Reconstructing APT Datasets: Challenging the Limits of the Possible
Atom probe tomography (APT) has been successfully used in materials science for several decades for probing local compositional variations. In metals, the capacity to measure reliable composition at the nanoscale in 3D was successfully demonstrated in the early nineties [I, 2]. By using a few geomet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microscopy and microanalysis 2017-07, Vol.23 (S1), p.640-641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 641 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 640 |
container_title | Microscopy and microanalysis |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Vurpillot, François Zanuttini, David Parviainen, Stefan Mazumder, Baishaikhi Rolland, Nicolas Hatzoglou, Constantinos Speck, James S. |
description | Atom probe tomography (APT) has been successfully used in materials science for several decades for probing local compositional variations. In metals, the capacity to measure reliable composition at the nanoscale in 3D was successfully demonstrated in the early nineties [I, 2]. By using a few geometric ingredients, a reconstruction recipe was proposed at this time that surprisingly produced on selected materials, 3D images with an atomic scale precision of the distribution of atoms with elemental identification [3). The ability to localize precisely the 3-D coordinates of individual atoms in direct space of materials is expected to find important applications in materials science and engineering, nanoscience, physics and chemistry. It is particularly crucial in semiconductor industry, to design optical devices or electronic devices, such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), or transistors.This ideal picture of near-perfect 3D microscope however faces two issues. First, the precision of images may vary strongly from one material to another. Compared to an optical or an electron microscope, the spatial resolution loss is not diffraction limited, since image is produced from the inverse projection of ion trajectories, ions been produced by field evaporation of surface atoms. Precision is perturbed by slight deviations of the trajectories of ions from their initial positions at the specimen surace to the ion detector. A real understanding of this trajectory taking into account first the quantum interaction of atoms/ions with the specimen surface under the presence of the strong electric field existing on the surface is mandatory. The interplay between quantum processes, and more classical deviations induced by the distribution of the electric field close to the surface is extremely complex. In metals, most of the deviations thought to be induced by the field, as it was recently demonstrated experimentally by field ion microscopy in tungsten (fig. I). In oxides, quantum effects such as in-flight dissociation of molecules may degrade significantly the spatial precision (fig. 2) [4]. The second issue concerns the global distortions induced by the presence in the sample of phases very different in term of the critical fields required to extract surface atoms. This is a current case when analyzing devices composed of complex structures of metals, oxides and semiconductors materials. The surface of the sample ideally modelled with a constant curvature radius evolves dyn |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1431927617003865 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cambridge_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02107482v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1431927617003865</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_S1431927617003865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1635-6fca7933e0e789fb6a37f157126c2879d0cca39f17dbd0baeb923c00450926853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtPwzAMjhBIjMEP4NYrh4LdtEnDbSqPIVVignGu0jTZMnUtSjok_j3pNnFB4mT7e1ifTcg1wi0C8rt3TCmKhDPkADRn2QmZBCiLc8TsdN9jPPLn5ML7DQQRcDYhxZtWfecHt1OD7VbRbLGMHuQgvR78fVSsZdvqbjUyw1pHpd3awUe92U-L3ntbt_qSnBnZen11rFPy8fS4LOZx-fr8UszKWCELSZhRkgtKNWieC1MzSbnBjGPCVJJz0YBSkgqDvKkbqKWuRUIVQJqBSFie0Sm5OewNqapPZ7fSfVe9tNV8VlYjBgkCT_PkC4MWD1rlQkqnza8BoRo_Vv35WPDQo0dua2ebla42_c514aZ_XD8OAGtW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructing APT Datasets: Challenging the Limits of the Possible</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Vurpillot, François ; Zanuttini, David ; Parviainen, Stefan ; Mazumder, Baishaikhi ; Rolland, Nicolas ; Hatzoglou, Constantinos ; Speck, James S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vurpillot, François ; Zanuttini, David ; Parviainen, Stefan ; Mazumder, Baishaikhi ; Rolland, Nicolas ; Hatzoglou, Constantinos ; Speck, James S.</creatorcontrib><description>Atom probe tomography (APT) has been successfully used in materials science for several decades for probing local compositional variations. In metals, the capacity to measure reliable composition at the nanoscale in 3D was successfully demonstrated in the early nineties [I, 2]. By using a few geometric ingredients, a reconstruction recipe was proposed at this time that surprisingly produced on selected materials, 3D images with an atomic scale precision of the distribution of atoms with elemental identification [3). The ability to localize precisely the 3-D coordinates of individual atoms in direct space of materials is expected to find important applications in materials science and engineering, nanoscience, physics and chemistry. It is particularly crucial in semiconductor industry, to design optical devices or electronic devices, such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), or transistors.This ideal picture of near-perfect 3D microscope however faces two issues. First, the precision of images may vary strongly from one material to another. Compared to an optical or an electron microscope, the spatial resolution loss is not diffraction limited, since image is produced from the inverse projection of ion trajectories, ions been produced by field evaporation of surface atoms. Precision is perturbed by slight deviations of the trajectories of ions from their initial positions at the specimen surace to the ion detector. A real understanding of this trajectory taking into account first the quantum interaction of atoms/ions with the specimen surface under the presence of the strong electric field existing on the surface is mandatory. The interplay between quantum processes, and more classical deviations induced by the distribution of the electric field close to the surface is extremely complex. In metals, most of the deviations thought to be induced by the field, as it was recently demonstrated experimentally by field ion microscopy in tungsten (fig. I). In oxides, quantum effects such as in-flight dissociation of molecules may degrade significantly the spatial precision (fig. 2) [4]. The second issue concerns the global distortions induced by the presence in the sample of phases very different in term of the critical fields required to extract surface atoms. This is a current case when analyzing devices composed of complex structures of metals, oxides and semiconductors materials. The surface of the sample ideally modelled with a constant curvature radius evolves dynamically under the process of field evaporation in a complex 3D surface. The direct consequence is the presence of distortions in the projected image. After the evaporation of each atom, the field distribution around the sample must be evaluated, to understand the projection law that should necessary be taken into account to generate an accurate reconstruction [5, 6). To overcome this cumbersome calculation, an alternative model, much simpler, was developed to reproduce the imaging process in simple configurations. In multilayers systems, it was demonstrated that most of the distortions could be reduced using a fast and efficient reconstruction algorithm that predicts the analytical shape of the emitting surface all along the evaporation process [7]. If a complementary technique can be used on the same sample to verify the morphology or provide complementary information before APT analysis, then this can also greatly…</description><identifier>ISSN: 1431-9276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-8115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1431927617003865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analytical and Instrumentation Science Symposia ; Physics ; Reconstruction, Simulations, and Data Analysis in Atom Probe Tomography</subject><ispartof>Microscopy and microanalysis, 2017-07, Vol.23 (S1), p.640-641</ispartof><rights>Microscopy Society of America 2017</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1635-6fca7933e0e789fb6a37f157126c2879d0cca39f17dbd0baeb923c00450926853</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7101-0028 ; 0000-0002-6834-3507</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1431927617003865/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02107482$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vurpillot, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanuttini, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parviainen, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazumder, Baishaikhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolland, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatzoglou, Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speck, James S.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructing APT Datasets: Challenging the Limits of the Possible</title><title>Microscopy and microanalysis</title><addtitle>Microsc Microanal</addtitle><description>Atom probe tomography (APT) has been successfully used in materials science for several decades for probing local compositional variations. In metals, the capacity to measure reliable composition at the nanoscale in 3D was successfully demonstrated in the early nineties [I, 2]. By using a few geometric ingredients, a reconstruction recipe was proposed at this time that surprisingly produced on selected materials, 3D images with an atomic scale precision of the distribution of atoms with elemental identification [3). The ability to localize precisely the 3-D coordinates of individual atoms in direct space of materials is expected to find important applications in materials science and engineering, nanoscience, physics and chemistry. It is particularly crucial in semiconductor industry, to design optical devices or electronic devices, such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), or transistors.This ideal picture of near-perfect 3D microscope however faces two issues. First, the precision of images may vary strongly from one material to another. Compared to an optical or an electron microscope, the spatial resolution loss is not diffraction limited, since image is produced from the inverse projection of ion trajectories, ions been produced by field evaporation of surface atoms. Precision is perturbed by slight deviations of the trajectories of ions from their initial positions at the specimen surace to the ion detector. A real understanding of this trajectory taking into account first the quantum interaction of atoms/ions with the specimen surface under the presence of the strong electric field existing on the surface is mandatory. The interplay between quantum processes, and more classical deviations induced by the distribution of the electric field close to the surface is extremely complex. In metals, most of the deviations thought to be induced by the field, as it was recently demonstrated experimentally by field ion microscopy in tungsten (fig. I). In oxides, quantum effects such as in-flight dissociation of molecules may degrade significantly the spatial precision (fig. 2) [4]. The second issue concerns the global distortions induced by the presence in the sample of phases very different in term of the critical fields required to extract surface atoms. This is a current case when analyzing devices composed of complex structures of metals, oxides and semiconductors materials. The surface of the sample ideally modelled with a constant curvature radius evolves dynamically under the process of field evaporation in a complex 3D surface. The direct consequence is the presence of distortions in the projected image. After the evaporation of each atom, the field distribution around the sample must be evaluated, to understand the projection law that should necessary be taken into account to generate an accurate reconstruction [5, 6). To overcome this cumbersome calculation, an alternative model, much simpler, was developed to reproduce the imaging process in simple configurations. In multilayers systems, it was demonstrated that most of the distortions could be reduced using a fast and efficient reconstruction algorithm that predicts the analytical shape of the emitting surface all along the evaporation process [7]. If a complementary technique can be used on the same sample to verify the morphology or provide complementary information before APT analysis, then this can also greatly…</description><subject>Analytical and Instrumentation Science Symposia</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reconstruction, Simulations, and Data Analysis in Atom Probe Tomography</subject><issn>1431-9276</issn><issn>1435-8115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtPwzAMjhBIjMEP4NYrh4LdtEnDbSqPIVVignGu0jTZMnUtSjok_j3pNnFB4mT7e1ifTcg1wi0C8rt3TCmKhDPkADRn2QmZBCiLc8TsdN9jPPLn5ML7DQQRcDYhxZtWfecHt1OD7VbRbLGMHuQgvR78fVSsZdvqbjUyw1pHpd3awUe92U-L3ntbt_qSnBnZen11rFPy8fS4LOZx-fr8UszKWCELSZhRkgtKNWieC1MzSbnBjGPCVJJz0YBSkgqDvKkbqKWuRUIVQJqBSFie0Sm5OewNqapPZ7fSfVe9tNV8VlYjBgkCT_PkC4MWD1rlQkqnza8BoRo_Vv35WPDQo0dua2ebla42_c514aZ_XD8OAGtW</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Vurpillot, François</creator><creator>Zanuttini, David</creator><creator>Parviainen, Stefan</creator><creator>Mazumder, Baishaikhi</creator><creator>Rolland, Nicolas</creator><creator>Hatzoglou, Constantinos</creator><creator>Speck, James S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-3507</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Reconstructing APT Datasets: Challenging the Limits of the Possible</title><author>Vurpillot, François ; Zanuttini, David ; Parviainen, Stefan ; Mazumder, Baishaikhi ; Rolland, Nicolas ; Hatzoglou, Constantinos ; Speck, James S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1635-6fca7933e0e789fb6a37f157126c2879d0cca39f17dbd0baeb923c00450926853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analytical and Instrumentation Science Symposia</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reconstruction, Simulations, and Data Analysis in Atom Probe Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vurpillot, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanuttini, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parviainen, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazumder, Baishaikhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolland, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatzoglou, Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speck, James S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Microscopy and microanalysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vurpillot, François</au><au>Zanuttini, David</au><au>Parviainen, Stefan</au><au>Mazumder, Baishaikhi</au><au>Rolland, Nicolas</au><au>Hatzoglou, Constantinos</au><au>Speck, James