Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe

In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assess and compare the environmental and energy profiles of three potential bioenergy production chains using different available feedstocks in Southern European countries. Two wastes, vineyard pruning and eucalypt logging residues, and a wooden...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2014-08, Vol.76, p.42-54
Hauptverfasser: González-García, Sara, Dias, Ana Cláudia, Clermidy, Sónia, Benoist, Antony, Bellon Maurel, Véronique, Gasol, Carles M., Gabarrell, Xavier, Arroja, Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue
container_start_page 42
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 76
creator González-García, Sara
Dias, Ana Cláudia
Clermidy, Sónia
Benoist, Antony
Bellon Maurel, Véronique
Gasol, Carles M.
Gabarrell, Xavier
Arroja, Luis
description In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assess and compare the environmental and energy profiles of three potential bioenergy production chains using different available feedstocks in Southern European countries. Two wastes, vineyard pruning and eucalypt logging residues, and a wooden energy crop, poplar, were examined in detail. The comparative LCA study showed that the use of poplar biomass for bioenergy production has a greater impact than the use of vineyard pruning and logging residues. The contribution from the poplar-cultivation-related activities considerably affected the results, as all the activities from field preparation to harvesting have been included within the system boundaries. In contrast, all the activities performed in the vineyard and forest prior to collection of the residues have not been computed in both scenarios since they have been allocated to the driving force of these stands: grapes and roundwood, respectively. The results support the idea that forest and agricultural waste would be an interesting and potential raw material for bioenergy purposes. However, further analysis should focus on these potential bioenergy sources, namely in terms of their availability and technical burning conditions, in order to meet energy requirements. Moreover, the environmental results were compared with others from literature corresponding to electricity production using alternative biomass sources and fossil fuels. In all the categories considered for comparison, environmental benefits were reported for the electricity production using a biomass source. However, these results must be carefully used since other issues – such as production costs, water availability and land use – should be considered. •Electricity production from SRC and agricultural/forest residues was environmentally compared.•The three bioenergy scenarios are representative for Southern European countries.•The use of poplar biomass is more impacting due to cultivation related activities.•Forest/agricultural residues are potential feedstocks although their availability must be guaranteed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02601049v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652614003709</els_id><sourcerecordid>1540230726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7c1bf9c7613aa6f0c6514b2e7676dfef6a549976927cdf26166d3a35d407305b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFqGzEQhkVpoW6SRyjoUmgP64ykXck6lWDSpmDIIc1ZyNpRLbOWttKuIW8fGZv0WBgYmPnmH2Z-Qj4zWDJg8na_3LsBx5yWHFi7hBqcvyMLtlK6YWol35MF6E43suPyI_lUyh6AKVDtgoR1Oow22ykckWI8hpziAeNkB2pjXyuY_7zQqu3DgIUmT8c01X6owDakf_1-dlNIkbqdDbHQEOlTmqcd5kjv55xGvCYfvB0K3lzyFXn-cf97_dBsHn_-Wt9tGtcqMTXKsa3XTkkmrJUenOxYu-WopJK9Ry9t12qtpObK9Z5LJmUvrOj6FpSAbiuuyLez7s4OZszhYPOLSTaYh7uNOdWAS2DQ6iOr7NczWw_4O2OZzCEUh8NgI6a5GNa1wAUoLivanVGXUykZ_Zs2A3OywezNxQZzssFADc7r3JfLClucHXy20YXyNsxXHRdM6Mp9P3NYf3MMmE1xAaPDPmR0k-lT-M-mV8hpoX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540230726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>González-García, Sara ; Dias, Ana Cláudia ; Clermidy, Sónia ; Benoist, Antony ; Bellon Maurel, Véronique ; Gasol, Carles M. ; Gabarrell, Xavier ; Arroja, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>González-García, Sara ; Dias, Ana Cláudia ; Clermidy, Sónia ; Benoist, Antony ; Bellon Maurel, Véronique ; Gasol, Carles M. ; Gabarrell, Xavier ; Arroja, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assess and compare the environmental and energy profiles of three potential bioenergy production chains using different available feedstocks in Southern European countries. Two wastes, vineyard pruning and eucalypt logging residues, and a wooden energy crop, poplar, were examined in detail. The comparative LCA study showed that the use of poplar biomass for bioenergy production has a greater impact than the use of vineyard pruning and logging residues. The contribution from the poplar-cultivation-related activities considerably affected the results, as all the activities from field preparation to harvesting have been included within the system boundaries. In contrast, all the activities performed in the vineyard and forest prior to collection of the residues have not been computed in both scenarios since they have been allocated to the driving force of these stands: grapes and roundwood, respectively. The results support the idea that forest and agricultural waste would be an interesting and potential raw material for bioenergy purposes. However, further analysis should focus on these potential bioenergy sources, namely in terms of their availability and technical burning conditions, in order to meet energy requirements. Moreover, the environmental results were compared with others from literature corresponding to electricity production using alternative biomass sources and fossil fuels. In all the categories considered for comparison, environmental benefits were reported for the electricity production using a biomass source. However, these results must be carefully used since other issues – such as production costs, water availability and land use – should be considered. •Electricity production from SRC and agricultural/forest residues was environmentally compared.•The three bioenergy scenarios are representative for Southern European countries.•The use of poplar biomass is more impacting due to cultivation related activities.•Forest/agricultural residues are potential feedstocks although their availability must be guaranteed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biofuel production ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Energy ; Environment and sustainable development ; Environmental Sciences ; Eucalypt ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Life cycle assessment ; Logging residues ; Populus spp ; Short rotation coppice ; Use of agricultural and forest wastes. Biomass use, bioconversion ; Vineyard pruning residues ; Vitaceae</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2014-08, Vol.76, p.42-54</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7c1bf9c7613aa6f0c6514b2e7676dfef6a549976927cdf26166d3a35d407305b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7c1bf9c7613aa6f0c6514b2e7676dfef6a549976927cdf26166d3a35d407305b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9337-3604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652614003709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28523139$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02601049$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>González-García, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Ana Cláudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clermidy, Sónia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Antony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellon Maurel, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasol, Carles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabarrell, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroja, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assess and compare the environmental and energy profiles of three potential bioenergy production chains using different available feedstocks in Southern European countries. Two wastes, vineyard pruning and eucalypt logging residues, and a wooden energy crop, poplar, were examined in detail. The comparative LCA study showed that the use of poplar biomass for bioenergy production has a greater impact than the use of vineyard pruning and logging residues. The contribution from the poplar-cultivation-related activities considerably affected the results, as all the activities from field preparation to harvesting have been included within the system boundaries. In contrast, all the activities performed in the vineyard and forest prior to collection of the residues have not been computed in both scenarios since they have been allocated to the driving force of these stands: grapes and roundwood, respectively. The results support the idea that forest and agricultural waste would be an interesting and potential raw material for bioenergy purposes. However, further analysis should focus on these potential bioenergy sources, namely in terms of their availability and technical burning conditions, in order to meet energy requirements. Moreover, the environmental results were compared with others from literature corresponding to electricity production using alternative biomass sources and fossil fuels. In all the categories considered for comparison, environmental benefits were reported for the electricity production using a biomass source. However, these results must be carefully used since other issues – such as production costs, water availability and land use – should be considered. •Electricity production from SRC and agricultural/forest residues was environmentally compared.•The three bioenergy scenarios are representative for Southern European countries.•The use of poplar biomass is more impacting due to cultivation related activities.•Forest/agricultural residues are potential feedstocks although their availability must be guaranteed.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biofuel production</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environment and sustainable development</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Eucalypt</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Logging residues</subject><subject>Populus spp</subject><subject>Short rotation coppice</subject><subject>Use of agricultural and forest wastes. Biomass use, bioconversion</subject><subject>Vineyard pruning residues</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFqGzEQhkVpoW6SRyjoUmgP64ykXck6lWDSpmDIIc1ZyNpRLbOWttKuIW8fGZv0WBgYmPnmH2Z-Qj4zWDJg8na_3LsBx5yWHFi7hBqcvyMLtlK6YWol35MF6E43suPyI_lUyh6AKVDtgoR1Oow22ykckWI8hpziAeNkB2pjXyuY_7zQqu3DgIUmT8c01X6owDakf_1-dlNIkbqdDbHQEOlTmqcd5kjv55xGvCYfvB0K3lzyFXn-cf97_dBsHn_-Wt9tGtcqMTXKsa3XTkkmrJUenOxYu-WopJK9Ry9t12qtpObK9Z5LJmUvrOj6FpSAbiuuyLez7s4OZszhYPOLSTaYh7uNOdWAS2DQ6iOr7NczWw_4O2OZzCEUh8NgI6a5GNa1wAUoLivanVGXUykZ_Zs2A3OywezNxQZzssFADc7r3JfLClucHXy20YXyNsxXHRdM6Mp9P3NYf3MMmE1xAaPDPmR0k-lT-M-mV8hpoX4</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>González-García, Sara</creator><creator>Dias, Ana Cláudia</creator><creator>Clermidy, Sónia</creator><creator>Benoist, Antony</creator><creator>Bellon Maurel, Véronique</creator><creator>Gasol, Carles M.