Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for thirty-three pesticides in natural water and comparison of performance between classical solid phase extraction and passive sampling approaches
The aim of this study is to propose an analytical method for determining different classes of pesticides in water using LC–ESI-MS/MS. Two techniques of field-sampling and analyte extraction were used: solid phase extraction (SPE) of water samples from active sampling and field exposure of Polar Orga...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Chromatography A 2011-03, Vol.1218 (11), p.1492-1502 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1502 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1492 |
| container_title | Journal of Chromatography A |
| container_volume | 1218 |
| creator | Lissalde, Sophie Mazzella, Nicolas Fauvelle, Vincent Delmas, François Mazellier, Patrick Legube, Bernard |
| description | The aim of this study is to propose an analytical method for determining different classes of pesticides in water using LC–ESI-MS/MS. Two techniques of field-sampling and analyte extraction were used: solid phase extraction (SPE) of water samples from active sampling and field exposure of Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS). We have worked with thirty-three molecules representing eight pesticide classes: carbamates, chloroacetanilides, dicarboximides, morpholines, organophosphorous, phenylureas, strobilurines and triazines. First, liquid chromatography separation protocols and the optimization of the ESI-MS/MS parameters were developed. Then, the SPE step was optimized to obtain acceptable levels of recovery for the various classes of molecules. The matrix effect that may significantly lower the ionization efficiency with ESI interfaces was evaluated and minimized. The performances (limits of quantification, accuracy and precision) of the SPE and POCIS techniques were evaluated, and a comparison between the active and passive sampling techniques was carried out with a field application. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.040 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02594677v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967311001117</els_id><sourcerecordid>876240896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-1a0bf6cc26eef2938483c7edea88dd08272d60cd947acc3fd91bed285f10b13e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksGO0zAQhiMEYsvCGyDwBSEOKXacxskFabUCFqkSB9izNbUnjaskztpuS1-U52GqlOWGZNmS9f3_jOafLHst-FJwUX3cLU0X_ADLggux5HRK_iRbiFrJXCpVP80WnBcibyolr7IXMe44F4qr4nl2VQjJuazkIvu9dg97Z9nslfw2wNSdmPH7qUfLji51LMFocWADxMjihCYRiimcGN2dt6z1gaXOhXTKUxcQ2YQxOeMsRuZGNkLaB-jZERIGRl7kPkwQXPQj8y3RgRwGGA2yDaYj4shMT8WcIVX0PbU3dRCR4a8UwCRHurPNdGYOyCIMU-_GLYNpCh5Mh_Fl9qyFPuKry3ud3X_5_PP2Ll9___rt9madm7IWKRfAN21lTFEhtkUj67KWRqFFqGtreV2owlbc2KZUYIxsbSM2aIt61Qq-ERLldfZh9u2g11NwA4ST9uD03c1an_94sWrKSqmDIPb9zFKTD3sakR5cNNj3MKLfR12rqih53VREljNpgo8xYPtoLbg-h693eg5Mn8PXnE7JSfbmUmC_GdA-iv6mTcC7CwCRZtsGmrmL_zjZ8IrTulxnb2euBa9hS0np-x9USXLRlKtSNkR8mgmk4R4cBh2NQ0rQukALoq13_-_1D3Gd35k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876240896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for thirty-three pesticides in natural water and comparison of performance between classical solid phase extraction and passive sampling approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lissalde, Sophie ; Mazzella, Nicolas ; Fauvelle, Vincent ; Delmas, François ; Mazellier, Patrick ; Legube, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Lissalde, Sophie ; Mazzella, Nicolas ; Fauvelle, Vincent ; Delmas, François ; Mazellier, Patrick ; Legube, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to propose an analytical method for determining different classes of pesticides in water using LC–ESI-MS/MS. Two techniques of field-sampling and analyte extraction were used: solid phase extraction (SPE) of water samples from active sampling and field exposure of Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS). We have worked with thirty-three molecules representing eight pesticide classes: carbamates, chloroacetanilides, dicarboximides, morpholines, organophosphorous, phenylureas, strobilurines and triazines. First, liquid chromatography separation protocols and the optimization of the ESI-MS/MS parameters were developed. Then, the SPE step was optimized to obtain acceptable levels of recovery for the various classes of molecules. The matrix effect that may significantly lower the ionization efficiency with ESI interfaces was evaluated and minimized. The performances (limits of quantification, accuracy and precision) of the SPE and POCIS techniques were evaluated, and a comparison between the active and passive sampling techniques was carried out with a field application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21300363</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOCRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Analytical chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Environmental Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; LC–ESI-MS/MS ; Matrix effects ; Natural water pollution ; Non alcoholic beverage industries and mineral waters ; Other chromatographic methods ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - analysis ; POCIS ; Pollution ; Solid Phase Extraction - methods ; SPE ; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Water ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 2011-03, Vol.1218 (11), p.1492-1502</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-1a0bf6cc26eef2938483c7edea88dd08272d60cd947acc3fd91bed285f10b13e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-1a0bf6cc26eef2938483c7edea88dd08272d60cd947acc3fd91bed285f10b13e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3971-0603</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23906067$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02594677$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lissalde, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzella, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauvelle, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmas, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazellier, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legube, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for thirty-three pesticides in natural water and comparison of performance between classical solid phase extraction and passive sampling approaches</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to propose an analytical method for determining different classes of pesticides in water using LC–ESI-MS/MS. Two techniques of field-sampling and analyte extraction were used: solid phase extraction (SPE) of water samples from active sampling and field exposure of Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS). We have worked with thirty-three molecules representing eight pesticide classes: carbamates, chloroacetanilides, dicarboximides, morpholines, organophosphorous, phenylureas, strobilurines and triazines. First, liquid chromatography separation protocols and the optimization of the ESI-MS/MS parameters were developed. Then, the SPE step was optimized to obtain acceptable levels of recovery for the various classes of molecules. The matrix effect that may significantly lower the ionization efficiency with ESI interfaces was evaluated and minimized. The performances (limits of quantification, accuracy and precision) of the SPE and POCIS techniques were evaluated, and a comparison between the active and passive sampling techniques was carried out with a field application.