A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox

This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Synthese (Dordrecht) 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.273-297
Hauptverfasser: Vidal, Mathieu, Perrin, Denis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 1
container_start_page 273
container_title Synthese (Dordrecht)
container_volume 196
creator Vidal, Mathieu
Perrin, Denis
description This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01970336v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48704131</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48704131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1c49abaf6ab1bf384e1309f44d5b851a5f63e32528cbd3c4097e93552f0d468d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gAeh4MlDdKZJmva4LOoKC170HNI2cbt0NzVJF317WyrrzdPA8P3fDD8h1wj3CCAfAmKaFhRQUuSSUzghMxSSUSgyfkpmAKygMhfynFyEsAVAzDjMCFsktbG6byO13pgkuLaPjdsn0SVxY5Jm1xlvTRWbg0k67XXtvi7JmdVtMFe_c07enx7fliu6fn1-WS7WtGIpjxQrXuhS20yXWFqWc4MMCst5LcpcoBY2Y4alIs2rsmYVh0KaggmRWqh5ltdsTu4m70a3qvPNTvtv5XSjVou1GneAhQTGsgMO7O3Edt599iZEtXW93w_vqRSznHPB-UjhRFXeheCNPWoR1NijmnoczFKNPSoYMumUCQO7_zD-z_xf6GYKbUN0_niF5xKGN5D9ACy_fIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168445441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vidal, Mathieu ; Perrin, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Mathieu ; Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Belief &amp; doubt ; Beliefs ; Context ; Education ; Epistemology ; Event semantics ; Grammatical aspect ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Inference ; Interruptions ; Linguistics ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Pauses ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Progressivism ; REGULAR ARTICLES ; Semantic analysis ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.273-297</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Synthese is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1c49abaf6ab1bf384e1309f44d5b851a5f63e32528cbd3c4097e93552f0d468d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7017-9208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48704131$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48704131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-01970336$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.</description><subject>Belief &amp; doubt</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Event semantics</subject><subject>Grammatical aspect</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Interruptions</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Pauses</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Progressivism</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><subject>Semantic analysis</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK4-gAeh4MlDdKZJmva4LOoKC170HNI2cbt0NzVJF317WyrrzdPA8P3fDD8h1wj3CCAfAmKaFhRQUuSSUzghMxSSUSgyfkpmAKygMhfynFyEsAVAzDjMCFsktbG6byO13pgkuLaPjdsn0SVxY5Jm1xlvTRWbg0k67XXtvi7JmdVtMFe_c07enx7fliu6fn1-WS7WtGIpjxQrXuhS20yXWFqWc4MMCst5LcpcoBY2Y4alIs2rsmYVh0KaggmRWqh5ltdsTu4m70a3qvPNTvtv5XSjVou1GneAhQTGsgMO7O3Edt599iZEtXW93w_vqRSznHPB-UjhRFXeheCNPWoR1NijmnoczFKNPSoYMumUCQO7_zD-z_xf6GYKbUN0_niF5xKGN5D9ACy_fIs</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Vidal, Mathieu</creator><creator>Perrin, Denis</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-9208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</title><author>Vidal, Mathieu ; Perrin, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1c49abaf6ab1bf384e1309f44d5b851a5f63e32528cbd3c4097e93552f0d468d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Belief &amp; doubt</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Event semantics</topic><topic>Grammatical aspect</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Interruptions</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Pauses</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Progressivism</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><topic>Semantic analysis</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vidal, Mathieu</au><au>Perrin, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>273-297</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>This article advances the first semantics that is neither for nor against a default implicational link between the progressive and perfective forms, when it comes to solving the imperfective paradox. Depending on the doxastic context of its use, we contend that the progressive form sometimes allows and sometimes does not allow the inference of the corresponding simple form. In other words, the preparatory phase of an event might or might not be believed to lead to its culmination. Indeed, the context can put constraints on beliefs about the time of the culmination and whether or not it allows this inference to be made. From a formal perspective, this new solution to the imperfective paradox combines a specific modal approach with an event-structure analysis originating in event semantics. Finally, this approach solves the associated difficulties (e.g., pauses, past futures, interruptions and sensibility to description) that have plagued the most well-known theories in this field.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-9208</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-7857
ispartof Synthese (Dordrecht), 2019-01, Vol.196 (1), p.273-297
issn 0039-7857
1573-0964
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01970336v1
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Belief & doubt
Beliefs
Context
Education
Epistemology
Event semantics
Grammatical aspect
Humanities and Social Sciences
Inference
Interruptions
Linguistics
Logic
Metaphysics
Pauses
Philosophy
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Science
Progressivism
REGULAR ARTICLES
Semantic analysis
Semantics
title A default-free solution to the imperfective paradox
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20default-free%20solution%20to%20the%20imperfective%20paradox&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Vidal,%20Mathieu&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=273-297&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-017-1474-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E48704131%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168445441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48704131&rfr_iscdi=true