Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation

Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runof...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2003-08, Vol.279 (1), p.275-289
Hauptverfasser: Perrin, Charles, Michel, Claude, Andréassian, Vazken
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 289
container_issue 1
container_start_page 275
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 279
creator Perrin, Charles
Michel, Claude
Andréassian, Vazken
description Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02581740v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169403002257</els_id><sourcerecordid>27862717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctq3DAUhkVJoZNJH6HgTUuycKKLdVuUMIQmGRjoIulanMpHVMW2ppJnQt6-diYky9FG6Og7l__8hHxh9JJRpq4eKOW8Zso251RczA9Z6w9kwYy2NddUn5DFG_KJnJbyl05HiGZBvq_7bU577HEYqxQqqLaQS-zTENOuVH1qsatCylUZM0IfuvRUTd-7DsaYhjPyMUBX8PPrvSS_bn883tzXm59365vVpgYp7Fgbb40MRisPPlipeJCsaawW9rcVIJlvDYop1HqmVGgRKcfAQ5CaSwGAYkkuDnX_QOe2OfaQn12C6O5XGzfHKJeG6Ybu2cR-O7CTrn87LKPrY_HYdTDgJMlxbRTXTB8FmbGUNcIeBxulNVVqAuUB9DmVkjG8zcqom61yL1a52QdHhXuxys2TfH1tAMVDFzIMPpb3ZEmN0WaWdn3gcNr1PmJ2xUccPLYxox9dm-KRTv8BW-ampA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14677066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Perrin, Charles ; Michel, Claude ; Andréassian, Vazken</creator><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Charles ; Michel, Claude ; Andréassian, Vazken</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; GR4J model ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Model complexity ; Model improvement ; Model robustness ; Parsimony ; Rainfall-runoff modelling</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2003-08, Vol.279 (1), p.275-289</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7124-9303 ; 0000-0001-8552-1881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169403002257$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15088781$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02581740$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andréassian, Vazken</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>GR4J model</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Model complexity</subject><subject>Model improvement</subject><subject>Model robustness</subject><subject>Parsimony</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff modelling</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctq3DAUhkVJoZNJH6HgTUuycKKLdVuUMIQmGRjoIulanMpHVMW2ppJnQt6-diYky9FG6Og7l__8hHxh9JJRpq4eKOW8Zso251RczA9Z6w9kwYy2NddUn5DFG_KJnJbyl05HiGZBvq_7bU577HEYqxQqqLaQS-zTENOuVH1qsatCylUZM0IfuvRUTd-7DsaYhjPyMUBX8PPrvSS_bn883tzXm59365vVpgYp7Fgbb40MRisPPlipeJCsaawW9rcVIJlvDYop1HqmVGgRKcfAQ5CaSwGAYkkuDnX_QOe2OfaQn12C6O5XGzfHKJeG6Ybu2cR-O7CTrn87LKPrY_HYdTDgJMlxbRTXTB8FmbGUNcIeBxulNVVqAuUB9DmVkjG8zcqom61yL1a52QdHhXuxys2TfH1tAMVDFzIMPpb3ZEmN0WaWdn3gcNr1PmJ2xUccPLYxox9dm-KRTv8BW-ampA</recordid><startdate>20030825</startdate><enddate>20030825</enddate><creator>Perrin, Charles</creator><creator>Michel, Claude</creator><creator>Andréassian, Vazken</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-1881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20030825</creationdate><title>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</title><author>Perrin, Charles ; Michel, Claude ; Andréassian, Vazken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>GR4J model</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Model complexity</topic><topic>Model improvement</topic><topic>Model robustness</topic><topic>Parsimony</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff modelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andréassian, Vazken</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perrin, Charles</au><au>Michel, Claude</au><au>Andréassian, Vazken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2003-08-25</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>279</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>275-289</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-1881</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2003-08, Vol.279 (1), p.275-289
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02581740v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Environmental Sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
GR4J model
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Model complexity
Model improvement
Model robustness
Parsimony
Rainfall-runoff modelling
title Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20of%20a%20parsimonious%20model%20for%20streamflow%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Perrin,%20Charles&rft.date=2003-08-25&rft.volume=279&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=275-289&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E27862717%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14677066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169403002257&rfr_iscdi=true