Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species

Efforts to elucidate the causes of biological differences between wild fowls and their domesticated relatives, the chicken, have to date mainly focused on the identification of single nucleotide mutations. Other types of genomic variations have however been demonstrated to be important in avian evol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genomics (San Diego, Calif.) Calif.), 2020-03, Vol.112 (2), p.1660-1673
Hauptverfasser: Piégu, Benoît, Arensburger, Peter, Beauclair, Linda, Chabault, Marie, Raynaud, Emilie, Coustham, Vincent, Brard, Sophie, Guizard, Sébastien, Burlot, Thierry, Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth, Bigot, Yves
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1673
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1660
container_title Genomics (San Diego, Calif.)
container_volume 112
creator Piégu, Benoît
Arensburger, Peter
Beauclair, Linda
Chabault, Marie
Raynaud, Emilie
Coustham, Vincent
Brard, Sophie
Guizard, Sébastien
Burlot, Thierry
Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth
Bigot, Yves
description Efforts to elucidate the causes of biological differences between wild fowls and their domesticated relatives, the chicken, have to date mainly focused on the identification of single nucleotide mutations. Other types of genomic variations have however been demonstrated to be important in avian evolution and associated to variations in phenotype. They include several types of sequences duplicated in tandem that can vary in their repetition number. Here we report on genome size differences between the red jungle fowl and several domestic chicken breeds and selected lines. Sequences duplicated in tandem such as rDNA, telomere repeats, satellite DNA and segmental duplications were found to have been significantly re-shaped during domestication and subsequently by human-mediated selection. We discuss the extent to which changes in genome organization that occurred during domestication agree with the hypothesis that domesticated animal genomes have been shaped by evolutionary forces aiming to adapt them to anthropized environments. [Display omitted] •Genome size variations can be observed between wild fowls and domestic chicken breeds.•Genome size variations are not due to the activity of transposable elements.•Various kinds of tandem repeats are responsible for chicken genome size variations.•Centromeres, telomeres, rDNA and segmental duplications seat of these variations•The organization of tandem repeats has been changed during chicken domestication.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02385792v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0888754319300746</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_02385792v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1a3edef8c038c3da2170bf8308b9579ed82016a44729923d5bc1f35f3c6f3ac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwBEjIVw4pdpwf58ABIShIlbgAV8ux16mr1K7ilAqeHodAj5xWmp2Z1X4IXVIyp4QWN-v5ZwPOz1NCq6jMCcmO0JQSXiW8yIpjNCWc86TMMzZBZyGsCSEV4-kpmjBaFFVJ8inavsvOyt56F7B1eCjcAA72C3AN_R7A4b1tNZZOYx1XobdK9qBxax3IBgL2Bhu_b0P0t9411jW497hfAV7Itt0F3IwjbEFZCOfoxMg2wMXvnKG3x4fX-6dk-bJ4vr9bJipjvE-oZKDBcEUYV0zLlJakNpwRXld5WYHm8e1CZlmZVlXKdF4ralhumCoMk6pgM3Q99q5kK7ad3cjuU3hpxdPdUgwaSRmPTekHjV42elXnQ-jAHAKUiIG1WIsf1mJgPYiRdUxdjantrt6APmT-4EbD7WiA-OeHhU6ESMAp0LYD1Qvt7b8HvgF8wZIp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Piégu, Benoît ; Arensburger, Peter ; Beauclair, Linda ; Chabault, Marie ; Raynaud, Emilie ; Coustham, Vincent ; Brard, Sophie ; Guizard, Sébastien ; Burlot, Thierry ; Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth ; Bigot, Yves</creator><creatorcontrib>Piégu, Benoît ; Arensburger, Peter ; Beauclair, Linda ; Chabault, Marie ; Raynaud, Emilie ; Coustham, Vincent ; Brard, Sophie ; Guizard, Sébastien ; Burlot, Thierry ; Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth ; Bigot, Yves</creatorcontrib><description>Efforts to elucidate the causes of biological differences between wild fowls and their domesticated relatives, the chicken, have to date mainly focused on the identification of single nucleotide mutations. Other types of genomic variations have however been demonstrated to be important in avian evolution and associated to variations in phenotype. They include several types of sequences duplicated in tandem that can vary in their repetition number. Here we report on genome size differences between the red jungle fowl and several domestic chicken breeds and selected lines. Sequences duplicated in tandem such as rDNA, telomere repeats, satellite DNA and segmental duplications were found to have been significantly re-shaped during domestication and subsequently by human-mediated selection. We discuss the extent to which changes in genome organization that occurred during domestication agree with the hypothesis that domesticated animal genomes have been shaped by evolutionary forces aiming to adapt them to anthropized environments. [Display omitted] •Genome size variations can be observed between wild fowls and domestic chicken breeds.•Genome size variations are not due to the activity of transposable elements.•Various kinds of tandem repeats are responsible for chicken genome size variations.•Centromeres, telomeres, rDNA and segmental duplications seat of these variations•The organization of tandem repeats has been changed during chicken domestication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-8646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31669705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal biology ; Animal genetics ; Animals ; Breeding ; C-value ; Centromere - genetics ; Chickens - genetics ; CNV ; Domestication ; Gene Duplication ; Genetics ; Genome Size ; Life Sciences ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Repeats ; RNA, Ribosomal - genetics ; Tandem Repeat Sequences ; Telomere - genetics</subject><ispartof>Genomics (San Diego, Calif.), 2020-03, Vol.112 (2), p.1660-1673</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1a3edef8c038c3da2170bf8308b9579ed82016a44729923d5bc1f35f3c6f3ac63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1a3edef8c038c3da2170bf8308b9579ed82016a44729923d5bc1f35f3c6f3ac63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0124-2664 ; 0000-0003-4384-1726 ; 0000-0002-5399-2723 ; 0000-0001-9476-0710</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31669705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02385792$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piégu, Benoît</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arensburger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauclair, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chabault, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coustham, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brard, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guizard, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlot, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigot, Yves</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species</title><title>Genomics (San Diego, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Genomics</addtitle><description>Efforts to elucidate the causes of biological differences between wild fowls and their domesticated relatives, the chicken, have to date mainly focused on the identification of single nucleotide mutations. Other types of genomic variations have however been demonstrated to be important in avian evolution and associated to variations in phenotype. They include several types of sequences duplicated in tandem that can vary in their repetition number. Here we report on genome size differences between the red jungle fowl and several domestic chicken breeds and selected lines. Sequences duplicated in tandem such as rDNA, telomere repeats, satellite DNA and segmental duplications were found to have been significantly re-shaped during domestication and subsequently by human-mediated selection. We discuss the extent to which changes in genome organization that occurred during domestication agree with the hypothesis that domesticated animal genomes have been shaped by evolutionary forces aiming to adapt them to anthropized environments. [Display omitted] •Genome size variations can be observed between wild fowls and domestic chicken breeds.•Genome size variations are not due to the activity of transposable elements.•Various kinds of tandem repeats are responsible for chicken genome size variations.•Centromeres, telomeres, rDNA and segmental duplications seat of these variations•The organization of tandem repeats has been changed during chicken domestication.</description><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animal genetics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>C-value</subject><subject>Centromere - genetics</subject><subject>Chickens - genetics</subject><subject>CNV</subject><subject>Domestication</subject><subject>Gene Duplication</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genome Size</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Repeats</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal - genetics</subject><subject>Tandem Repeat Sequences</subject><subject>Telomere - genetics</subject><issn>0888-7543</issn><issn>1089-8646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwBEjIVw4pdpwf58ABIShIlbgAV8ux16mr1K7ilAqeHodAj5xWmp2Z1X4IXVIyp4QWN-v5ZwPOz1NCq6jMCcmO0JQSXiW8yIpjNCWc86TMMzZBZyGsCSEV4-kpmjBaFFVJ8inavsvOyt56F7B1eCjcAA72C3AN_R7A4b1tNZZOYx1XobdK9qBxax3IBgL2Bhu_b0P0t9411jW497hfAV7Itt0F3IwjbEFZCOfoxMg2wMXvnKG3x4fX-6dk-bJ4vr9bJipjvE-oZKDBcEUYV0zLlJakNpwRXld5WYHm8e1CZlmZVlXKdF4ralhumCoMk6pgM3Q99q5kK7ad3cjuU3hpxdPdUgwaSRmPTekHjV42elXnQ-jAHAKUiIG1WIsf1mJgPYiRdUxdjantrt6APmT-4EbD7WiA-OeHhU6ESMAp0LYD1Qvt7b8HvgF8wZIp</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Piégu, Benoît</creator><creator>Arensburger, Peter</creator><creator>Beauclair, Linda</creator><creator>Chabault, Marie</creator><creator>Raynaud, Emilie</creator><creator>Coustham, Vincent</creator><creator>Brard, Sophie</creator><creator>Guizard, Sébastien</creator><creator>Burlot, Thierry</creator><creator>Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Bigot, Yves</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-2664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-1726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5399-2723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9476-0710</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species</title><author>Piégu, Benoît ; Arensburger, Peter ; Beauclair, Linda ; Chabault, Marie ; Raynaud, Emilie ; Coustham, Vincent ; Brard, Sophie ; Guizard, Sébastien ; Burlot, Thierry ; Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth ; Bigot, Yves</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-1a3edef8c038c3da2170bf8308b9579ed82016a44729923d5bc1f35f3c6f3ac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animal genetics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>C-value</topic><topic>Centromere - genetics</topic><topic>Chickens - genetics</topic><topic>CNV</topic><topic>Domestication</topic><topic>Gene Duplication</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genome Size</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Repeats</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal - genetics</topic><topic>Tandem Repeat Sequences</topic><topic>Telomere - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piégu, Benoît</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arensburger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauclair, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chabault, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynaud, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coustham, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brard, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guizard, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlot, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigot, Yves</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Genomics (San Diego, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piégu, Benoît</au><au>Arensburger, Peter</au><au>Beauclair, Linda</au><au>Chabault, Marie</au><au>Raynaud, Emilie</au><au>Coustham, Vincent</au><au>Brard, Sophie</au><au>Guizard, Sébastien</au><au>Burlot, Thierry</au><au>Le Bihan-Duval, Elisabeth</au><au>Bigot, Yves</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species</atitle><jtitle>Genomics (San Diego, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Genomics</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1660</spage><epage>1673</epage><pages>1660-1673</pages><issn>0888-7543</issn><eissn>1089-8646</eissn><abstract>Efforts to elucidate the causes of biological differences between wild fowls and their domesticated relatives, the chicken, have to date mainly focused on the identification of single nucleotide mutations. Other types of genomic variations have however been demonstrated to be important in avian evolution and associated to variations in phenotype. They include several types of sequences duplicated in tandem that can vary in their repetition number. Here we report on genome size differences between the red jungle fowl and several domestic chicken breeds and selected lines. Sequences duplicated in tandem such as rDNA, telomere repeats, satellite DNA and segmental duplications were found to have been significantly re-shaped during domestication and subsequently by human-mediated selection. We discuss the extent to which changes in genome organization that occurred during domestication agree with the hypothesis that domesticated animal genomes have been shaped by evolutionary forces aiming to adapt them to anthropized environments. [Display omitted] •Genome size variations can be observed between wild fowls and domestic chicken breeds.•Genome size variations are not due to the activity of transposable elements.•Various kinds of tandem repeats are responsible for chicken genome size variations.•Centromeres, telomeres, rDNA and segmental duplications seat of these variations•The organization of tandem repeats has been changed during chicken domestication.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31669705</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.004</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-2664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-1726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5399-2723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9476-0710</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-7543
ispartof Genomics (San Diego, Calif.), 2020-03, Vol.112 (2), p.1660-1673
issn 0888-7543
1089-8646
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02385792v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal biology
Animal genetics
Animals
Breeding
C-value
Centromere - genetics
Chickens - genetics
CNV
Domestication
Gene Duplication
Genetics
Genome Size
Life Sciences
Polymorphism, Genetic
Repeats
RNA, Ribosomal - genetics
Tandem Repeat Sequences
Telomere - genetics
title Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A19%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20genome%20size%20between%20wild%20and%20domesticated%20lineages%20of%20fowls%20belonging%20to%20the%20Gallus%20gallus%20species&rft.jtitle=Genomics%20(San%20Diego,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Pi%C3%A9gu,%20Beno%C3%AEt&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1660&rft.epage=1673&rft.pages=1660-1673&rft.issn=0888-7543&rft.eissn=1089-8646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.004&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_02385792v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31669705&rft_els_id=S0888754319300746&rfr_iscdi=true