A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox
This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.273-297 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 297 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Vidal, Mathieu Perrin, Denis |
description | This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01970336v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48704131</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48704131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1c49abaf6ab1bf384e1309f44d5b851a5f63e32528cbd3c4097e93552f0d468d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gAeh4MlDdKZJmva4LOoKC170HNI2cbt0NzVJF317WyrrzdPA8P3fDD8h1wj3CCAfAmKaFhRQUuSSUzghMxSSUSgyfkpmAKygMhfynFyEsAVAzDjMCFsktbG6byO13pgkuLaPjdsn0SVxY5Jm1xlvTRWbg0k67XXtvi7JmdVtMFe_c07enx7fliu6fn1-WS7WtGIpjxQrXuhS20yXWFqWc4MMCst5LcpcoBY2Y4alIs2rsmYVh0KaggmRWqh5ltdsTu4m70a3qvPNTvtv5XSjVou1GneAhQTGsgMO7O3Edt599iZEtXW93w_vqRSznHPB-UjhRFXeheCNPWoR1NijmnoczFKNPSoYMumUCQO7_zD-z_xf6GYKbUN0_niF5xKGN5D9ACy_fIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168445441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vidal, Mathieu ; Perrin, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Mathieu ; Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Belief & doubt ; Beliefs ; Context ; Education ; Epistemology ; Event semantics ; Grammatical aspect ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Inference ; Interruptions ; Linguistics ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Pauses ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Progressivism ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Semantic analysis ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.273-297</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Synthese is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1c49abaf6ab1bf384e1309f44d5b851a5f63e32528cbd3c4097e93552f0d468d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7017-9208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48704131$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48704131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-01970336$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.</description><subject>Belief & doubt</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Event semantics</subject><subject>Grammatical aspect</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Interruptions</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Pauses</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Progressivism</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Semantic analysis</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gAeh4MlDdKZJmva4LOoKC170HNI2cbt0NzVJF317WyrrzdPA8P3fDD8h1wj3CCAfAmKaFhRQUuSSUzghMxSSUSgyfkpmAKygMhfynFyEsAVAzDjMCFsktbG6byO13pgkuLaPjdsn0SVxY5Jm1xlvTRWbg0k67XXtvi7JmdVtMFe_c07enx7fliu6fn1-WS7WtGIpjxQrXuhS20yXWFqWc4MMCst5LcpcoBY2Y4alIs2rsmYVh0KaggmRWqh5ltdsTu4m70a3qvPNTvtv5XSjVou1GneAhQTGsgMO7O3Edt599iZEtXW93w_vqRSznHPB-UjhRFXeheCNPWoR1NijmnoczFKNPSoYMumUCQO7_zD-z_xf6GYKbUN0_niF5xKGN5D9ACy_fIs</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Vidal, Mathieu</creator><creator>Perrin, Denis</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-9208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</title><author>Vidal, Mathieu ; Perrin, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1c49abaf6ab1bf384e1309f44d5b851a5f63e32528cbd3c4097e93552f0d468d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Belief & doubt</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Event semantics</topic><topic>Grammatical aspect</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Interruptions</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Pauses</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Progressivism</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Semantic analysis</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vidal, Mathieu</au><au>Perrin, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>273-297</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-9208</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.273-297 |
issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01970336v1 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Belief & doubt Beliefs Context Education Epistemology Event semantics Grammatical aspect Humanities and Social Sciences Inference Interruptions Linguistics Logic Metaphysics Pauses Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science Progressivism REGULAR ARTICLES Semantic analysis Semantics |
title | A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20default-free%20solution%20to%20the%20imperfective%20paradox&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Vidal,%20Mathieu&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=273-297&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E48704131%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168445441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48704131&rfr_iscdi=true |