3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes

Electrical conductivity tomography is a well-established galvanometric method for imaging the subsurface electrical conductivity distribution. We characterize the conductivity distribution of a set of volcanic structures that are different in terms of activity and morphology. For that purpose, we de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of volcanology and geothermal research 2018-05, Vol.356, p.243-263
Hauptverfasser: Soueid Ahmed, A., Revil, A., Byrdina, S., Coperey, A., Gailler, L., Grobbe, N., Viveiros, F., Silva, C., Jougnot, D., Ghorbani, A., Hogg, C., Kiyan, D., Rath, V., Heap, M.J., Grandis, H., Humaida, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue
container_start_page 243
container_title Journal of volcanology and geothermal research
container_volume 356
creator Soueid Ahmed, A.
Revil, A.
Byrdina, S.
Coperey, A.
Gailler, L.
Grobbe, N.
Viveiros, F.
Silva, C.
Jougnot, D.
Ghorbani, A.
Hogg, C.
Kiyan, D.
Rath, V.
Heap, M.J.
Grandis, H.
Humaida, H.
description Electrical conductivity tomography is a well-established galvanometric method for imaging the subsurface electrical conductivity distribution. We characterize the conductivity distribution of a set of volcanic structures that are different in terms of activity and morphology. For that purpose, we developed a large-scale inversion code named ECT-3D aimed at handling complex topographical effects like those encountered in volcanic areas. In addition, ECT-3D offers the possibility of using as input data the two components of the electrical field recorded at independent stations. Without prior information, a Gauss-Newton method with roughness constraints is used to solve the inverse problem. The roughening operator used to impose constraints is computed on unstructured tetrahedral elements to map complex geometries. We first benchmark ECT-3D on two synthetic tests. A first test using the topography of Mt. St Helens volcano (Washington, USA) demonstrates that we can successfully reconstruct the electrical conductivity field of an edifice marked by a strong topography and strong variations in the resistivity distribution. A second case study is used to demonstrate the versatility of the code in using the two components of the electrical field recorded on independent stations along the ground surface. Then, we apply our code to real data sets recorded at (i) a thermally active area of Yellowstone caldera (Wyoming, USA), (ii) a monogenetic dome on Furnas volcano (the Azores, Portugal), and (iii) the upper portion of the caldera of Kīlauea (Hawai'i, USA). The tomographies reveal some of the major structures of these volcanoes as well as identifying alteration associated with high surface conductivities. We also review the petrophysics underlying the interpretation of the electrical conductivity of fresh and altered volcanic rocks and molten rocks to show that electrical conductivity tomography cannot be used as a stand-alone technique due to the non-uniqueness in interpreting electrical conductivity tomograms. That said, new experimental data provide evidence regarding the strong role of alteration in the vicinity of preferential fluid flow paths including magmatic conduits and hydrothermal vents. •Electrical conductivity data on volcanic rocks can be understood with a simple model.•A code is developed to perform electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes.•The petrophysical model and code are applied to three case studies of volcanoes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02324342v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377027317307527</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_02324342v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-1f32e377f78926ce1aa907b52820de13d626f0c744355a738bd62ee3429f19c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_obdetJ4kbZNezvkxYeCNXocsPdlSumUktdB_b8ZEL7068PJ-cB5CMgoFBVo_dEU3-n6LPmAsGFBZAC-Aigsyo1KwvIZGXJIZcCFyYIJfk5sYOwCgIGFGGH_KsEczBGd0nxl_aL_M4EY3TNng934b9HE3Zd5macXog8d4S66s7iPe_dw5-Xx5_liu8vX769tysc51yaohp5YzTKtWyIbVBqnWDYhNxSSDFilva1ZbMKIseVVpweUmKYi8ZI2ljWF8Tu7PvTvdq2Nwex0m5bVTq8VanTRgnJXJP9LklWevCT7GgPY3QEGdOKlO_XFSJ04KuEqcUvTxHMX0y-gwqGgcHgy2LiQuqvXu_5Jv9GB1PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soueid Ahmed, A. ; Revil, A. ; Byrdina, S. ; Coperey, A. ; Gailler, L. ; Grobbe, N. ; Viveiros, F. ; Silva, C. ; Jougnot, D. ; Ghorbani, A. ; Hogg, C. ; Kiyan, D. ; Rath, V. ; Heap, M.J. ; Grandis, H. ; Humaida, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soueid Ahmed, A. ; Revil, A. ; Byrdina, S. ; Coperey, A. ; Gailler, L. ; Grobbe, N. ; Viveiros, F. ; Silva, C. ; Jougnot, D. ; Ghorbani, A. ; Hogg, C. ; Kiyan, D. ; Rath, V. ; Heap, M.J. ; Grandis, H. ; Humaida, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Electrical conductivity tomography is a well-established galvanometric method for imaging the subsurface electrical conductivity distribution. We characterize the conductivity distribution of a set of volcanic structures that are different in terms of activity and morphology. For that purpose, we developed a large-scale inversion code named ECT-3D aimed at handling complex topographical effects like those encountered in volcanic areas. In addition, ECT-3D offers the possibility of using as input data the two components of the electrical field recorded at independent stations. Without prior information, a Gauss-Newton method with roughness constraints is used to solve the inverse problem. The roughening operator used to impose constraints is computed on unstructured tetrahedral elements to map complex geometries. We first benchmark ECT-3D on two synthetic tests. A first test using the topography of Mt. St Helens volcano (Washington, USA) demonstrates that we can successfully reconstruct the electrical conductivity field of an edifice marked by a strong topography and strong variations in the resistivity distribution. A second case study is used to demonstrate the versatility of the code in using the two components of the electrical field recorded on independent stations along the ground