Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation
•Provide a review on a generic property of the oculomotor system, motion extrapolation.•Propose a generic model based on predictive coding for this phenomena.•Compares the results to existing physiological data and gives a novel interpretation of previous results on motion extrapolation. During norm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physiology, Paris Paris, 2013-11, Vol.107 (5), p.409-420 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 420 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 409 |
container_title | Journal of physiology, Paris |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Khoei, Mina A. Masson, Guillaume S. Perrinet, Laurent U. |
description | •Provide a review on a generic property of the oculomotor system, motion extrapolation.•Propose a generic model based on predictive coding for this phenomena.•Compares the results to existing physiological data and gives a novel interpretation of previous results on motion extrapolation.
During normal viewing, the continuous stream of visual input is regularly interrupted, for instance by blinks of the eye. Despite these frequents blanks (that is the transient absence of a raw sensory source), the visual system is most often able to maintain a continuous representation of motion. For instance, it maintains the movement of the eye such as to stabilize the image of an object. This ability suggests the existence of a generic neural mechanism of motion extrapolation to deal with fragmented inputs. In this paper, we have modeled how the visual system may extrapolate the trajectory of an object during a blank using motion-based prediction. This implies that using a prior on the coherency of motion, the system may integrate previous motion information even in the absence of a stimulus. In order to compare with experimental results, we simulated tracking velocity responses. We found that the response of the motion integration process to a blanked trajectory pauses at the onset of the blank, but that it quickly recovers the information on the trajectory after reappearance. This is compatible with behavioral and neural observations on motion extrapolation. To understand these mechanisms, we have recorded the response of the model to a noisy stimulus. Crucially, we found that motion-based prediction acted at the global level as a gain control mechanism and that we could switch from a smooth regime to a binary tracking behavior where the dot is tracked or lost. Our results imply that a local prior implementing motion-based prediction is sufficient to explain a large range of neural and behavioral results at a more global level. We show that the tracking behavior deteriorates for sensory noise levels higher than a certain value, where motion coherency and predictability fail to hold longer. In particular, we found that motion-based prediction leads to the emergence of a tracking behavior only when enough information from the trajectory has been accumulated. Then, during tracking, trajectory estimation is robust to blanks even in the presence of relatively high levels of noise. Moreover, we found that tracking is necessary for motion extrapolation, this calls for furthe |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.08.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02387884v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092842571300051X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1443410660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-624c3c2b03c9f0dded29cf596d9e1f6eec155e1ea9e6ea1d728cb16a9d44f3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFO3DAQhq2Kqiy0r1D5WA4JHsdxnCMgCkiLemnPlmNPut5m49TOInj7OtotHDmN5tf3z0gfIRRYCQzk5bbcTpuXNJnoU8kZVCVTJWPwgaygkW3RANQnZMVargrB6-aUnKW0ZZkQSn0ip1ywSoISK_L4GGYfxqIzCR2dIjpvl4Di8zQYPyY6b5DGMCANPZ2jsX_8-Jv6ke7CkcvhFAazbJ_Jx94MCb8c5zn59f325819sf5x93BztS6sqNVcSC5sZXnHKtv2zDl0vLV93UrXIvQS0UJdI6BpUaIB13BlO5CmdUL0FXbVObk43N2YQU_R70x80cF4fX-11kvGeKUapcQTZPbbgZ1i-LvHNOudTxaHwYwY9kmDEJUAJiXLqDqgNoaUIvavt4HpRbze6jfxehGvmdJZa65-PX7Zdzt0r8X_pjNwfQAwe3nyGHWyHkebhUe0s3bBv__lHzxemvs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1443410660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Khoei, Mina A. ; Masson, Guillaume S. ; Perrinet, Laurent U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khoei, Mina A. ; Masson, Guillaume S. ; Perrinet, Laurent U.</creatorcontrib><description>•Provide a review on a generic property of the oculomotor system, motion extrapolation.•Propose a generic model based on predictive coding for this phenomena.•Compares the results to existing physiological data and gives a novel interpretation of previous results on motion extrapolation.
