Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France
From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2005-11, Vol.551 (1), p.131-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 136 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 551 |
creator | DANDELOT, Sophie VERLAQUE, Régine DUTARTRE, Alain CAZAUBON, Arlette |
description | From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. & Arn.) Nesom & Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02586878v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17196554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFLHDEQxoNU8Gr9A3wLhZYKrs5skk3yKKK9woII-hzmstlrZG9z3dxq_e-7y0kFn4YZft83zHyMnSJcIIC-zAhaQQGgCimVKuCALVBpUShE_YktANAUBpU5Yp9zfoJJY0tYsPsbn7q0jp66c9689rSJnlPf8B39TX2au-2QVl3YZN6Mge8Sr8fmJa4j8R93Pa0H8oHCGY89vx2o9-ELO2ypy-HkrR6zx9ubh-tlUd_9_HV9VRdeCrErQktWWK2NWUEZlBGtrFatxYaCIV-VElBq0VglKt2SN1Z5SUAaqUG_slIcs7O972_q3HaIGxpeXaLolle1m2dQKlMZbZ5xYr_v2emWP2PIO7eJ2Yeuoz6kMTvUaCulZtOvH8CnNA79dIczJSopq2qGcA_5IeU8hPb_egQ3p-H2abgpDTen4WDSfHszpjz9up1fFfO7UJdlZSWKf2bUh4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821544664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>DANDELOT, Sophie ; VERLAQUE, Régine ; DUTARTRE, Alain ; CAZAUBON, Arlette</creator><creatorcontrib>DANDELOT, Sophie ; VERLAQUE, Régine ; DUTARTRE, Alain ; CAZAUBON, Arlette</creatorcontrib><description>From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. & Arn.) Nesom & Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Biological and medical sciences ; Environmental Sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hybrids ; Hydrophytes ; Invasive species ; Ludwigia ; Ludwigia peploides ; Nonnative species ; Onagraceae ; Plant ecology ; Plant reproduction ; Synecology ; Taxa ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2005-11, Vol.551 (1), p.131-136</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,778,782,787,788,883,23913,23914,25123,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17226941$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02586878$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DANDELOT, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERLAQUE, Régine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUTARTRE, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAZAUBON, Arlette</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. & Arn.) Nesom & Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Hydrophytes</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Ludwigia</subject><subject>Ludwigia peploides</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Onagraceae</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdFLHDEQxoNU8Gr9A3wLhZYKrs5skk3yKKK9woII-hzmstlrZG9z3dxq_e-7y0kFn4YZft83zHyMnSJcIIC-zAhaQQGgCimVKuCALVBpUShE_YktANAUBpU5Yp9zfoJJY0tYsPsbn7q0jp66c9689rSJnlPf8B39TX2au-2QVl3YZN6Mge8Sr8fmJa4j8R93Pa0H8oHCGY89vx2o9-ELO2ypy-HkrR6zx9ubh-tlUd_9_HV9VRdeCrErQktWWK2NWUEZlBGtrFatxYaCIV-VElBq0VglKt2SN1Z5SUAaqUG_slIcs7O972_q3HaIGxpeXaLolle1m2dQKlMZbZ5xYr_v2emWP2PIO7eJ2Yeuoz6kMTvUaCulZtOvH8CnNA79dIczJSopq2qGcA_5IeU8hPb_egQ3p-H2abgpDTen4WDSfHszpjz9up1fFfO7UJdlZSWKf2bUh4Y</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>DANDELOT, Sophie</creator><creator>VERLAQUE, Régine</creator><creator>DUTARTRE, Alain</creator><creator>CAZAUBON, Arlette</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</title><author>DANDELOT, Sophie ; VERLAQUE, Régine ; DUTARTRE, Alain ; CAZAUBON, Arlette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-efa9397788b02e583f46bf91dae8ac62401473d95367fac895c4a0a71ad1cb943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Hydrophytes</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Ludwigia</topic><topic>Ludwigia peploides</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Onagraceae</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DANDELOT, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERLAQUE, Régine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUTARTRE, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAZAUBON, Arlette</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DANDELOT, Sophie</au><au>VERLAQUE, Régine</au><au>DUTARTRE, Alain</au><au>CAZAUBON, Arlette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>551</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>131-136</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>From their introduction in the beginning of the 19th century in the Lez river at Montpellier, the American Ludwigia have, progressively, colonized the whole of France. In spite of their real nuisance for natural habitats, these ornamental hydrophytes are still for sale. The management of these invasive species requires their precise identification, but this appears to be extremely complex. A morphological and cytogenetic study allowed to confirm the presence of two different taxa in France, and the absence of hybrids in the mixed zones that were monitored. The diploids (2n = 16) correspond to L. peploides subsp. montevidensis (Spreng.) Raven, and the decaploids (2n = 80) to L. grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Hook. & Arn.) Nesom & Kartesz. The diploids colonize especially the Mediterranean region (except the Southeastern part), while the polyploids predominate throughout the other regions. Both taxa exhibit an intense vegetative growth, however they have a distinct breeding system: the self-compatible diploids were always found very fructiferous, whereas the self-incompatible polyploids were often observed as sterile. The breeding system difference could explain the substitution of L. grandiflora (first wave of invasion in the 19th century) by L. peploides, in the 20th century, in the southern part of France.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2005-11, Vol.551 (1), p.131-136 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02586878v1 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Aquatic plants Biological and medical sciences Environmental Sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Hybrids Hydrophytes Invasive species Ludwigia Ludwigia peploides Nonnative species Onagraceae Plant ecology Plant reproduction Synecology Taxa Taxonomy |
title | Ecological, dynamic and taxonomic problems due to Ludwigia (Onagraceae) in France |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A51%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological,%20dynamic%20and%20taxonomic%20problems%20due%20to%20Ludwigia%20(Onagraceae)%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=DANDELOT,%20Sophie&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=551&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=131-136&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-005-4455-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E17196554%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821544664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |