Ruminal methanogens and bacteria populations in sheep are modified by a tropical environment

•Methanogen and bacteria populations differ between temperate and tropical areas.•Differences in forage digestion depend on their composition, not on site of growth.•Sheep breeds can adapt to their environment through rumen digestion. Microbial fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen is largely r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal feed science and technology 2016-10, Vol.220, p.226-236
Hauptverfasser: Rira, Moufida, Morgavi, Diego P., Popova, Milka, Marie-Magdeleine, Carine, Silou-Etienne, Tatiana, Archimède, Harry, Doreau, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue
container_start_page 226
container_title Animal feed science and technology
container_volume 220
creator Rira, Moufida
Morgavi, Diego P.
Popova, Milka
Marie-Magdeleine, Carine
Silou-Etienne, Tatiana
Archimède, Harry
Doreau, Michel
description •Methanogen and bacteria populations differ between temperate and tropical areas.•Differences in forage digestion depend on their composition, not on site of growth.•Sheep breeds can adapt to their environment through rumen digestion. Microbial fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen is largely responsible for the emission of methane by ruminants. Ruminants fed tropical forages usually produce more enteric methane than ruminants fed temperate forages. The relative influence of forage type, breed and temperate vs tropical environment on rumen microbial populations is not known. This experiment aimed to separate these effects. We designed two parallel experiments in sheep in two sites: temperate (France) and tropical (French West Indies), using in each site two breeds, Texel (temperate origin), and Blackbelly (tropical origin) fed the same temperate forages (C3 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality) and tropical forages (C4 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality). We determined diet digestibility, ruminal end-products of fermentation and microbial groups: total protozoa, methanogens and bacteria, and selected fibrolytic bacteria. Dry matter digestibility coefficient was higher in tropical site (612 vs 580g/kg on average, P=0.004) but no difference was observed between C3 and C4 forages. There was no effect of site on total VFA concentration, but the acetate:propionate ratio was higher for the tropical site (4.30 vs 3.93 on average, P=0.007). The acetate:propionate ratio was also affected by forage type with higher values for C3 than C4 forage (4.24 vs 3.99 on average, P=0.03). Concentration of total rumen bacteria and methanogens was determined by qPCR targeting, respectively, the rrs (16S ribosomal RNA subunit) and mcrA (methyl coenzyme-M reductase) genes. For both groups, the number of gene copies per gram of DM rumen content was higher in the tropical site (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02454663v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840116304850</els_id><sourcerecordid>1837291289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-71a5e787b79532c99ac1acd0366356e663cf2adfd780bdea6f8e6eb119d57e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQQEVpoK6T_6BjctiNPrwr7dE1bVwwBEqOBTGWZmOZXWkrrQ3595VxaI-5SDB680CPEMpZzRlvH481BN8jumx9LcqkZrpmnH0iC66VrITg7WeyYFKpSq8Y_0K-5nxkjAstxYL8_nUafYCBjjgfIMRXDJlCcHQPdsbkgU5xOg0w-1gefKD5gDhRSEjH6HzvsaBvFOic4uRtEWE4-xTDiGG-JTc9DBnv3u8lefnx_WWzrXbPTz83611lV7KZK8WhQaXVXnWNFLbrwHKwjsm2lU2L5bS9ANc7pdneIbS9xhb3nHeuUSjkkjxctQcYzJT8COnNRPBmu96Zy4yJVbMqmjMv7P2VnVL8c8I8m9Fni8MAAeMpG66lEl2J0xVUX1GbYs4J-39uzsylvTma_-3Npb1h2pT2ZfXbdRXLr88ekykEBovOJ7SzcdF_LPkLfPuTFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1837291289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ruminal methanogens and bacteria populations in sheep are modified by a tropical environment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rira, Moufida ; Morgavi, Diego P. ; Popova, Milka ; Marie-Magdeleine, Carine ; Silou-Etienne, Tatiana ; Archimède, Harry ; Doreau, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Rira, Moufida ; Morgavi, Diego P. ; Popova, Milka ; Marie-Magdeleine, Carine ; Silou-Etienne, Tatiana ; Archimède, Harry ; Doreau, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>•Methanogen and bacteria populations differ between temperate and tropical areas.•Differences in forage digestion depend on their composition, not on site of growth.