External Pancreatic Duct Stent Decreases Pancreatic Fistula Rate After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent. Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2011-05, Vol.253 (5), p.879-885
Hauptverfasser: PESSAUX, Patrick, SAUVANET, Alain, MARIETTE, Christophe, PAYE, François, MUSCARI, Fabrice, CUNHA, Antonio Sa, SASTRE, Bernard, ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 885
container_issue 5
container_start_page 879
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 253
creator PESSAUX, Patrick
SAUVANET, Alain
MARIETTE, Christophe
PAYE, François
MUSCARI, Fabrice
CUNHA, Antonio Sa
SASTRE, Bernard
ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre
description Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent. Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81). The criteria of inclusion were soft pancreas and a diameter of wirsung 3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level) collected from the peripancreatic drains after postoperative day 3. CT scan was routinely done on day 7. The 2 groups were comparable concerning demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting symptoms, presence of comorbid illness, and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage. Mortality, morbidity, and PF rates were 3.8%, 51.8%, and 34.2%, respectively. Stented group had a significantly lower overall PF (26% vs. 42%; P = 0.034), morbidity (41.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (7.8% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.001) rates compared with nonstented group. Radiologic or surgical intervention for PF was required in 9 patients in the stented group and 12 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (3.7% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.37) and in hospital stay (22 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.11). External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced. PF and overall morbidity rates after PD in high risk patients (soft pancreatic texture and a nondilated pancreatic duct).
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02507302v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>869580135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b261212daa66807b7e9974deb0811f26314a3f92deed7fb794c1adda8007c9f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtv1DAQhS0EokvhHyCUF1TxkDJjJ3HM26pXpK2o2vIcTeyJCMpliZ2K8gv6s-vVbi_iyfLMd451fIT4iHCIYPTX69XyEGpAxQpLiRINNa_EAnNZpogZvBYLAFBpZpTcE--8_w2AWQn6rdiTqIqyyMuFuD_5G3gaqEsuabATU2htcjzbkFwHHkJyzJuhZ_9yf9r6MHeUXFHgZNlEgxfb0c2j44FtGPu7b8nlNPp1vLS3nFzMXQSibRRc0eDGvv3HLrmZWureizcNdZ4_7M598fP05OboPF39OPt-tFylVqEJaS2LGFU6oqKIWWrNxujMcQ0lYiMLhRmpxkjH7HRTa5NZJOeoBNDWNErtiy9b31_UVeup7Wm6q0Zqq_PlqtrMQOagFchbjOzBll1P45-Zfaj61lvuOhp4nH1VFiYvYwN5JLMtaWNcP3HzZI1QbeqqYl3V_3VF2afdA3Pds3sSPfYTgc87gLylrpniN7f-mctQ6RyUegCE-KBZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869580135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>External Pancreatic Duct Stent Decreases Pancreatic Fistula Rate After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>PESSAUX, Patrick ; SAUVANET, Alain ; MARIETTE, Christophe ; PAYE, François ; MUSCARI, Fabrice ; CUNHA, Antonio Sa ; SASTRE, Bernard ; ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>PESSAUX, Patrick ; SAUVANET, Alain ; MARIETTE, Christophe ; PAYE, François ; MUSCARI, Fabrice ; CUNHA, Antonio Sa ; SASTRE, Bernard ; ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre ; Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (French)</creatorcontrib><description>Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent. Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81). The criteria of inclusion were soft pancreas and a diameter of wirsung &lt;3 mm. The primary study end point was PF rate defined as amylase-rich fluid (amylase concentration &gt;3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level) collected from the peripancreatic drains after postoperative day 3. CT scan was routinely done on day 7. The 2 groups were comparable concerning demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting symptoms, presence of comorbid illness, and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage. Mortality, morbidity, and PF rates were 3.8%, 51.8%, and 34.2%, respectively. Stented group had a significantly lower overall PF (26% vs. 42%; P = 0.034), morbidity (41.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (7.8% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.001) rates compared with nonstented group. Radiologic or surgical intervention for PF was required in 9 patients in the stented group and 12 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (3.7% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.37) and in hospital stay (22 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.11). External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced. PF and overall morbidity rates after PD in high risk patients (soft pancreatic texture and a nondilated pancreatic duct).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21368658</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General aspects ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pancreatic Ducts - surgery ; Pancreatic Fistula - etiology ; Pancreatic Fistula - prevention &amp; control ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Reference Values ; Risk Assessment ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stents ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2011-05, Vol.253 (5), p.879-885</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(C) 2011 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b261212daa66807b7e9974deb0811f26314a3f92deed7fb794c1adda8007c9f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5635-7437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24137503$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21368658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02507302$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PESSAUX, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUVANET, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARIETTE, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAYE, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSCARI, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUNHA, Antonio Sa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SASTRE, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (French)</creatorcontrib><title>External Pancreatic Duct Stent Decreases Pancreatic Fistula Rate After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent. Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81). The criteria of inclusion were soft pancreas and a diameter of wirsung &lt;3 mm. The primary study end point was PF rate defined as amylase-rich fluid (amylase concentration &gt;3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level) collected from the peripancreatic drains after postoperative day 3. CT scan was routinely done on day 7. The 2 groups were comparable concerning demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting symptoms, presence of comorbid illness, and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage. Mortality, morbidity, and PF rates were 3.8%, 51.8%, and 34.2%, respectively. Stented group had a significantly lower overall PF (26% vs. 42%; P = 0.034), morbidity (41.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (7.8% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.001) rates compared with nonstented group. Radiologic or surgical intervention for PF was required in 9 patients in the stented group and 12 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (3.7% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.37) and in hospital stay (22 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.11). External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced. PF and overall morbidity rates after PD in high risk patients (soft pancreatic texture and a nondilated pancreatic duct).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Pancreatic Ducts - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtv1DAQhS0EokvhHyCUF1TxkDJjJ3HM26pXpK2o2vIcTeyJCMpliZ2K8gv6s-vVbi_iyfLMd451fIT4iHCIYPTX69XyEGpAxQpLiRINNa_EAnNZpogZvBYLAFBpZpTcE--8_w2AWQn6rdiTqIqyyMuFuD_5G3gaqEsuabATU2htcjzbkFwHHkJyzJuhZ_9yf9r6MHeUXFHgZNlEgxfb0c2j44FtGPu7b8nlNPp1vLS3nFzMXQSibRRc0eDGvv3HLrmZWureizcNdZ4_7M598fP05OboPF39OPt-tFylVqEJaS2LGFU6oqKIWWrNxujMcQ0lYiMLhRmpxkjH7HRTa5NZJOeoBNDWNErtiy9b31_UVeup7Wm6q0Zqq_PlqtrMQOagFchbjOzBll1P45-Zfaj61lvuOhp4nH1VFiYvYwN5JLMtaWNcP3HzZI1QbeqqYl3V_3VF2afdA3Pds3sSPfYTgc87gLylrpniN7f-mctQ6RyUegCE-KBZ</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>PESSAUX, Patrick</creator><creator>SAUVANET, Alain</creator><creator>MARIETTE, Christophe</creator><creator>PAYE, François</creator><creator>MUSCARI, Fabrice</creator><creator>CUNHA, Antonio Sa</creator><creator>SASTRE, Bernard</creator><creator>ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott, Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5635-7437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>External Pancreatic Duct Stent Decreases Pancreatic Fistula Rate After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial</title><author>PESSAUX, Patrick ; SAUVANET, Alain ; MARIETTE, Christophe ; PAYE, François ; MUSCARI, Fabrice ; CUNHA, Antonio Sa ; SASTRE, Bernard ; ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b261212daa66807b7e9974deb0811f26314a3f92deed7fb794c1adda8007c9f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Pancreatic Ducts - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PESSAUX, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUVANET, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARIETTE, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAYE, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSCARI, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUNHA, Antonio Sa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SASTRE, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (French)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PESSAUX, Patrick</au><au>SAUVANET, Alain</au><au>MARIETTE, Christophe</au><au>PAYE, François</au><au>MUSCARI, Fabrice</au><au>CUNHA, Antonio Sa</au><au>SASTRE, Bernard</au><au>ARNAUD, Jean-Pierre</au><aucorp>Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (French)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>External Pancreatic Duct Stent Decreases Pancreatic Fistula Rate After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>253</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>885</epage><pages>879-885</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this multicenter prospective randomized trial was to compare the results of PD with an external drainage stent versus no stent. Between 2006 and 2009, 158 patients who underwent PD were randomized intraoperatively to either receive an external stent inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct (n = 77) or no stent (n = 81). The criteria of inclusion were soft pancreas and a diameter of wirsung &lt;3 mm. The primary study end point was PF rate defined as amylase-rich fluid (amylase concentration &gt;3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase level) collected from the peripancreatic drains after postoperative day 3. CT scan was routinely done on day 7. The 2 groups were comparable concerning demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting symptoms, presence of comorbid illness, and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage. Mortality, morbidity, and PF rates were 3.8%, 51.8%, and 34.2%, respectively. Stented group had a significantly lower overall PF (26% vs. 42%; P = 0.034), morbidity (41.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (7.8% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.001) rates compared with nonstented group. Radiologic or surgical intervention for PF was required in 9 patients in the stented group and 12 patients in the nonstented group. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (3.7% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.37) and in hospital stay (22 days vs. 26 days; P = 0.11). External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent reduced. PF and overall morbidity rates after PD in high risk patients (soft pancreatic texture and a nondilated pancreatic duct).</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>21368658</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5635-7437</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2011-05, Vol.253 (5), p.879-885
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02507302v1
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Follow-Up Studies
General aspects
Human health and pathology
Humans
Intraoperative Care - methods
Life Sciences
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Pancreatic Ducts - surgery
Pancreatic Fistula - etiology
Pancreatic Fistula - prevention & control
Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality
Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Statistics, Nonparametric
Stents
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title External Pancreatic Duct Stent Decreases Pancreatic Fistula Rate After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=External%20Pancreatic%20Duct%20Stent%20Decreases%20Pancreatic%20Fistula%20Rate%20After%20Pancreaticoduodenectomy:%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=PESSAUX,%20Patrick&rft.aucorp=F%C3%A9d%C3%A9ration%20de%20Recherche%20en%20Chirurgie%20(French)&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=253&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=885&rft.pages=879-885&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821219af&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E869580135%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869580135&rft_id=info:pmid/21368658&rfr_iscdi=true