Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments
Purpose Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of soils and sediments 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.543-556 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 556 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Journal of soils and sediments |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Couvidat, Julien Neculita, Carmen Mihaela Benzaazoua, Mostafa Genty, Thomas Chatain, Vincent |
description | Purpose
Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments.
Materials and methods
Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity.
Results and discussion
Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10
−3
vs. 9.4 × 10
−5
g S kg
−1
in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results.
Conclusions
Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01957712v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4268270141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpoek2PyA3Qy_twe2MJVvyMYQ0KSzk0h6LkK3RroJtpZJ2S_Lrq8UllEBPrzTzvMN8MHaB8BkB5JeEyDtVA3Y1tlLVT6_YGXYoaikUvC5vwfuSBfWWvUvpHoDLkj5jP6-PZjqY7MNSBVcNPuwojHua_WimKpIZsz_6_HhKukhpX5nFVr_J5D1FstUYlmxmv5hcPrZEdkUTWT_TktN79saZKdH5X92wH1-vv1_d1tu7m29Xl9t65IrnmpvGkQGphGu7ogN2jXDK9c4JGKzgIJxtDfQKxIBoG2mdpGHk0Ii-t5xv2Ke17t5M-iH62cRHHYzXt5dbfYoB9q2U2ByxsB9X9iGGXwdKWc8-jTRNZqFwSBpVC1JCx_uCfniB3odDXMokhRJtWWFf9rphuFJjDClFcs8dIOjTcfR6nNJEp0_H0U_F06yeVNhlR_Gfyv81_QHP-pIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845371914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Couvidat, Julien ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Benzaazoua, Mostafa ; Genty, Thomas ; Chatain, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Couvidat, Julien ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Benzaazoua, Mostafa ; Genty, Thomas ; Chatain, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments.
Materials and methods
Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity.
Results and discussion
Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10
−3
vs. 9.4 × 10
−5
g S kg
−1
in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results.
Conclusions
Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aerobic bacteria ; Anoxic conditions ; Biogeochemistry ; Carbonates ; Chemical reactions ; Chemical Sciences ; Contaminants ; Contaminated sediments ; Continental interfaces, environment ; Dredging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental Physics ; Environmental Sciences ; Leaching ; Marine pollution ; Marine sediments ; Other ; Sciences of the Universe ; Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article ; Sediments ; Soil contamination ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Sulfides ; Sulfur ; Trace metals</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.543-556</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Soils and Sediments is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4077-6973 ; 0000-0003-2349-873X ; 0000-0001-9925-4657</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01957712$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Couvidat, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genty, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatain, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose
Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments.
Materials and methods
Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity.
Results and discussion
Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10
−3
vs. 9.4 × 10
−5
g S kg
−1
in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results.
Conclusions
Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.</description><subject>Aerobic bacteria</subject><subject>Anoxic conditions</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Continental interfaces, environment</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Marine pollution</subject><subject>Marine sediments</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Trace metals</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpoek2PyA3Qy_twe2MJVvyMYQ0KSzk0h6LkK3RroJtpZJ2S_Lrq8UllEBPrzTzvMN8MHaB8BkB5JeEyDtVA3Y1tlLVT6_YGXYoaikUvC5vwfuSBfWWvUvpHoDLkj5jP6-PZjqY7MNSBVcNPuwojHua_WimKpIZsz_6_HhKukhpX5nFVr_J5D1FstUYlmxmv5hcPrZEdkUTWT_TktN79saZKdH5X92wH1-vv1_d1tu7m29Xl9t65IrnmpvGkQGphGu7ogN2jXDK9c4JGKzgIJxtDfQKxIBoG2mdpGHk0Ii-t5xv2Ke17t5M-iH62cRHHYzXt5dbfYoB9q2U2ByxsB9X9iGGXwdKWc8-jTRNZqFwSBpVC1JCx_uCfniB3odDXMokhRJtWWFf9rphuFJjDClFcs8dIOjTcfR6nNJEp0_H0U_F06yeVNhlR_Gfyv81_QHP-pIk</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Couvidat, Julien</creator><creator>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creator><creator>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</creator><creator>Genty, Thomas</creator><creator>Chatain, Vincent</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-6973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-873X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-4657</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</title><author>Couvidat, Julien ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Benzaazoua, Mostafa ; Genty, Thomas ; Chatain, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3a2fea0784f56a07b1624f8f9ff40bd4304fd5a09804b11d27df7ebc302499d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bacteria</topic><topic>Anoxic conditions</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Continental interfaces, environment</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Marine pollution</topic><topic>Marine sediments</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Trace metals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Couvidat, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genty, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatain, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Couvidat, Julien</au><au>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</au><au>Benzaazoua, Mostafa</au><au>Genty, Thomas</au><au>Chatain, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>543-556</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Metal mobility in contaminated marine sediments is largely controlled by low-soluble sulfides. In dredged sediments exposed to air and water, geochemical and microbial-mediated processes may enhance the weathering and leaching of hazardous contaminants, especially trace metals. The objective of the present study was to thoroughly characterize and assess the biogeochemical reactivity of marine-dredged sediments.
Materials and methods
Two samples of dredged sediments, one stored (to preserve anoxic conditions) and another exposed to the air, were assessed in the perspective of their long-term management. Biogeochemical reactivity was evaluated, especially by a qualitative assessment of aerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria activity.
Results and discussion
Despite the high content of total sulfides (2 to 3.5 wt.% S), the acid-volatile fraction was low (4.3 × 10
−3
vs. 9.4 × 10
−5
g S kg
−1
in raw and weathered sediments, respectively), as an indication of the high degree of crystallinity of sulfide minerals present in samples. The raw sediment was reactive, particularly to aerobic bacteria that decreased the pH from 7.0 to 4.2, for neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and from 4.5 to 2.5, for acidophilic iron-oxidizing, within only 18 days. Even though only neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria seem reactive in the aged sediment, they countered the major buffering effect due to the high amount of carbonates. Important differences in the temporal evolution of pH and Eh of the raw and aged sediments support these results.
Conclusions
Neutrophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria showed to be the most reactive in both sediments. Finally, despite the sharp pH decrease over time, acidophilic bacteria activity does not seem to be particularly enhanced.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-6973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-873X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-4657</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-0108 |
ispartof | Journal of soils and sediments, 2017-02, Vol.17 (2), p.543-556 |
issn | 1439-0108 1614-7480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01957712v1 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aerobic bacteria Anoxic conditions Biogeochemistry Carbonates Chemical reactions Chemical Sciences Contaminants Contaminated sediments Continental interfaces, environment Dredging Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental Engineering Environmental Physics Environmental Sciences Leaching Marine pollution Marine sediments Other Sciences of the Universe Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article Sediments Soil contamination Soil Science & Conservation Sulfides Sulfur Trace metals |
title | Evaluation of biogeochemical reactivity of fresh and weathered contaminated dredged sediments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20biogeochemical%20reactivity%20of%20fresh%20and%20weathered%20contaminated%20dredged%20sediments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Couvidat,%20Julien&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=543-556&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-016-1578-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E4268270141%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845371914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |