Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety
Background In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), achievement of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) is commonly advocated to prevent bile duct injuries (BDI). However, BDI rates remain stable, probably due to inconsistent application or a poor understanding of CVS as well as unreliable reporting. Obje...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2020-06, Vol.34 (6), p.2709-2714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2714 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2709 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Mascagni, Pietro Fiorillo, Claudio Urade, Takeshi Emre, Taha Yu, Tong Wakabayashi, Taiga Felli, Emanuele Perretta, Silvana Swanstrom, Lee Mutter, Didier Marescaux, Jacques Pessaux, Patrick Costamagna, Guido Padoy, Nicolas Dallemagne, Bernard |
description | Background
In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), achievement of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) is commonly advocated to prevent bile duct injuries (BDI). However, BDI rates remain stable, probably due to inconsistent application or a poor understanding of CVS as well as unreliable reporting. Objective video reporting could serve for quality auditing and help generate consistent datasets for deep learning models aimed at intraoperative assistance. In this study, we develop and test a method to report CVS using videos.
Method
LC videos performed at our institution were retrieved and the video segments starting 60 s prior to the division of cystic structures were edited. Two independent reviewers assessed CVS using an adaptation of the doublet view 6-point scale and a novel binary method in which each criterion is considered either achieved or not. Feasibility to assess CVS in the edited video clips and inter-rater agreements were evaluated.
Results
CVS was attempted in 78 out of the 100 LC videos retrieved. CVS was assessable in 100% of the 60-s video clips. After mediation, CVS was achieved in 32/78(41.03%). Kappa scores of inter-rater agreements using the doublet view versus the binary assessment were as follows: 0.54 versus 0.75 for CVS achievement, 0.45 versus 0.62 for the dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, 0.36 versus 0.77 for the exposure of the lower part of the cystic plate, and 0.48 versus 0.79 for the 2 structures connected to the gallbladder.
Conclusions
The present study is the first to formalize a reproducible method for objective video reporting of CVS in LC. Minute-long video clips provide information on CVS and binary assessment yields a higher inter-rater agreement than previously used methods. These results offer an easy-to-implement strategy for objective video reporting of CVS, which could be used for quality auditing, scientific communication, and development of deep learning models for intraoperative guidance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02390241v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2301444667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7f8981cccde4afdb8bf1dd1aed777a546cecfbf39e25abbda154279cf9ec3df43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEokvhD3BAlriUQ8COnU3MrVpRirQSBz6u1sQe77pK4sV2tlp-U39knd1SJA6cPBo_887HWxSvGX3PKG0-RErFUpSUyZI2TMiSPykWTPCqrCrWPi0WVHJaVo0UZ8WLGG9o5iWrnxdnnNUtF8vlori78mGA3v1244bsnUFPjNfTgGOC5PxIvCVpi2QVXHIaevLT4e2c_AYW04G4kfSwg-Cj9junid76HvUhJtTJD4ePBEiOdyT5WwgmEgjJWaddVnJjwr53Gxw1EojRxQRzmDxxwy74PZI4hc2xazx2e1k8s9BHfPXwnhc_rj59X12X66-fv6wu16UWVKaysa1smdbaoABrurazzBgGaJqmgVosNWrbWS6xqqHrDLBa5CtpK1FzYwU_L96ddLfQq11wA4SD8uDU9eVazTlacUkrwfYssxcnNk_8a8KY1OCizovBiH6KquKUCZFv3WT07T_ojZ_CmDeZKSpqJlueqepE6XzUGNA-TsComn1XJ99V9l0dfVdz0ZsH6akb0DyW_DE6A_wExPw1bjD87f0f2Xvy2r3N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300451983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety</title><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><creator>Mascagni, Pietro ; Fiorillo, Claudio ; Urade, Takeshi ; Emre, Taha ; Yu, Tong ; Wakabayashi, Taiga ; Felli, Emanuele ; Perretta, Silvana ; Swanstrom, Lee ; Mutter, Didier ; Marescaux, Jacques ; Pessaux, Patrick ; Costamagna, Guido ; Padoy, Nicolas ; Dallemagne, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Mascagni, Pietro ; Fiorillo, Claudio ; Urade, Takeshi ; Emre, Taha ; Yu, Tong ; Wakabayashi, Taiga ; Felli, Emanuele ; Perretta, Silvana ; Swanstrom, Lee ; Mutter, Didier ; Marescaux, Jacques ; Pessaux, Patrick ; Costamagna, Guido ; Padoy, Nicolas ; Dallemagne, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), achievement of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) is commonly advocated to prevent bile duct injuries (BDI). However, BDI rates remain stable, probably due to inconsistent application or a poor understanding of CVS as well as unreliable reporting. Objective video reporting could serve for quality auditing and help generate consistent datasets for deep learning models aimed at intraoperative assistance. In this study, we develop and test a method to report CVS using videos.
