Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment

AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic and legal medicine 2019-11, Vol.68, p.101866-101866, Article 101866
Hauptverfasser: Kotěrová, Anežka, Králík, Vlastimil, Rmoutilová, Rebeka, Friedl, Lukáš, Růžička, Pavel, Velemínská, Jana, Marchal, François, Brůžek, Jaroslav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101866
container_issue
container_start_page 101866
container_title Journal of forensic and legal medicine
container_volume 68
creator Kotěrová, Anežka
Králík, Vlastimil
Rmoutilová, Rebeka
Friedl, Lukáš
Růžička, Pavel
Velemínská, Jana
Marchal, François
Brůžek, Jaroslav
description AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02383197v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1752928X19301039</els_id><sourcerecordid>2290836749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAXsJigh_zsBFCihKglSIVKV2wsxzPdeIwYwfbE7X_Ho-mdMGCla-uvnMkn3OL4i3BC4JJ8_G4OJp-WFBMxLTgTfOsuCS85WVb8fZ5ntualoLynxfFqxiPGNcVbeuXxQUjNeGc08vifDOclE7IG8TWaDsGozSgrVbOWbdHP4JPXvs-Iu9QOgC6jWjl7xWgtd3bpHq0Vkl9Qtmlt1ol611Exge0hXukXIeWeyhVKjtQ6YCWMUKMA7j0unhhVB_hzeN7Vdx9-3q3ui43t99vVstNqSsuUgm0q4UBo3Ztpwxrd7RpRP5oxzEVjcY16RoGjdFggFGDu7YWgjfM8IrlHNhV8WG2PahenoIdVHiQXll5vdzIaYcp44yI9kwy-35mT8H_HiEmOdiooe-VAz9GSanAnDVtJTJKZ1QHH2MA8-RNsJyqkUc5VSOnauRcTRa9e_QfdwN0T5K_XWTg8wxADuRsIcioLTgNnQ2gk-y8_b__l3_kurcul9L_ggeIRz8Gl6OWREYqsdxOxzHdBhEME8wE-wOY8LMG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290836749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kotěrová, Anežka ; Králík, Vlastimil ; Rmoutilová, Rebeka ; Friedl, Lukáš ; Růžička, Pavel ; Velemínská, Jana ; Marchal, François ; Brůžek, Jaroslav</creator><creatorcontrib>Kotěrová, Anežka ; Králík, Vlastimil ; Rmoutilová, Rebeka ; Friedl, Lukáš ; Růžička, Pavel ; Velemínská, Jana ; Marchal, François ; Brůžek, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-928X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31518882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age and sex estimation ; Age Determination by Skeleton ; Biological anthropology ; Biological profile ; Computer Simulation ; Female ; Forensic Anthropology ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Laser scanning ; Lasers ; Male ; Observer Variation ; Os coxae ; Pathology ; Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging ; RedLux profiler ; Regression Analysis ; Sex Determination by Skeleton ; Structured light technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 2019-11, Vol.68, p.101866-101866, Article 101866</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5500-244X ; 0000-0002-0180-8912 ; 0000-0001-7479-2360</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02383197$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kotěrová, Anežka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Králík, Vlastimil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Lukáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Růžička, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velemínská, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchal, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brůžek, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</title><title>Journal of forensic and legal medicine</title><addtitle>J Forensic Leg Med</addtitle><description>AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).</description><subject>Age and sex estimation</subject><subject>Age Determination by Skeleton</subject><subject>Biological anthropology</subject><subject>Biological profile</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Laser scanning</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Os coxae</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>RedLux profiler</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Sex Determination by Skeleton</subject><subject>Structured light technology</subject><issn>1752-928X</issn><issn>1878-7487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktvEzEUhUcIREvhD7BAXsJigh_zsBFCihKglSIVKV2wsxzPdeIwYwfbE7X_Ho-mdMGCla-uvnMkn3OL4i3BC4JJ8_G4OJp-WFBMxLTgTfOsuCS85WVb8fZ5ntualoLynxfFqxiPGNcVbeuXxQUjNeGc08vifDOclE7IG8TWaDsGozSgrVbOWbdHP4JPXvs-Iu9QOgC6jWjl7xWgtd3bpHq0Vkl9Qtmlt1ol611Exge0hXukXIeWeyhVKjtQ6YCWMUKMA7j0unhhVB_hzeN7Vdx9-3q3ui43t99vVstNqSsuUgm0q4UBo3Ztpwxrd7RpRP5oxzEVjcY16RoGjdFggFGDu7YWgjfM8IrlHNhV8WG2PahenoIdVHiQXll5vdzIaYcp44yI9kwy-35mT8H_HiEmOdiooe-VAz9GSanAnDVtJTJKZ1QHH2MA8-RNsJyqkUc5VSOnauRcTRa9e_QfdwN0T5K_XWTg8wxADuRsIcioLTgNnQ2gk-y8_b__l3_kurcul9L_ggeIRz8Gl6OWREYqsdxOxzHdBhEME8wE-wOY8LMG</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Kotěrová, Anežka</creator><creator>Králík, Vlastimil</creator><creator>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</creator><creator>Friedl, Lukáš</creator><creator>Růžička, Pavel</creator><creator>Velemínská, Jana</creator><creator>Marchal, François</creator><creator>Brůžek, Jaroslav</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-244X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-2360</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</title><author>Kotěrová, Anežka ; Králík, Vlastimil ; Rmoutilová, Rebeka ; Friedl, Lukáš ; Růžička, Pavel ; Velemínská, Jana ; Marchal, François ; Brůžek, Jaroslav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-e2d59fefab7daf37b2669186d80296c051d63e6fcefe32f0d7599863f8438783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age