Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fiber composites
Composite processing strongly affects the size of lignocellulosic fibers, and consequently the mechanical properties of the final product. Using a reliable method for the analysis of fiber length and diameter distributions is thus crucial for the understanding of fiber behavior during processing. In...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing Applied science and manufacturing, 2016-11, Vol.90, p.320-329 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 329 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 320 |
| container_title | Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Di Giuseppe, Erika Castellani, Romain Dobosz, Simon Malvestio, Jérôme Berzin, Françoise Beaugrand, Johnny Delisée, Christine Vergnes, Bruno Budtova, Tatiana |
| description | Composite processing strongly affects the size of lignocellulosic fibers, and consequently the mechanical properties of the final product. Using a reliable method for the analysis of fiber length and diameter distributions is thus crucial for the understanding of fiber behavior during processing. In this study, three different techniques, X-ray microtomography, 2D scanning and automated fiber analyzer, were compared in terms of their reliability for the characterization of dimensions of two kinds of lignocellulosic fibers, hemp and miscanthus, in polymer-natural fiber composites. Statistical analysis was employed to interpret fiber size distributions. The study confirmed that interpreting the dimensions of natural fiber is still a difficult task. The inherent limitations of the measuring methods make each technique complementary to the others in terms of length scale. The choice of the technique is, therefore, strictly dependent on fiber dimensions and the aim of the work. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.020 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02420034v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359835X16302408</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1359835X16302408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b87539dc1fbce88e68e0539e18aa29d1d78cd90ca28b86ca8ac94f92b6e3c04d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFq3DAUNCWBJmn_QT0WYkeyvbZ8DNu0CSwEQgO9iWfpefctsrRI3gV_Tv40WjY0Oeb0hmFmYN5k2Q_BC8FFc7MttB93PtKEEYoyUQVvC17yL9mFkK3MF7LmZwlXiy6X1eLf1-wyxi3nvKo6cZG9PKEl6MnSNDM8gN3DRN4xPzDYT36ECQ0DB3aOFK9Z-YtFDc5huE6sYSPp4POk8-sAu83MRpw23kQ2-JAwxH0gt2YD9RiYoRFdTOmRkWM7b-cRQ25p7bxGa_c21dBv2vdW37LzAWzE72_3Knv-ffd3eZ-vHv88LG9Xua55M-W9bBdVZ7QYeo1SYiORJwKFBCg7I0wrtem4hlL2stEgQXf10JV9g5Xmtamusp-n3A1YtQs0QpiVB1L3tyt15HhZl-lt9UEkbXfSpvYxBhz-GwRXx13UVn3YRR13UbxNETx5lycvpjIHwqCiJnQaDQXUkzKePpHyCqS4opE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fiber composites</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Di Giuseppe, Erika ; Castellani, Romain ; Dobosz, Simon ; Malvestio, Jérôme ; Berzin, Françoise ; Beaugrand, Johnny ; Delisée, Christine ; Vergnes, Bruno ; Budtova, Tatiana</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Giuseppe, Erika ; Castellani, Romain ; Dobosz, Simon ; Malvestio, Jérôme ; Berzin, Françoise ; Beaugrand, Johnny ; Delisée, Christine ; Vergnes, Bruno ; Budtova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><description>Composite processing strongly affects the size of lignocellulosic fibers, and consequently the mechanical properties of the final product. Using a reliable method for the analysis of fiber length and diameter distributions is thus crucial for the understanding of fiber behavior during processing. In this study, three different techniques, X-ray microtomography, 2D scanning and automated fiber analyzer, were compared in terms of their reliability for the characterization of dimensions of two kinds of lignocellulosic fibers, hemp and miscanthus, in polymer-natural fiber composites. Statistical analysis was employed to interpret fiber size distributions. The study confirmed that interpreting the dimensions of natural fiber is still a difficult task. The inherent limitations of the measuring methods make each technique complementary to the others in terms of length scale. The choice of the technique is, therefore, strictly dependent on fiber dimensions and the aim of the work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-835X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>A. Natural fibers ; A. Polymer-matrix composites ; B. Microstructures ; C. Statistical properties/methods ; Engineering Sciences</subject><ispartof>Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing, 2016-11, Vol.90, p.320-329</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b87539dc1fbce88e68e0539e18aa29d1d78cd90ca28b86ca8ac94f92b6e3c04d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b87539dc1fbce88e68e0539e18aa29d1d78cd90ca28b86ca8ac94f92b6e3c04d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6490-0313 ; 0000-0003-1835-2146 ; 0000-0003-1421-2074 ; 0000-0002-8643-9086</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02420034$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Giuseppe, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellani, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobosz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malvestio, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berzin, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaugrand, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delisée, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergnes, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budtova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fiber composites</title><title>Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing</title><description>Composite processing strongly affects the size of lignocellulosic fibers, and consequently the mechanical properties of the final product. Using a reliable method for the analysis of fiber length and diameter distributions is thus crucial for the understanding of fiber behavior during processing. In this study, three different techniques, X-ray microtomography, 2D scanning and automated fiber analyzer, were compared in terms of their reliability for the characterization of dimensions of two kinds of lignocellulosic fibers, hemp and miscanthus, in polymer-natural fiber composites. Statistical analysis was employed to interpret fiber size distributions. The study confirmed that interpreting the dimensions of natural fiber is still a difficult task. The inherent limitations of the measuring methods make each technique complementary to the others in terms of length scale. The choice of the technique is, therefore, strictly dependent on fiber dimensions and the aim of the work.