During normal viewing, the continuous stream of visual input is regularly interrupted, for instance by blinks of the eye. Despite these frequents blanks (that is the transient absence of a raw sensory source), the visual system is most often able to maintain a continuous representation of motion. For instance, it maintains the movement of the eye such as to stabilize the image of an object. This ability suggests the existence of a generic neural mechanism of motion extrapolation to deal with fragmented inputs. In this paper, we have modeled how the visual system may extrapolate the trajectory of an object during a blank using motion-based prediction. This implies that using a prior on the coherency of motion, the system may integrate previous motion information even in the absence of a stimulus. In order to compare with experimental results, we simulated tracking velocity responses. We found that the response of the motion integration process to a blanked trajectory pauses at the onset of the blank, but that it quickly recovers the information on the trajectory after reappearance. This is compatible with behavioral and neural observations on motion extrapolation. To understand these mechanisms, we have recorded the response of the model to a noisy stimulus. Crucially, we found that motion-based prediction acted at the global level as a gain control mechanism and that we could switch from a smooth regime to a binary tracking behavior where the dot is tracked or lost. Our results imply that a local prior implementing motion-based prediction is sufficient to explain a large range of neural and behavioral results at a more global level. We show that the tracking behavior deteriorates for sensory noise levels higher than a certain value, where motion coherency and predictability fail to hold longer. In particular, we found that motion-based prediction leads to the emergence of a tracking behavior only when enough information from the trajectory has been accumulated. Then, during tracking, trajectory estimation is robust to blanks even in the presence of relatively high levels of noise. Moreover, we found that tracking is necessary for motion extrapolation, this calls for further experimental work exploring the role of noise in motion extrapolation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1769-7115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24036184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cognitive science ; Contrast response function ; Forecasting ; Gain control ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Models, Biological ; Motion ; Motion detection ; Motion extrapolation ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Neurons and Cognition ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Predictive coding ; Probabilistic representation ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of physiology, Paris, 2013-11, Vol.107 (5), p.409-420</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-624c3c2b03c9f0dded29cf596d9e1f6eec155e1ea9e6ea1d728cb16a9d44f3eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-624c3c2b03c9f0dded29cf596d9e1f6eec155e1ea9e6ea1d728cb16a9d44f3eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9227-0777 ; 0000-0002-9536-010X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24036184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02387884$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khoei, Mina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masson, Guillaume S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrinet, Laurent U.</creatorcontrib><title>Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation</title><title>Journal of physiology, Paris</title><addtitle>J Physiol Paris</addtitle><description>•Provide a review on a generic property of the oculomotor system, motion extrapolation.•Propose a generic model based on predictive coding for this phenomena.•Compares the results to existing physiological data and gives a novel interpretation of previous results on motion extrapolation.
During normal viewing, the continuous stream of visual input is regularly interrupted, for instance by blinks of the eye. Despite these frequents blanks (that is the transient absence of a raw sensory source), the visual system is most often able to maintain a continuous representation of motion. For instance, it maintains the movement of the eye such as to stabilize the image of an object. This ability suggests the existence of a generic neural mechanism of motion extrapolation to deal with fragmented inputs. In this paper, we have modeled how the visual system may extrapolate the trajectory of an object during a blank using motion-based prediction. This implies that using a prior on the coherency of motion, the system may integrate previous motion information even in the absence of a stimulus. In order to compare with experimental results, we simulated tracking velocity responses. We found that the response of the motion integration process to a blanked trajectory pauses at the onset of the blank, but that it quickly recovers the information on the trajectory after reappearance. This is compatible with behavioral and neural observations on motion extrapolation. To understand these mechanisms, we have recorded the response of the model to a noisy stimulus. Crucially, we found that motion-based prediction acted at the global level as a gain control mechanism and that we could switch from a smooth regime to a binary tracking behavior where the dot is tracked or lost. Our results imply that a local prior implementing motion-based prediction is sufficient to explain a large range of neural and behavioral results at a more global level. We show that the tracking behavior deteriorates for sensory noise levels higher than a certain value, where motion coherency and predictability fail to hold longer. In particular, we found that motion-based prediction leads to the emergence of a tracking behavior only when enough information from the trajectory has been accumulated. Then, during tracking, trajectory estimation is robust to blanks even in the presence of relatively high levels of noise. Moreover, we found that tracking is necessary for motion extrapolation, this calls for further experimental work exploring the role of noise in motion extrapolation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Contrast