Privileged access to action for objects relative to words

We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in actio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2002-06, Vol.9 (2), p.348-355
Hauptverfasser: CHAINAY, Hanna, HUMPHREYS, Glyn W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 355
container_issue 2
container_start_page 348
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 9
creator CHAINAY, Hanna
HUMPHREYS, Glyn W
description We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/BF03196292
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02080165v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71915748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgiq3Viz9A9qKgsDr52iTHWqwKBT3oeclms5qybWqyrfjvTelij54yZB5mhhehcwy3VHB5dz8FilVBFDlAQ8wpzjklcJhqKFSuqGQDdBLjHAB4oYpjNMAEExBKDZF6DW7jWvth60wbY2PMOp-qzvll1viQ-WpuTRezYFvduY3dtr99qOMpOmp0G-1Z_47Q-_ThbfKUz14enyfjWW4Y511uFGeYskoaI42WUggJVBol6wI4xg0htQKTVgtRWVoDqxihdTqv0UKYoqIjdL2b-6nbchXcQoef0mtXPo1n5fYPCEjABd_gZK92dhX819rGrly4aGzb6qX161hKzhmn4n8osMJcMJngzQ6a4GMMtvk7AUO5Tb_cp5_wRT91XS1svad93Alc9kBHo9sm6KVxce-oEFhSQX8BET6JSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71915748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>CHAINAY, Hanna ; HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creator><creatorcontrib>CHAINAY, Hanna ; HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><description>We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03196292</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12120799</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Association Learning ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive science ; Decision Making ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Semantics ; Verbal Learning</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2002-06, Vol.9 (2), p.348-355</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5754-033X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13771837$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12120799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02080165$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHAINAY, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><title>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.</description><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgiq3Viz9A9qKgsDr52iTHWqwKBT3oeclms5qybWqyrfjvTelij54yZB5mhhehcwy3VHB5dz8FilVBFDlAQ8wpzjklcJhqKFSuqGQDdBLjHAB4oYpjNMAEExBKDZF6DW7jWvth60wbY2PMOp-qzvll1viQ-WpuTRezYFvduY3dtr99qOMpOmp0G-1Z_47Q-_ThbfKUz14enyfjWW4Y511uFGeYskoaI42WUggJVBol6wI4xg0htQKTVgtRWVoDqxihdTqv0UKYoqIjdL2b-6nbchXcQoef0mtXPo1n5fYPCEjABd_gZK92dhX819rGrly4aGzb6qX161hKzhmn4n8osMJcMJngzQ6a4GMMtvk7AUO5Tb_cp5_wRT91XS1svad93Alc9kBHo9sm6KVxce-oEFhSQX8BET6JSg</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>CHAINAY, Hanna</creator><creator>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-033X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</title><author>CHAINAY, Hanna ; HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHAINAY, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHAINAY, Hanna</au><au>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>348-355</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>12120799</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03196292</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-033X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2002-06, Vol.9 (2), p.348-355
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02080165v1
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Association Learning
Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive science
Decision Making
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning. Memory
Memory
Mental Recall
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Reading
Semantics
Verbal Learning
title Privileged access to action for objects relative to words
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A37%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Privileged%20access%20to%20action%20for%20objects%20relative%20to%20words&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=CHAINAY,%20Hanna&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=348-355&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03196292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E71915748%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71915748&rft_id=info:pmid/12120799&rfr_iscdi=true