S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructing APT Datasets: Challenging the Limits of the Possible</atitle><jtitle>Microscopy and microanalysis</jtitle><addtitle>Microsc Microanal</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>640</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>640-641</pages><issn>1431-9276</issn><eissn>1435-8115</eissn><abstract>Atom probe tomography (APT) has been successfully used in materials science for several decades for probing local compositional variations. In metals, the capacity to measure reliable composition at the nanoscale in 3D was successfully demonstrated in the early nineties [I, 2]. By using a few geometric ingredients, a reconstruction recipe was proposed at this time that surprisingly produced on selected materials, 3D images with an atomic scale precision of the distribution of atoms with elemental identification [3). The ability to localize precisely the 3-D coordinates of individual atoms in direct space of materials is expected to find important applications in materials science and engineering, nanoscience, physics and chemistry. It is particularly crucial in semiconductor industry, to design optical devices or electronic devices, such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), or transistors.This ideal picture of near-perfect 3D microscope however faces two issues. First, the precision of images may vary strongly from one material to another. Compared to an optical or an electron microscope, the spatial resolution loss is not diffraction limited, since image is produced from the inverse projection of ion trajectories, ions been produced by field evaporation of surface atoms. Precision is perturbed by slight deviations of the trajectories of ions from their initial positions at the specimen surace to the ion detector. A real understanding of this trajectory taking into account first the quantum interaction of atoms/ions with the specimen surface under the presence of the strong electric field existing on the surface is mandatory. The interplay between quantum processes, and more classical deviations induced by the distribution of the electric field close to the surface is extremely complex. In metals, most of the deviations thought to be induced by the field, as it was recently demonstrated experimentally by field ion microscopy in tungsten (fig. I). In oxides, quantum effects such as in-flight dissociation of molecules may degrade significantly the spatial precision (fig. 2) [4]. The second issue concerns the global distortions induced by the presence in the sample of phases very different in term of the critical fields required to extract surface atoms. This is a current case when analyzing devices composed of complex structures of metals, oxides and semiconductors materials. The surface of the sample ideally modelled with a constant curvature radius evolves dynamically under the process of field evaporation in a complex 3D surface. The direct consequence is the presence of distortions in the projected image. After the evaporation of each atom, the field distribution around the sample must be evaluated, to understand the projection law that should necessary be taken into account to generate an accurate reconstruction [5, 6). To overcome this cumbersome calculation, an alternative model, much simpler, was developed to reproduce the imaging process in simple configurations. In multilayers systems, it was demonstrated that most of the distortions could be reduced using a fast and efficient reconstruction algorithm that predicts the analytical shape of the emitting surface all along the evaporation process [7]. If a complementary technique can be used on the same sample to verify the morphology or provide complementary information before APT analysis, then this can also greatly…</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1431927617003865</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-0028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-3507</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1431-9276 |
ispartof | Microscopy and microanalysis, 2017-07, Vol.23 (S1), p.640-641 |
issn | 1431-9276 1435-8115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02107482v1 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Analytical and Instrumentation Science Symposia Physics Reconstruction, Simulations, and Data Analysis in Atom Probe Tomography |
title | Reconstructing APT Datasets: Challenging the Limits of the Possible |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A04%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructing%20APT%20Datasets:%20Challenging%20the%20Limits%20of%20the%20Possible&rft.jtitle=Microscopy%20and%20microanalysis&rft.au=Vurpillot,%20Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=640-641&rft.issn=1431-9276&rft.eissn=1435-8115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1431927617003865&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge_hal_p%3E10_1017_S1431927617003865%3C/cambridge_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1431927617003865&rfr_iscdi=true |