Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status – New opportunities and challenges
•We analyze the opportunities and challenges of remote sensing for habitat mapping.•We review 128 references on habitat mapping and monitoring with remote sensing.•The sensors’ suitability for the characterization of natural habitats is evaluated.•Possible methods for detecting the conservation stat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation 2015-05, Vol.37 (SI), p.7-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | SI |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Corbane, Christina Lang, Stefan Pipkins, Kyle Alleaume, Samuel Deshayes, Michel García Millán, Virginia Elena Strasser, Thomas Vanden Borre, Jeroen Toon, Spanhove Michael, Förster |
description | •We analyze the opportunities and challenges of remote sensing for habitat mapping.•We review 128 references on habitat mapping and monitoring with remote sensing.•The sensors’ suitability for the characterization of natural habitats is evaluated.•Possible methods for detecting the conservation status of forest are presented.•Recommendations for a better use of remote sensing by field experts are given.
Safeguarding the diversity of natural and semi-natural habitats in Europe is one of the aims set out by the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora) and one of the targets of the European 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, and is to be accomplished by maintaining a favourable conservation status. To reach this aim a high-level understanding of the distribution and conditions of these habitats is needed. Remote sensing can considerably contribute to habitat mapping and their observation over time. Several European projects and a large number of scientific studies have addressed the issue of mapping and monitoring natural habitats via remote sensing and the deriving of indicators on their conservation status. The multitude of utilized remote sensing sensors and applied methods used in these studies, however, impede a common understanding of what is achievable with current state-of-the-art technologies. The aim of this paper is to provide a synthesis on what is currently feasible in terms of detection and monitoring of natural and semi-natural habitats with remote sensing. To focus this endeavour, we concentrate on those studies aimed at direct mapping of individual habitat types or discriminating between different types of habitats occurring in relatively large, spatially contiguous units. By this we uncover the potential of remote sensing to better understand the distribution of habitats and the assessment of their conservation status in Europe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jag.2014.11.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02108627v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0303243414002451</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_02108627v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3f98dd380bef40c4ceb30a76ed30ac8ddffdd9c3e996a1c85c64bf7dd5e2042a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLdcPbQm_V88LYu6wqIgCt5Cmkx3U7pJSbIr3nwH39AnMaXi0dP3MTO_GeZD6JKSmBJaXHdxxzdxQmgWUxoTkh-hGa3KJKqS4u04-LyooypLk1N05lxHCC3Lopoh_Qw74wE70E7pDW6NxTs-DKPX3O8t7_GWN8pz7zDXEvstKIuF0Q7sgXtlNHahuXf4-_MLP8I7NsNgrN9r5RVMjNjyvge9AXeOTlreO7j41Tl6vbt9Wa6i9dP9w3KxjkSaUh-lbV1JmVakgTYjIhPQpISXBcggIrTaVspapFDXBaeiykWRNW0pZQ4JyRKeztHVtDdcZoNVO24_mOGKrRZrNtZIQklVJOWBhlk6zQprnLPQ_gGUsDFc1rEQLhvDZZSyEG5gbiYGwhMHBZY5oUALkMqC8Ewa9Q_9A2e4hh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status – New opportunities and challenges</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Corbane, Christina ; Lang, Stefan ; Pipkins, Kyle ; Alleaume, Samuel ; Deshayes, Michel ; García Millán, Virginia Elena ; Strasser, Thomas ; Vanden Borre, Jeroen ; Toon, Spanhove ; Michael, Förster</creator><creatorcontrib>Corbane, Christina ; Lang, Stefan ; Pipkins, Kyle ; Alleaume, Samuel ; Deshayes, Michel ; García Millán, Virginia Elena ; Strasser, Thomas ; Vanden Borre, Jeroen ; Toon, Spanhove ; Michael, Förster</creatorcontrib><description>•We analyze the opportunities and challenges of remote sensing for habitat mapping.•We review 128 references on habitat mapping and monitoring with remote sensing.•The sensors’ suitability for the characterization of natural habitats is evaluated.•Possible methods for detecting the conservation status of forest are presented.•Recommendations for a better use of remote sensing by field experts are given.
Safeguarding the diversity of natural and semi-natural habitats in Europe is one of the aims set out by the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora) and one of the targets of the European 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, and is to be accomplished by maintaining a favourable conservation status. To reach this aim a high-level understanding of the distribution and conditions of these habitats is needed. Remote sensing can considerably contribute to habitat mapping and their observation over time. Several European projects and a large number of scientific studies have addressed the issue of mapping and monitoring natural habitats via remote sensing and the deriving of indicators on their conservation status. The multitude of utilized remote sensing sensors and applied methods used in these studies, however, impede a common understanding of what is achievable with current state-of-the-art technologies. The aim of this paper is to provide a synthesis on what is currently feasible in terms of detection and monitoring of natural and semi-natural habitats with remote sensing. To focus this endeavour, we concentrate on those studies aimed at direct mapping of individual habitat types or discriminating between different types of habitats occurring in relatively large, spatially contiguous units. By this we uncover the potential of remote sensing to better understand the distribution of habitats and the assessment of their conservation status in Europe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-8432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-826X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.11.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology ; Computer Science ; Earth observation data ; Environmental Sciences ; European Habitats Directive ; Image Processing ; Natural and semi-natural habitats ; Satellite image analysis</subject><ispartof>International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2015-05, Vol.37 (SI), p.7-16</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3f98dd380bef40c4ceb30a76ed30ac8ddffdd9c3e996a1c85c64bf7dd5e2042a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3f98dd380bef40c4ceb30a76ed30ac8ddffdd9c3e996a1c85c64bf7dd5e2042a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0153-7243 ; 0000-0002-9200-8338</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.11.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02108627$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corbane, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipkins, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alleaume, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshayes, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Millán, Virginia Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanden Borre, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toon, Spanhove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Förster</creatorcontrib><title>Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status – New opportunities and challenges</title><title>International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation</title><description>•We analyze the opportunities and challenges of remote sensing for habitat mapping.•We review 128 references on habitat mapping and monitoring with remote sensing.•The sensors’ suitability for the characterization of natural habitats is evaluated.•Possible methods for detecting the conservation status of forest are presented.•Recommendations for a better use of remote sensing by field experts are given.
Safeguarding the diversity of natural and semi-natural habitats in Europe is one of the aims set out by the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora) and one of the targets of the European 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, and is to be accomplished by maintaining a favourable conservation status. To reach this aim a high-level understanding of the distribution and conditions of these habitats is needed. Remote sensing can considerably contribute to habitat mapping and their observation over time. Several European projects and a large number of scientific studies have addressed the issue of mapping and monitoring natural habitats via remote sensing and the deriving of indicators on their conservation status. The multitude of utilized remote sensing sensors and applied methods used in these studies, however, impede a common understanding of what is achievable with current state-of-the-art technologies. The aim of this paper is to provide a synthesis on what is currently feasible in terms of detection and monitoring of natural and semi-natural habitats with remote sensing. To focus this endeavour, we concentrate on those studies aimed at direct mapping of individual habitat types or discriminating between different types of habitats occurring in relatively large, spatially contiguous units. By this we uncover the potential of remote sensing to better understand the distribution of habitats and the assessment of their conservation status in Europe.</description><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Earth observation data</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>European Habitats Directive</subject><subject>Image Processing</subject><subject>Natural and semi-natural habitats</subject><subject>Satellite image analysis</subject><issn>1569-8432</issn><issn>1872-826X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLdcPbQm_V88LYu6wqIgCt5Cmkx3U7pJSbIr3nwH39AnMaXi0dP3MTO_GeZD6JKSmBJaXHdxxzdxQmgWUxoTkh-hGa3KJKqS4u04-LyooypLk1N05lxHCC3Lopoh_Qw74wE70E7pDW6NxTs-DKPX3O8t7_GWN8pz7zDXEvstKIuF0Q7sgXtlNHahuXf4-_MLP8I7NsNgrN9r5RVMjNjyvge9AXeOTlreO7j41Tl6vbt9Wa6i9dP9w3KxjkSaUh-lbV1JmVakgTYjIhPQpISXBcggIrTaVspapFDXBaeiykWRNW0pZQ4JyRKeztHVtDdcZoNVO24_mOGKrRZrNtZIQklVJOWBhlk6zQprnLPQ_gGUsDFc1rEQLhvDZZSyEG5gbiYGwhMHBZY5oUALkMqC8Ewa9Q_9A2e4hh0</recordid><startdate>20150501</startdate><enddate>20150501</enddate><creator>Corbane, Christina</creator><creator>Lang, Stefan</creator><creator>Pipkins, Kyle</creator><creator>Alleaume, Samuel</creator><creator>Deshayes, Michel</creator><creator>García Millán, Virginia Elena</creator><creator>Strasser, Thomas</creator><creator>Vanden Borre, Jeroen</creator><creator>Toon, Spanhove</creator><creator>Michael, Förster</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0153-7243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-8338</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150501</creationdate><title>Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status – New opportunities and challenges</title><author>Corbane, Christina ; Lang, Stefan ; Pipkins, Kyle ; Alleaume, Samuel ; Deshayes, Michel ; García Millán, Virginia Elena ; Strasser, Thomas ; Vanden Borre, Jeroen ; Toon, Spanhove ; Michael, Förster</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3f98dd380bef40c4ceb30a76ed30ac8ddffdd9c3e996a1c85c64bf7dd5e2042a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Earth observation data</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>European Habitats Directive</topic><topic>Image Processing</topic><topic>Natural and semi-natural habitats</topic><topic>Satellite image analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corbane, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pipkins, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alleaume, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshayes, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Millán, Virginia Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strasser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanden Borre, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toon, Spanhove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Förster</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corbane, Christina</au><au>Lang, Stefan</au><au>Pipkins, Kyle</au><au>Alleaume, Samuel</au><au>Deshayes, Michel</au><au>García Millán, Virginia Elena</au><au>Strasser, Thomas</au><au>Vanden Borre, Jeroen</au><au>Toon, Spanhove</au><au>Michael, Förster</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status – New opportunities and challenges</atitle><jtitle>International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation</jtitle><date>2015-05-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>SI</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>7-16</pages><issn>1569-8432</issn><eissn>1872-826X</eissn><abstract>•We analyze the opportunities and challenges of remote sensing for habitat mapping.•We review 128 references on habitat mapping and monitoring with remote sensing.•The sensors’ suitability for the characterization of natural habitats is evaluated.•Possible methods for detecting the conservation status of forest are presented.•Recommendations for a better use of remote sensing by field experts are given.
Safeguarding the diversity of natural and semi-natural habitats in Europe is one of the aims set out by the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora) and one of the targets of the European 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, and is to be accomplished by maintaining a favourable conservation status. To reach this aim a high-level understanding of the distribution and conditions of these habitats is needed. Remote sensing can considerably contribute to habitat mapping and their observation over time. Several European projects and a large number of scientific studies have addressed the issue of mapping and monitoring natural habitats via remote sensing and the deriving of indicators on their conservation status. The multitude of utilized remote sensing sensors and applied methods used in these studies, however, impede a common understanding of what is achievable with current state-of-the-art technologies. The aim of this paper is to provide a synthesis on what is currently feasible in terms of detection and monitoring of natural and semi-natural habitats with remote sensing. To focus this endeavour, we concentrate on those studies aimed at direct mapping of individual habitat types or discriminating between different types of habitats occurring in relatively large, spatially contiguous units. By this we uncover the potential of remote sensing to better understand the distribution of habitats and the assessment of their conservation status in Europe.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jag.2014.11.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0153-7243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-8338</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1569-8432 |
ispartof | International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2015-05, Vol.37 (SI), p.7-16 |
issn | 1569-8432 1872-826X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02108627v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biodiversity and Ecology Computer Science Earth observation data Environmental Sciences European Habitats Directive Image Processing Natural and semi-natural habitats Satellite image analysis |
title | Remote sensing for mapping natural habitats and their conservation status – New opportunities and challenges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T17%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remote%20sensing%20for%20mapping%20natural%20habitats%20and%20their%20conservation%20status%20%E2%80%93%20New%20opportunities%20and%20challenges&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20applied%20earth%20observation%20and%20geoinformation&rft.au=Corbane,%20Christina&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=SI&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=7-16&rft.issn=1569-8432&rft.eissn=1872-826X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jag.2014.11.005&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_02108627v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0303243414002451&rfr_iscdi=true |