Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges
This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2007-12, Vol.35 (12), p.6514-6525 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6525 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 6514 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Pearce, Joshua M. Harris, Paul J. |
description | This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73
billion
kW
h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased
avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02120518v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421507003758</els_id><sourcerecordid>1381937061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEEkvhCbhYHJA4JPWfOE4OHKqqUKRFSAjOluNMsl4l9mInK-1r8MRMmqoHDrVkWx7_vs_jmSx7z2jBKKuujwX4UxgLTqkqaF1Q3rzIdqxWIq-UUi-zHRWU5SVn8nX2JqUjpbSsm3KX_f0J3WKdH8gQAfwhLAnIYBKByaXkgk-kvRDnHyHwEIcLsRiHeDYzAsT4jnQuzdG1ywwdGVZou-pjmAiMbnJ-C4Qej2CRtWSZ3ehmNFvSHCaIxB5MHCC9zV71Zkzw7nG_yn5_uft1e5_vf3z9dnuzz61kdM5Fa2zDmbJCArU95bzjvOyVqcC0NXRVaVtTSl613LJeMdPQSpremr5VqkPZVfZp8z2YUZ-im0y86GCcvr_Z6zVGOeNUsvrMkP24sacY_iyQZo3lsTCOxgOWTItKlaKSK_jhP_AYlujxHxq9BDo2NUJig2wMKUXon55nVK8N1Uf90FC9NlTTGlNpUPV9U0U4gX2SAA4PK3zWwgiJywXng1Lgb4RhHJcTTkyw1JXkUh_mCf0-b36ART47iDpZB95C5yK2SHfBPZvPP-nNyHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205321298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pearce, Joshua M. ; Harris, Paul J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Joshua M. ; Harris, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73
billion
kW
h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased
avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Customers ; Distribution ; Economics and Finance ; Electric rates ; Electric utilities ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy conservation ; Energy policy ; Environment and Society ; Environmental Sciences ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gas ; Greenhouse gases ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Investment returns ; Payments ; Pollution control ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Utility rates</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2007-12, Vol.35 (12), p.6514-6525</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2007</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421507003758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,3994,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a35_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a12_3ap_3a6514-6525.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02120518$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73
billion
kW
h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased
avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.</description><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Electric rates</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Environment and Society</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gas</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Investment returns</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Utility rates</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEEkvhCbhYHJA4JPWfOE4OHKqqUKRFSAjOluNMsl4l9mInK-1r8MRMmqoHDrVkWx7_vs_jmSx7z2jBKKuujwX4UxgLTqkqaF1Q3rzIdqxWIq-UUi-zHRWU5SVn8nX2JqUjpbSsm3KX_f0J3WKdH8gQAfwhLAnIYBKByaXkgk-kvRDnHyHwEIcLsRiHeDYzAsT4jnQuzdG1ywwdGVZou-pjmAiMbnJ-C4Qej2CRtWSZ3ehmNFvSHCaIxB5MHCC9zV71Zkzw7nG_yn5_uft1e5_vf3z9dnuzz61kdM5Fa2zDmbJCArU95bzjvOyVqcC0NXRVaVtTSl613LJeMdPQSpremr5VqkPZVfZp8z2YUZ-im0y86GCcvr_Z6zVGOeNUsvrMkP24sacY_iyQZo3lsTCOxgOWTItKlaKSK_jhP_AYlujxHxq9BDo2NUJig2wMKUXon55nVK8N1Uf90FC9NlTTGlNpUPV9U0U4gX2SAA4PK3zWwgiJywXng1Lgb4RhHJcTTkyw1JXkUh_mCf0-b36ART47iDpZB95C5yK2SHfBPZvPP-nNyHg</recordid><startdate>20071201</startdate><enddate>20071201</enddate><creator>Pearce, Joshua M.</creator><creator>Harris, Paul J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071201</creationdate><title>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</title><author>Pearce, Joshua M. ; Harris, Paul J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-3bac9217c35e0cf022d224f7a6eab8ed64cba4526b2c1f71a9065afcafb77d7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Electric rates</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Environment and Society</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gas</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Investment returns</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Utility rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Joshua M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearce, Joshua M.</au><au>Harris, Paul J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2007-12-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6514</spage><epage>6525</epage><pages>6514-6525</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This paper quantifies the increased greenhouse gas emissions and negative effect on energy conservation (or “efficiency penalty”) due to electric rate structures that employ an unavoidable customer charge. First, the extent of customer charges was determined from a nationwide survey of US electric tariffs. To eliminate the customer charge nationally while maintaining a fixed sum for electric companies for a given amount of electricity, an increase of 7.12% in the residential electrical rate was found to be necessary. If enacted, this increase in the electric rate would result in a 6.4% reduction in overall electricity consumption, conserving 73
billion
kW
h, eliminating 44.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, and saving the entire US residential sector over $8 billion per year. As shown here, these reductions would come from increased
avoidable costs, thus leveraging an increased rate of return on investments in energy efficiency, energy conservation behavior, distributed energy generation, and fuel choices. Finally, limitations of this study and analysis are discussed and conclusions are drawn for proposed energy policy changes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2007-12, Vol.35 (12), p.6514-6525 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02120518v1 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Customers Distribution Economics and Finance Electric rates Electric utilities Electricity Emissions Emissions control Energy conservation Energy policy Environment and Society Environmental Sciences Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gas Greenhouse gases Humanities and Social Sciences Investment returns Payments Pollution control Studies U.S.A Utility rates |
title | Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by inducing energy conservation and distributed generation from elimination of electric utility customer charges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20by%20inducing%20energy%20conservation%20and%20distributed%20generation%20from%20elimination%20of%20electric%20utility%20customer%20charges&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Pearce,%20Joshua%20M.&rft.date=2007-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6514&rft.epage=6525&rft.pages=6514-6525&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1381937061%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205321298&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421507003758&rfr_iscdi=true |