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>LC–ESI-MS/MS</subject><subject>Matrix effects</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Non alcoholic beverage industries and mineral waters</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>POCIS</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</subject><subject>SPE</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><issn>1873-3778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksGO0zAQhiMEYsvCGyDwBSEOKXacxskFabUCFqkSB9izNbUnjaskztpuS1-U52GqlOWGZNmS9f3_jOafLHst-FJwUX3cLU0X_ADLggux5HRK_iRbiFrJXCpVP80WnBcibyolr7IXMe44F4qr4nl2VQjJuazkIvu9dg97Z9nslfw2wNSdmPH7qUfLji51LMFocWADxMjihCYRiimcGN2dt6z1gaXOhXTKUxcQ2YQxOeMsRuZGNkLaB-jZERIGRl7kPkwQXPQj8y3RgRwGGA2yDaYj4shMT8WcIVX0PbU3dRCR4a8UwCRHurPNdGYOyCIMU-_GLYNpCh5Mh_Fl9qyFPuKry3ud3X_5_PP2Ll9___rt9madm7IWKRfAN21lTFEhtkUj67KWRqFFqGtreV2owlbc2KZUYIxsbSM2aIt61Qq-ERLldfZh9u2g11NwA4ST9uD03c1an_94sWrKSqmDIPb9zFKTD3sakR5cNNj3MKLfR12rqih53VREljNpgo8xYPtoLbg-h693eg5Mn8PXnE7JSfbmUmC_GdA-iv6mTcC7CwCRZtsGmrmL_zjZ8IrTulxnb2euBa9hS0np-x9USXLRlKtSNkR8mgmk4R4cBh2NQ0rQukALoq13_-_1D3Gd35k</recordid><startdate>20110318</startdate><enddate>20110318</enddate><creator>Lissalde, Sophie</creator><creator>Mazzella, Nicolas</creator><creator>Fauvelle, Vincent</creator><creator>Delmas, François</creator><creator>Mazellier, Patrick</creator><creator>Legube, Bernard</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-0603</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110318</creationdate><title>Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for thirty-three pesticides in natural water and comparison of performance between classical solid phase extraction and passive sampling approaches</title><author>Lissalde, Sophie ; Mazzella, Nicolas ; Fauvelle, Vincent ; Delmas, François ; Mazellier, Patrick ; Legube, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-1a0bf6cc26eef2938483c7edea88dd08272d60cd947acc3fd91bed285f10b13e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>LC–ESI-MS/MS</topic><topic>Matrix effects</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Non alcoholic beverage industries and mineral waters</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>POCIS</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</topic><topic>SPE</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lissalde, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzella, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauvelle, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmas, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazellier, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legube, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lissalde, Sophie</au><au>Mazzella, Nicolas</au><au>Fauvelle, Vincent</au><au>Delmas, François</au><au>Mazellier, Patrick</au><au>Legube, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for thirty-three pesticides in natural water and comparison of performance between classical solid phase extraction and passive sampling approaches</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><date>2011-03-18</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>1218</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1492</spage><epage>1502</epage><pages>1492-1502</pages><issn>0021-9673</issn><eissn>1873-3778</eissn><coden>JOCRAM</coden><abstract>The aim of this study is to propose an analytical method for determining different classes of pesticides in water using LC–ESI-MS/MS. Two techniques of field-sampling and analyte extraction were used: solid phase extraction (SPE) of water samples from active sampling and field exposure of Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS). We have worked with thirty-three molecules representing eight pesticide classes: carbamates, chloroacetanilides, dicarboximides, morpholines, organophosphorous, phenylureas, strobilurines and triazines. First, liquid chromatography separation protocols and the optimization of the ESI-MS/MS parameters were developed. Then, the SPE step was optimized to obtain acceptable levels of recovery for the various classes of molecules. The matrix effect that may significantly lower the ionization efficiency with ESI interfaces was evaluated and minimized. The performances (limits of quantification, accuracy and precision) of the SPE and POCIS techniques were evaluated, and a comparison between the active and passive sampling techniques was carried out with a field application.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21300363</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.040</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-0603</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9673 |
| ispartof | Journal of Chromatography A, 2011-03, Vol.1218 (11), p.1492-1502 |
| issn | 0021-9673 1873-3778 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02594677v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Analysis methods Analytical chemistry Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Chromatography, Liquid - methods Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination Environmental Sciences Exact sciences and technology Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology LC–ESI-MS/MS Matrix effects Natural water pollution Non alcoholic beverage industries and mineral waters Other chromatographic methods Pesticides Pesticides - analysis POCIS Pollution Solid Phase Extraction - methods SPE Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods Water Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water treatment and pollution |
| title | Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for thirty-three pesticides in natural water and comparison of performance between classical solid phase extraction and passive sampling approaches |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liquid%20chromatography%20coupled%20with%20tandem%20mass%20spectrometry%20method%20for%20thirty-three%20pesticides%20in%20natural%20water%20and%20comparison%20of%20performance%20between%20classical%20solid%20phase%20extraction%20and%20passive%20sampling%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Lissalde,%20Sophie&rft.date=2011-03-18&rft.volume=1218&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1492&rft.epage=1502&rft.pages=1492-1502&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.eissn=1873-3778&rft.coden=JOCRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E876240896%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876240896&rft_id=info:pmid/21300363&rft_els_id=S0021967311001117&rfr_iscdi=true |