Method
LC videos performed at our institution were retrieved and the video segments starting 60 s prior to the division of cystic structures were edited. Two independent reviewers assessed CVS using an adaptation of the doublet view 6-point scale and a novel binary method in which each criterion is considered either achieved or not. Feasibility to assess CVS in the edited video clips and inter-rater agreements were evaluated.
Results
CVS was attempted in 78 out of the 100 LC videos retrieved. CVS was assessable in 100% of the 60-s video clips. After mediation, CVS was achieved in 32/78(41.03%). Kappa scores of inter-rater agreements using the doublet view versus the binary assessment were as follows: 0.54 versus 0.75 for CVS achievement, 0.45 versus 0.62 for the dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, 0.36 versus 0.77 for the exposure of the lower part of the cystic plate, and 0.48 versus 0.79 for the 2 structures connected to the gallbladder.
Conclusions
The present study is the first to formalize a reproducible method for objective video reporting of CVS in LC. Minute-long video clips provide information on CVS and binary assessment yields a higher inter-rater agreement than previously used methods. These results offer an easy-to-implement strategy for objective video reporting of CVS, which could be used for quality auditing, scientific communication, and development of deep learning models for intraoperative guidance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31583466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>2019 EAES Oral ; Abdominal Surgery ; Artificial intelligence ; Bile ; Cholecystectomy ; Data science ; Deep learning ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Human health and pathology ; Laparoscopy ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Proctology ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2020-06, Vol.34 (6), p.2709-2714</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7f8981cccde4afdb8bf1dd1aed777a546cecfbf39e25abbda154279cf9ec3df43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7f8981cccde4afdb8bf1dd1aed777a546cecfbf39e25abbda154279cf9ec3df43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7288-3023 ; 0000-0002-5010-4137 ; 0000-0001-5635-7437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31583466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02390241$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mascagni, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorillo, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urade, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emre, Taha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, Taiga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felli, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perretta, Silvana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanstrom, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutter, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marescaux, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessaux, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costamagna, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padoy, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallemagne, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), achievement of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) is commonly advocated to prevent bile duct injuries (BDI). However, BDI rates remain stable, probably due to inconsistent application or a poor understanding of CVS as well as unreliable reporting. Objective video reporting could serve for quality auditing and help generate consistent datasets for deep learning models aimed at intraoperative assistance. In this study, we develop and test a method to report CVS using videos.
Method
LC videos performed at our institution were retrieved and the video segments starting 60 s prior to the division of cystic structures were edited. Two independent reviewers assessed CVS using an adaptation of the doublet view 6-point scale and a novel binary method in which each criterion is considered either achieved or not. Feasibility to assess CVS in the edited video clips and inter-rater agreements were evaluated.
Results
CVS was attempted in 78 out of the 100 LC videos retrieved. CVS was assessable in 100% of the 60-s video clips. After mediation, CVS was achieved in 32/78(41.03%). Kappa scores of inter-rater agreements using the doublet view versus the binary assessment were as follows: 0.54 versus 0.75 for CVS achievement, 0.45 versus 0.62 for the dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, 0.36 versus 0.77 for the exposure of the lower part of the cystic plate, and 0.48 versus 0.79 for the 2 structures connected to the gallbladder.
