Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data?

Aim: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation are extremely complex, and surrogate taxa may represent proxies to test methods and solutions. However, cross-taxon correlations in species diversity (i.e., cross-taxon congruence) may vary widely with spatial scale. Our goal is to assess how cross-taxon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global ecology and biogeography 2018-08, Vol.27 (7/8), p.980-990
Hauptverfasser: Burrascano, S., de Andrade, R. B., Paillet, Y., Ódor, P., Antonini, G., Bouget, C., Campagnaro, T., Gosselin, F., Janssen, P., Persiani, A. M., Nascimbene, J., Sabatini, F. M., Sitzia, T., Blasi, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 990
container_issue 7/8
container_start_page 980
container_title Global ecology and biogeography
container_volume 27
creator Burrascano, S.
de Andrade, R. B.
Paillet, Y.
Ódor, P.
Antonini, G.
Bouget, C.
Campagnaro, T.
Gosselin, F.
Janssen, P.
Persiani, A. M.
Nascimbene, J.
Sabatini, F. M.
Sitzia, T.
Blasi, C.
description Aim: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation are extremely complex, and surrogate taxa may represent proxies to test methods and solutions. However, cross-taxon correlations in species diversity (i.e., cross-taxon congruence) may vary widely with spatial scale. Our goal is to assess how cross-taxon congruence varies with spatial scale in European temperate forests. We expect that congruence in species diversity increases when shifting from fine to coarse spatial scales. with differences between species richness and composition, and across pairs of taxonomic groups. Location: European temperate forests. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants, bryophytes, birds, epiphytic lichens, saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi. Methods: We used field data (354 plots across 23 sites) encompassing Italy, France and Hungary, with species information for six taxonomic groups. We accounted separately for spatial grain (the size of elementary sampling unit) and extent (the geographical area included in the survey) and evaluated the relationships within all the possible pairs of taxa. Results: Although no pair of taxa had its species richness consistently correlated across scales, we found no changes in the direction of correlations when analysing species composition. However, when increasing grain and extent, we did find a general increase in the magnitude of correlations in species composition and partial changes in significance, with plants having the highest number of significant correlations. Main conclusions: Species richness congruence among taxa is strongly scale dependent owing to differences in the relative contribution of large- and small-scale processes across taxa. Cross-taxon congruence in species composition is scale dependent only for its magnitude, because life-history traits of individual species make responses to environmental factors similar across scales. Forest monitoring should consider multi-taxon sampling and limit the use of surrogates at specific spatial scales, especially for species richness. Sampling plant species composition in scattered plots across different sites may effectively summarize the whole community composition.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/geb.12766
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02608173v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26636240</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26636240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bbb4df66c548f97a2245e7826653d3127209264468530226a4c3b93c6cf72b463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFLwzAYxYsoOKcH_wAh4MlDtzRJv6ZeZI65CQNBFLyFNE23zq6ZSevcf2-26TyZS0L4vfd97wXBZYR7kT_9mc56EUkAjoJOxABCTig_PrzJ22lw5twCYxyzGDrB89DUM9vqWmkklTXOoUZ-SSTrHLmVbEpZIadkpd0tGliN1h5z72U9Q40xaNmqOTKFJ7UqtUO5bOTdeXBSyMrpi5-7G7w-jF6Gk3D6NH4cDqahopxDmGUZywsAFTNepIkkhMU64QQgpjn1GQhOCTAGPKaYEJBM0SylClSRkIwB7QY3e9-5rMTKlktpN8LIUkwGU7H9wwQwjxL6GXn2es-urPlotWvEwrS29uuJ7RjK0zjif467IqwuDrYRFtt6ha9X7Or1bH_PrstKb_4HxXh0_6u42isWrjH2oPCBKRCG6TcOGYHu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2092389518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Burrascano, S. ; de Andrade, R. B. ; Paillet, Y. ; Ódor, P. ; Antonini, G. ; Bouget, C. ; Campagnaro, T. ; Gosselin, F. ; Janssen, P. ; Persiani, A. M. ; Nascimbene, J. ; Sabatini, F. M. ; Sitzia, T. ; Blasi, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burrascano, S. ; de Andrade, R. B. ; Paillet, Y. ; Ódor, P. ; Antonini, G. ; Bouget, C. ; Campagnaro, T. ; Gosselin, F. ; Janssen, P. ; Persiani, A. M. ; Nascimbene, J. ; Sabatini, F. M. ; Sitzia, T. ; Blasi, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation are extremely complex, and surrogate taxa may represent proxies to test methods and solutions. However, cross-taxon correlations in species diversity (i.e., cross-taxon congruence) may vary widely with spatial scale. Our goal is to assess how cross-taxon congruence varies with spatial scale in European temperate forests. We expect that congruence in species diversity increases when shifting from fine to coarse spatial scales. with differences between species richness and composition, and across pairs of taxonomic groups. Location: European temperate forests. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants, bryophytes, birds, epiphytic lichens, saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi. Methods: We used field data (354 plots across 23 sites) encompassing Italy, France and Hungary, with species information for six taxonomic groups. We accounted separately for spatial grain (the size of elementary sampling unit) and extent (the geographical area included in the survey) and evaluated the relationships within all the possible pairs of taxa. Results: Although no pair of taxa had its species richness consistently correlated across scales, we found no changes in the direction of correlations when analysing species composition. However, when increasing grain and extent, we did find a general increase in the magnitude of correlations in species composition and partial changes in significance, with plants having the highest number of significant correlations. Main conclusions: Species richness congruence among taxa is strongly scale dependent owing to differences in the relative contribution of large- and small-scale processes across taxa. Cross-taxon congruence in species composition is scale dependent only for its