Privileged access to action for objects relative to words
We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in actio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2002-06, Vol.9 (2), p.348-355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 355 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 348 |
container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | CHAINAY, Hanna HUMPHREYS, Glyn W |
description | We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/BF03196292 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02080165v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71915748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgiq3Viz9A9qKgsDr52iTHWqwKBT3oeclms5qybWqyrfjvTelij54yZB5mhhehcwy3VHB5dz8FilVBFDlAQ8wpzjklcJhqKFSuqGQDdBLjHAB4oYpjNMAEExBKDZF6DW7jWvth60wbY2PMOp-qzvll1viQ-WpuTRezYFvduY3dtr99qOMpOmp0G-1Z_47Q-_ThbfKUz14enyfjWW4Y511uFGeYskoaI42WUggJVBol6wI4xg0htQKTVgtRWVoDqxihdTqv0UKYoqIjdL2b-6nbchXcQoef0mtXPo1n5fYPCEjABd_gZK92dhX819rGrly4aGzb6qX161hKzhmn4n8osMJcMJngzQ6a4GMMtvk7AUO5Tb_cp5_wRT91XS1svad93Alc9kBHo9sm6KVxce-oEFhSQX8BET6JSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71915748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>CHAINAY, Hanna ; HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creator><creatorcontrib>CHAINAY, Hanna ; HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><description>We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03196292</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12120799</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Association Learning ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive science ; Decision Making ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Semantics ; Verbal Learning</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2002-06, Vol.9 (2), p.348-355</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5754-033X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13771837$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12120799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02080165$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHAINAY, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><title>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.</description><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgiq3Viz9A9qKgsDr52iTHWqwKBT3oeclms5qybWqyrfjvTelij54yZB5mhhehcwy3VHB5dz8FilVBFDlAQ8wpzjklcJhqKFSuqGQDdBLjHAB4oYpjNMAEExBKDZF6DW7jWvth60wbY2PMOp-qzvll1viQ-WpuTRezYFvduY3dtr99qOMpOmp0G-1Z_47Q-_ThbfKUz14enyfjWW4Y511uFGeYskoaI42WUggJVBol6wI4xg0htQKTVgtRWVoDqxihdTqv0UKYoqIjdL2b-6nbchXcQoef0mtXPo1n5fYPCEjABd_gZK92dhX819rGrly4aGzb6qX161hKzhmn4n8osMJcMJngzQ6a4GMMtvk7AUO5Tb_cp5_wRT91XS1svad93Alc9kBHo9sm6KVxce-oEFhSQX8BET6JSg</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>CHAINAY, Hanna</creator><creator>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-033X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</title><author>CHAINAY, Hanna ; HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-c954134b8cc8ca88778038c98d60511f22d90cacc77be3d04b423d120fa77c6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHAINAY, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHAINAY, Hanna</au><au>HUMPHREYS, Glyn W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Privileged access to action for objects relative to words</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>348-355</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>We compared action (pour or twist?) and contextual/semantic (found in kitchen?) decisions made to pictures of objects, nonobjects, and words. Although there was no advantage for objects over words in contextual/semantic decisions, there was an advantage for objects over words and nonobjects in action decisions. For objects, both action and contextual/semantic decisions were faster than naming; for words, the opposite occurred. These results extend the early results of Potter and Faulconer (1975) that there is privileged access to semantic memory for objects relative to that for words and privileged access to phonology for words. Our data suggest that, for objects, there is privileged access to action knowledge rather than to all forms of semantic knowledge and that this is contingent on learned associations between objects and actions.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>12120799</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03196292</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-033X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2002-06, Vol.9 (2), p.348-355 |
issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02080165v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Association Learning Attention Biological and medical sciences Cognitive science Decision Making Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning. Memory Memory Mental Recall Pattern Recognition, Visual Psycholinguistics Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Reading Semantics Verbal Learning |
title | Privileged access to action for objects relative to words |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A37%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Privileged%20access%20to%20action%20for%20objects%20relative%20to%20words&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=CHAINAY,%20Hanna&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=348-355&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03196292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E71915748%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71915748&rft_id=info:pmid/12120799&rfr_iscdi=true |