response function</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Gain control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion detection</subject><subject>Motion extrapolation</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Predictive coding</subject><subject>Probabilistic representation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0928-4257</issn><issn>1769-7115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFO3DAQhq2Kqiy0r1D5WA4JHsdxnCMgCkiLemnPlmNPut5m49TOInj7OtotHDmN5tf3z0gfIRRYCQzk5bbcTpuXNJnoU8kZVCVTJWPwgaygkW3RANQnZMVargrB6-aUnKW0ZZkQSn0ip1ywSoISK_L4GGYfxqIzCR2dIjpvl4Di8zQYPyY6b5DGMCANPZ2jsX_8-Jv6ke7CkcvhFAazbJ_Jx94MCb8c5zn59f325819sf5x93BztS6sqNVcSC5sZXnHKtv2zDl0vLV93UrXIvQS0UJdI6BpUaIB13BlO5CmdUL0FXbVObk43N2YQU_R70x80cF4fX-11kvGeKUapcQTZPbbgZ1i-LvHNOudTxaHwYwY9kmDEJUAJiXLqDqgNoaUIvavt4HpRbze6jfxehGvmdJZa65-PX7Zdzt0r8X_pjNwfQAwe3nyGHWyHkebhUe0s3bBv__lHzxemvs</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Khoei, Mina A.</creator><creator>Masson, Guillaume S.</creator><creator>Perrinet, Laurent U.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-010X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation</title><author>Khoei, Mina A. ; Masson, Guillaume S. ; Perrinet, Laurent U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-624c3c2b03c9f0dded29cf596d9e1f6eec155e1ea9e6ea1d728cb16a9d44f3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Contrast response function</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Gain control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion detection</topic><topic>Motion extrapolation</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Predictive coding</topic><topic>Probabilistic representation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khoei, Mina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masson, Guillaume S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrinet, Laurent U.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of physiology, Paris</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khoei, Mina A.</au><au>Masson, Guillaume S.</au><au>Perrinet, Laurent U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physiology, Paris</jtitle><addtitle>J Physiol Paris</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>409-420</pages><issn>0928-4257</issn><eissn>1769-7115</eissn><abstract>•Provide a review on a generic property of the oculomotor system, motion extrapolation.•Propose a generic model based on predictive coding for this phenomena.•Compares the results to existing physiological data and gives a novel interpretation of previous results on motion extrapolation.
During normal viewing, the continuous stream of visual input is regularly interrupted, for instance by blinks of the eye. Despite these frequents blanks (that is the transient absence of a raw sensory source), the visual system is most often able to maintain a continuous representation of motion. For instance, it maintains the movement of the eye such as to stabilize the image of an object. This ability suggests the existence of a generic neural mechanism of motion extrapolation to deal with fragmented inputs. In this paper, we have modeled how the visual system may extrapolate the trajectory of an object during a blank using motion-based prediction. This implies that using a prior on the coherency of motion, the system may integrate previous motion information even in the absence of a stimulus. In order to compare with experimental results, we simulated tracking velocity responses. We found that the response of the motion integration process to a blanked trajectory pauses at the onset of the blank, but that it quickly recovers the information on the trajectory after reappearance. This is compatible with behavioral and neural observations on motion extrapolation. To understand these mechanisms, we have recorded the response of the model to a noisy stimulus. Crucially, we found that motion-based prediction acted at the global level as a gain control mechanism and that we could switch from a smooth regime to a binary tracking behavior where the dot is tracked or lost. Our results imply that a local prior implementing motion-based prediction is sufficient to explain a large range of neural and behavioral results at a more global level. We show that the tracking behavior deteriorates for sensory noise levels higher than a certain value, where motion coherency and predictability fail to hold longer. In particular, we found that motion-based prediction leads to the emergence of a tracking behavior only when enough information from the trajectory has been accumulated. Then, during tracking, trajectory estimation is robust to blanks even in the presence of relatively high levels of noise. Moreover, we found that tracking is necessary for motion extrapolation, this calls for further experimental work exploring the role of noise in motion extrapolation.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24036184</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.08.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-0777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-010X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0928-4257 |
ispartof | Journal of physiology, Paris, 2013-11, Vol.107 (5), p.409-420 |
issn | 0928-4257 1769-7115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02387884v1 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animals Cognitive science Contrast response function Forecasting Gain control Humans Life Sciences Models, Biological Motion Motion detection Motion extrapolation Motion Perception - physiology Movement - physiology Neurons and Cognition Photic Stimulation - methods Predictive coding Probabilistic representation Psychology |
title | Motion-based prediction explains the role of tracking in motion extrapolation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motion-based%20prediction%20explains%20the%20role%20of%20tracking%20in%20motion%20extrapolation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physiology,%20Paris&rft.au=Khoei,%20Mina%20A.&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=409-420&rft.issn=0928-4257&rft.eissn=1769-7115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1443410660%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1443410660&rft_id=info:pmid/24036184&rft_els_id=S092842571300051X&rfr_iscdi=true |