Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise

Conflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads to impairment in response speed and accuracy. For instance, in the colour-word Stroop paradigm, participants respond slower and less accurately to the print colour of incongruent colour words (e.g., “red” printed in green)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2019-05, Vol.72 (5), p.1119-1130
Hauptverfasser: Schmidt, James R, Lemercier, Céline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1130
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1119
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 72
creator Schmidt, James R
Lemercier, Céline
description Conflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads to impairment in response speed and accuracy. For instance, in the colour-word Stroop paradigm, participants respond slower and less accurately to the print colour of incongruent colour words (e.g., “red” printed in green) than to congruent colour words (e.g., “green” in green). Importantly, this congruency effect is diminished when the trials in an experiment are mostly incongruent, relative to mostly congruent, termed a proportion congruent effect. When distracting stimuli are mostly congruent in one context (e.g., location or font) but mostly incongruent in another context (e.g., another location or font), the congruency effect is still diminished in the mostly incongruent context, termed a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) effect. Both the standard proportion congruent and CSPC effects are typically interpreted in terms of conflict-driven attentional control, frequently termed conflict adaptation or conflict monitoring. However, in two experiments, we investigated contingency learning confounds in context-specific proportion congruent effects. In particular, two variants of a dissociation procedure are presented with the font variant of the CSPC procedure. In both, robust contingency learning effects were observed. No evidence for context-specific control was observed. In fact, results trended in the wrong direction. In all, the results suggest that CSPC effects may not be a useful way of studying attentional control.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1747021818787155
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02099654v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021818787155</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2057864245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cceb6668782651fbd087c3237f99277a37e103ad8ca83bdaad047060a1395ced3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFr2zAUxsVoWbps952KoZft4E5PliW7txC2phDoZbsNhCI_pwqO5Ep2Wf77KiRLIdCTpKff-977-Aj5CvQWQMofILmkDCqoZCWhLD-Qq30pp4yJi9Mdqgn5FOOGUl5IIT-SCatrJqSgV-Tv3LsB_w157NHY1pqsD773YbDeZca7dRjRDRm2LZoh3mVzv-396JrcjLj_H6xbozO7rEMdXHpk1mWNjevRRvxMLlvdRfxyPKfkz6-fv-eLfPl4_zCfLXPDOQy5MbgSQiQPTJTQrhpaSVOwQrZpTSl1IRFooZvK6KpYNVo3NNkWVENRlwabYkq-H3SfdKf6YLc67JTXVi1mS7WvUUbrWpT8BRL77cAmn88jxkFtbTTYddqhH6NitJSV4IyXCb05Qzd-DC45UYwBlBx42nJK6IEywccYsD1tAFTtU1LnKaWW66PwuNpic2r4H0sC8gMQ9Rrfpr4r-AqC4Jjr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211541432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Schmidt, James R ; Lemercier, Céline</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, James R ; Lemercier, Céline</creatorcontrib><description>Conflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads to impairment in response speed and accuracy. For instance, in the colour-word Stroop paradigm, participants respond slower and less accurately to the print colour of incongruent colour words (e.g., “red” printed in green) than to congruent colour words (e.g., “green” in green). Importantly, this congruency effect is diminished when the trials in an experiment are mostly incongruent, relative to mostly congruent, termed a proportion congruent effect. When distracting stimuli are mostly congruent in one context (e.g., location or font) but mostly incongruent in another context (e.g., another location or font), the congruency effect is still diminished in the mostly incongruent context, termed a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) effect. Both the standard proportion congruent and CSPC effects are typically interpreted in terms of conflict-driven attentional control, frequently termed conflict adaptation or conflict monitoring. However, in two experiments, we investigated contingency learning confounds in context-specific proportion congruent effects. In particular, two variants of a dissociation procedure are presented with the font variant of the CSPC procedure. In both, robust contingency learning effects were observed. No evidence for context-specific control was observed. In fact, results trended in the wrong direction. In all, the results suggest that CSPC effects may not be a useful way of studying attentional control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021818787155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29926760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognitive science ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019-05, Vol.72 (5), p.1119-1130</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2018</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cceb6668782651fbd087c3237f99277a37e103ad8ca83bdaad047060a1395ced3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cceb6668782651fbd087c3237f99277a37e103ad8ca83bdaad047060a1395ced3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2832-8724 ; 