magnitude, because life-history traits of individual species make responses to environmental factors similar across scales. Forest monitoring should consider multi-taxon sampling and limit the use of surrogates at specific spatial scales, especially for species richness. Sampling plant species composition in scattered plots across different sites may effectively summarize the whole community composition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/geb.12766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Bryophytes ; Community composition ; Composition ; conservation ; Correlation analysis ; Environmental factors ; Environmental Sciences ; Forests ; Fungi ; Grain ; indicators ; Lichens ; Monitoring ; multi‐taxon ; Plant species ; Plants ; Sampling ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; surrogates ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; Temperate forests ; Test procedures ; Wildlife conservation ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 2018-08, Vol.27 (7/8), p.980-990</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bbb4df66c548f97a2245e7826653d3127209264468530226a4c3b93c6cf72b463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bbb4df66c548f97a2245e7826653d3127209264468530226a4c3b93c6cf72b463</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6221-4256 ; 0000-0002-6537-3313 ; 0000-0002-7050-3696 ; 0000-0002-6307-6892 ; 0000-0002-7976-7647 ; 0000-0002-9174-654X ; 0000-0002-7202-7697 ; 0000-0001-7232-7844 ; 0000-0003-1729-8897 ; 0000-0002-5206-7560 ; 0000-0003-3310-0078 ; 0000-0003-3737-106X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26636240$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26636240$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02608173$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burrascano, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paillet, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ódor, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonini, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouget, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagnaro, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persiani, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimbene, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabatini, F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitzia, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasi, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data?</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><description>Aim: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation are extremely complex, and surrogate taxa may represent proxies to test methods and solutions. However, cross-taxon correlations in species diversity (i.e., cross-taxon congruence) may vary widely with spatial scale. Our goal is to assess how cross-taxon congruence varies with spatial scale in European temperate forests. We expect that congruence in species diversity increases when shifting from fine to coarse spatial scales. with differences between species richness and composition, and across pairs of taxonomic groups. Location: European temperate forests. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants, bryophytes, birds, epiphytic lichens, saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi. Methods: We used field data (354 plots across 23 sites) encompassing Italy, France and Hungary, with species information for six taxonomic groups. We accounted separately for spatial grain (the size of elementary sampling unit) and extent (the geographical area included in the survey) and evaluated the relationships within all the possible pairs of taxa. Results: Although no pair of taxa had its species richness consistently correlated across scales, we found no changes in the direction of correlations when analysing species composition. However, when increasing grain and extent, we did find a general increase in the magnitude of correlations in species composition and partial changes in significance, with plants having the highest number of significant correlations. Main conclusions: Species richness congruence among taxa is strongly scale dependent owing to differences in the relative contribution of large- and small-scale processes across taxa. Cross-taxon congruence in species composition is scale dependent only for its magnitude, because life-history traits of individual species make responses to environmental factors similar across scales. Forest monitoring should consider multi-taxon sampling and limit the use of surrogates at specific spatial scales, especially for species richness. Sampling plant species composition in scattered plots across different sites may effectively summarize the whole community composition.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bryophytes</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>indicators</subject><subject>Lichens</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>multi‐taxon</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>surrogates</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><issn>1466-822X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFLwzAYxYsoOKcH_wAh4MlDtzRJv6ZeZI65CQNBFLyFNE23zq6ZSevcf2-26TyZS0L4vfd97wXBZYR7kT_9mc56EUkAjoJOxABCTig_PrzJ22lw5twCYxyzGDrB89DUM9vqWmkklTXOoUZ-SSTrHLmVbEpZIadkpd0tGliN1h5z72U9Q40xaNmqOTKFJ7UqtUO5bOTdeXBSyMrpi5-7G7w-jF6Gk3D6NH4cDqahopxDmGUZywsAFTNepIkkhMU64QQgpjn1GQhOCTAGPKaYEJBM0SylClSRkIwB7QY3e9-5rMTKlktpN8LIUkwGU7H9wwQwjxL6GXn2es-urPlotWvEwrS29uuJ7RjK0zjif467IqwuDrYRFtt6ha9X7Or1bH_PrstKb_4HxXh0_6u42isWrjH2oPCBKRCG6TcOGYHu</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Burrascano, S.</creator><creator>de Andrade, R. B.</creator><creator>Paillet, Y.</creator><creator>Ódor, P.</creator><creator>Antonini, G.</creator><creator>Bouget, C.</creator><creator>Campagnaro, T.</creator><creator>Gosselin, F.</creator><creator>Janssen, P.</creator><creator>Persiani, A. M.</creator><creator>Nascimbene, J.</creator><creator>Sabatini, F. M.</creator><creator>Sitzia, T.</creator><creator>Blasi, C.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-4256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-3313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7050-3696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-6892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-7647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-654X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7202-7697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-7844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-8897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-7560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-0078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-106X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data?