Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment
AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forensic and legal medicine 2019-11, Vol.68, p.101866-101866, Article 101866 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101866 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101866 |
container_title | Journal of forensic and legal medicine |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Kotěrová, Anežka Králík, Vlastimil Rmoutilová, Rebeka Friedl, Lukáš Růžička, Pavel Velemínská, Jana Marchal, François Brůžek, Jaroslav |
description | AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02383197v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1752928X19301039</els_id><sourcerecordid>2290836749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAXsJigh_zsBFCihKglSIVKV2wsxzPdeIwYwfbE7X_Ho-mdMGCla-uvnMkn3OL4i3BC4JJ8_G4OJp-WFBMxLTgTfOsuCS85WVb8fZ5ntualoLynxfFqxiPGNcVbeuXxQUjNeGc08vifDOclE7IG8TWaDsGozSgrVbOWbdHP4JPXvs-Iu9QOgC6jWjl7xWgtd3bpHq0Vkl9Qtmlt1ol611Exge0hXukXIeWeyhVKjtQ6YCWMUKMA7j0unhhVB_hzeN7Vdx9-3q3ui43t99vVstNqSsuUgm0q4UBo3Ztpwxrd7RpRP5oxzEVjcY16RoGjdFggFGDu7YWgjfM8IrlHNhV8WG2PahenoIdVHiQXll5vdzIaYcp44yI9kwy-35mT8H_HiEmOdiooe-VAz9GSanAnDVtJTJKZ1QHH2MA8-RNsJyqkUc5VSOnauRcTRa9e_QfdwN0T5K_XWTg8wxADuRsIcioLTgNnQ2gk-y8_b__l3_kurcul9L_ggeIRz8Gl6OWREYqsdxOxzHdBhEME8wE-wOY8LMG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290836749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kotěrová, Anežka ; Králík, Vlastimil ; Rmoutilová, Rebeka ; Friedl, Lukáš ; Růžička, Pavel ; Velemínská, Jana ; Marchal, François ; Brůžek, Jaroslav</creator><creatorcontrib>Kotěrová, Anežka ; Králík, Vlastimil ; Rmoutilová, Rebeka ; Friedl, Lukáš ; Růžička, Pavel ; Velemínská, Jana ; Marchal, François ; Brůžek, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-928X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31518882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age and sex estimation ; Age Determination by Skeleton ; Biological anthropology ; Biological profile ; Computer Simulation ; Female ; Forensic Anthropology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Laser scanning ; Lasers ; Male ; Observer Variation ; Os coxae ; Pathology ; Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging ; RedLux profiler ; Regression Analysis ; Sex Determination by Skeleton ; Structured light technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 2019-11, Vol.68, p.101866-101866, Article 101866</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5500-244X ; 0000-0002-0180-8912 ; 0000-0001-7479-2360</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02383197$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kotěrová, Anežka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Králík, Vlastimil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Lukáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Růžička, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velemínská, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchal, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brůžek, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</title><title>Journal of forensic and legal medicine</title><addtitle>J Forensic Leg Med</addtitle><description>AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).</description><subject>Age and sex estimation</subject><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton</subject><subject>Biological anthropology</subject><subject>Biological profile</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Laser scanning</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Os coxae</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>RedLux profiler</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Sex Determination by Skeleton</subject><subject>Structured light technology</subject><issn>1752-928X</issn><issn>1878-7487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAXsJigh_zsBFCihKglSIVKV2wsxzPdeIwYwfbE7X_Ho-mdMGCla-uvnMkn3OL4i3BC4JJ8_G4OJp-WFBMxLTgTfOsuCS85WVb8fZ5ntualoLynxfFqxiPGNcVbeuXxQUjNeGc08vifDOclE7IG8TWaDsGozSgrVbOWbdHP4JPXvs-Iu9QOgC6jWjl7xWgtd3bpHq0Vkl9Qtmlt1ol611Exge0hXukXIeWeyhVKjtQ6YCWMUKMA7j0unhhVB_hzeN7Vdx9-3q3ui43t99vVstNqSsuUgm0q4UBo3Ztpwxrd7RpRP5oxzEVjcY16RoGjdFggFGDu7YWgjfM8IrlHNhV8WG2PahenoIdVHiQXll5vdzIaYcp44yI9kwy-35mT8H_HiEmOdiooe-VAz9GSanAnDVtJTJKZ1QHH2MA8-RNsJyqkUc5VSOnauRcTRa9e_QfdwN0T5K_XWTg8wxADuRsIcioLTgNnQ2gk-y8_b__l3_kurcul9L_ggeIRz8Gl6OWREYqsdxOxzHdBhEME8wE-wOY8LMG</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Kotěrová, Anežka</creator><creator>Králík, Vlastimil</creator><creator>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</creator><creator>Friedl, Lukáš</creator><creator>Růžička, Pavel</creator><creator>Velemínská, Jana</creator><creator>Marchal, François</creator><creator>Brůžek, Jaroslav</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-244X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-2360</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</title><author>Kotěrová, Anežka ; Králík, Vlastimil ; Rmoutilová, Rebeka ; Friedl, Lukáš ; Růžička, Pavel ; Velemínská, Jana ; Marchal, François ; Brůžek, Jaroslav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age and sex estimation</topic><topic>Age Determination by Skeleton</topic><topic>Biological anthropology</topic><topic>Biological profile</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Laser scanning</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Os coxae</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>RedLux profiler</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Sex Determination by Skeleton</topic><topic>Structured light technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kotěrová, Anežka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Králík, Vlastimil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Lukáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Růžička, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velemínská, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchal, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brůžek, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic and legal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kotěrová, Anežka</au><au>Králík, Vlastimil</au><au>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</au><au>Friedl, Lukáš</au><au>Růžička, Pavel</au><au>Velemínská, Jana</au><au>Marchal, François</au><au>Brůžek, Jaroslav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic and legal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Leg Med</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><spage>101866</spage><epage>101866</epage><pages>101866-101866</pages><artnum>101866</artnum><issn>1752-928X</issn><eissn>1878-7487</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31518882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-244X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-2360</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-928X |
ispartof | Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 2019-11, Vol.68, p.101866-101866, Article 101866 |
issn | 1752-928X 1878-7487 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02383197v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Age and sex estimation Age Determination by Skeleton Biological anthropology Biological profile Computer Simulation Female Forensic Anthropology Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Laser scanning Lasers Male Observer Variation Os coxae Pathology Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging RedLux profiler Regression Analysis Sex Determination by Skeleton Structured light technology |
title | Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A39%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%203D%20Surface%20Scanning%20Protocols%20on%20the%20Os%20Coxae%20Digital%20Data:%20Implications%20for%20Sex%20and%20Age-at-death%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20and%20legal%20medicine&rft.au=Kot%C4%9Brov%C3%A1,%20Ane%C5%BEka&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.spage=101866&rft.epage=101866&rft.pages=101866-101866&rft.artnum=101866&rft.issn=1752-928X&rft.eissn=1878-7487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2290836749%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290836749&rft_id=info:pmid/31518882&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1752928X19301039&rfr_iscdi=true |