Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France

From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2005-11, Vol.551 (1), p.131-136
Hauptverfasser: DANDELOT, Sophie, VERLAQUE, Régine, DUTARTRE, Alain, CAZAUBON, Arlette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 551
creator DANDELOT, Sophie
VERLAQUE, Régine
DUTARTRE, Alain
CAZAUBON, Arlette
description From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. & Arn.) Nesom & Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02586878v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17196554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFLHDEQxoNU8Gr9A3wLhZYKrs5skk3yKKK9woII-hzmstlrZG9z3dxq_e-7y0kFn4YZft83zHyMnSJcIIC-zAhaQQGgCimVKuCALVBpUShE_YktANAUBpU5Yp9zfoJJY0tYsPsbn7q0jp66c9689rSJnlPf8B39TX2au-2QVl3YZN6Mge8Sr8fmJa4j8R93Pa0H8oHCGY89vx2o9-ELO2ypy-HkrR6zx9ubh-tlUd_9_HV9VRdeCrErQktWWK2NWUEZlBGtrFatxYaCIV-VElBq0VglKt2SN1Z5SUAaqUG_slIcs7O972_q3HaIGxpeXaLolle1m2dQKlMZbZ5xYr_v2emWP2PIO7eJ2Yeuoz6kMTvUaCulZtOvH8CnNA79dIczJSopq2qGcA_5IeU8hPb_egQ3p-H2abgpDTen4WDSfHszpjz9up1fFfO7UJdlZSWKf2bUh4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821544664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>DANDELOT, Sophie ; VERLAQUE, Régine ; DUTARTRE, Alain ; CAZAUBON, Arlette</creator><creatorcontrib>DANDELOT, Sophie ; VERLAQUE, Régine ; DUTARTRE, Alain ; CAZAUBON, Arlette</creatorcontrib><description>From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. &amp; Arn.) Nesom &amp; Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Biological and medical sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hybrids ; Hydrophytes ; Invasive species ; Ludwigia ; Ludwigia peploides ; Nonnative species ; Onagraceae ; Plant ecology ; Plant reproduction ; Synecology ; Taxa ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2005-11, Vol.551 (1), p.131-136</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,778,782,787,788,883,23913,23914,25123,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17226941$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02586878$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DANDELOT, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERLAQUE, Régine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUTARTRE, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAZAUBON, Arlette</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. &amp; Arn.) Nesom &amp; Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Hydrophytes</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Ludwigia</subject><subject>Ludwigia peploides</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Onagraceae</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdFLHDEQxoNU8Gr9A3wLhZYKrs5skk3yKKK9woII-hzmstlrZG9z3dxq_e-7y0kFn4YZft83zHyMnSJcIIC-zAhaQQGgCimVKuCALVBpUShE_YktANAUBpU5Yp9zfoJJY0tYsPsbn7q0jp66c9689rSJnlPf8B39TX2au-2QVl3YZN6Mge8Sr8fmJa4j8R93Pa0H8oHCGY89vx2o9-ELO2ypy-HkrR6zx9ubh-tlUd_9_HV9VRdeCrErQktWWK2NWUEZlBGtrFatxYaCIV-VElBq0VglKt2SN1Z5SUAaqUG_slIcs7O972_q3HaIGxpeXaLolle1m2dQKlMZbZ5xYr_v2emWP2PIO7eJ2Yeuoz6kMTvUaCulZtOvH8CnNA79dIczJSopq2qGcA_5IeU8hPb_egQ3p-H2abgpDTen4WDSfHszpjz9up1fFfO7UJdlZSWKf2bUh4Y</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>DANDELOT, Sophie</creator><creator>VERLAQUE, Régine</creator><creator>DUTARTRE, Alain</creator><creator>CAZAUBON, Arlette</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</title><author>DANDELOT, Sophie ; VERLAQUE, Régine ; DUTARTRE, Alain ; CAZAUBON, Arlette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Hydrophytes</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Ludwigia</topic><topic>Ludwigia peploides</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Onagraceae</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DANDELOT, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERLAQUE, Régine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUTARTRE, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAZAUBON, Arlette</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DANDELOT, Sophie</au><au>VERLAQUE, Régine</au><au>DUTARTRE, Alain</au><au>CAZAUBON, Arlette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>551</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>131-136</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. &amp; Arn.) Nesom &amp; Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2005-11, Vol.551 (1), p.131-136
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02586878v1
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aquatic plants
Biological and medical sciences
Environmental Sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Hybrids
Hydrophytes
Invasive species
Ludwigia
Ludwigia peploides
Nonnative species
Onagraceae
Plant ecology
Plant reproduction
Synecology
Taxa
Taxonomy
title Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A51%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological,%20dynamic%20and%20taxonomic%20problems%20due%20to%20Ludwigia%20(Onagraceae)%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=DANDELOT,%20Sophie&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=551&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=131-136&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E17196554%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821544664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true