</description><subject>A. Natural fibers</subject><subject>A. Polymer-matrix composites</subject><subject>B. Microstructures</subject><subject>C. Statistical properties/methods</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><issn>1359-835X</issn><issn>1878-5840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUcFq3DAUNCWBJmn_QT0WYkeyvbZ8DNu0CSwEQgO9iWfpefctsrRI3gV_Tv40WjY0Oeb0hmFmYN5k2Q_BC8FFc7MttB93PtKEEYoyUQVvC17yL9mFkK3MF7LmZwlXiy6X1eLf1-wyxi3nvKo6cZG9PKEl6MnSNDM8gN3DRN4xPzDYT36ECQ0DB3aOFK9Z-YtFDc5huE6sYSPp4POk8-sAu83MRpw23kQ2-JAwxH0gt2YD9RiYoRFdTOmRkWM7b-cRQ25p7bxGa_c21dBv2vdW37LzAWzE72_3Knv-ffd3eZ-vHv88LG9Xua55M-W9bBdVZ7QYeo1SYiORJwKFBCg7I0wrtem4hlL2stEgQXf10JV9g5Xmtamusp-n3A1YtQs0QpiVB1L3tyt15HhZl-lt9UEkbXfSpvYxBhz-GwRXx13UVn3YRR13UbxNETx5lycvpjIHwqCiJnQaDQXUkzKePpHyCqS4opE</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Di Giuseppe, Erika</creator><creator>Castellani, Romain</creator><creator>Dobosz, Simon</creator><creator>Malvestio, Jérôme</creator><creator>Berzin, Françoise</creator><creator>Beaugrand, Johnny</creator><creator>Delisée, Christine</creator><creator>Vergnes, Bruno</creator><creator>Budtova, Tatiana</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-0313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-2146</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-2074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-9086</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fiber composites</title><author>Di Giuseppe, Erika ; Castellani, Romain ; Dobosz, Simon ; Malvestio, Jérôme ; Berzin, Françoise ; Beaugrand, Johnny ; Delisée, Christine ; Vergnes, Bruno ; Budtova, Tatiana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-b87539dc1fbce88e68e0539e18aa29d1d78cd90ca28b86ca8ac94f92b6e3c04d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>A. Natural fibers</topic><topic>A. Polymer-matrix composites</topic><topic>B. Microstructures</topic><topic>C. Statistical properties/methods</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Giuseppe, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellani, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobosz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malvestio, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berzin, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaugrand, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delisée, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergnes, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budtova, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Giuseppe, Erika</au><au>Castellani, Romain</au><au>Dobosz, Simon</au><au>Malvestio, Jérôme</au><au>Berzin, Françoise</au><au>Beaugrand, Johnny</au><au>Delisée, Christine</au><au>Vergnes, Bruno</au><au>Budtova, Tatiana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fiber composites</atitle><jtitle>Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing</jtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>320</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>320-329</pages><issn>1359-835X</issn><eissn>1878-5840</eissn><abstract>Composite processing strongly affects the size of lignocellulosic fibers, and consequently the mechanical properties of the final product. Using a reliable method for the analysis of fiber length and diameter distributions is thus crucial for the understanding of fiber behavior during processing. In this study, three different techniques, X-ray microtomography, 2D scanning and automated fiber analyzer, were compared in terms of their reliability for the characterization of dimensions of two kinds of lignocellulosic fibers, hemp and miscanthus, in polymer-natural fiber composites. Statistical analysis was employed to interpret fiber size distributions. The study confirmed that interpreting the dimensions of natural fiber is still a difficult task. The inherent limitations of the measuring methods make each technique complementary to the others in terms of length scale. The choice of the technique is, therefore, strictly dependent on fiber dimensions and the aim of the work.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.020</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-0313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-2146</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-2074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-9086</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1359-835X |
| ispartof | Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing, 2016-11, Vol.90, p.320-329 |
| issn | 1359-835X 1878-5840 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02420034v1 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | A. Natural fibers A. Polymer-matrix composites B. Microstructures C. Statistical properties/methods Engineering Sciences |
| title | Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fiber composites |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20evaluation%20of%20automated%20analysis,%202D%20scanner,%20and%20micro-tomography%20methods%20for%20measuring%20fiber%20dimensions%20in%20polymer-lignocellulosic%20fiber%20composites&rft.jtitle=Composites.%20Part%20A,%20Applied%20science%20and%20manufacturing&rft.au=Di%20Giuseppe,%20Erika&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=320-329&rft.issn=1359-835X&rft.eissn=1878-5840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.020&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES1359835X16302408%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1359835X16302408&rfr_iscdi=true |