Conclusions
The present study is the first to formalize a reproducible method for objective video reporting of CVS in LC. Minute-long video clips provide information on CVS and binary assessment yields a higher inter-rater agreement than previously used methods. These results offer an easy-to-implement strategy for objective video reporting of CVS, which could be used for quality auditing, scientific communication, and development of deep learning models for intraoperative guidance.</description><subject>2019 EAES Oral</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Data science</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEokvhD3BAlriUQ8COnU3MrVpRirQSBz6u1sQe77pK4sV2tlp-U39knd1SJA6cPBo_887HWxSvGX3PKG0-RErFUpSUyZI2TMiSPykWTPCqrCrWPi0WVHJaVo0UZ8WLGG9o5iWrnxdnnNUtF8vlori78mGA3v1244bsnUFPjNfTgGOC5PxIvCVpi2QVXHIaevLT4e2c_AYW04G4kfSwg-Cj9junid76HvUhJtTJD4ePBEiOdyT5WwgmEgjJWaddVnJjwr53Gxw1EojRxQRzmDxxwy74PZI4hc2xazx2e1k8s9BHfPXwnhc_rj59X12X66-fv6wu16UWVKaysa1smdbaoABrurazzBgGaJqmgVosNWrbWS6xqqHrDLBa5CtpK1FzYwU_L96ddLfQq11wA4SD8uDU9eVazTlacUkrwfYssxcnNk_8a8KY1OCizovBiH6KquKUCZFv3WT07T_ojZ_CmDeZKSpqJlueqepE6XzUGNA-TsComn1XJ99V9l0dfVdz0ZsH6akb0DyW_DE6A_wExPw1bjD87f0f2Xvy2r3N</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Mascagni, Pietro</creator><creator>Fiorillo, Claudio</creator><creator>Urade, Takeshi</creator><creator>Emre, Taha</creator><creator>Yu, Tong</creator><creator>Wakabayashi, Taiga</creator><creator>Felli, Emanuele</creator><creator>Perretta, Silvana</creator><creator>Swanstrom, Lee</creator><creator>Mutter, Didier</creator><creator>Marescaux, Jacques</creator><creator>Pessaux, Patrick</creator><creator>Costamagna, Guido</creator><creator>Padoy, Nicolas</creator><creator>Dallemagne, Bernard</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-3023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-4137</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5635-7437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety</title><author>Mascagni, Pietro ; Fiorillo, Claudio ; Urade, Takeshi ; Emre, Taha ; Yu, Tong ; Wakabayashi, Taiga ; Felli, Emanuele ; Perretta, Silvana ; Swanstrom, Lee ; Mutter, Didier ; Marescaux, Jacques ; Pessaux, Patrick ; Costamagna, Guido ; Padoy, Nicolas ; Dallemagne, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7f8981cccde4afdb8bf1dd1aed777a546cecfbf39e25abbda154279cf9ec3df43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>2019 EAES Oral</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Data science</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mascagni, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorillo, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urade, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emre, Taha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, Taiga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felli, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perretta, Silvana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanstrom, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutter, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marescaux, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessaux, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costamagna, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padoy, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallemagne, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mascagni, Pietro</au><au>Fiorillo, Claudio</au><au>Urade, Takeshi</au><au>Emre, Taha</au><au>Yu, Tong</au><au>Wakabayashi, Taiga</au><au>Felli, Emanuele</au><au>Perretta, Silvana</au><au>Swanstrom, Lee</au><au>Mutter, Didier</au><au>Marescaux, Jacques</au><au>Pessaux, Patrick</au><au>Costamagna, Guido</au><au>Padoy, Nicolas</au><au>Dallemagne, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2709</spage><epage>2714</epage><pages>2709-2714</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), achievement of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) is commonly advocated to prevent bile duct injuries (BDI). However, BDI rates remain stable, probably due to inconsistent application or a poor understanding of CVS as well as unreliable reporting. Objective video reporting could serve for quality auditing and help generate consistent datasets for deep learning models aimed at intraoperative assistance. In this study, we develop and test a method to report CVS using videos.
Method
LC videos performed at our institution were retrieved and the video segments starting 60 s prior to the division of cystic structures were edited. Two independent reviewers assessed CVS using an adaptation of the doublet view 6-point scale and a novel binary method in which each criterion is considered either achieved or not. Feasibility to assess CVS in the edited video clips and inter-rater agreements were evaluated.
Results
CVS was attempted in 78 out of the 100 LC videos retrieved. CVS was assessable in 100% of the 60-s video clips. After mediation, CVS was achieved in 32/78(41.03%). Kappa scores of inter-rater agreements using the doublet view versus the binary assessment were as follows: 0.54 versus 0.75 for CVS achievement, 0.45 versus 0.62 for the dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, 0.36 versus 0.77 for the exposure of the lower part of the cystic plate, and 0.48 versus 0.79 for the 2 structures connected to the gallbladder.
Conclusions
The present study is the first to formalize a reproducible method for objective video reporting of CVS in LC. Minute-long video clips provide information on CVS and binary assessment yields a higher inter-rater agreement than previously used methods. These results offer an easy-to-implement strategy for objective video reporting of CVS, which could be used for quality auditing, scientific communication, and development of deep learning models for intraoperative guidance.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31583466</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-3023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-4137</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5635-7437</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2020-06, Vol.34 (6), p.2709-2714 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02390241v1 |
source | SpringerLink Journals (MCLS) |
subjects | 2019 EAES Oral Abdominal Surgery Artificial intelligence Bile Cholecystectomy Data science Deep learning Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Human health and pathology Laparoscopy Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Proctology Surgery |
title | Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formalizing%20video%20documentation%20of%20the%20Critical%20View%20of%20Safety%20in%20laparoscopic%20cholecystectomy:%20a%20step%20towards%20artificial%20intelligence%20assistance%20to%20improve%20surgical%20safety&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Mascagni,%20Pietro&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2709&rft.epage=2714&rft.pages=2709-2714&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-019-07149-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2301444667%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300451983&rft_id=info:pmid/31583466&rfr_iscdi=true |