•Sheep breeds can adapt to their environment through rumen digestion. Microbial fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen is largely responsible for the emission of methane by ruminants. Ruminants fed tropical forages usually produce more enteric methane than ruminants fed temperate forages. The relative influence of forage type, breed and temperate vs tropical environment on rumen microbial populations is not known. This experiment aimed to separate these effects. We designed two parallel experiments in sheep in two sites: temperate (France) and tropical (French West Indies), using in each site two breeds, Texel (temperate origin), and Blackbelly (tropical origin) fed the same temperate forages (C3 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality) and tropical forages (C4 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality). We determined diet digestibility, ruminal end-products of fermentation and microbial groups: total protozoa, methanogens and bacteria, and selected fibrolytic bacteria. Dry matter digestibility coefficient was higher in tropical site (612 vs 580g/kg on average, P=0.004) but no difference was observed between C3 and C4 forages. There was no effect of site on total VFA concentration, but the acetate:propionate ratio was higher for the tropical site (4.30 vs 3.93 on average, P=0.007). The acetate:propionate ratio was also affected by forage type with higher values for C3 than C4 forage (4.24 vs 3.99 on average, P=0.03). Concentration of total rumen bacteria and methanogens was determined by qPCR targeting, respectively, the rrs (16S ribosomal RNA subunit) and mcrA (methyl coenzyme-M reductase) genes. For both groups, the number of gene copies per gram of DM rumen content was higher in the tropical site (P&lt;0.001). For cellulolytic bacteria, higher number of rrs copies per gram of DM of rumen content were detected for Fibrobacter succinogenes in the temperate site (P&lt;0.001), whereas no differences were observed for Ruminococcus flavefaciens or Ruminococcus albus numbers between sites, breeds and forage type. Protozoa numbers determined by counting did not vary between sites, forages or breeds, but a site×forage interaction was observed (P=0.01): there were more protozoa and R. albus in tropical sites for tropical forages. Our results suggest that rumen microbiota was mainly influenced by environment (temperate vs tropical) and that forage type (C3 vs C4) and breed had minor effects. However, an interaction between environment and forage type was observed for some variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology ; Fibrobacter succinogenes ; Forage ; Life Sciences ; Methane ; Microbiology and Parasitology ; Molecular biology ; Rumen microbiota ; Ruminantia ; Ruminococcus albus ; Ruminococcus flavefaciens ; Sheep breed ; Temperate vs tropical site ; Volatile fatty acids</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2016-10, Vol.220, p.226-236</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-71a5e787b79532c99ac1acd0366356e663cf2adfd780bdea6f8e6eb119d57e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-71a5e787b79532c99ac1acd0366356e663cf2adfd780bdea6f8e6eb119d57e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6695-5502 ; 0000-0002-3553-5887 ; 0000-0002-3883-0937 ; 0000-0001-9325-7216 ; 0000-0002-2648-6833</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840116304850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://uca.hal.science/hal-02454663$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rira, Moufida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgavi, Diego P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popova, Milka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marie-Magdeleine, Carine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silou-Etienne, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archimède, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doreau, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Ruminal methanogens and bacteria populations in sheep are modified by a tropical environment</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description>•Methanogen and bacteria populations differ between temperate and tropical areas.•Differences in forage digestion depend on their composition, not on site of growth.•Sheep breeds can adapt to their environment through rumen digestion. Microbial fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen is largely responsible for the emission of methane by ruminants. Ruminants fed tropical forages usually produce more enteric methane than ruminants fed temperate forages. The relative influence of forage type, breed and temperate vs tropical environment on rumen microbial populations is not known. This experiment aimed to separate these effects. We designed two parallel experiments in sheep in two sites: temperate (France) and tropical (French West Indies), using in each site two breeds, Texel (temperate origin), and Blackbelly (tropical origin) fed the same temperate forages (C3 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality) and tropical forages (C4 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality). We determined diet digestibility, ruminal end-products of fermentation and microbial groups: total protozoa, methanogens and bacteria, and selected fibrolytic bacteria. Dry matter digestibility coefficient was higher in tropical site (612 vs 580g/kg on average, P=0.004) but no difference was observed between C3 and C4 forages. There was no effect of site on total VFA concentration, but the acetate:propionate ratio was higher for the tropical site (4.30 vs 3.93 on average, P=0.007). The acetate:propionate ratio was also affected by forage type with higher values for C3 than C4 forage (4.24 vs 3.99 on average, P=0.03). Concentration of total rumen bacteria and methanogens was determined by qPCR targeting, respectively, the rrs (16S ribosomal RNA subunit) and mcrA (methyl coenzyme-M reductase) genes. For both groups, the number of gene copies per gram of DM rumen content was higher in the tropical site (P&lt;0.001). For cellulolytic bacteria, higher number of rrs copies per gram of DM of rumen content were detected for Fibrobacter succinogenes in the temperate site (P&lt;0.001), whereas no differences were observed for Ruminococcus flavefaciens or Ruminococcus albus numbers between sites, breeds and forage type. Protozoa numbers determined by counting did not vary between sites, forages or breeds, but a site×forage interaction was observed (P=0.01): there were more protozoa and R. albus in tropical sites for tropical forages. Our results suggest that rumen microbiota was mainly influenced by environment (temperate vs tropical) and that forage type (C3 vs C4) and breed had minor effects. However, an interaction between environment and forage type was observed for some variables.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Fibrobacter succinogenes</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Microbiology and Parasitology</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Rumen microbiota</subject><subject>Ruminantia</subject><subject>Ruminococcus albus</subject><subject>Ruminococcus flavefaciens</subject><subject>Sheep breed</subject><subject>Temperate vs tropical site</subject><subject>Volatile fatty acids</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQQEVpoK6T_6BjctiNPrwr7dE1bVwwBEqOBTGWZmOZXWkrrQ3595VxaI-5SDB680CPEMpZzRlvH481BN8jumx9LcqkZrpmnH0iC66VrITg7WeyYFKpSq8Y_0K-5nxkjAstxYL8_nUafYCBjjgfIMRXDJlCcHQPdsbkgU5xOg0w-1gefKD5gDhRSEjH6HzvsaBvFOic4uRtEWE4-xTDiGG-JTc9DBnv3u8lefnx_WWzrXbPTz83611lV7KZK8WhQaXVXnWNFLbrwHKwjsm2lU2L5bS9ANc7pdneIbS9xhb3nHeuUSjkkjxctQcYzJT8COnNRPBmu96Zy4yJVbMqmjMv7P2VnVL8c8I8m9Fni8MAAeMpG66lEl2J0xVUX1GbYs4J-39uzsylvTma_-3Npb1h2pT2ZfXbdRXLr88ekykEBovOJ7SzcdF_LPkLfPuTFw</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Rira, Moufida</creator><creator>Morgavi, Diego P.</creator><creator>Popova, Milka</creator><creator>Marie-Magdeleine, Carine</creator><creator>Silou-Etienne, Tatiana</creator><creator>Archimède, Harry</creator><creator>Doreau, Michel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-5502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-5887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-0937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9325-7216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-6833</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Ruminal methanogens and bacteria populations in sheep are modified by a tropical environment</title><author>Rira, Moufida ; Morgavi, Diego P. ; Popova, Milka ; Marie-Magdeleine, Carine ; Silou-Etienne, Tatiana ; Archimède, Harry ; Doreau, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-71a5e787b79532c99ac1acd0366356e663cf2adfd780bdea6f8e6eb119d57e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Fibrobacter succinogenes</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Microbiology and Parasitology</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Rumen microbiota</topic><topic>Ruminantia</topic><topic>Ruminococcus albus</topic><topic>Ruminococcus flavefaciens</topic><topic>Sheep breed</topic><topic>Temperate vs tropical site</topic><topic>Volatile fatty acids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rira, Moufida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgavi, Diego P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popova, Milka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marie-Magdeleine, Carine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silou-Etienne, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archimède, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doreau, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rira, Moufida</au><au>Morgavi, Diego P.</au><au>Popova, Milka</au><au>Marie-Magdeleine, Carine</au><au>Silou-Etienne, Tatiana</au><au>Archimède, Harry</au><au>Doreau, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ruminal methanogens and bacteria populations in sheep are modified by a tropical environment</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>220</volume><spage>226</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>226-236</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><abstract>•Methanogen and bacteria populations differ between temperate and tropical areas.•Differences in forage digestion depend on their composition, not on site of growth.•Sheep breeds can adapt to their environment through rumen digestion. Microbial fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen is largely responsible for the emission of methane by ruminants. Ruminants fed tropical forages usually produce more enteric methane than ruminants fed temperate forages. The relative influence of forage type, breed and temperate vs tropical environment on rumen microbial populations is not known. This experiment aimed to separate these effects. We designed two parallel experiments in sheep in two sites: temperate (France) and tropical (French West Indies), using in each site two breeds, Texel (temperate origin), and Blackbelly (tropical origin) fed the same temperate forages (C3 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality) and tropical forages (C4 carbon fixation, permanent grasslands of high and low quality). We determined diet digestibility, ruminal end-products of fermentation and microbial groups: total protozoa, methanogens and bacteria, and selected fibrolytic bacteria. Dry matter digestibility coefficient was higher in tropical site (612 vs 580g/kg on average, P=0.004) but no difference was observed between C3 and C4 forages. There was no effect of site on total VFA concentration, but the acetate:propionate ratio was higher for the tropical site (4.30 vs 3.93 on average, P=0.007). The acetate:propionate ratio was also affected by forage type with higher values for C3 than C4 forage (4.24 vs 3.99 on average, P=0.03). Concentration of total rumen bacteria and methanogens was determined by qPCR targeting, respectively, the rrs (16S ribosomal RNA subunit) and mcrA (methyl coenzyme-M reductase) genes. For both groups, the number of gene copies per gram of DM rumen content was higher in the tropical site (P&lt;0.001). For cellulolytic bacteria, higher number of rrs copies per gram of DM of rumen content were detected for Fibrobacter succinogenes in the temperate site (P&lt;0.001), whereas no differences were observed for Ruminococcus flavefaciens or Ruminococcus albus numbers between sites, breeds and forage type. Protozoa numbers determined by counting did not vary between sites, forages or breeds, but a site×forage interaction was observed (P=0.01): there were more protozoa and R. albus in tropical sites for tropical forages. Our results suggest that rumen microbiota was mainly influenced by environment (temperate vs tropical) and that forage type (C3 vs C4) and breed had minor effects. However, an interaction between environment and forage type was observed for some variables.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-5502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-5887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-0937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9325-7216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-6833</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-8401
ispartof Animal feed science and technology, 2016-10, Vol.220, p.226-236
issn 0377-8401
1873-2216
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02454663v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bacteria
Biochemistry, Molecular Biology
Fibrobacter succinogenes
Forage
Life Sciences
Methane
Microbiology and Parasitology
Molecular biology
Rumen microbiota
Ruminantia
Ruminococcus albus
Ruminococcus flavefaciens
Sheep breed
Temperate vs tropical site
Volatile fatty acids
title Ruminal methanogens and bacteria populations in sheep are modified by a tropical environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A35%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ruminal%20methanogens%20and%20bacteria%20populations%20in%20sheep%20are%20modified%20by%20a%20tropical%20environment&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Rira,%20Moufida&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=220&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=226-236&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1837291289%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1837291289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377840116304850&rfr_iscdi=true