Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges

This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2007-12, Vol.35 (12), p.6514-6525
Hauptverfasser: Pearce, Joshua M., Harris, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6525
container_issue 12
container_start_page 6514
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 35
creator Pearce, Joshua M.
Harris, Paul J.
description This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73 billion kW h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02120518v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421507003758</els_id><sourcerecordid>1381937061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEEkvhCbhYHJA4JPWfOE4OHKqqUKRFSAjOluNMsl4l9mInK-1r8MRMmqoHDrVkWx7_vs_jmSx7z2jBKKuujwX4UxgLTqkqaF1Q3rzIdqxWIq-UUi-zHRWU5SVn8nX2JqUjpbSsm3KX_f0J3WKdH8gQAfwhLAnIYBKByaXkgk-kvRDnHyHwEIcLsRiHeDYzAsT4jnQuzdG1ywwdGVZou-pjmAiMbnJ-C4Qej2CRtWSZ3ehmNFvSHCaIxB5MHCC9zV71Zkzw7nG_yn5_uft1e5_vf3z9dnuzz61kdM5Fa2zDmbJCArU95bzjvOyVqcC0NXRVaVtTSl613LJeMdPQSpremr5VqkPZVfZp8z2YUZ-im0y86GCcvr_Z6zVGOeNUsvrMkP24sacY_iyQZo3lsTCOxgOWTItKlaKSK_jhP_AYlujxHxq9BDo2NUJig2wMKUXon55nVK8N1Uf90FC9NlTTGlNpUPV9U0U4gX2SAA4PK3zWwgiJywXng1Lgb4RhHJcTTkyw1JXkUh_mCf0-b36ART47iDpZB95C5yK2SHfBPZvPP-nNyHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205321298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pearce, Joshua M. ; Harris, Paul J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Joshua M. ; Harris, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73 billion kW h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Customers ; Distribution ; Economics and Finance ; Electric rates ; Electric utilities ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy conservation ; Energy policy ; Environment and Society ; Environmental Sciences ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gas ; Greenhouse gases ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Investment returns ; Payments ; Pollution control ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Utility rates</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2007-12, Vol.35 (12), p.6514-6525</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2007</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421507003758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,3994,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a35_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a12_3ap_3a6514-6525.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02120518$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73 billion kW h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.</description><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Electric rates</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environment and Society</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gas</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Investment returns</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Utility rates</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEEkvhCbhYHJA4JPWfOE4OHKqqUKRFSAjOluNMsl4l9mInK-1r8MRMmqoHDrVkWx7_vs_jmSx7z2jBKKuujwX4UxgLTqkqaF1Q3rzIdqxWIq-UUi-zHRWU5SVn8nX2JqUjpbSsm3KX_f0J3WKdH8gQAfwhLAnIYBKByaXkgk-kvRDnHyHwEIcLsRiHeDYzAsT4jnQuzdG1ywwdGVZou-pjmAiMbnJ-C4Qej2CRtWSZ3ehmNFvSHCaIxB5MHCC9zV71Zkzw7nG_yn5_uft1e5_vf3z9dnuzz61kdM5Fa2zDmbJCArU95bzjvOyVqcC0NXRVaVtTSl613LJeMdPQSpremr5VqkPZVfZp8z2YUZ-im0y86GCcvr_Z6zVGOeNUsvrMkP24sacY_iyQZo3lsTCOxgOWTItKlaKSK_jhP_AYlujxHxq9BDo2NUJig2wMKUXon55nVK8N1Uf90FC9NlTTGlNpUPV9U0U4gX2SAA4PK3zWwgiJywXng1Lgb4RhHJcTTkyw1JXkUh_mCf0-b36ART47iDpZB95C5yK2SHfBPZvPP-nNyHg</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Pearce, Joshua M.</creator><creator>Harris, Paul J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</title><author>Pearce, Joshua M. ; Harris, Paul J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Electric rates</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environment and Society</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gas</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Investment returns</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Utility rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearce, Joshua M.</au><au>Harris, Paul J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6514</spage><epage>6525</epage><pages>6514-6525</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73 billion kW h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2007-12, Vol.35 (12), p.6514-6525
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02120518v1
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Customers
Distribution
Economics and Finance
Electric rates
Electric utilities
Electricity
Emissions
Emissions control
Energy conservation
Energy policy
Environment and Society
Environmental Sciences
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gas
Greenhouse gases
Humanities and Social Sciences
Investment returns
Payments
Pollution control
Studies
U.S.A
Utility rates
title Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20by%20inducing%20energy%20conservation%20and%20distributed%20generation%20from%20elimination%20of%20electric%20utility%20customer%20charges&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Pearce,%20Joshua%20M.&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6514&rft.epage=6525&rft.pages=6514-6525&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1381937061%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205321298&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421507003758&rfr_iscdi=true