</creator><creator>Gabarrell, Xavier</creator><creator>Arroja, Luis</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9337-3604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe</title><author>González-García, Sara ; Dias, Ana Cláudia ; Clermidy, Sónia ; Benoist, Antony ; Bellon Maurel, Véronique ; Gasol, Carles M. ; Gabarrell, Xavier ; Arroja, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-7c1bf9c7613aa6f0c6514b2e7676dfef6a549976927cdf26166d3a35d407305b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biofuel production</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environment and sustainable development</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Eucalypt</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Logging residues</topic><topic>Populus spp</topic><topic>Short rotation coppice</topic><topic>Use of agricultural and forest wastes. Biomass use, bioconversion</topic><topic>Vineyard pruning residues</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González-García, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Ana Cláudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clermidy, Sónia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Antony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellon Maurel, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasol, Carles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabarrell, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroja, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González-García, Sara</au><au>Dias, Ana Cláudia</au><au>Clermidy, Sónia</au><au>Benoist, Antony</au><au>Bellon Maurel, Véronique</au><au>Gasol, Carles M.</au><au>Gabarrell, Xavier</au><au>Arroja, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>76</volume><spage>42</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>42-54</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assess and compare the environmental and energy profiles of three potential bioenergy production chains using different available feedstocks in Southern European countries. Two wastes, vineyard pruning and eucalypt logging residues, and a wooden energy crop, poplar, were examined in detail. The comparative LCA study showed that the use of poplar biomass for bioenergy production has a greater impact than the use of vineyard pruning and logging residues. The contribution from the poplar-cultivation-related activities considerably affected the results, as all the activities from field preparation to harvesting have been included within the system boundaries. In contrast, all the activities performed in the vineyard and forest prior to collection of the residues have not been computed in both scenarios since they have been allocated to the driving force of these stands: grapes and roundwood, respectively. The results support the idea that forest and agricultural waste would be an interesting and potential raw material for bioenergy purposes. However, further analysis should focus on these potential bioenergy sources, namely in terms of their availability and technical burning conditions, in order to meet energy requirements. Moreover, the environmental results were compared with others from literature corresponding to electricity production using alternative biomass sources and fossil fuels. In all the categories considered for comparison, environmental benefits were reported for the electricity production using a biomass source. However, these results must be carefully used since other issues – such as production costs, water availability and land use – should be considered. •Electricity production from SRC and agricultural/forest residues was environmentally compared.•The three bioenergy scenarios are representative for Southern European countries.•The use of poplar biomass is more impacting due to cultivation related activities.•Forest/agricultural residues are potential feedstocks although their availability must be guaranteed.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.022</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9337-3604</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2014-08, Vol.76, p.42-54
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02601049v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Applied sciences
Biofuel production
Biological and medical sciences
Biotechnology
Energy
Environment and sustainable development
Environmental Sciences
Eucalypt
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
Life cycle assessment
Logging residues
Populus spp
Short rotation coppice
Use of agricultural and forest wastes. Biomass use, bioconversion
Vineyard pruning residues
Vitaceae
title Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20environmental%20and%20energy%20profiles%20of%20potential%20bioenergy%20production%20chains%20in%20Southern%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez-Garc%C3%ADa,%20Sara&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=42-54&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1540230726%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540230726&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959652614003709&rfr_iscdi=true