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02622134v1 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural industry Agricultural management Agricultural sciences Agriculture Agroforestry Biomass Biomass energy Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon Carbon content Carbon sequestration Climate Forestry Forests and forestry Harvesting Leaves Life Sciences Monoculture Original Paper Plantations Poplar Renewable energy Roots Soils Storage Trees Wheat |
title | Biomass production and carbon balance in two hybrid poplar (Populus euramericana) plantations raised with and without agriculture in southern France |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T14%3A56%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomass%20production%20and%20carbon%20balance%20in%20two%20hybrid%20poplar%20(Populus%20euramericana)%20plantations%20raised%20with%20and%20without%20agriculture%20in%20southern%20France&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry%20research&rft.au=Jha,%20Kaushalendra%20Kumar&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1689&rft.epage=1701&rft.pages=1689-1701&rft.issn=1007-662X&rft.eissn=1993-0607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11676-018-0590-0&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_hal_p%3Elyyj201806024%3C/wanfang_jour_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108883792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A717798845&rft_wanfj_id=lyyj201806024&rfr_iscdi=true |