Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV
Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of display technology 2016-02, Vol.12 (2), p.178-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 178 |
container_title | Journal of display technology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Zhang Di Sang Xinzhu Wang Peng Chen Duo de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis |
description | Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02114507v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7254114</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4005338221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h237t-d86f8748159595ee3985387984eff8efc0d141e14fc0a6308eb6a36b51c936493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFLwzAUh4soOKd3wUvAk4fOvCZpk-PY1CkDPdThrWTdK8volpqkg_33Zk7kHd6PHx8fj5ckt0BHAFQ9vk3LUUZBjDJeFIUSZ8kAhJCpYhk7_82QMlBfl8mV9xtKmcxlPkjWE7vttNPB7JEsjO91S0rbotO7GkmwZIEumDq2U-MjaMKB2B1hU_Lh7AbrYN0R8b0nc9xFsm-1I-M-WB_QofW17UxNysV1ctHo1uPN3x4mn89P5WSWzt9fXifjebrOWBHSlcwbWXAJQsVBZEoKJgslOTaNxKamK-CAwGPSOaMSl7lm-VJArVjOFRsmDyfvWrdV58xWu0Nltalm43l17GgGwAUt9hDZ-xPbOfvdow_VxvZuF8-rID6RScgZj9TdiTKI-K8sMsGjiP0AkRJwNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777381634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Zhang Di ; Sang Xinzhu ; Wang Peng ; Chen Duo ; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang Di ; Sang Xinzhu ; Wang Peng ; Chen Duo ; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creatorcontrib><description>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-319X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJDTAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Autostereoscopic display ; Complexity theory ; Engineering Sciences ; Lighting ; Optics ; Photonic ; Stereo image processing ; stereo vision comfort ; stereoscopic display ; Telecommunications ; Three-dimensional displays ; vertical disparity ; visual fusion ; Visualization</subject><ispartof>Journal of display technology, 2016-02, Vol.12 (2), p.178-184</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7254114$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,794,883,27907,27908,54741</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7254114$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02114507$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang Xinzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen Duo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</title><title>Journal of display technology</title><addtitle>JDT</addtitle><description>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.</description><subject>Autostereoscopic display</subject><subject>Complexity theory</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Photonic</subject><subject>Stereo image processing</subject><subject>stereo vision comfort</subject><subject>stereoscopic display</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Three-dimensional displays</subject><subject>vertical disparity</subject><subject>visual fusion</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><issn>1551-319X</issn><issn>1558-9323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFLwzAUh4soOKd3wUvAk4fOvCZpk-PY1CkDPdThrWTdK8volpqkg_33Zk7kHd6PHx8fj5ckt0BHAFQ9vk3LUUZBjDJeFIUSZ8kAhJCpYhk7_82QMlBfl8mV9xtKmcxlPkjWE7vttNPB7JEsjO91S0rbotO7GkmwZIEumDq2U-MjaMKB2B1hU_Lh7AbrYN0R8b0nc9xFsm-1I-M-WB_QofW17UxNysV1ctHo1uPN3x4mn89P5WSWzt9fXifjebrOWBHSlcwbWXAJQsVBZEoKJgslOTaNxKamK-CAwGPSOaMSl7lm-VJArVjOFRsmDyfvWrdV58xWu0Nltalm43l17GgGwAUt9hDZ-xPbOfvdow_VxvZuF8-rID6RScgZj9TdiTKI-K8sMsGjiP0AkRJwNw</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Zhang Di</creator><creator>Sang Xinzhu</creator><creator>Wang Peng</creator><creator>Chen Duo</creator><creator>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</title><author>Zhang Di ; Sang Xinzhu ; Wang Peng ; Chen Duo ; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h237t-d86f8748159595ee3985387984eff8efc0d141e14fc0a6308eb6a36b51c936493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Autostereoscopic display</topic><topic>Complexity theory</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Photonic</topic><topic>Stereo image processing</topic><topic>stereo vision comfort</topic><topic>stereoscopic display</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Three-dimensional displays</topic><topic>vertical disparity</topic><topic>visual fusion</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang Xinzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen Duo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of display technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang Di</au><au>Sang Xinzhu</au><au>Wang Peng</au><au>Chen Duo</au><au>de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, Jean Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV</atitle><jtitle>Journal of display technology</jtitle><stitle>JDT</stitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>178-184</pages><issn>1551-319X</issn><eissn>1558-9323</eissn><coden>IJDTAL</coden><abstract>Vertical fusion amplitude (VFA) as a reference to assess visual tolerance for vertical disparity is measured by various methods. However, it has not been comprehensively investigated on current 3D displays, although some technical display features lead to different visual impacts, such as crosstalk and viewing angle. A psychophysical measurement of the VFA on representative 3D stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays is presented here, with considerations on certain factors affecting visual performances. For the 3D stereoscopic display, we used a 3D projector, VFA was measured under different viewing distance, stimulus size, background luminance, room lighting, target complexity and disparity velocity. Corresponding tests were carried out on a lenticular autostereoscopic TV, with additional test parameters of viewing angle, due to the presence of the lenticular. Results show that the vertical disparity tolerance is generally better on 3D projector than on autostereoscopic TV. VFA on 3D projector is significantly affected by the stimulus size, target complexity and disparity velocity, whereas crucial factors for autostereoscopic TV are stimulus size, target complexity, disparity velocity, background luminance and viewing angle. The visual performance differences indicate that technical display features should be considered when VFA is measured on different 3D devices.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1551-319X |
ispartof | Journal of display technology, 2016-02, Vol.12 (2), p.178-184 |
issn | 1551-319X 1558-9323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02114507v1 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Autostereoscopic display Complexity theory Engineering Sciences Lighting Optics Photonic Stereo image processing stereo vision comfort stereoscopic display Telecommunications Three-dimensional displays vertical disparity visual fusion Visualization |
title | Comparative Visual Tolerance to Vertical Disparity on 3D Projector Versus Lenticular Autostereoscopic TV |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Visual%20Tolerance%20to%20Vertical%20Disparity%20on%203D%20Projector%20Versus%20Lenticular%20Autostereoscopic%20TV&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20display%20technology&rft.au=Zhang%20Di&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=178-184&rft.issn=1551-319X&rft.eissn=1558-9323&rft.coden=IJDTAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JDT.2015.2477795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E4005338221%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777381634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7254114&rfr_iscdi=true |