and sex estimation</topic><topic>Age Determination by Skeleton</topic><topic>Biological anthropology</topic><topic>Biological profile</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Laser scanning</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Os coxae</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>RedLux profiler</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Sex Determination by Skeleton</topic><topic>Structured light technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kotěrová, Anežka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Králík, Vlastimil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Lukáš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Růžička, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velemínská, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchal, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brůžek, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic and legal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kotěrová, Anežka</au><au>Králík, Vlastimil</au><au>Rmoutilová, Rebeka</au><au>Friedl, Lukáš</au><au>Růžička, Pavel</au><au>Velemínská, Jana</au><au>Marchal, François</au><au>Brůžek, Jaroslav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic and legal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Leg Med</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><spage>101866</spage><epage>101866</epage><pages>101866-101866</pages><artnum>101866</artnum><issn>1752-928X</issn><eissn>1878-7487</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe 3D imaging technologies have become of paramount importance for example in disciplines such as forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology, where they are being used more and more frequently. There are several new possibilities that they offer; for instance, the easier and faster sharing of data among institutions, the possibility of permanent documentation, or new opportunities of data analysis. An important requirement, however, is whether the data obtained from different scanning devices are comparable and whether the possible varying outputs could affect further analyses, such as the estimation of the biological profile. Therefore, we aimed to investigate two important questions: (1) whether 3D models acquired by two different scanning technologies (structured light and laser) are comparable and (2) whether the scanning equipment has an effect on the anthropological analyses, such as age-at-death estimation and sex assessment. 3D models of ossa coxa (n=29) were acquired by laser (NextEngine) and structured light (HP 3D Structured Light Scanner PRO 2) scanners. The resulting 3D models from both scanners were subjected to age-at-death analyses (via the quantitative method of Stoyanova et al., 2017) and sex analyses (via Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste 2 of Brůžek et al., 2017). Furthermore, high quality scans of a small sample (n=5) of pubic symphyseal surfaces with the RedLux Profiler device were acquired as reference surfaces to which the outputs from both scanners were compared. Small deviations between surfaces were more evident in more rugged surfaces (in areas of depression and protrusion). Even though small differences from the reference surfaces were found, they did not have a significant effect on the age and sex estimates. It never resulted in the opposite sex assignment, and no significant differences were observed between age estimates (with the exception of those with the TPS/BE model).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31518882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-244X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-2360</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-928X
ispartof Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 2019-11, Vol.68, p.101866-101866, Article 101866
issn 1752-928X
1878-7487
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02383197v1
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Age and sex estimation
Age Determination by Skeleton
Biological anthropology
Biological profile
Computer Simulation
Female
Forensic Anthropology
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Laser scanning
Lasers
Male
Observer Variation
Os coxae
Pathology
Pelvic Bones - diagnostic imaging
RedLux profiler
Regression Analysis
Sex Determination by Skeleton
Structured light technology
title Impact of 3D Surface Scanning Protocols on the Os Coxae Digital Data: Implications for Sex and Age-at-death Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A39%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%203D%20Surface%20Scanning%20Protocols%20on%20the%20Os%20Coxae%20Digital%20Data:%20Implications%20for%20Sex%20and%20Age-at-death%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20and%20legal%20medicine&rft.au=Kot%C4%9Brov%C3%A1,%20Ane%C5%BEka&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.spage=101866&rft.epage=101866&rft.pages=101866-101866&rft.artnum=101866&rft.issn=1752-928X&rft.eissn=1878-7487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101866&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2290836749%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290836749&rft_id=info:pmid/31518882&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1752928X19301039&rfr_iscdi=true