surface. Then, we apply our code to real data sets recorded at (i) a thermally active area of Yellowstone caldera (Wyoming, USA), (ii) a monogenetic dome on Furnas volcano (the Azores, Portugal), and (iii) the upper portion of the caldera of Kīlauea (Hawai'i, USA). The tomographies reveal some of the major structures of these volcanoes as well as identifying alteration associated with high surface conductivities. We also review the petrophysics underlying the interpretation of the electrical conductivity of fresh and altered volcanic rocks and molten rocks to show that electrical conductivity tomography cannot be used as a stand-alone technique due to the non-uniqueness in interpreting electrical conductivity tomograms. That said, new experimental data provide evidence regarding the strong role of alteration in the vicinity of preferential fluid flow paths including magmatic conduits and hydrothermal vents. •Electrical conductivity data on volcanic rocks can be understood with a simple model.•A code is developed to perform electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes.•The petrophysical model and code are applied to three case studies of volcanoes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-0273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth Sciences ; Sciences of the Universe</subject><ispartof>Journal of volcanology and geothermal research, 2018-05, Vol.356, p.243-263</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-1f32e377f78926ce1aa907b52820de13d626f0c744355a738bd62ee3429f19c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-1f32e377f78926ce1aa907b52820de13d626f0c744355a738bd62ee3429f19c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4950-5766 ; 0000-0002-1196-306X ; 0000-0001-9558-6726 ; 0000-0001-8948-5718 ; 0000-0002-0442-7955 ; 0000-0003-0769-5645</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02324342$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soueid Ahmed, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revil, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrdina, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coperey, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gailler, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grobbe, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viveiros, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jougnot, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rath, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heap, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandis, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humaida, H.</creatorcontrib><title>3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes</title><title>Journal of volcanology and geothermal research</title><description>Electrical conductivity tomography is a well-established galvanometric method for imaging the subsurface electrical conductivity distribution. We characterize the conductivity distribution of a set of volcanic structures that are different in terms of activity and morphology. For that purpose, we developed a large-scale inversion code named ECT-3D aimed at handling complex topographical effects like those encountered in volcanic areas. In addition, ECT-3D offers the possibility of using as input data the two components of the electrical field recorded at independent stations. Without prior information, a Gauss-Newton method with roughness constraints is used to solve the inverse problem. The roughening operator used to impose constraints is computed on unstructured tetrahedral elements to map complex geometries. We first benchmark ECT-3D on two synthetic tests. A first test using the topography of Mt. St Helens volcano (Washington, USA) demonstrates that we can successfully reconstruct the electrical conductivity field of an edifice marked by a strong topography and strong variations in the resistivity distribution. A second case study is used to demonstrate the versatility of the code in using the two components of the electrical field recorded on independent stations along the ground surface. Then, we apply our code to real data sets recorded at (i) a thermally active area of Yellowstone caldera (Wyoming, USA), (ii) a monogenetic dome on Furnas volcano (the Azores, Portugal), and (iii) the upper portion of the caldera of Kīlauea (Hawai'i, USA). The tomographies reveal some of the major structures of these volcanoes as well as identifying alteration associated with high surface conductivities. We also review the petrophysics underlying the interpretation of the electrical conductivity of fresh and altered volcanic rocks and molten rocks to show that electrical conductivity tomography cannot be used as a stand-alone technique due to the non-uniqueness in interpreting electrical conductivity tomograms. That said, new experimental data provide evidence regarding the strong role of alteration in the vicinity of preferential fluid flow paths including magmatic conduits and hydrothermal vents. •Electrical conductivity data on volcanic rocks can be understood with a simple model.•A code is developed to perform electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes.•The petrophysical model and code are applied to three case studies of volcanoes.</description><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><issn>0377-0273</issn><issn>1872-6097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_obdetJ4kbZNezvkxYeCNXocsPdlSumUktdB_b8ZEL7068PJ-cB5CMgoFBVo_dEU3-n6LPmAsGFBZAC-Aigsyo1KwvIZGXJIZcCFyYIJfk5sYOwCgIGFGGH_KsEczBGd0nxl_aL_M4EY3TNng934b9HE3Zd5macXog8d4S66s7iPe_dw5-Xx5_liu8vX769tysc51yaohp5YzTKtWyIbVBqnWDYhNxSSDFilva1ZbMKIseVVpweUmKYi8ZI2ljWF8Tu7PvTvdq2Nwex0m5bVTq8VanTRgnJXJP9LklWevCT7GgPY3QEGdOKlO_XFSJ04KuEqcUvTxHMX0y-gwqGgcHgy2LiQuqvXu_5Jv9GB1PQ</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Soueid Ahmed, A.</creator><creator>Revil, A.</creator><creator>Byrdina, S.</creator><creator>Coperey, A.</creator><creator>Gailler, L.</creator><creator>Grobbe, N.</creator><creator>Viveiros, F.</creator><creator>Silva, C.</creator><creator>Jougnot, D.</creator><creator>Ghorbani, A.</creator><creator>Hogg, C.</creator><creator>Kiyan, D.</creator><creator>Rath, V.</creator><creator>Heap, M.J.</creator><creator>Grandis, H.</creator><creator>Humaida, H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-306X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-6726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-5718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-7955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-5645</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes</title><author>Soueid Ahmed, A. ; Revil, A. ; Byrdina, S. ; Coperey, A. ; Gailler, L. ; Grobbe, N. ; Viveiros, F. ; Silva, C. ; Jougnot, D. ; Ghorbani, A. ; Hogg, C. ; Kiyan, D. ; Rath, V. ; Heap, M.J. ; Grandis, H. ; Humaida, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a425t-1f32e377f78926ce1aa907b52820de13d626f0c744355a738bd62ee3429f19c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soueid Ahmed, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revil, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrdina, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coperey, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gailler, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grobbe, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viveiros, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jougnot, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rath, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heap, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandis, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humaida, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of volcanology and geothermal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soueid Ahmed, A.</au><au>Revil, A.</au><au>Byrdina, S.</au><au>Coperey, A.</au><au>Gailler, L.</au><au>Grobbe, N.</au><au>Viveiros, F.</au><au>Silva, C.</au><au>Jougnot, D.</au><au>Ghorbani, A.</au><au>Hogg, C.</au><au>Kiyan, D.</au><au>Rath, V.</au><au>Heap, M.J.</au><au>Grandis, H.</au><au>Humaida, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of volcanology and geothermal research</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>356</volume><spage>243</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>243-263</pages><issn>0377-0273</issn><eissn>1872-6097</eissn><abstract>Electrical conductivity tomography is a well-established galvanometric method for imaging the subsurface electrical conductivity distribution. We characterize the conductivity distribution of a set of volcanic structures that are different in terms of activity and morphology. For that purpose, we developed a large-scale inversion code named ECT-3D aimed at handling complex topographical effects like those encountered in volcanic areas. In addition, ECT-3D offers the possibility of using as input data the two components of the electrical field recorded at independent stations. Without prior information, a Gauss-Newton method with roughness constraints is used to solve the inverse problem. The roughening operator used to impose constraints is computed on unstructured tetrahedral elements to map complex geometries. We first benchmark ECT-3D on two synthetic tests. A first test using the topography of Mt. St Helens volcano (Washington, USA) demonstrates that we can successfully reconstruct the electrical conductivity field of an edifice marked by a strong topography and strong variations in the resistivity distribution. A second case study is used to demonstrate the versatility of the code in using the two components of the electrical field recorded on independent stations along the ground surface. Then, we apply our code to real data sets recorded at (i) a thermally active area of Yellowstone caldera (Wyoming, USA), (ii) a monogenetic dome on Furnas volcano (the Azores, Portugal), and (iii) the upper portion of the caldera of Kīlauea (Hawai'i, USA). The tomographies reveal some of the major structures of these volcanoes as well as identifying alteration associated with high surface conductivities. We also review the petrophysics underlying the interpretation of the electrical conductivity of fresh and altered volcanic rocks and molten rocks to show that electrical conductivity tomography cannot be used as a stand-alone technique due to the non-uniqueness in interpreting electrical conductivity tomograms. That said, new experimental data provide evidence regarding the strong role of alteration in the vicinity of preferential fluid flow paths including magmatic conduits and hydrothermal vents. •Electrical conductivity data on volcanic rocks can be understood with a simple model.•A code is developed to perform electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes.•The petrophysical model and code are applied to three case studies of volcanoes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.017</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-5766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-306X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-6726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-5718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-7955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-5645</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-0273
ispartof Journal of volcanology and geothermal research, 2018-05, Vol.356, p.243-263
issn 0377-0273
1872-6097
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02324342v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Earth Sciences
Sciences of the Universe
title 3D electrical conductivity tomography of volcanoes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D%20electrical%20conductivity%20tomography%20of%20volcanoes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20volcanology%20and%20geothermal%20research&rft.au=Soueid%20Ahmed,%20A.&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=356&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=243-263&rft.issn=0377-0273&rft.eissn=1872-6097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.017&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_02324342v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377027317307527&rfr_iscdi=true