</title><author>Burrascano, S. ; de Andrade, R. B. ; Paillet, Y. ; Ódor, P. ; Antonini, G. ; Bouget, C. ; Campagnaro, T. ; Gosselin, F. ; Janssen, P. ; Persiani, A. M. ; Nascimbene, J. ; Sabatini, F. M. ; Sitzia, T. ; Blasi, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bbb4df66c548f97a2245e7826653d3127209264468530226a4c3b93c6cf72b463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bryophytes</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>indicators</topic><topic>Lichens</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>multi‐taxon</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>surrogates</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burrascano, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paillet, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ódor, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonini, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouget, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campagnaro, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persiani, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimbene, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabatini, F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitzia, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasi, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burrascano, S.</au><au>de Andrade, R. B.</au><au>Paillet, Y.</au><au>Ódor, P.</au><au>Antonini, G.</au><au>Bouget, C.</au><au>Campagnaro, T.</au><au>Gosselin, F.</au><au>Janssen, P.</au><au>Persiani, A. M.</au><au>Nascimbene, J.</au><au>Sabatini, F. M.</au><au>Sitzia, T.</au><au>Blasi, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data?</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7/8</issue><spage>980</spage><epage>990</epage><pages>980-990</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><eissn>1466-822X</eissn><abstract>Aim: Biodiversity monitoring and conservation are extremely complex, and surrogate taxa may represent proxies to test methods and solutions. However, cross-taxon correlations in species diversity (i.e., cross-taxon congruence) may vary widely with spatial scale. Our goal is to assess how cross-taxon congruence varies with spatial scale in European temperate forests. We expect that congruence in species diversity increases when shifting from fine to coarse spatial scales. with differences between species richness and composition, and across pairs of taxonomic groups. Location: European temperate forests. Time period: Present. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants, bryophytes, birds, epiphytic lichens, saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi. Methods: We used field data (354 plots across 23 sites) encompassing Italy, France and Hungary, with species information for six taxonomic groups. We accounted separately for spatial grain (the size of elementary sampling unit) and extent (the geographical area included in the survey) and evaluated the relationships within all the possible pairs of taxa. Results: Although no pair of taxa had its species richness consistently correlated across scales, we found no changes in the direction of correlations when analysing species composition. However, when increasing grain and extent, we did find a general increase in the magnitude of correlations in species composition and partial changes in significance, with plants having the highest number of significant correlations. Main conclusions: Species richness congruence among taxa is strongly scale dependent owing to differences in the relative contribution of large- and small-scale processes across taxa. Cross-taxon congruence in species composition is scale dependent only for its magnitude, because life-history traits of individual species make responses to environmental factors similar across scales. Forest monitoring should consider multi-taxon sampling and limit the use of surrogates at specific spatial scales, especially for species richness. Sampling plant species composition in scattered plots across different sites may effectively summarize the whole community composition.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/geb.12766</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-4256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-3313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7050-3696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-6892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7976-7647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-654X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7202-7697</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-7844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-8897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-7560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-0078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-106X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1466-822X
ispartof Global ecology and biogeography, 2018-08, Vol.27 (7/8), p.980-990
issn 1466-822X
1466-8238
1466-822X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02608173v1
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal behavior
Beetles
Biodiversity
Birds
Bryophytes
Community composition
Composition
conservation
Correlation analysis
Environmental factors
Environmental Sciences
Forests
Fungi
Grain
indicators
Lichens
Monitoring
multi‐taxon
Plant species
Plants
Sampling
Species composition
Species diversity
Species richness
surrogates
Taxa
Taxonomy
Temperate forests
Test procedures
Wildlife conservation
Wood
title Congruence across taxa and spatial scales: Are we asking too much of species data?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Congruence%20across%20taxa%20and%20spatial%20scales:%20Are%20we%20asking%20too%20much%20of%20species%20data?&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=Burrascano,%20S.&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7/8&rft.spage=980&rft.epage=990&rft.pages=980-990&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/geb.12766&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E26636240%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2092389518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26636240&rfr_iscdi=true