Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments

Purpose Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of soils and sediments 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.543-556
Hauptverfasser: Couvidat, Julien, Neculita, Carmen Mihaela, Benzaazoua, Mostafa, Genty, Thomas, Chatain, Vincent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue 2
container_start_page 543
container_title Journal of soils and sediments
container_volume 17
creator Couvidat, Julien
Neculita, Carmen Mihaela
Benzaazoua, Mostafa
Genty, Thomas
Chatain, Vincent
description Purpose Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments. Materials and methods Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity. Results and discussion Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10 −3 vs. 9.4 × 10 −5  g S kg −1 in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results. Conclusions Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01957712v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4268270141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpoek2PyA3Qy_twe2MJVvyMYQ0KSzk0h6LkK3RroJtpZJ2S_Lrq8UllEBPrzTzvMN8MHaB8BkB5JeEyDtVA3Y1tlLVT6_YGXYoaikUvC5vwfuSBfWWvUvpHoDLkj5jP6-PZjqY7MNSBVcNPuwojHua_WimKpIZsz_6_HhKukhpX5nFVr_J5D1FstUYlmxmv5hcPrZEdkUTWT_TktN79saZKdH5X92wH1-vv1_d1tu7m29Xl9t65IrnmpvGkQGphGu7ogN2jXDK9c4JGKzgIJxtDfQKxIBoG2mdpGHk0Ii-t5xv2Ke17t5M-iH62cRHHYzXt5dbfYoB9q2U2ByxsB9X9iGGXwdKWc8-jTRNZqFwSBpVC1JCx_uCfniB3odDXMokhRJtWWFf9rphuFJjDClFcs8dIOjTcfR6nNJEp0_H0U_F06yeVNhlR_Gfyv81_QHP-pIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845371914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Couvidat, Julien ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Benzaazoua, Mostafa ; Genty, Thomas ; Chatain, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Couvidat, Julien ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Benzaazoua, Mostafa ; Genty, Thomas ; Chatain, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments. Materials and methods Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity. Results and discussion Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10 −3 vs. 9.4 × 10 −5  g S kg −1 in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results. Conclusions Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aerobic bacteria ; Anoxic conditions ; Biogeochemistry ; Carbonates ; Chemical reactions ; Chemical Sciences ; Contaminants ; Contaminated sediments ; Continental interfaces, environment ; Dredging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental Physics ; Environmental Sciences ; Leaching ; Marine pollution ; Marine sediments ; Other ; Sciences of the Universe ; Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article ; Sediments ; Soil contamination ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Sulfides ; Sulfur ; Trace metals</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.543-556</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Soils and Sediments is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4077-6973 ; 0000-0003-2349-873X ; 0000-0001-9925-4657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01957712$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Couvidat, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genty, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatain, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments. Materials and methods Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity. Results and discussion Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10 −3 vs. 9.4 × 10 −5  g S kg −1 in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results. Conclusions Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.</description><subject>Aerobic bacteria</subject><subject>Anoxic conditions</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Continental interfaces, environment</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Marine pollution</subject><subject>Marine sediments</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Trace metals</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpoek2PyA3Qy_twe2MJVvyMYQ0KSzk0h6LkK3RroJtpZJ2S_Lrq8UllEBPrzTzvMN8MHaB8BkB5JeEyDtVA3Y1tlLVT6_YGXYoaikUvC5vwfuSBfWWvUvpHoDLkj5jP6-PZjqY7MNSBVcNPuwojHua_WimKpIZsz_6_HhKukhpX5nFVr_J5D1FstUYlmxmv5hcPrZEdkUTWT_TktN79saZKdH5X92wH1-vv1_d1tu7m29Xl9t65IrnmpvGkQGphGu7ogN2jXDK9c4JGKzgIJxtDfQKxIBoG2mdpGHk0Ii-t5xv2Ke17t5M-iH62cRHHYzXt5dbfYoB9q2U2ByxsB9X9iGGXwdKWc8-jTRNZqFwSBpVC1JCx_uCfniB3odDXMokhRJtWWFf9rphuFJjDClFcs8dIOjTcfR6nNJEp0_H0U_F06yeVNhlR_Gfyv81_QHP-pIk</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Couvidat, Julien</creator><creator>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creator><creator>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</creator><creator>Genty, Thomas</creator><creator>Chatain, Vincent</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-6973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-873X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-4657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</title><author>Couvidat, Julien ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Benzaazoua, Mostafa ; Genty, Thomas ; Chatain, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bacteria</topic><topic>Anoxic conditions</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Continental interfaces, environment</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Marine pollution</topic><topic>Marine sediments</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Trace metals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Couvidat, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genty, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatain, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Couvidat, Julien</au><au>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</au><au>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</au><au>Genty, Thomas</au><au>Chatain, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>543-556</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments. Materials and methods Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity. Results and discussion Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10 −3 vs. 9.4 × 10 −5  g S kg −1 in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results. Conclusions Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-6973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-873X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-4657</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-0108
ispartof Journal of soils and sediments, 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.543-556
issn 1439-0108
1614-7480
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01957712v1
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aerobic bacteria
Anoxic conditions
Biogeochemistry
Carbonates
Chemical reactions
Chemical Sciences
Contaminants
Contaminated sediments
Continental interfaces, environment
Dredging
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental Engineering
Environmental Physics
Environmental Sciences
Leaching
Marine pollution
Marine sediments
Other
Sciences of the Universe
Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article
Sediments
Soil contamination
Soil Science & Conservation
Sulfides
Sulfur
Trace metals
title Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20biogeochemical%20reactivity%20of%20fresh%20and%20weathered%20contaminated%20dredged%20sediments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Couvidat,%20Julien&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=543-556&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E4268270141%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845371914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true