Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV

Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of display technology 2016-02, Vol.12 (2), p.178-184
Hauptverfasser: Zhang Di, Sang Xinzhu, Wang Peng, Chen Duo, de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 178
container_title Journal of display technology
container_volume 12
creator Zhang Di
Sang Xinzhu
Wang Peng
Chen Duo
de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis
description Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02114507v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7254114</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4005338221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h237t-d86f8748159595ee3985387984eff8efc0d141e14fc0a6308eb6a36b51c936493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFLwzAUh4soOKd3wUvAk4fOvCZpk-PY1CkDPdThrWTdK8volpqkg_33Zk7kHd6PHx8fj5ckt0BHAFQ9vk3LUUZBjDJeFIUSZ8kAhJCpYhk7_82QMlBfl8mV9xtKmcxlPkjWE7vttNPB7JEsjO91S0rbotO7GkmwZIEumDq2U-MjaMKB2B1hU_Lh7AbrYN0R8b0nc9xFsm-1I-M-WB_QofW17UxNysV1ctHo1uPN3x4mn89P5WSWzt9fXifjebrOWBHSlcwbWXAJQsVBZEoKJgslOTaNxKamK-CAwGPSOaMSl7lm-VJArVjOFRsmDyfvWrdV58xWu0Nltalm43l17GgGwAUt9hDZ-xPbOfvdow_VxvZuF8-rID6RScgZj9TdiTKI-K8sMsGjiP0AkRJwNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777381634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Zhang Di ; Sang Xinzhu ; Wang Peng ; Chen Duo ; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang Di ; Sang Xinzhu ; Wang Peng ; Chen Duo ; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creatorcontrib><description>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-319X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJDTAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Autostereoscopic display ; Complexity theory ; Engineering Sciences ; Lighting ; Optics ; Photonic ; Stereo image processing ; stereo vision comfort ; stereoscopic display ; Telecommunications ; Three-dimensional displays ; vertical disparity ; visual fusion ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>Journal of display technology, 2016-02, Vol.12 (2), p.178-184</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7254114$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,794,883,27907,27908,54741</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7254114$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02114507$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang Xinzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen Duo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</title><title>Journal of display technology</title><addtitle>JDT</addtitle><description>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.</description><subject>Autostereoscopic display</subject><subject>Complexity theory</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Photonic</subject><subject>Stereo image processing</subject><subject>stereo vision comfort</subject><subject>stereoscopic display</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Three-dimensional displays</subject><subject>vertical disparity</subject><subject>visual fusion</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1551-319X</issn><issn>1558-9323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFLwzAUh4soOKd3wUvAk4fOvCZpk-PY1CkDPdThrWTdK8volpqkg_33Zk7kHd6PHx8fj5ckt0BHAFQ9vk3LUUZBjDJeFIUSZ8kAhJCpYhk7_82QMlBfl8mV9xtKmcxlPkjWE7vttNPB7JEsjO91S0rbotO7GkmwZIEumDq2U-MjaMKB2B1hU_Lh7AbrYN0R8b0nc9xFsm-1I-M-WB_QofW17UxNysV1ctHo1uPN3x4mn89P5WSWzt9fXifjebrOWBHSlcwbWXAJQsVBZEoKJgslOTaNxKamK-CAwGPSOaMSl7lm-VJArVjOFRsmDyfvWrdV58xWu0Nltalm43l17GgGwAUt9hDZ-xPbOfvdow_VxvZuF8-rID6RScgZj9TdiTKI-K8sMsGjiP0AkRJwNw</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Zhang Di</creator><creator>Sang Xinzhu</creator><creator>Wang Peng</creator><creator>Chen Duo</creator><creator>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</title><author>Zhang Di ; Sang Xinzhu ; Wang Peng ; Chen Duo ; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h237t-d86f8748159595ee3985387984eff8efc0d141e14fc0a6308eb6a36b51c936493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Autostereoscopic display</topic><topic>Complexity theory</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Photonic</topic><topic>Stereo image processing</topic><topic>stereo vision comfort</topic><topic>stereoscopic display</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Three-dimensional displays</topic><topic>vertical disparity</topic><topic>visual fusion</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang Xinzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen Duo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of display technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang Di</au><au>Sang Xinzhu</au><au>Wang Peng</au><au>Chen Duo</au><au>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</atitle><jtitle>Journal of display technology</jtitle><stitle>JDT</stitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>178-184</pages><issn>1551-319X</issn><eissn>1558-9323</eissn><coden>IJDTAL</coden><abstract>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1551-319X
ispartof Journal of display technology, 2016-02, Vol.12 (2), p.178-184
issn 1551-319X
1558-9323
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02114507v1
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Autostereoscopic display
Complexity theory
Engineering Sciences
Lighting
Optics
Photonic
Stereo image processing
stereo vision comfort
stereoscopic display
Telecommunications
Three-dimensional displays
vertical disparity
visual fusion
Visualization
title Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Visual%20Tolerance%20to%20Vertical%20Disparity%20on%203D%20Projector%20Versus%20Lenticular%20Autostereoscopic%20TV&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20display%20technology&rft.au=Zhang%20Di&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=178-184&rft.issn=1551-319X&rft.eissn=1558-9323&rft.coden=IJDTAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E4005338221%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777381634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7254114&rfr_iscdi=true