Comparing and classifying model transformation reuse approaches across metamodels
Model transformations are essential elements of model-driven engineering (MDE) solutions, as they enable the automatic manipulation of models. MDE promotes the creation of domain-specific metamodels, but without proper reuse mechanisms, model transformations need to be developed from scratch for eac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Software and systems modeling 2020-03, Vol.19 (2), p.441-465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 465 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 441 |
container_title | Software and systems modeling |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Bruel, Jean-Michel Combemale, Benoit Guerra, Esther Jézéquel, Jean-Marc Kienzle, Jörg de Lara, Juan Mussbacher, Gunter Syriani, Eugene Vangheluwe, Hans |
description | Model transformations are essential elements of model-driven engineering (MDE) solutions, as they enable the automatic manipulation of models. MDE promotes the creation of domain-specific metamodels, but without proper reuse mechanisms, model transformations need to be developed from scratch for each new metamodel. In this paper, our goal is to understand whether transformation reuse across metamodels is needed by the community, evaluate its current state, identify practical needs and propose promising lines for further research. For this purpose, we first report on a survey to understand the reuse approaches used currently in practice and the needs of the community. Then, we propose a classification of reuse techniques based on a feature model and compare a sample of specific approaches—model types, concepts, a-posteriori typing, multilevel modeling, typing requirement models, facet-oriented modeling, mapping operators, constraint-based model types, and design patterns for model transformations—based on this feature model and a common example. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of each approach, provide a reading grid used to compare their features, compare with community needs, identify gaps in current transformation reuse approaches in relation to these needs and propose future research directions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10270-019-00762-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02317864v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1508240661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4e6255234574b6dac7ac59104caff381c105fbb20cdd0ddb8b9e0987b6fb61fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKfFm4fVSTab3RxLUSsURNBzmGQTu9L9Y7IV-u3NdqV48TTzwnuPyY-Qawp3FKC4DxRYASlQmUYpWCrPyIyKKGlW8PPTLsQlWYRQawDOpORCzMjrqmt69HX7kWBbJWaH0eAOo266yu6SwWMbXOcbHOquTbzdB5tg3_sOzdaGBI3vQkgaO-AxEK7IhcNdsIvfOSfvjw9vq3W6eXl6Xi03qeFZPqTcCpbnLON5wbWo0BRockmBG3QuK6mhkDutGZiqgqrSpZYWZFlo4bSgzmRzcjv1bnGnel836A-qw1qtlxs1vgHLaFEK_k2j92byxrO_9jYM6rPb-zaep6gsQeSUQzSxyXT8kbfu1EpBjaDVBFpF0OoIWskYyqZQ6EeI1v9p_j_1A2zggVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198065140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing and classifying model transformation reuse approaches across metamodels</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bruel, Jean-Michel ; Combemale, Benoit ; Guerra, Esther ; Jézéquel, Jean-Marc ; Kienzle, Jörg ; de Lara, Juan ; Mussbacher, Gunter ; Syriani, Eugene ; Vangheluwe, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruel, Jean-Michel ; Combemale, Benoit ; Guerra, Esther ; Jézéquel, Jean-Marc ; Kienzle, Jörg ; de Lara, Juan ; Mussbacher, Gunter ; Syriani, Eugene ; Vangheluwe, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>Model transformations are essential elements of model-driven engineering (MDE) solutions, as they enable the automatic manipulation of models. MDE promotes the creation of domain-specific metamodels, but without proper reuse mechanisms, model transformations need to be developed from scratch for each new metamodel. In this paper, our goal is to understand whether transformation reuse across metamodels is needed by the community, evaluate its current state, identify practical needs and propose promising lines for further research. For this purpose, we first report on a survey to understand the reuse approaches used currently in practice and the needs of the community. Then, we propose a classification of reuse techniques based on a feature model and compare a sample of specific approaches—model types, concepts, a-posteriori typing, multilevel modeling, typing requirement models, facet-oriented modeling, mapping operators, constraint-based model types, and design patterns for model transformations—based on this feature model and a common example. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of each approach, provide a reading grid used to compare their features, compare with community needs, identify gaps in current transformation reuse approaches in relation to these needs and propose future research directions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-1366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-1374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10270-019-00762-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Classification ; Compilers ; Computer Science ; Constraint modelling ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Interpreters ; IT in Business ; Mapping ; Metamodels ; Operators (mathematics) ; Programming Languages ; Programming Techniques ; Software Engineering ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; Special Section Paper ; Transformations (mathematics)</subject><ispartof>Software and systems modeling, 2020-03, Vol.19 (2), p.441-465</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4e6255234574b6dac7ac59104caff381c105fbb20cdd0ddb8b9e0987b6fb61fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4e6255234574b6dac7ac59104caff381c105fbb20cdd0ddb8b9e0987b6fb61fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3653-0148 ; 0000-0002-7104-7848 ; 0000-0002-0582-9745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10270-019-00762-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10270-019-00762-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://inria.hal.science/hal-02317864$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruel, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Combemale, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jézéquel, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kienzle, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lara, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussbacher, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syriani, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vangheluwe, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing and classifying model transformation reuse approaches across metamodels</title><title>Software and systems modeling</title><addtitle>Softw Syst Model</addtitle><description>Model transformations are essential elements of model-driven engineering (MDE) solutions, as they enable the automatic manipulation of models. MDE promotes the creation of domain-specific metamodels, but without proper reuse mechanisms, model transformations need to be developed from scratch for each new metamodel. In this paper, our goal is to understand whether transformation reuse across metamodels is needed by the community, evaluate its current state, identify practical needs and propose promising lines for further research. For this purpose, we first report on a survey to understand the reuse approaches used currently in practice and the needs of the community. Then, we propose a classification of reuse techniques based on a feature model and compare a sample of specific approaches—model types, concepts, a-posteriori typing, multilevel modeling, typing requirement models, facet-oriented modeling, mapping operators, constraint-based model types, and design patterns for model transformations—based on this feature model and a common example. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of each approach, provide a reading grid used to compare their features, compare with community needs, identify gaps in current transformation reuse approaches in relation to these needs and propose future research directions.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Compilers</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Interpreters</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Metamodels</subject><subject>Operators (mathematics)</subject><subject>Programming Languages</subject><subject>Programming Techniques</subject><subject>Software Engineering</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>Special Section Paper</subject><subject>Transformations (mathematics)</subject><issn>1619-1366</issn><issn>1619-1374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGq_gKfFm4fVSTab3RxLUSsURNBzmGQTu9L9Y7IV-u3NdqV48TTzwnuPyY-Qawp3FKC4DxRYASlQmUYpWCrPyIyKKGlW8PPTLsQlWYRQawDOpORCzMjrqmt69HX7kWBbJWaH0eAOo266yu6SwWMbXOcbHOquTbzdB5tg3_sOzdaGBI3vQkgaO-AxEK7IhcNdsIvfOSfvjw9vq3W6eXl6Xi03qeFZPqTcCpbnLON5wbWo0BRockmBG3QuK6mhkDutGZiqgqrSpZYWZFlo4bSgzmRzcjv1bnGnel836A-qw1qtlxs1vgHLaFEK_k2j92byxrO_9jYM6rPb-zaep6gsQeSUQzSxyXT8kbfu1EpBjaDVBFpF0OoIWskYyqZQ6EeI1v9p_j_1A2zggVM</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Bruel, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Combemale, Benoit</creator><creator>Guerra, Esther</creator><creator>Jézéquel, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Kienzle, Jörg</creator><creator>de Lara, Juan</creator><creator>Mussbacher, Gunter</creator><creator>Syriani, Eugene</creator><creator>Vangheluwe, Hans</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-0148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-7848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0582-9745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Comparing and classifying model transformation reuse approaches across metamodels</title><author>Bruel, Jean-Michel ; Combemale, Benoit ; Guerra, Esther ; Jézéquel, Jean-Marc ; Kienzle, Jörg ; de Lara, Juan ; Mussbacher, Gunter ; Syriani, Eugene ; Vangheluwe, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4e6255234574b6dac7ac59104caff381c105fbb20cdd0ddb8b9e0987b6fb61fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Compilers</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Interpreters</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Metamodels</topic><topic>Operators (mathematics)</topic><topic>Programming Languages</topic><topic>Programming Techniques</topic><topic>Software Engineering</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>Special Section Paper</topic><topic>Transformations (mathematics)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruel, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Combemale, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jézéquel, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kienzle, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lara, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussbacher, Gunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syriani, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vangheluwe, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Software and systems modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruel, Jean-Michel</au><au>Combemale, Benoit</au><au>Guerra, Esther</au><au>Jézéquel, Jean-Marc</au><au>Kienzle, Jörg</au><au>de Lara, Juan</au><au>Mussbacher, Gunter</au><au>Syriani, Eugene</au><au>Vangheluwe, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing and classifying model transformation reuse approaches across metamodels</atitle><jtitle>Software and systems modeling</jtitle><stitle>Softw Syst Model</stitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>441-465</pages><issn>1619-1366</issn><eissn>1619-1374</eissn><abstract>Model transformations are essential elements of model-driven engineering (MDE) solutions, as they enable the automatic manipulation of models. MDE promotes the creation of domain-specific metamodels, but without proper reuse mechanisms, model transformations need to be developed from scratch for each new metamodel. In this paper, our goal is to understand whether transformation reuse across metamodels is needed by the community, evaluate its current state, identify practical needs and propose promising lines for further research. For this purpose, we first report on a survey to understand the reuse approaches used currently in practice and the needs of the community. Then, we propose a classification of reuse techniques based on a feature model and compare a sample of specific approaches—model types, concepts, a-posteriori typing, multilevel modeling, typing requirement models, facet-oriented modeling, mapping operators, constraint-based model types, and design patterns for model transformations—based on this feature model and a common example. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of each approach, provide a reading grid used to compare their features, compare with community needs, identify gaps in current transformation reuse approaches in relation to these needs and propose future research directions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10270-019-00762-9</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-0148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7104-7848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0582-9745</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1619-1366 |
ispartof | Software and systems modeling, 2020-03, Vol.19 (2), p.441-465 |
issn | 1619-1366 1619-1374 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02317864v1 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Classification Compilers Computer Science Constraint modelling Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Interpreters IT in Business Mapping Metamodels Operators (mathematics) Programming Languages Programming Techniques Software Engineering Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems Special Section Paper Transformations (mathematics) |
title | Comparing and classifying model transformation reuse approaches across metamodels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20and%20classifying%20model%20transformation%20reuse%20approaches%20across%20metamodels&rft.jtitle=Software%20and%20systems%20modeling&rft.au=Bruel,%20Jean-Michel&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=441-465&rft.issn=1619-1366&rft.eissn=1619-1374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10270-019-00762-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1508240661%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198065140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |