Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation
Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runof...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2003-08, Vol.279 (1), p.275-289 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 289 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 275 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 279 |
creator | Perrin, Charles Michel, Claude Andréassian, Vazken |
description | Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02581740v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169403002257</els_id><sourcerecordid>27862717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctq3DAUhkVJoZNJH6HgTUuycKKLdVuUMIQmGRjoIulanMpHVMW2ppJnQt6-diYky9FG6Og7l__8hHxh9JJRpq4eKOW8Zso251RczA9Z6w9kwYy2NddUn5DFG_KJnJbyl05HiGZBvq_7bU577HEYqxQqqLaQS-zTENOuVH1qsatCylUZM0IfuvRUTd-7DsaYhjPyMUBX8PPrvSS_bn883tzXm59365vVpgYp7Fgbb40MRisPPlipeJCsaawW9rcVIJlvDYop1HqmVGgRKcfAQ5CaSwGAYkkuDnX_QOe2OfaQn12C6O5XGzfHKJeG6Ybu2cR-O7CTrn87LKPrY_HYdTDgJMlxbRTXTB8FmbGUNcIeBxulNVVqAuUB9DmVkjG8zcqom61yL1a52QdHhXuxys2TfH1tAMVDFzIMPpb3ZEmN0WaWdn3gcNr1PmJ2xUccPLYxox9dm-KRTv8BW-ampA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14677066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Perrin, Charles ; Michel, Claude ; Andréassian, Vazken</creator><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Charles ; Michel, Claude ; Andréassian, Vazken</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental Sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; GR4J model ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Model complexity ; Model improvement ; Model robustness ; Parsimony ; Rainfall-runoff modelling</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2003-08, Vol.279 (1), p.275-289</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7124-9303 ; 0000-0001-8552-1881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169403002257$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15088781$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02581740$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andréassian, Vazken</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>GR4J model</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Model complexity</subject><subject>Model improvement</subject><subject>Model robustness</subject><subject>Parsimony</subject><subject>Rainfall-runoff modelling</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctq3DAUhkVJoZNJH6HgTUuycKKLdVuUMIQmGRjoIulanMpHVMW2ppJnQt6-diYky9FG6Og7l__8hHxh9JJRpq4eKOW8Zso251RczA9Z6w9kwYy2NddUn5DFG_KJnJbyl05HiGZBvq_7bU577HEYqxQqqLaQS-zTENOuVH1qsatCylUZM0IfuvRUTd-7DsaYhjPyMUBX8PPrvSS_bn883tzXm59365vVpgYp7Fgbb40MRisPPlipeJCsaawW9rcVIJlvDYop1HqmVGgRKcfAQ5CaSwGAYkkuDnX_QOe2OfaQn12C6O5XGzfHKJeG6Ybu2cR-O7CTrn87LKPrY_HYdTDgJMlxbRTXTB8FmbGUNcIeBxulNVVqAuUB9DmVkjG8zcqom61yL1a52QdHhXuxys2TfH1tAMVDFzIMPpb3ZEmN0WaWdn3gcNr1PmJ2xUccPLYxox9dm-KRTv8BW-ampA</recordid><startdate>20030825</startdate><enddate>20030825</enddate><creator>Perrin, Charles</creator><creator>Michel, Claude</creator><creator>Andréassian, Vazken</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-1881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20030825</creationdate><title>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</title><author>Perrin, Charles ; Michel, Claude ; Andréassian, Vazken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-8c985f876cacf9562f51449739b93a51cd8e3514dc166fdee02ef2ff57253aae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>GR4J model</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Model complexity</topic><topic>Model improvement</topic><topic>Model robustness</topic><topic>Parsimony</topic><topic>Rainfall-runoff modelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andréassian, Vazken</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perrin, Charles</au><au>Michel, Claude</au><au>Andréassian, Vazken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2003-08-25</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>279</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>275-289</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>Hydrologists have been struggling over the past decades to improve rainfall-runoff models. As a consequence, models proposed 20–30 years ago still keep evolving as progress is made in the understanding of catchment hydrological behaviour. Here we present the GR4J model, a daily lumped rainfall-runoff model which is the result of a continuous improvement process over the last 15 years. The article provides the mathematical formulation of a new four-parameter version of the model. Model performance is assessed on a large sample of catchments: compared to other rainfall-runoff models, the GR4J performance is among the best ones. It also gives better results than the previous three-parameter model version, especially in the simulation of low flows. The tests indicate that a four-parameter structure corresponds to the maximum level of complexity that could be afforded in the model. Adding more free parameters did not bring significant improvements. The gain in model robustness with this new version should enhance the confidence in the practical use of this simple model for water engineering and resource management. The discussion underlines the potential limits introduced in the modelling process when one relies on a priori concepts in building a model structure and it stresses the value of large catchment samples to assess models.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8552-1881</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1694 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2003-08, Vol.279 (1), p.275-289 |
issn | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02581740v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Environmental Sciences Exact sciences and technology Freshwater GR4J model Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Model complexity Model improvement Model robustness Parsimony Rainfall-runoff modelling |
title | Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20of%20a%20parsimonious%20model%20for%20streamflow%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Perrin,%20Charles&rft.date=2003-08-25&rft.volume=279&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=275-289&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E27862717%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14677066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169403002257&rfr_iscdi=true |