0000-0002-0412-396X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747021818787155$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747021818787155$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29926760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02099654$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemercier, Céline</creatorcontrib><title>Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Conflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads to impairment in response speed and accuracy. For instance, in the colour-word Stroop paradigm, participants respond slower and less accurately to the print colour of incongruent colour words (e.g., “red” printed in green) than to congruent colour words (e.g., “green” in green). Importantly, this congruency effect is diminished when the trials in an experiment are mostly incongruent, relative to mostly congruent, termed a proportion congruent effect. When distracting stimuli are mostly congruent in one context (e.g., location or font) but mostly incongruent in another context (e.g., another location or font), the congruency effect is still diminished in the mostly incongruent context, termed a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) effect. Both the standard proportion congruent and CSPC effects are typically interpreted in terms of conflict-driven attentional control, frequently termed conflict adaptation or conflict monitoring. However, in two experiments, we investigated contingency learning confounds in context-specific proportion congruent effects. In particular, two variants of a dissociation procedure are presented with the font variant of the CSPC procedure. In both, robust contingency learning effects were observed. No evidence for context-specific control was observed. In fact, results trended in the wrong direction. In all, the results suggest that CSPC effects may not be a useful way of studying attentional control.</description><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFr2zAUxsVoWbps952KoZft4E5PliW7txC2phDoZbsNhCI_pwqO5Ep2Wf77KiRLIdCTpKff-977-Aj5CvQWQMofILmkDCqoZCWhLD-Qq30pp4yJi9Mdqgn5FOOGUl5IIT-SCatrJqSgV-Tv3LsB_w157NHY1pqsD773YbDeZca7dRjRDRm2LZoh3mVzv-396JrcjLj_H6xbozO7rEMdXHpk1mWNjevRRvxMLlvdRfxyPKfkz6-fv-eLfPl4_zCfLXPDOQy5MbgSQiQPTJTQrhpaSVOwQrZpTSl1IRFooZvK6KpYNVo3NNkWVENRlwabYkq-H3SfdKf6YLc67JTXVi1mS7WvUUbrWpT8BRL77cAmn88jxkFtbTTYddqhH6NitJSV4IyXCb05Qzd-DC45UYwBlBx42nJK6IEywccYsD1tAFTtU1LnKaWW66PwuNpic2r4H0sC8gMQ9Rrfpr4r-AqC4Jjr</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Schmidt, James R</creator><creator>Lemercier, Céline</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis (Routledge)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-8724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-396X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise</title><author>Schmidt, James R ; Lemercier, Céline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cceb6668782651fbd087c3237f99277a37e103ad8ca83bdaad047060a1395ced3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemercier, Céline</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidt, James R</au><au>Lemercier, Céline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1130</epage><pages>1119-1130</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Conflict between task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus information leads to impairment in response speed and accuracy. For instance, in the colour-word Stroop paradigm, participants respond slower and less accurately to the print colour of incongruent colour words (e.g., “red” printed in green) than to congruent colour words (e.g., “green” in green). Importantly, this congruency effect is diminished when the trials in an experiment are mostly incongruent, relative to mostly congruent, termed a proportion congruent effect. When distracting stimuli are mostly congruent in one context (e.g., location or font) but mostly incongruent in another context (e.g., another location or font), the congruency effect is still diminished in the mostly incongruent context, termed a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) effect. Both the standard proportion congruent and CSPC effects are typically interpreted in terms of conflict-driven attentional control, frequently termed conflict adaptation or conflict monitoring. However, in two experiments, we investigated contingency learning confounds in context-specific proportion congruent effects. In particular, two variants of a dissociation procedure are presented with the font variant of the CSPC procedure. In both, robust contingency learning effects were observed. No evidence for context-specific control was observed. In fact, results trended in the wrong direction. In all, the results suggest that CSPC effects may not be a useful way of studying attentional control.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29926760</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021818787155</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-8724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-396X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019-05, Vol.72 (5), p.1119-1130
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02099654v1
source Access via SAGE
subjects Cognitive science
Psychology
title Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-10T07%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Context-specific%20proportion%20congruent%20effects:%20Compound-cue%20contingency%20learning%20in%20disguise&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Schmidt,%20James%20R&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1130&rft.pages=1119-1130&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021818787155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2057864245%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211541432&rft_id=info:pmid/29926760&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021818787155&rfr_iscdi=true